Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Thousands using Britain as base for Islamic terrorism

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2008
THOUSANDS of Islamist militants in the UK are actively supporting jihadist activities at home and abroad, according to a leaked Government document.
The secret report, obtained by a Sunday newspaper, states that Britain will remain "a high-priority target" for international terrorists aligned with al-Qaida for the foreseeable future, and warns of a network of extremist cells in the UK, with the
main concentrations in London, Birmingham and Luton.

The document – marked "restricted" – was reportedly drawn up by the intelligence branch of the Ministry of Defence, MI5 and Special Branch, and describes the threat from Islamist extremists as "diverse and widely distributed" with the number of terrorists in Britain "difficult to judge". However, it cites estimates from the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre that there are "some thousands of extremists in the UK committed to supporting jihadi activities, either in the UK or abroad".

It goes on to state: "For the foreseeable future the UK will continue to be a high-priority target for international terrorists aligned with al Qaida.

"It will face a threat from British nationals, including Muslim converts, and UK-based foreign terrorists as well as terrorists planning attacks from abroad."

In 2006, the then head of the Security Service, Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller said that MI5 was aware of 30 major terrorist plots and had 1,600 people in 200 cells under surveillance. Last year, her successor Jonathan Evans said the number had grown to 2,000.

The new document paints a picture of the kinds of people caught up in extremist activity in the UK. It reads: "The majority of extremists are British nationals of south Asian, mainly Pakistani, origin but there are also extremists from north and east Africa, Iraq and the Middle East, and a number of converts. The overwhelming majority of extremists are male, typically in the 18-30 age range."

The document also states that a number of extremists at large in the UK have been trained in terrorist camps overseas and have "some ability to construct improvised explosive devices, incorporating home-made explosives".

Last year Scotland On Sunday revealed that a hard core of 200 Islamic extremists with links to foreign terror groups had been identified by intelligence services as working north of the border. Senior intelligence insiders said the individuals concerned, many of whom were born and brought up in Scotland, posed a "significant" risk to public safety, and revealed that up to 1,000 Scottish Asians known to associate with radicals could be placed under surveillance, with their e-mails, mobile and landline calls all being monitored by GCHQ.

In October last year Mohammed Siddique became Scotland's first "home-grown" terrorist. The 21-year-old from Alva, Clackmannanshire, was found guilty of four separate terrorist offences, including providing material on how to make bombs. He was arrested at Glasgow airport in 2006, after several months of surveillance, as he attempted to board a flight to Pakistan. He was sentenced to eight years in prison.

A Home Office spokesman said it did not comment on leaked documents.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 November 2008 10:44 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

gus1940,

Edinburgh 09/11/2008 01:12:10
Correct me if I am wrong but I cannot recall there being any acknowledged threat of Islamic terrorism to the UK prior to 11/9/2001 and Blair's subsequent ascent up Bush's backside and participation in an illegal war.

If there was such a threat the government and the media kept pretty quiet about it.
2

William of Liberton,

EDINBURGH 09/11/2008 01:39:24
Spot on, gus 1940!
3

Guga II,

Rockall 09/11/2008 02:53:12
#1.

You've got it in one.
4

Finlang,

Switzerland 09/11/2008 03:29:00
#1
Correct me if I am wrong, but if there was such a threat, the government (and the media, via D Notices) might of necessity keep "pretty quiet about it." It's called state security, however much we might criticise the method.

The 9/11 atrocity wasn't hatched overnight. Check out the history.
5

Finlang,

Switzerland 09/11/2008 03:32:44
... lost from above.

There are dangerous people in our midst (Islamists, that is), Europe-wide, as well as Blair and Brown, whose calamitous watch we are all aware of.
6

Covert Action,

09/11/2008 07:42:13
#1,2,3

So what ? This is a parliamentary democracy. If the "tiny minority of extremists" don't like it they should form a political party and see how far they get at the polls. But that isn't what you mean you treasonous scum. Next time there is an atrocity I hope you rats are in the way.
7

Chaplin,

09/11/2008 07:50:47
Agree with 4 & 6
8

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 09/11/2008 08:41:54
"secret report, obtained by a Sunday newspaper"

Surely that's a story in itself. I guess "leaked documents" carry more authenticity than government press briefings these days.
9

Joe Macdelta.,

09/11/2008 09:32:10
Is there truth in this leak, or is it more scaremongering by this government, in order that civil liberties can be further erroded under the guise security?.
10

billengland,

09/11/2008 10:06:26
"Thousands using Britain as base for Islamic terrorism"

This pales into insignificance compared with the millions using Britain as a base for British terrorism.
11

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 09/11/2008 12:39:56
If correct, is it not ironic that we're fighting the "war on terror" in Iraq and Afghanistan when the war starts here?

Why not use the military resources we have in a more targeted way to root out Islamic terrorists and their resources in the UK. Get the gloves off and root them out. The kind solution - deportation with their entire families and no monkeying about with detention or endless appeals. It is after all a "war" and in war you don't give your opponent legal aid.

In Afghanistan, the poppy crops still apparently thrive because we're too backward about spraying them and cutting off Al Quaeda's monetery resources at source. Why waste servicemen and women's lives unnecessarily when the obvious solutions can be implemented. There will be collateral damage in that farmers will be cheesed off but - again - so what? You'd think this country was a major nation with major resources, but thanks to Broon and Blair we'll soon be down there with the third world countries proffering the begging bowl except we already have and from Arab nations.
12

yoric,

09/11/2008 15:53:21
Round up the foreign ones and deport.

Strip the British born of citizenship and kick them out too.

Tear up the human rights charter that just benefits the criminal.
13

truthsleuth,

09/11/2008 16:00:03
Has anyone done a survey amongst the terrorists to find out what religious affiliations they have.

The result would be interesting
14

Kipling,

09/11/2008 23:09:05
The problem lies in the notion of 'nationality'. These guys simply have British nationality because they may be born here. They don't have that allegiance which might be called 'patriotism', not because it's not a cool sentiment to have, but because their links with their home countries is too immediate. Many of them have mothers here who don't speak English. They can go back to the land of their ancestors, much as the British during the Empire and later (Scots, English, & Welsh) could return to the UK. A Scotsman with an Indian colonial passport in the first part of the century was not an Indian, any more than a south Asian with a British passport might necessarily be Scottish. We are presently 'at war' with Afghanistan/Iraq etc, and whether we agree or not with New Labour's imperialism, Britain is identified with their policies. The only real but completely unpractical let alone politically unacceptable solution would be to have camps like they did in the 2nd world war, until the crisis blew over. Or deport everyone.
15

Kipling,

09/11/2008 23:16:57
Remember that the internment camps were cruel as well as a safeguard: there were many from an Axis background who had been in this country for at least two generations who were threatened with this.
16

Kipling,

09/11/2008 23:21:29
There must be an empty Scottish island somewhere where everybody could go. It could be renamed Al-Qatraz.
17

Benjamin,

Dresden 10/11/2008 02:52:44
#1 Gus, what exactly is an "illegal war"? Given the history of the world, the war that exists between the US and the UK on the one side and some nebulous force of "baddies" on the other is no more illegal than something that happened in 1066 or any land dispute between rival area clans in 1402. One group attacks another. The other fights back. Other parties are involved. And so on.
18

billengland,

10/11/2008 08:19:00
19 Benjamin

An illegal war is one which is joined without justification. We have moved on somewhat from 1066 and 1402 and 1914 come to that.

The present war stems from the establishment of Israel in Palestine in 1948, the US/UK overthrow of Iran's government in 1953, the Suez canal invasion in 1956, the placement of the Baath party and Saddam in Iraq, the war against Iran and the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.

The US/UK are the clear aggressors and the peoples of the Middle East have every right to fight back.

Gus1940 is quite right; the terrorist threat was engineered by the murderous Bush/Blair gang.

The gang have done very well out of it - mission accomplished - and Brown continues to build on his success.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.