Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


BBC blunders again

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 January 2009
ANOTHER week, another crisis for the BBC. One which yet again displays a complete lack of leadership and an abject failure to understand the mood of a nation which keeps the corporation's executives in chauffeur-driven cars and allows them to pay millions of pounds a year to their pet talent.
Indeed, it was on the very day that Jonathan Ross returned to our TV screens after being suspended over a prank call that the BBC landed itself in yet another mess. And this time, lives are at stake.

What possessed Director-General Mark Thompson a
nd his underlings to rule that the BBC could not broadcast a humanitarian appeal for aid to send to those suffering in the aftermath of the three-week conflict in Gaza? This is a channel which – as Tony Benn observed yesterday – had been happy to show an appeal for the same coalition of charities, the Disasters Emergency Committee, in another conflict. That appeal raised £10m for civilians caught between rebel and government forces in the Congo. Other BBC broadcasts have included one which raised £18m for the DEC to help after last year's cyclone in Burma.

That was good work and responsible broadcasting – so why not do the same when the DEC asked for help in Palestine? Thompson attempted to justify himself by describing Gaza as "an ongoing and highly controversial news story within which the human suffering and distress which have resulted from the conflict remain intrinsic and contentious elements". He added: "To broadcast a free-standing appeal, no matter how carefully couched, ran the risk of calling into question the public's confidence in the BBC's impartiality in its coverage of the story as a whole."

What a lot of baloney. The DEC is a non-political umbrella group representing respected charities including the British Red Cross, Christian Aid, Help the Aged, Oxfam and Save the Children. These charities are not taking an anti-Israeli or pro-Palestinian stance by wanting to help those who have been injured or made homeless by the conflict. We are confident that if for some reason Israel fell victim to a natural disaster which left civilians in dire need of help, those same DEC charities would be the first to ride to the rescue.

And let's be clear – there is a massive need for urgent aid in Gaza, where 1,300 people died in the recent fighting and more than 100,000 people were made homeless. Half of those are currently in UN emergency shelters, and the UK Government has had no problem with sending in £25m in aid. Oxfam and Save the Children have also managed to deliver supplies to Gaza, so the BBC's side claim that it may be difficult for aid to get into the battle zones is clearly bogus.

Initially, several other broadcasters unaccountably shared the BBC's view that to broadcast the DEC's Gaza appeal would compromise their journalistic independence. ITV saw sense yesterday and announced a change of heart. Sky was expected to follow suit, and there is a growing feeling that the BBC will eventually be forced into a humiliating U-turn. That will be welcome, but it will come too late: further damage has been done to the BBC's already tarnished reputation.

The furore over Ross and Russell Brand's stupid and offensive phone call to actor Andrew Sachs may have been overblown, but it did expose the BBC leadership's inability to make the right decisions, and to make them quickly. A similar lack of leadership has been demonstrated on a wide range of other occasions, from the events leading up to – and the reporting of – the Hutton report to last year's phone-in scandals. On each occasion, original mistakes were compounded by blind panic among executives when the BBC itself became part of the story.

On this occasion, those at the very top of the corporation appear to have overreacted in the face of, frankly unsupportable, claims that its news output had been biased against Israel. The result is a foolish decision that can only put Palestinian lives, which are already miserable, in further jeopardy. Thompson must reconsider.

In the meantime, we have no qualms in advising that payment to the DEC's Gaza Appeal can be made at www.dec.org.uk or by calling 0370 60 60 900.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 January 2009 7:42 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Leader comment , The BBC
 
1

Lobeydoser,

25/01/2009 01:06:43
If, as the Scotland on Sunday editorial claims:

“The DEC is a non-political umbrella group representing respected charities including the British Red Cross, Christian Aid, Help the Aged, Oxfam and Save the Children. These charities are not taking an anti-Israeli or pro-Palestinian stance”.

Why did Gavin McLellan, Director of Christian Aid Scotland, in May 2008 advise a meeting at the Scottish Parliament to call upon the UN to invoke it’s “Right to Protect” doctrine, advocating a military intervention, the outcome of which could clearly be far in excess of what has already happened?

Before encouraging viewers to donate, the BBC has obviously taken into account the current inability of the UN and other aid agencies to protect aid convoys, having already lost over 60 truckloads of supplies, paid for by British taxpayers and others, to armed Hamas highjackers.
2

Glaswegian2,

Glasgow 25/01/2009 08:22:32
Lobeydoser: Your comment smacks of the worst type of anti-Palestinian propaganda.

According to the Disasters Emergenc Committee, its members "have confirmed they are able to work without hindrance from the Hamas controlled authorities both to identify who are the most needy and to channel assistance to them directly".

Why are you so keen to stop British people sending aid to the victims of Gaza?

Well done Scotland on Sunday for your reasoned, humane stance. The BBC has seriously misjudged the publuc mood.
3

Neilbudd,

Glasgow 25/01/2009 10:02:05
Without information like this the general public
are being left out of the picture:
Jan. 22, 2009
Khaled Abu Toameh , an Arab writer in THE JERUSALEM POST reports:

The Palestinian Authority's Minister of Social Welfare Affairs, Mahmoud Habbash, accused Hamas on Wednesday of confiscating 63 trucks loaded with humanitarian aid while they were on their way to the UN Relief and Works Agency in Gaza.
He also confirmed that Hamas had been torturing and executing Fatah members in the Gaza Strip during and after Operation Cast Lead. Nineteen Palestinians were murdered in cold blood by Hamas, Habbash said, while more than 60 others were shot in the legs.
Ihab Ghissin, spokesman for the Hamas-run Interior Ministry in Gaza, confirmed that his men had arrested scores of "collaborators" with Israel during and after the war. However, he refused to say whether the detainees were members of Fatah.

He also denied that the detainees were being tortured.
4

Neilbudd,

Glasgow 25/01/2009 11:05:55
Jordanian newspaper reports HAMAS stealing and killing continues:

Without such information being reported here in the UK press and media, the British Public is sadly kept in the dark, preferring to base their views on a very selective type of reporting. There is now a video sequence taken from Arabic TV (AlJazeera)of a Hamas rocket being fired from a public building in Gaza during a live brodacast in Arabic on an Arab TV channel.

http://www.petranews.gov.jo/nepras/2009/Jan/20/19000.htm

19/ Armed men seize Jordanian aid in Gaza Strip

Amman, Jan. 20 (Petra) – A number of armed men have seized on Tuesday a Jordanian aid convoy after entering the Gaza Strip via Karem Abu Salem Crossing Point, Petra was informed

The aid convoy, which was sent by the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization (JHCO), was unloaded to non-Jordanian trucks driven by non-Jordanian drivers after crossing King Hussein Bridge.

The UNRWA was expected to receive the convoy and unload it into its warehouses in Gaza to be distributed later on civilians in the strip.

The armed men opened fire at drivers after crossing Karem Abu Salem crossing point and forced them to head to their own warehouses.

UNRWA has asked the transport company not to send the aid convoys scheduled for Tuesday and Wednesday until the issue of the seized convoy is solved.

//Petra// A.SH

5

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 25/01/2009 12:40:37
How can the BBC claim to be impartial when the Director General is appointed by the Prime Minister.
You will never see that job advertised in the press.
It is the ultimate jobs for the boys case.
6

Finlay,

Currie, 25/01/2009 16:04:32
This BBC DEC story has developed into a Palestinian v Isreali stoushie.

We have lost the plot here. The question is should the BBC take sides and the answer is a resounding NO!

Put aside the the rantings of chaps like Benn and Salmond; they have personal agendas unrelated not only to the BBC decison but also to the suffering in Gaza. They could not care less and incidentally neither could Hamas or the Jews.
7

Observer,,

Glasgow 25/01/2009 20:00:14
The BBC ran an appeal for aid to Kosova before the NATO bombardment of Serbia. That DID legitimise questionable military activities.

They haven't got a leg to stand on here: they are wrong.
8

Great Scott.,

Clearbrook Vancouver 28/01/2009 17:38:15
NGO'S such as Oxfam Christian Aid etc are already funded by the British Taxpayer,and there is no accountability where the money is spent.
This applies to other foundations that are formed by various so-called N.G.O.charities.
The U.N is hostile to Israel.
Where were they when Egypt refused to open the border for fleeing Gazans?.Where were they when Hamas refused Gazans access to Israeli Field Hospitals?.Where were they when Hamas rocketed Israel.?
Where is the Aid from other Arab States?.
Gazans have been fed for sixty years by the U.N.
Time to review strategy.
And Jimmy Carter the Peanut Farmer's main complaint about the Hamas Rocketing,is not enough Israelis were killed.And why where they not.Because they care about their civillians and they spent days in Bomb Shelters or were evacuated.
Did Britain wait for Hitler to kill its children? No they evacuated them.

Hamas were hiding in tunnels,when Israel called their bluff,then fled.Most casualities were Hamas Fighters.

As far as those celebrities who will refuse to work for the BBC,well thats their choice!

And as far as the British Government sending over 40 million pounds to Hamas, I suggest they spend an equal amount on the people they were elected to serve -the british public-to improve their services hospitals dentists etc.

The BBC and Sky are correct,so expect howls of protest from those who are nashing their collective teeth at the new Boundaries set by BBC and SKY.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Does Jeremy Clarkson deserve to sacked from the BBC for his comments about Gordon Brown?
Yes
No

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.