Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 11th May 2008 Change Date

Great Dobbies offer with Scotland on Sunday

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

4,000 more post offices may still be stamped out



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 March 2008
A FURTHER one in three post offices in the UK could be forced to shut even after the latest round of closures is over, Scotland on Sunday can reveal.
Hundreds of towns and villages across Britain are currently being told that their local office is being closed, as bosses seek to stem losses of £3.5m a week.

But ministers now admit that there are "no guarantees" that even more post offices will not be axed after 2011 when their current budgets run out.

The round of closures now ongoing will see the number of post offices reduced from 14,000 to 11,500. However, the eventual scale of closures could reduce the total down to just 7,500, meaning that one in three post offices now 'safe' could still face closure.

The news comes with post offices across Scotland already closing as a result of the cuts. A total of 41 branches across Central Scotland and Glasgow have been pinpointed for closure. Next month, 17 post offices across the Highlands will close for good. Further closures in north-east Scotland, Edinburgh, the west and south of Scotland will be announced soon.

But business minister Pat McFadden said he was unable to rule out further closures down to the Government's minimum of 7,500 post offices once the current round of cuts was over.

In an interview with Scotland on Sunday, McFadden said: "No one wants to be going through the process that we are going through at the moment but huge lifestyle changes have caused a reduction in the use of post offices which has not been matched by a decline in sentiment towards them. In terms of funding we have funded a sustainable network of 11,500 post offices until 2011. I can't make new spending commitments beyond that, no minister can."

The 7,500 figure has been set as the bare minimum by ministers. They claim with this number, nearly all the urban population would be within one mile of a post office, with the majority of the rural population all within three miles.

Conservative shadow business secretary Alan Duncan warned that ministers were set for even more closures. He said: "Under the Government's current criteria, there's nothing to stop them reducing the network down to around 7,000."

MP Mike Weir, the SNP's spokesman on postal affairs, added: "These closures are equivalent to the cuts to the railway network made by Dr Beeching in the Sixties. Like those cuts, closure of local post offices will hit rural areas and the vulnerable hardest."

Danny Alexander, the Lib Dem work and pensions spokesman, said: "The fact that ministers can contemplate further closures while they are in the process of closing 2,500 suggests that we should have no faith that this is the last mass closure programme."

A further problem may come later this year if Post Office Ltd fails to retain a contract to supply cards which allow around four million people without bank accounts to withdraw benefits and pensions. Duncan said: "We have serious concerns that the network will be devastated if the Post Office does not succeed in retaining the card account."

A spokesman for Post Office Ltd said: "The Network Change programme is aimed at creating a sustainable post office network for the future. Post Office Ltd is also working hard to become more efficient and to develop successful new products and services that will attract new customers and revenue to the business and increase the sustainability of the post office network in the future."

The full article contains 601 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 March 2008 7:09 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 23/03/2008 05:08:52
The New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party seem determined to totally ruin the Post Office, as they are still hell bent on selling it to their business buddies in private enterprise. They'll all be looking for positions on the boards of all these companies when they get chucked out at the next general election. They've probably been taking lessons from their former leader, Bliar, on how to become a millionaire.
2

eric,

23/03/2008 07:51:48
Cant local councils take over Post offices,More income for them.or just set up Scottish system.
3

C U Jimmy,

East Ayrshire 23/03/2008 10:47:28
My local council can't even run the the local council, most, if not all have ambitions much greater than their ability, and are only concerned with their own selfish greed. The arrogance and contempt shown is beyond belief. and I have pages of letters and emails to back this up.
4

Toast,

23/03/2008 11:01:48
Labour totally destroying the fabric of our communites,when will these morons be stopped destroying the few things that make life tolerable ,especially for the elderly who cannot shop on the internet and whos sole outside contact can be their visit to the post office,politicians should stay in their pampered ivory towers and leave real people alone.
5

Tris,

dundee 23/03/2008 12:57:16

#4. Totally agree. We have to find a way of stopping them. I hope that the Communities Departments of councils and the proper governement in Edinburgh are looking at ways that we can counteract the greed and folly of the Labour Party.

Advice to Brown...NOT EVERYTHING CAN MAKE A POROFIT YOU TORY FOOL
6

Shug,

23/03/2008 16:42:19
If they are not making money and locals are not using them shut them down. Use it or lose it.

4. It's not the government that is destroying our fabric of life as you so grandly put it. We are our own worst enemy. We choose Tesco's over our old local shops. We jet off to foreign lands for our holidays instead of holidaying in the UK. We buy cheap crap from China. We buy food that has travelled thousnads of miles when we could grow a lot more of our own. The list goes on.

5. So we have to support things that are making a loss. Fine but are you happy to pay an extra 20% on your income tax to pay for all the things you want to hang on to.
7

snoozyowl,

Wales 23/03/2008 20:34:18
I do have a question about this whole PO episode. Yes, they used to do car tax, TV licences, lots of other things that are now done elsewhere. But why for example did they lose TV licence renewal? Could it be that the PO is much more expensive than other options, such as PayPoint? If that was the reason, why were they more expensive? Maybe PO have shot themselves in the foot by not being all that efficient. If big customers leave at the first opportunity of an alternative, you do wonder what the reason is...
8

Tris,

23/03/2008 21:54:29
#6.... Well, I doubt it will take an extra 20% to keep essential services open for old people and people in isolated palces. I would be prepared to pay more, and I'd be happy to pay less for say Trident, and other Weapons of Mass Destruction, MP's salaries and expenses, the Royal Family, the Olympics... and an awful lot of other stupid rubbish.

Simple choice Post Offices or Prince Charles and Mrs Parker Bowles.... hardly difficult.
9

donald,

glasgow 30/03/2008 08:03:21
Will I have more Labour leaflets through my door insinuating (for the beneft of the thick) that the SNP are responsible and that Labour saved Kelvindale and Hyndland POs at the expense of poorer districts?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.