Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Crombie's future now a soap opera, says SL chairman

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 February 2008
GERRY Grimstone, the chairman of Standard Life, says the continuing speculation over the future of chief executive Sandy Crombie has become "a soap opera" and that he has the full support of the board.
Crombie's position was again thrown into doubt after the departure last week of UK life and pensions boss Trevor Matthews, which appeared to leave the board weakened and the company vulnerable to takeover.

Speaking about the speculation over Cromb
ie's future, Grimstone said: "It has become a soap opera. He is 58 and doing a good job."

Critics say the company is drifting and that Crombie has overseen a muddled strategy, including a switch from organic growth to attempting a £5bn acquisition. But the chairman said: "The process of moving from a mutual to a plc takes time. It is like a privatisation."

He also refuted claims that the Standard Life board was split over the bid for Resolution Life and that Matthews, who is to become chief executive of Friends Provident, opposed the offer. Matthews was "positively enthusiastic about it" and presented the strategy on why the company should try to acquire it, he said.

Grimstone's comments, in an interview with Scotland on Sunday, lay to rest constant speculation that Matthews disagreed with the bid and that disagreements over strategy may have been a factor in his decision to leave.

"The board was completely unanimous on Resolution," said Grimstone. "We would be barmy to have gone into it if the bloke who was going to run it was not enthusiastic."

Matthews' appointment at Friends Provident emerged just before it announced the results of a strategic review that left the City unimpressed. The company will sell some assets, including its 52% stake in F&C Asset Management.

But JC Flowers, the US private equity firm, has indicated it may bid for the company and there was speculation that Matthews will never step into the role. He is on six months' gardening leave until July 29. It is thought he may have negotiated a two-year contract, ensuring a potential £2m pay-off on top of an estimated £6m he has earned from his four years at Standard Life.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 February 2008 2:58 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Standard Life
 
1

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 03/02/2008 10:47:50
Perhaps the Chairman needs to go to?

How about a new Board?
2

Active Sassenach,

Luton, England 03/02/2008 13:27:26
http://business.scotsman.com/business/Endowment-holders-must-prepare-for.3738728.jp

The above link to a page elsewhere in this newspaper is the reason why nobody has any confidence in Sandy Crombie. It is not the confidence of the Board he needs. It is the confidence of shareholders. Their lack of confidence reflects the poor value Standard Life now delivers to its policyholders.

Jim Black excuses the low policy values to the switch out of equities in 2004. That followed the commission of criminal offences under S345-348 FSMA 2000 for which nobody has ever been brought to justice. When those offences were committed the Senior Independent Director of Standard Life was also a non-executive director of the FSA. Standard Life has yet to disclose how that conflict of interest was managed.

The actual reason the switch out of equities was necessary is because Sandy Crombie ran away from a fight with David Stonebanks to whom the destruction of Standard Life is equally attributable.
3

Glasgow Expat,

Desert 03/02/2008 14:43:29
You are right number 2 and in my opinion what went on in 2003/04 in SL was no different from Leeson, LTCM and the SocGen guy. In each case there are big losses because of being badly positioned in the market and in each case they ignore the growing losses due to either denial, ego (they are right and the market is wrong) or a combination of both. SL was overweight equities all the way down in a raging bear market. The FSA was just acting as a risk manager should and stopping them out. I wonder if they will have an underweight equities view in the coming mega bear market.
4

,

03/02/2008 19:17:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 07/02/2008 21:34:34
The only bit of 'soap' I can remember is a splash when 'Dirty Den' fell in the canal. Apparently that wasn't the end of him, like many of the life company executives he turned up on another sinking ship when the money ran out.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.