Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 12th October 2008 Change Date

London from only £11.50 plus, over 50 Other Discounted National Express Train Routes

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Pakistan strikes out at Taliban 'on our doorstep'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 June 2008
PAKISTANI forces bombarded suspected militant hide-outs with mortar shells yesterday at the start of a major offensive against Taliban fighters threatening the main city in the country's volatile north-west, officials said.
The offensive in the Khyber tribal region marked the first major military action Pakistan's newly-elected government has taken against the militants operating along the border with Afghanistan.

The government had said it preferred to defuse tensio
n through negotiations, but with threats to the city of Peshawar growing in recent weeks, the military decided to take action. Khyber is also is a key route for US military supplies into neighbouring Afghanistan.

In response to the operation and other confrontations with security forces, Baitullah Mehsud, the Taliban leader in Pakistan, said he was suspending talks with the government. "Peace cannot be brought with force and aggression," he said. "This will be very unfortunate for the Pakistani nation if fighting starts again."

A round-the-clock curfew was imposed in the Bara area bordering Peshawar, and heavy contingents of troops blocked the main road into Khyber, said Mujeeb Khan, a senior local official. "All bazaars are shut, and residents have been asked not to come out of their homes."

By yesterday afternoon, the paramilitary Frontier Corps began shelling suspected militant hide-outs in the mountains in Khyber.

Tauseef Haider, a top official with the Frontier Constabulary – a local law enforcement agency – said his forces had brought in reinforcements and heavy weapons to protect Peshawar and its more than one million residents.

"Since the operation is going on in the tribal area, we have to be extra cautious," he said from the constabulary's brick outpost in Shahkas, outside Peshawar. "We will not let any militant come this way."

A likely target of the offensive was the Vice and Virtue Movement of militant leader Haji Namdar, which is suspected of attacks against Coalition soldiers in Afghanistan. Namdar has sought to impose his own strict brand of Islamic law in the region. He, however, is at odds with Mehsud.

The offensive also could target Menghal Bagh, whose fighters have waged attacks in Peshawar. Bagh's followers have been accused of threatening supply convoys bound for Coalition forces in Afghanistan.

Namdar's group said an offensive would create further problems. "If the government thinks there is any issue to address, that should be resolved through talks, not by the use of force," said Munsif Khan, spokesman for the group. "We are ready for talks with the government."

There has been growing concern about threats to Peshawar. Two weeks ago, a Taliban force from Khyber entered the city and kidnapped 16 Christians, who were later released.

Mahmood Shah, a former security chief in the tribal regions, said the Taliban "are on our doorstep" around Peshawar. "The situation is like water flowing into a field and until you have some obstruction to stop it, you will drown. We are drowning," he said.

Shah said a leadership vacuum in Islamabad supplied more oxygen to a burgeoning Taliban movement, which now controls the tribal regions bordering Afghanistan. "It is completely under their control. Everyone now is waiting for some action from the federal government, some coherent policy decision," he said.





The full article contains 539 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 June 2008 9:05 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

MisterN,

Scotland 29/06/2008 10:19:57
If you choose sides in a war then you have to expect to be attacked at some point.
One of the major reasons why normal people dont like to get involved in war and only complete morons start one.
2

57Nomad,

california 30/06/2008 01:04:27
#1 N

There are times when it is impossible to avoid war even if you don't take sides and even though you didn't start it. There are times when the choices are not peace or war, the choice sometimes is war or surrender.

Wars are not generally fought between sides whose mutual goal is peace. There are times when one side wants war or at least the threat of war to extract concessions from the other. In that case the choice is fight or capitulate. This is such a situation.

The choice is not between peace or war. It is between freedom or enslavement. If we want to stay free we have to fight for it. Can't see that changing unless human nature changes and one thing history teaches us is that human nature NEVER changes and only a fool believes that good intentions is enough to stay free.
3

,

30/06/2008 03:09:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.