Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


64% dub BBC's licence fee a rip-off

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 November 2008
MORE than six in 10 people think the BBC's TV licence fee is a "rip-off", it was revealed last night.
Asked whether the £139.50 licence fee was good value for money, 64% of people chose the answer "No, it's a rip off".

Just 10% of people chose "Yes", while 24% chose "Just about, but they could do a bit more".

The poll of 2,062 adults across the
country was carried out by market research company YouGov.

The news came as the controller of BBC1 revealed that multi-million-pound deals for BBC stars are "extremely unlikely" in the future.

Jay Hunt also said the return of Jonathan Ross following his three-month suspension over his role in the "Sachsgate" controversy presented the BBC with a "challenge".

Asked whether the affair was handled properly, 36% chose the answer, "Too little was done", 43% chose, "Harder action should have been taken" and 17% said, "It was blown out of proportion".

Asked to choose two or three shows from a list of seven which they would prefer to watch, more people opted for old favourites The Two Ronnies (49%), Morecambe And Wise (46%) and Michael Parkinson (40%) than Jonathan Ross (26%).

Hunt said she did not see herself agreeing to contracts that would pay presenters salaries like the £6m a year Ross is reputed to earn.

"I would say it's extremely unlikely," she said. "I believe that part of what I am there to do is to be a custodian of value on the channel and I take that very, very seriously."

Ross's salary is among the highest in British TV, with only X Factor's Simon Cowell's golden handcuffs deal with ITV believed to be in a similar region.

Speaking about the planned return of Ross to the channel in January, she said: "The challenge now is how we bring Jonathan back and give him the platform to re-establish that relationship with audiences."

The chat show host was suspended for his role in a BBC Radio 2 broadcast with Russell Brand during which the pair left obscene messages on the phone of Fawlty Towers actor Andrew Sachs.

It later emerged that the BBC had received 38,000 complaints about the now notorious broadcast, after which Brand resigned from his £200,000-a-year radio show.

Yesterday, Melody Sachs, the 75-year-old wife of the actor, told of her distress about the episode, which aired while she was in hospital recovering from a hip replacement operation.

She said: "When I first heard the broadcast, I couldn't believe what I was hearing – the repeated abuse of my husband coming from the mouths of two grown men. It was very, very upsetting and I was incredibly hurt and angry.

"There's no doubt the stress made my recovery much harder, it made me feel weak. I'm not the sort of person who gets down, I'm very upbeat, but I felt depressed to have Andrew treated like this. I was breaking down in tears at night."

Mrs Sachs also reveals that she knew nothing about the career of her 23-year-old grand-daughter, Georgina Baillie, whose relationship with Brand, a former sex addict, was central to the broadcast.

Baillie is a member of girl group, the Satanic Sluts, who perform in scanty underwear.

"There are some things you would rather not know about your grandchildren," she said.

Learning about the Satanic Sluts on TV came as "dreadful shock" to both her and her husband. "Some of the images were obviously disturbing and we'd never heard of the Satanic 'whatevers.'"







The full article contains 606 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 November 2008 10:22 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: The BBC
 
1

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 30/11/2008 06:41:19
Jonathan who ???
2

Boy Wonder,

30/11/2008 08:09:44
Where's Guga II with his view on ther licence-fee? He usually says it better than the rest of us!
3

aljok.23,

the world 30/11/2008 09:16:03
we should have a national vote
4

eric,

30/11/2008 10:07:32
Dont matter what we think .queeny bags will have last say.Scotland should ditch it.
5

Axl,

Edinburgh 30/11/2008 10:25:28
As long as the Beeb are able to provide world-class Formula One coverage next year with all the races broadcast in High Definition, I'm quite happy to pay the £139.50 license fee!


6

jkr,

Lochwinnoch Greater Glasgow 30/11/2008 12:21:47
I like shows like the 'Weakest Link' but do not think licencepayers money should be used to pay out winnings. Programmes like this should be sponsored.
7

Adopado,

30/11/2008 17:08:50
139.50 is about 38p per day. A daily newspaper or evening paper costs what? A weekend Sunday or Saturday paper costs what? From the BBC we get several TV channels without ads, umpteen radio channels without ads, a superb Web site, iPlayer and live streaming ... Sure some things could be done differently and better but overall it seems pretty damned good value to me!
8

Axl,

Edinburgh 30/11/2008 19:57:04
#7

I agree.

The BBC provides a superb service to the whole of the UK using a variety of media applications.

How many of us watch Wimbledon?, the snooker world championships?, strictly come dancing? (not me anyway!), The FA Cup, Eastenders?, News 24?, etc, etc, etc.

As you say, pretty damned good value!




 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.