Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Mugabe arms ship' left all at sea

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 April 2008
DOCKYARD workers in Africa are refusing to unload a Chinese ship laden with weapons for Zimbabwe.
The whereabouts of the vessel, the An Yue Jiang, were not known last night, although it was believed to be heading to Angola. Sources say the ship is carrying three million rounds of AK-47 ammunition along with 1,500 rocket-propelled grenades and se
veral thousand mortar rounds.

Dock workers in the region are expected to refuse to have any dealings with the deadly cargo, which many fear will be used by President Robert Mugabe to crack down on opponents in his landlocked country. Zimbabwe is still in a state of chaos over the outcome of recent elections, which appear to indicate that Mugabe lost. Results of the presidential vote have not been released, although MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai says he has won.

Mugabe has refused to step down and yesterday a partial recount of the votes cast in the election was started.

At the same time, the vessel was reported to have left South African waters, heading towards Angola.

The ship's captain tried to berth the vessel in the South African port of Durban on Friday, but after being refused entry by dock workers, he was forced to anchor about 11 miles from the harbour entrance. Dockers there said they would refuse to unload the ship, fearing her cargo was destined for neighbouring Zimbabwe.

Originally, it was thought that the ship was en route to the Mozambican capital of Maputo, but last night this was ruled out by a spokesman for the east African country.

Transport and communications minister Paulo Zucula said Mozambique had been monitoring the An Yue Jiang since she left South Africa. "We know that it registered its next destination as Luanda (the Angolan capital] because we wouldn't allow it into Mozambican waters without prior arrangements."

Yesterday, Andrew Linington, a spokesman for Nautilus, the main union for UK maritime professionals, said he was confident the ship would never be unloaded by any of their colleagues around the world. "We are part of the International Transport Workers' Federation (ITWF] and we have been very strong in our support of the workers in South Africa who refused to allow this ship to dock. Our hope is that there will be international support to not have anything to do with this vessel. It is a worry to us, however, that the cover of merchant shipping is being used to carry arms in this way."

Speaking about the South African workers' decision, ITWF general secretary David Cockcroft said: "This is a significant act of solidarity with Zimbabwe's working people. We fully, strongly and uncategorically support these actions and will be following the case with the closest of interests."

A court order to ban transportation of the ship's cargo across South Africa was obtained by the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), which argued that it had been destined to "suppress the Zimbabwean people".

The group's African co-ordinator, Joseph Dube, said: "We welcome the court's decision and the solidarity shown by the South African transportation unions. South Africa has a chance to show the world that arms atrocities can be stopped by responsible governments."

"The protocol states that all Southern African states should harmonise their arms control laws to prevent conflict. South African law says that permits to convey arms across South African land must be cancelled, amended or suspended if it is in the interest of international peace or avoiding repression."

Zimbabwe's deputy information minister, Bright Matonga, hit out at the ban. "Every country has got a right to acquire arms," he said. "There is nothing wrong with that. If they are for Zimbabwe, they will definitely come to Zimbabwe. How they are used, when they are going to be used, is none of anybody's business."

For its part, China is trying to prevent the controversy fuelling criticism over human rights and its rule in Tibet ahead of the Beijing Olympics in August.

China's foreign ministry said it had seen the reports about the ship, but "did not understand the actual situation". A ministry statement said: "China and Zimbabwe maintain normal trade relations. What we want to stress is China has always had a prudent and responsible attitude towards arms sales, and one of the most important principles is not to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries."

The incident has put extra pressure on Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who has condemned Zimbabwe's record on human rights and has stated he will not go to the opening ceremony of the Olympics.

A Foreign Office spokesman said: "There is a UN arms embargo in place on arms entering Zimbabwe and we would encourage every other nation to follow that same approach."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 April 2008 7:38 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Zimbabwe
 
1

mighty,

canada 20/04/2008 00:15:04
Thank god at least the other African countres are starting to do something, it should be food that is getting shipped in but then I suppose his belly is full and most of the bully boys he has to do his dirty work.
2

Matt there,

somewhere 20/04/2008 01:41:10
Time for Gordon Brown to grasp the nettle and prove he is not a dot.

Grasp the nettle?? Who am I kidding? He refused to grasp the Olympic torch, so he is not going to grasp anything, is he, poor chap?
3

Guga II,

Rockall 20/04/2008 01:42:11
Why doesn't Bush class the Chinese gangster government as terrorists? They are acting like terrorists in Tibet, and among some of their own people in China; they support a terrorist regime in Burma; they support a terrorist regime in the Sudan; and now they are going give more arms to a terrorist regime in Zimbabwe.

And why doesn't Maggie.Broon join his very special pal, Bush, in classing them as a terrorist regime?
4

,

20/04/2008 01:49:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 20/04/2008 02:10:07
#4 nobody

Looks like your weapons shipments are about as popular as your torch.

Is the Chinese government now starting to wish they had never got the Olympics?

Take about having all the skeletons jumping out of their closets.

The US government does an annual survey around the world to find out how people in other countries view them. It would be interesting to see a survey on peoples attitudes to China's "peaceful rise".

My guess is your numbers have fallen faster than the domestic polls of the Labour governments performance in the UK.
6

Landman,

20/04/2008 02:22:45
#5 KampungHighlander

What's an American doing claiming to be in Jakarta? Your comment here and elsewhere is exclusively American english.

7

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 20/04/2008 02:23:07
#3

I think that the West's policy of engagement with China has run its course without any meaningful changes in China's policies.

I think that serious consideration should be given to a policy of containment. Much like the cold war strategy that brought about the fall of the Soviet Union, we need to look at a cold war to bringing about regime change in China.

We need to reconsider our recognition of a regime that has no legitimacy in favour of recognizing a democratic goverment in Taiwan.

China's peacful rise is a myth, the democratic world has to realize that the greatest danger to freedom in the world today is the despotic regime in Beijing.

8

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 20/04/2008 02:26:46
#1

The only food aid that Mugabe allows into Zimbabwe is aid that is distributed by the Zanu-PF. This evil regime uses food as a weapon against its political opponents.
9

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 20/04/2008 02:29:07
#6

I blame that on my spelling checker which is set to American English.
10

Mashimaro,

China 20/04/2008 04:33:11
Well done Cosatu! A triumph for the will of the people. It is good to see Africa finally standing up for itself.

#5 Is the Chinese government now starting to wish they had never got the Olympics?

No. The Chinese goverment doesn't know what to do with the fantastic nationalist feeling the Olympics and the west's attitude towards the torch have engendered among its people. This has several benefits for the country:
1) Hu and Wen can do what they like and the people will love them for it - roll back what freedom they already have, execute dissidents, crackdown on religious organisations including the rebel Catholic church which is currently tolerated with a nod and a wink.
2) If anything bad happens in the future, all the government has to do is say "the west did it" and get off the hook. "No rice? The west is doing this to test us." In this way there will be no change in government as people will see giving in to the west as being unpatriotic. It does a lot to the Chinese psyche to see its hand of friendship bitten off at the wrist.
3) Maybe you don't realise it but the torch is covered with ancient Chinese symbols, so any thuggish attempts by the west to demean it engender outrage. Imagine if the torch was carrying a picture of Princess Diana and people were grabbing at it and wanting to destroy it.
4) There will be backlash from the nation and it will be directed at western businesses in China. Hopefully the PAP won't have to go in and save anyone or douse any fires like they had to in Lhasa. The effect on the boycotts will give Chinese businesses a chance to make up some of the ground they have lost to international competitors.

So no, China does not mind having the Olympics at all.
11

Mashimaro,

China 20/04/2008 04:41:05
#7 Yes, because that sort of thing worked so well in the past.

FACT: China does not need the west.

a) This amount of money coming in to the country harms the cohesiveness of the nation by increasing the gini index to dangerous levels - levels at which there is very likely to be a mass revolt. Please, take it away.

b) The increased freedoms that come along with having so many westerners in the country introduces ideas that are not conducive to an authoratarian government. So go away!

c) China has the rest of the world as its playground, Africa, Asia, South America, what more could it want? Within the next few years it will own the UN and the west will be completely shut out, purely by the weight of numbers.

So dude, bring on the cold war. I reckon you'll feel it way before China does.

Marmots should not chuck at eagles.
12

Richardinho,

20/04/2008 05:04:09
Give over with the 'regime change' nonsense about China.
40 years ago it's people were starving, now they are one of the biggest economys on earth. Make your point economically by boycotting the olympics, or any other Chinese product-or not, if quite frankly you don't really care about Tibet or Zimbabwe.
13

,

20/04/2008 05:14:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Mashimaro,

China 20/04/2008 06:46:05
#13 China needs the west enourmously.

"Your conclusion that foreign money somehow harms the country by increasing the gini index is nonsense in the extreme."

* waits for any sort of sensible reasoning to follow this bold statement... nope? oh well

"Point b makes no sense at all. What about non western foreigners? You sound like a nazi."

Amazing how people love to bandy about the Nazi word and then scream for the return of Tibet to the man who insipred the Nazis.
There are numerous ways the westerners affect our society. First of all they can go into places at will so we have to hide all the bodies of Tiben monks. Their style of clothing is unacceptable to us but the youngsters think it great. We don't agree with their low moral standards and western parents whine when their drug addicted children get arrested. You get the picture.

"It's worth bearing in mind that the US could quite easily squash china in the blink of an eye."

bwaaah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Should I answer that or just leave it alone to make you look completely crazy.

"Your army, navy and airforce are poorly funded and would be no match to a well aimed nuke."

Neither would your country be any match for a well aimed nuke... want to roll the dice?
15

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta; . CA.....a place in the Sun 20/04/2008 06:53:55
9
KampungHighlander,
Jakarta

Dude,
What a lame excuse . 'It takes just a few clicks on Ur keyboard to switch from American English to English English. And Ur spelling checker is changed automatically.

WOW Dude U are one smart cookie ..I think not !!!!
GC
16

Little Stewie Griffin,

20/04/2008 07:05:10
These Olympics are going to be like a rerun of the 1936 Berlin Olympia-stage managed propoganda on a massive scale just so the Chinese can show off their superpower status.

Only problem no-one will be able to see anything for the pollution!
17

postmark54,

Chongqing City, China, 20/04/2008 07:50:22
#6 Landman,
#9 KampungHighlander
#15 GalacticCannibal,
According to the ever so wise 'The Daleks', there is no difference between British English and American or Canadian English, so you'll have to find something else to argue about, 'The Daleks' know everything, we're all out in 'left field' somewhere. Apparently the difference is an excuse used by the Chinese to cover up for the mistakes they make when writing English.
18

,

20/04/2008 09:54:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

Biker,

Ayr 20/04/2008 09:55:45
Richardino. You said:-Give over with the 'regime change' nonsense about China.
40 years ago it's people were starving, now they are one of the biggest economys on earth.
Yes they are indeed one of the biggest economies on earth, but ask yourself what they are doing with the dosh? Re-arming the militery and supplying arms to despots around the world.
People are still starving in China,Oh not in Beijing or Hong Kong or indeed Shanghi but not too far outside these "showpieces" the people are dirt poor and suffering.
Mashimaro I note with interest that you are again swinging in the wind. When I mentioned a couple of weeks ago about Zimbabwe you denied that China had any involvement. Different story now eh?
As for the west hating China, once again ... bo@@ocks. The only hatefull part of your system is the regime. How many people voted for them, oh sorry none.
20

,

20/04/2008 10:22:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

,

20/04/2008 10:22:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

Mashimaro,

China 20/04/2008 10:39:25
Bob Christie - roll the dice dude, bring it
23

Toast,

20/04/2008 10:41:46
As always it is people not politicians that are leading the movement for change,remind me why we need these parasites.
24

Browards,

20/04/2008 10:50:14
17 postmark54

Are you crazy? There is a big difference in bittish script vs american script, the spelling alone of certain words.
25

,

20/04/2008 11:16:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

Mashimaro,

20/04/2008 11:25:43
#26 "#20 Yes Red China has missiles. Unfortunately their technology is such that they cannot get them off the ground yet."

dream on
27

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 20/04/2008 12:01:36
#11

I think you have an over inflated sense of the skills sets that Chinese managers have. I have friends who run the General Motors operations in China producing all those Buicks you Chinese love to buy.

These lads loath going on vacation because they know when they come back after leaving the plant in the hands of the local members of the management team its a complete shambles.

Your entire electronics industry is mostly Taiwanese owned and managed, as if your fast food industry.

The majority of the companies on the Shanghai and Shenzen stock exchanges don't even turn a profit, and this is during an economic boom.

You have 1.3 Billion people but your economic output is on par with Japan a country less than 1/10th your size.

The only place your lead the league tables behind population size and executions is in greenhouse gas emissions.

The only thing the west would have to do to make your exports completely uncompetitive is introduce a carbon tax.

Though exports only represent 20% of your GDP it is by far the most profitable portion. All that foreign currency allows you to susidise energy costs. Without it you have the most inefficient major economy on the planet.
28

Mashimaro,

China 20/04/2008 12:27:35
A carbon tax...please, go ahead.
Don't need you, don't want you. Get them out.
29

,

20/04/2008 12:33:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

postmark54,

Chongqing, China, 20/04/2008 13:02:13
#27 Browards,
I am just telling you what this clever bunch 'the Daleks' told me. I am from Canada and I know the difference, but obviously I know nothing, according to 'the Daleks'. They claim I am a Chinese national and that I cover up my 'poor' English by saying that it is Canadian English, and not British English. Please take it up with them, when you see them online, thank you.
31

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 20/04/2008 13:08:17
#15 GC

What, you think that I should go to the trouble of resetting the language on my browser every time I come on this forum to that I don't upset Landmans very english sensibilities?

Well that is about as likely as you going to the effort to find gainful employment. Its just not going to happen, Dude.
32

,

20/04/2008 13:29:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 20/04/2008 13:43:09
#36

Thanks for the compliment, its been a long time since I was confused for a teenager.
34

,

20/04/2008 14:01:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
35

,

20/04/2008 14:01:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
36

,

20/04/2008 14:28:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
37

,

20/04/2008 15:53:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

aaabbbccc,

london 20/04/2008 16:21:51
hey i don't really care about the childish banter of China vs USA. When did this topic become about China vs the West.
To some point I agree with China's policy not to interfere in internal politics, because when and on whose opinion will it be right to stop interfering.
US, UK, CHINA, RUSSIA all export weapons that kill millions of people per year.
At the end of the day we all know what happens when foreign forces get involved.
...LOTS OF PEOPLE DIE...
Irag, Afghan, Somalia, Vietnam and possible Iran very soon.
As a Zimbabwean myself i think they should be an arms embargo against Zimbabwe. However we should know that a lot of people still support Mugabe (i dnt) and we should address the problem of land.
Thats why Mugabe is still in power because ordinary people "peasants" are very passionate about their land than the people who live in the cities.
Media may try to potrait that only his "thugs" got land but in reality over 200,000 people got about 70 hactres each from 4,000 white farmers (do the maths.
These were not "thugs" but ordinary Zimbabweans.
39

Mashimaro,

China 20/04/2008 17:27:08
#21 Biker, you make it so easy...

"Yes they are indeed one of the biggest economies on earth, but ask yourself what they are doing with the dosh? Re-arming the militery and supplying arms to despots around the world."

Governments buy arms from China. They are by no means freebies. Just as governments buy arms from the US in far far greater quantities than from China.
China's military badly needs an upgrade. In proportion to what you and the US spend on your miitaries its budget is miniscule. Our soldiers earn very little, and a man can only go so far on his love for the motherland. Our standing army marches on less than one doller per day per soldier for food.
See boy, you need to have some hard facts at your fingertips before you start spouting your bs.

"people are dirt poor and suffering."

They are not starving. This is a blatant lie. People are poor, yes, just as they are in most parts of Asia. Something you "forgot" perhaps? I guess as you're an armchair warrior you imagine that all folks in the free Philippines live in mansions and eat three times a day - wrong. How about India? Oh oh.. wrong again. Pakistan? Bhutan? Outer Mongolia perhaps? Carp it's hard to find any Asian country that does not have poor people, except perhaps Baharain and Singapore.

40

Mashimaro,

China 20/04/2008 17:31:41
#21 "Mashimaro I note with interest that you are again swinging in the wind. When I mentioned a couple of weeks ago about Zimbabwe you denied that China had any involvement. Different story now eh?"

I'm not sure what you are referring to here...the boat or the rumour of Chinese military in Zimbabwe. The boat is nothing different from what I have been saying. We deal with everyone. The rumour is different. I wonder if you noticed it was infact ME who alterted people to it on here. However, that is all it is, a rumour. There is no solid evidence yet. There isn't even one witness's name. There are no pictures. So, in other words, shoddy journalism and no proof. The Chinese embassy has denied it. So until there is proof, I think we need to keep an open mind.

"The only hatefull part of your system is the regime. How many people voted for them, oh sorry none."

Another tired old comment that is not entirely true. Who do you think puts them in power? Every person in the cabinet is voted in.
41

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 20/04/2008 17:41:01
#42

By your figures those 200,000 black beneficiaries of Mugabes larges have 14,000,000 hectares of farmland in their possession.

So why was only 1,200,000 hectares of the most productive land in Africa planted last year. Could it be that the land was given to 200,000 incompetent Zanu-PF bootlickers? Or are you going to make the typically African excuse and blame colonialism?
42

Mashimaro,

China 20/04/2008 17:42:03
#41 "Can I ask what proxy server you are using to bypass Chinese censorship of this website?"

You can ask but I can't answer. I have no idea. I'm not a techie. However as I have full access to news services like Chicken Noodle News, the BBC, Reuters, Associated Press, Agence France-Presse, EPA, NYT, Bloomberg, Irna, Kyodo, the Russian dudes, Al Jazeera, Xinhua, Sapa, etc etc, I really can't see why there would be any restriction on a carp little rag like this.

"Have you government authorisation for your views?"

No. If they think my paper writes or does something that is out of line they stop it being sold. That is the agreement. And yes, we have been stopped before.


"Sorry little man, you are a drone doing nothing more than towing the party line! "
That would be "toeing" you dumb englishman. Do I have to tell you how to speak your own language?
If you knew anything of my posts you would know I don't toe the party line. If I did, I would not ever admit the things I have admitted on here. If I did I would be talking like those sad guys in Beijing using words like lackey, lickspittle, running dog, etc etc etc. Actually you can see some of them on here.
43

WL,

livingston 20/04/2008 18:52:04
I am sure that China has always had a prudent and responsible attitude towards arms sales. But their interpretation of that might differ from how democratic countries interpretate that. The Olympic spirit requires understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play (the Games' Charter), when will China understand what that means??? The Olympic Games in China should be cancelled - NOW !!!
44

,

20/04/2008 21:53:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

,

20/04/2008 21:54:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
46

,

21/04/2008 02:01:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
47

Mashimaro,

China 21/04/2008 03:37:13
#47 I am sure that China has always had a prudent and responsible attitude towards arms sales."

The attitude is which ever government buys, gets.

But their interpretation of that might differ from how democratic countries interpretate that.

Like the US arming rebels and warlords in Somalia so the fighting can continue there?

"The Olympic spirit requires understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play (the Games' Charter), when will China understand what that means??? "
China is being friendly.

48

Mashimaro,

China 21/04/2008 03:37:54
Regina, while I agree with you wholeheartedly, I find it best not to feed the trolls.
49

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

21/04/2008 10:27:17
50.....Why Regina I have no idea who you are!(snigger) and therefore must ask that you GRFUY....
50

adotconcerned,

london 21/04/2008 12:03:11
I would urge the Scotsman journalist who wrote this article to do a little more digging in order to clarify how exactly the Government can and should do more to turn this shipment back to China, rather than to attempt to whitewash the issue based on inaccurate statements.

Specifically with respect:
"A Foreign Office spokesman said: "There is a UN arms embargo in place on arms entering Zimbabwe and we would encourage every other nation to follow that same approach.""

In fact there is not a UN arms embargo that I can find. There was an EU (voluntary, sadly) one passed in 2002, renewed on 30 January 2006 for another 12 month period. Meaning, in effect, that apparently it has been allowed to lapse.

There are however arms proliferation treaties amongst the Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries, specifically addressing these sorts of shipments. There are moves amongst the African Union of States to pass similar treaties, not yet complete/successful.

Why does the journalist who wrote this article take a Foreign Office spokeperson's word for everything? The journalist should go back, challenge this inaccuracy and ask the Foreign Office why this Government does not use its membership in the EU to revitalise the EU arms embargo, its membership on the UN Security Council to push for a UN arms embargo, its leadership in the world to push SADC states and AU states to refuse this shipment?
51

Biker,

Ayr 22/04/2008 13:01:20
Mashimaro.By your reconning Zimbabwe paid for weapons from your country, is that correct? Or perhaps it was part of a trade agreement to supply another rogue regime along with mining rites supplied? Tell all my oriental mouthpiece.
The issue of arms sales is interesting though. China has outstripped the US and UK in conventional arms sales over the past 4 years. Because the Chinese enbassy denies the existance of this vessel, it is a rumour? Grow up.
I remember your comment a couple of weeks ago that you catagoricaly denied any trade with Zimbabwe, so I guess the egg is on your face .
My comment may be old and tired about your innability to vote, but it is non the less true.
Your pedantic correction of Foo's comment shows your contemptible dialogue is wearing thin.
Now the money. Have a good look around you Mashers and actually take in what you see. Beijing, Hong Kong, Shanghi are all very prosperous places, not so in the outer regions. I suspect that the infrastructure of these places is artificialy well kept at the expence of the other regions.
You also comment that the people are NOT starving, again at varience to your earlier comments. No consistancy.
52

Biker,

Ayr 22/04/2008 13:02:06
Mashimaro
Now the money. Have a good look around you Mashers and actually take in what you see. Beijing, Hong Kong, Shanghi are all very prosperous places, not so in the outer regions. I suspect that the infrastructure of these places is artificialy well kept at the expence of the other regions.
You also comment that the people are NOT starving, again at varience to your earlier comments. No consistancy.
53

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

22/04/2008 13:38:06
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2008-04/22/content_6636133.htm

Well they aint denying that Biker....thats for sure...
54

Maurice,

Fife 22/04/2008 16:07:42
Both Angola and Mozambique were involved for many years in civil war. They both know the cost. I have seen it, I was involved in them too and I assure you that no-one in these countries would ever want to put their worst enemies through what they experienced. I very much doubt that they will allow these weapons to be offloaded and if they are, there will be sabotage and theft and so should there be.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.