Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


SNP told 'save schools with class size U-turn'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 February 2009
EDUCATION chiefs and politicians last night urged the SNP Government to help solve the crisis of crumbling schools by ditching their class size pledge.
Following the launch of a campaign by Scotland on Sunday last week, in which we revealed dozens of schoolswith leaking roofs, filthy toilet blocks and condemned facilities, council education officials have revealed one of the key reasons why they can
not upgrade them.

Education chiefs say they face a stark choice between providing new school buildings or meeting the Government target for maximum class sizes. They called on SNP ministers to dump the election promise in favour of better schools.

Scotland on Sunday has been contacted by parents, teachers and MSPs since launching the campaign to improve schools.

Many of them were appalled at the standards in the 77 schools that are declared category D and "economically expired" – meaning it would cost more to repair than it would to start again – and councils have no plans for their refurbishment. Parents also highlighted the appalling condition of more schools ranked as being rated category C, "poor".

Bruce Robertson, director of education for Aberdeenshire – Scotland's worst authority for crumbling schools – said meeting the key pledge of class size target of 18 for primary one to three classes was costing £22m, detracting from funds to repair the 45 substandard primary schools in the area.

He told a teachers' publication: "This is placing us in acute difficulties. We need to build new roofs over new heads and this cannot be done as well as reducing class sizes."

Steven Purcell, leader of Glasgow council, told Scotland on Sunday: "Education departments across the country are facing a difficult choice: do we put in money to reduce class sizes or do we tackle the crumbling estate that is left?"

Ken MacIntosh, Labour spokesman for education, said: "The school environment for every pupil is more important than an arbitrary campaign to get class sizes down to 18."





The full article contains 331 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 February 2009 6:45 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Teaching
 
1

webwise,

Scotland 07/02/2009 22:23:33
Goodness, despite labour performing one of the most humiliating 'U' turns ever, after their budget calamity, we have yet to see any Scottish paper headline it as such.

However, amazingly The SOS have managed to create a headline with 'SNP' and 'U' turn in it, despite no 'U' turn having taken place.

It's so blatant as to be funny.
2

,

08/02/2009 02:09:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Bridged and tunnelled,

08/02/2009 11:07:03
Vincent - you're right on one point, you've got an argument on the second, but you're wrong about the third. In primary 4 and above big schools will collapse 3 classes into two. In smaller schools there will be more composite classes. In some local authorities, placing requests further up the school will be turned down.

Whatever happens, classes won't be as low as 18 above Primary 3, other than in small schools in rural areas.
4

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 08/02/2009 19:30:37
Interesting to note the construction of this article. It seems to follow a Labour path.

The thing that gets me is that all councils are still able to apply for funding for new-build under the previous administration's PFI/PPP scheme.

The fact that they sit there wringing their hands in anguish is beyond me. And bringing Purcell into the article is the giveaway.

So predictable.

New-build to accommodate smaller class sizes is a simple procedure at the architectural stage. It is the councils who are afraid to borrow at PFI rates of repayment, or are deliberately making a political issue of the lack of SFT funding who are at cause here and the Johnston Press is committed to furthering the effect.
5

,

09/02/2009 06:52:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

,

14/06/2009 10:29:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.