Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Nanny state' sends climbing into freefall

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 October 2008
SCOTS were among the brave and hardy pioneers who gave the sport of rock climbing to the world.
But the obsession with health and safety culture in Britain is threatening to wipe out the sport within a decade, according to experts.

Dr Bob Sharp, a sports scientist, vice-president of the Mountaineering Council of Scotland and a veteran mountain rescue team leader, suggests a combination of anxious parents, the 'nanny state' safety culture, poor weather and the rise of indoor climbing centres may be to blame.

Sharp, who has just retired from the University of Strathclyde, said: "By my calculation, within the next 10 years, climbing as we know it may well have ceased."

According to Sharp, the exact number of climbers using Scotland's mountains now is difficult to count. But he no longer sees young climbers out on the Dunbartonshire crags he trained on.

"In those days the crags used to brim with people – solo climbers, families, youth groups and others," he said. "Some evenings, you could count well over 100 climbers at any one time.

"Today, very few people go there. The routes are covered in moss and grass, and ferns grow on the ledges and cracks once used for handholds. The crag has virtually been abandoned. This is not an isolated example. Many people tell the same story of other, once-popular crags by roadsides and high in the mountains which are now rarely visited."

One explanation, says Sharp, is that more people are choosing to climb indoors. "Indoor climbing is a big trend and I'm pleased that people are climbing at all, but fewer are now going out onto the high crags. Indoor centres are nice and cosy – you are not going to get wet or lose your life – but the climbing wall experience should not become an end in its own right while mountains are neglected."

Winter ice climbing was possibly a victim of changing weather. "It's a fair bet that many are now heading for the Ice Factor (an indoor wall in Kinlochleven in the Highlands] as the warmer winters in Scotland and the absence of snow-ice has limited winter climbing to a very brief time period."

But, he added, there was a more "disturbing factor" at play. "It's all related to the so-called nanny state in which we now live. Life seems to be constructed around the desire to reduce risks, avoid accidents and sidestep any form of hardship or effort.

"The net result is that we're all risk-averse, afraid of blame, apprehensive of uncertainty and overly concerned about litigation. Children, and young people especially, are no longer allowed to take risks, and whatever environment they enter is designed to be sterile and safe.

"Mountaineering was bound to suffer as a result, because at its very core there is risk, hardship and inconvenience."

Sociologists said the decline in climbing mirrored changes in society towards a widespread, safety-first culture for children. Frank Furedi, Professor of Sociology at the University of Kent and author of Culture Of Fear, said:

"Children use climbing walls, encouraged by adults, but mainly because it is a risk-free way of approaching the sport. What is sad is that parents who understand the physical challenge will, when confronted by the real thing, draw back from it."

Marguerite Hunter Blair, chief executive of Play Scotland, an agency which believes that adventurous outdoor activities are part of growing up, said climbing was just one sport which was suffering.

"Research has shown that children aged eight now have not developed the hand-eye co-ordination of previous generations who were out doing things like climbing from an early age. That's why we may not have any rock climbers in numbers in future."

Veteran mountaineers backed Sharp, saying indoor climbing centres were proving too much of an attraction for new generations. Hamish McInnes, former leader of the Glencoe Mountain Rescue Team, said: "I hope Bob is not right about climbing's future, but the problem is there is no central heating in the mountains. We have a great history and tradition of rock climbing and it would be a shame if it were to die out."

But indoor climbing centre officials said their role in the demise of outdoor climbing was being exaggerated. "We are expanding the reach of climbing for people from tots to those over 60," said Mike Pinkerton, a spokesman for Edinburgh Leisure, which runs the Edinburgh International Climbing Arena at Ratho. "It is a more sheltered and safer environment but we see our role as preparing climbers for the outdoor experience. We are a complement to outdoor climbing, not a deterrent."

The family of Colin Munro, a Scots climber who died after a fall two years ago, said he would be "very disappointed" if young people were no longer taking up the outdoor sport that gave him so much enjoyment.

The 42-year-old software engineer from Motherwell died from a blood clot in 2006, six weeks after a 500ft fall in the Swiss Alps which shattered his neck and spinal cord.

His brother Ian, a sales representative, said: "Colin recognised the potential dangers of what he did but also that it could be done safely if done properly.

"He would have been very disappointed if rock climbing was to wither away because there is so much you can do to manage the risk safely.

"He was very safety-conscious and it was ironic that he died when he had turned back from a climb because he judged it too risky. He fell on the way down.

"Colin would not want his death to be used as an excuse for not getting out into the mountains. He would have wanted people to pursue their dreams."

Summit to write home about

The ascent of Mont Blanc in 1786 is often quoted as the single event which formalises the beginning of mountaineering. This makes the sport – in European terms – a little over 200 years old.

But the event that inaugurated Scottish mountaineering was the ascent of Sgurr nan Gillean on Skye in 1836 by James Forbes, Professor of natural history at Edinburgh University.

Britain was a leading nation in geological enquiry and Forbes was a leading figure of the day. Between 1835 and 1842 he devoted much energy to the study of glacier movement as he travelled, climbed and studied in the Alps.

His work helped to stimulate interest in the Alps by British climbers, ironically, not so much for his scientific work but more his descriptions of his climbs.

His gripping tales of battles high up the steep mountains along with his sketches captured the public's imagination and thirst for new areas to visit.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 October 2008 7:42 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Lanna,

'Go Climb A Rock' 05/10/2008 05:35:22
"Keep close to Nature's heart...and break clear away, once in awhile, and climb a mountain or spend a week in the woods. Wash your spirit clean."
-John Muir

....belay on!
2

Guga II,

Rockall 05/10/2008 06:15:09
I wish people would stop referring to the "nanny state" and tell it like it is. We are living in a Stalinist, totalitarian, control freak state, run by Maggie Broon and the New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party.
3

Richardinho,

05/10/2008 08:53:43
What a terrible blow to humanity if rock climbing as an activity ceased to exist.
4

Joe Macdelta.,

05/10/2008 09:44:27
All outdoor persuits should be encouraged, there is no better way to spend time of, than out in the countryside, nature is brilliant in all aspects.
5

Scythia,

Alba 05/10/2008 10:50:33
The inevitable outcome of applied Guardianista type socially engineered policies implemented by NULAB/SNP these last 11 years. Our footy side is hopeless for the same reason.
6

AdamAR,

Edinburgh 05/10/2008 14:59:00
I have grown up rock climbing, tree climbing, scrambling, and mountaineering. It's a real shame if young people (I'm only in my early 20's, so that includes me I guess) aren't doing this any more.

I'm also no fan of Labour, but blaming nanny state is unfair. It is the insurance companies who are to blame for creating a culture of fear. It is the ambulance chasing law firms who have scared companies and schools away from climbing.

It's the consumer society which tells people to stay inside. It is corporate advertising telling us that more stuff will make us happy.

It's time the government stood up to these insurance companies and law firms. It's time the government reigned in the corporations who dominate our lives, and persuade us to buy more useless stuff. And it's time we got back onto the hills.
7

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 05/10/2008 21:22:54
What the health and safety lot don't realise is that the more ridiculous the rules get the more they lose creditability and the more folk will just ignore them - I for one just ignore them and keep to common sense ... I couldn't care less what a little jobsworth from the council says.

Ironically they will infact be their own downfall - they keep on inventing stricter and stricter rules so they are all kept busy guzzling our tax money - but eventually they will make the place so darn safe they will be out of a job !!

But lets face it folks safe is boring - live on the edge and enjoy your short time here !!
8

ignorant townie?,

Scotland.. 06/10/2008 16:50:54
"Health and Safety" as a weapon of bureaucrats and a self serving industry arrived here via american business management practices - like so much else thats wrong in our work "culture".

Im sure a useful PhD could be written on when it all happened...and how.....avoiding annoying things like economics and the need for hard work was also probably ultimately behind the present financial crisis....via some superbly worded strategy about how to create wealth by lending money to people who could never pay it back...

welcome to the machine...run on elfin safety lines....
9

Dave MacLeod,

Fort William 10/10/2008 00:06:09
Whilst I agree some of whats in this piece, the idea that Scottish climbing is in freefall and heading for no climbers on the outdoor crags in ten years is a gross exaggeration. Also the evidence given is shows a lack of knowledge of climbers movements these days.

In Bob's quote he starts of by referring to the empty Dumbartonshire 'crags', then later 'crag'. My guess is that he refers to Craigmore, somewhere I trained on myself back when it was busy and watched the fashions slowly drift away from it. I wonder how often Bob goes to Dumbarton Rock, which has gained steadily in climbing foot (or hand?) fall where the other Dumbartonshire crags have lost over the past 15 years. What Bob maybe doesn't appreciate is simply that the diversity of climbing's many disciplines has split and spread climbers across many more venues than previously and the number of outdoor venues has increased dramatically also. Many of the climbing scence's currently 'en vogue' places to climb have only been developed in the past few years, and maybe Bob hasn't heard of them?

What has really happened is that indoor walls, sport climbing, bouldering and cheap flights to europe to much more extensive climbing meccas with more reliable weather have given people the option to climb but be risk averse also, where they never had the choice before. It's inevitable that some will take this up. So, where climbing used to equal risk and hardship, now it only does if you want it to.

But to say that noone is taking the hard choice is misleading, in fact just incorrect. Does Bob know that the cutting edge grade in traditional risky rock climbing has risen faster in the past 13 years than at any time since the extreme ('E') grade was invented? The reason? partly down to the availability of climbing walls to train properly on!

And he's onbviously not been anywhere near the north face of Ben Nevis in a few years - several amazing late season ice accumulations over the past ten years, and heaving

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.