Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 11th May 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Germans seek an Iron Cross fit for heroes



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 March 2008
THE German army has no awards for courage, only for attendance.
But calls to revive the famed Iron Cross to fill that gap have exposed how Nazi atrocities still haunt modern-day life in Germany.

As allies, including the United States, are pressing Germany to send more troops into the most dangerous parts of Af
ghanistan, not only does the German Bundeswehr lack medals of valour, nor does it have anything for wounded soldiers.

Georg Martin, 83, a private in the German army during the Second World War, received a Wound Badge in silver for the three times he was severely injured, and an Iron Cross for fighting in a heavy machine-gun crew during the Battle of Kharkov in what is now Ukraine.

Once a year, on Volkstrauertag, the national memorial day, he dons replicas he purchased for a few Deutsche marks in 1959. Meanwhile, in a file with copies of his military hospital records are the original crosses, both bearing the swastika of the Third Reich.

The history of the Iron Cross, designed by the noted German architect and painter Karl Friedrich Schinkel, dates back to 1813 and the Prussian War of Liberation against Napoleon.

Because Hitler's government placed the swastika in the centre of the simple black and silver design and handed out millions of the medals in the Second World War, the award remains off-limits for today's army.

"The symbol was abused by the Nazis and, as a result, has also become a symbol for the crimes of the Wehrmacht during National Socialism," said Stephan J Kramer, secretary-general of the Central Council of Jews in Germany. Kramer said he believed that German soldiers deserved a medal for bravery, but it needed a new design.

"I don't think it will come back in that form," agreed Martin, who is active in the local German War Graves Commission. Speaking from his home in the Bavarian village of Ingenried last week, he said of soldiers fighting in Afghanistan: "Of course they should have something." But he added with a smile: "They could have something prettier."

Germany's defence minister, Franz Josef Jung, plans to request a new grade of the Cross of Honour for bravery, according to a spokesman, a citation that is awarded in bronze, silver and gold for five, 10 and 20 years of service, respectively. While, in exceptional cases, they can be awarded earlier for individual acts, Crosses of Honour are not considered medals of valour.

A revival of the Iron Cross is not under consideration, the spokesman said. That disappoints many, particularly in the military, who would like to see the Iron Cross revived as a symbol of pre-Nazi military tradition.

"The crimes of National Socialism took place under the swastika and not under the Iron Cross," said Siegfried F Storbeck, a retired lieutenant general living in Hamburg.

What frustrates Storbeck and other supporters of the Iron Cross is that they see it as having emerged from an era about which Germans could be proud.

"This was part and parcel of the famous Prussian enlightened reform era, which included, a year earlier in 1812, Jewish emancipation; legal rights for Jewish citizens," said Michael Wolffsohn, a professor of modern history at the University of the Bundeswehr in Munich.

Oddly, while it is considered a political impossibility as a medal, the Iron Cross remains the symbol of the German army, emblazoned on everything from military vehicles to the defence ministry website.

"In the German culture it is simply not possible to express esteem for young soldiers," said Christoph Zuercher, a professor of international politics at the Free University in Berlin. Anti-militarism is a firmly centrist view in the political spectrum in Germany, he said.

Stefan Schroeter, a major in the army reserves, recalled a case during his deployment in Bosnia in 2003 in which the brakes failed on an armoured reconnaissance vehicle on a high mountain road. The driver of the vehicle behind it passed the out-of-control vehicle and stopped in front of it, risking his life and those of his crew members to save their comrades from hurtling off the side of the mountain.

Schroeter said that in a staff meeting, the soldier's commander said: "It's a shame that there isn't a decoration for bravery, or I would put him up for it."

The soldier received two extra days leave instead.



The full article contains 737 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 March 2008 7:48 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: World War II
 
1

Jim A,

23/03/2008 03:37:44
Can't see why the germans don't reintroduce the iron cross, ok the Nazis abused it, but hey it was around for 120 years before the Nazis came to power. The Bundeswher are using a form of Iron Cross to this day on the military equipment.
2

albanman,

Edinburgh 23/03/2008 08:55:50
Totally agree with No.1 Remove the swastika (a Nazi-abused ancient religious for peace) and there should be little problem. German soldiers deserve awards for bravery like any other soldiers; restoring the traditional Iron Cross would be a good thing.
3

James Donald,

Newbridge 23/03/2008 10:46:56
Soldiers of the Bundeswehr have worn the Iron Cross (in all its grades) in the past as the WW2 recipients were authorised to wear the cross (with oakleaves replacing the swastika) by a special law passed in 1957 (de-Nazified versions of other awards such as the Wound Badge were authorised at the same time).
The Iron Cross dates back to 1813 when the Prussians were fighting a war of liberation against the French. German politicians of the Right and Centre are too timid to re-introduce the ward and those on the left would be opposed to what they see as a symbol of Prussian militarism. The previous Red-Green administration forced the Luftwaffe unit Jagdgeschwader 74 to remove it honour title "Mölders" as it deemed it inappropriate that a Luftwaffe unit be named after a pilot who took part in the Spanish Civil War as a member of the Condor Legion. Unlikely then that the Left (and extreme-Left) in Germany would allow the re-introduction of the Iron Cross (or anything similar) without creating a stink.
4

Paddi,

23/03/2008 11:18:58
Why stop there? lets ask them to reintroduce the goose step and the pickelhaube.

All of these things including the iron cross are symbols of a Germany no one wants to see again.
5

James Donald,

Newbridge 23/03/2008 11:35:17
#4 Paddi,23/03/2008 - "All of these things including the iron cross are symbols of a Germany no one wants to see again" - evidently you did not read the article properly "That disappoints many, particularly in the military, who would like to see the Iron Cross revived as a symbol of pre-Nazi military tradition".
In any case, the Iron Cross has been used as a recognition sign on Bundeswehr vehicles, aircraft and naval craft since 1956.
The last German soldiers to use the goose step were those of the NVA, the armed forces of the "Socialist paradise" that was the German Democratic Republic.
6

Stefania Alvarez,

23/03/2008 16:43:13
German guilt about WW2 ... is being used by Islamists to push their agenda.
The British (and I include the Scots) need to pay attention to developments in Germany where a female judge was recently reprimanded for ruling in favour of a Muslim husband ... she tried to use part of Sharia law in the German Courts ... caused quite a stink!!

However bearing in mind the senior Church of England clergyman's remarks about accepting Sharia ... we need to excercise extreme caution!!!
7

Paddi,

23/03/2008 20:52:02
Where's the evidence that i've not read the article correctly?

"A revival of the Iron Cross is not under consideration, the spokesman said" I added the goose step and the pickelhaube to that. What 's you're point regarding the DDR still emplying the goose step?
8

James Donald,

Newbridge 23/03/2008 21:34:05
#7 Paddi,23/03/2008 - What you wrote was "All of these things including the iron cross are symbols of a Germany NO ONE wants to see again". It is evident from the article that this is not the case as there are many "who would like to see the Iron Cross revived as a symbol of pre-Nazi military tradition".
The pickelhaube has not been in general use since 1916 and the goose step was last used in Germany by the supposedly anti-Militarist DDR. Nobody has suggested that these be re-introduced and they are very different from the Iron Cross which is an award for bravery.
9

The Daleks,

Longmen 24/03/2008 01:50:46
It's about time modern day Germany stopped having its nose rubbed in it over WWII.

That all took place over 60 years ago when the world was a very different place.
10

John Blackley,

Florida 24/03/2008 20:33:33
What were seen as unjust, repressive measures (in the Treaty of Versailles) helped create the conditions in which the Nazis grew.

We would be wise to make sure that the Germans of today aren't subjected to too much guilt over their past as, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, and I wouldn't want to see another backlash take place in Germany.

There is nothing inherently shameful about the Iron Cross (no more than, say, other countries' awards for military valour) and I see no reason why Germany shouldn't be allowed to use it and to honour its past - excepting, of course, that part of it involving the Nazis.
11

,

24/03/2008 20:42:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

,

24/03/2008 22:23:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

25/03/2008 01:36:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

,

25/03/2008 03:13:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

25/03/2008 05:38:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

25/03/2008 17:42:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

,

25/03/2008 21:25:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

James Donald,

Newbridge 25/03/2008 23:29:37
DNFT.
19

donald,

glasgow 30/03/2008 08:08:42
Give England a St George's Cross and Scotland a St Andrew's Cross on the ballot papers.
20

donald,

glasgow 30/03/2008 08:09:05
Labour gave Scottish Troops a double cross.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is the government right to continue with its policy of cutting down quangos?
No, I think their independence means we get a better job
Yes, they are unaccountable and expensive
Only if their work is duplicated or plainly redundant

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.