Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


World Cup row resolved as SPL agree to delay start of season by a week

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 February 2009
AGREEMENT was finally reached yesterday between the Scottish Football Association and the Scottish Premier League that will result in the start of next season's SPL being delayed by one week until August 15 in order to supply Scotland manager George Burley with six days' preparation for the country's World Cup qualifier in Norway on August 12.
And the horse-trading that has brought about this resolution means that the SFA have given the SPL the go-ahead to schedule league matches for the Scottish Cup semi-final weekend of April 11/12. However, unless there is Scottish involvement in Europe
an club competition quarter-finals – which would raise the possibility of no free midweeks between April 14 and the end of the league season on May 8 – the SFA expect that the cup semi-finals will revert to their preferred weekend slots. If that is the case, the understanding of the SFA is that the SPL card would then be played on one of the free midweeks.

Burley believes the SPL's decision could prove decisive in Scotland's bid to qualify for South Africa.

He said: "I'm absolutely delighted that an agreement has been reached. This gives me time to prepare the boys properly for the crucial match in Norway and means that the first game of the season – which is always played at 100 miles an hour – will not now take place a few days before we head to Oslo.

"My thanks to the SPL for finding a solution to this, which I know has not been easy. This gives us a real chance to take the country to the World Cup."

The SPL decided to grant Burley's wish despite being angered by the SFA's negotiating tactics, which included withdrawing a firm commitment to switch the cup semi-finals to midweek.

The SFA will now only move the fixtures if a Scottish team reaches the quarter-finals of a European competition. Should that not happen, it appears they would expect the SPL to squeeze in an additional round of midweek league matches sometime in April next year.

That will not please the SPL, who are extremely concerned about fixture congestion in a season already shortened by next year's World Cup finals. The SPL said in a statement:

"The SFA told us yesterday (Friday) that they would meet our request (for a firm commitment to move the Scottish Cup semi-finals to a midweek]. But, subsequently, this commitment was withdrawn.

"The SPL board… were deeply disappointed at the SFA's unwillingness to provide the commitment sought. But, given the board's wish to meet the Scotland team manager's request for a free weekend on August 8, they decided the season would now start on August 15."



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Shantaram,

15/02/2009 08:41:58
1 in a row? There's no such thing.

1-0 Celtic with McDonald scoring the goal.

5 points ahead with 13 games to play.

Dave Clark Five - 1964 . . .

Catch us if you can.
2

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 13:25:14
Same old pro Celtic ref! VOH has about 3 hand balls and a total of 8 fouls committed and eventually gets booked for foul on McGregor and Weir gets one as well for nothing. That penalises Rangers and not Celtic. Brown also takes out Davis with no attempt at the ball and escapes a yellow! Talk about obvious to a blind man? Same old Celtic and the ref's always cheating!
3

e-sterka,

15/02/2009 13:31:02
As I can see, each team needs a good coach...
I think we too. What about Mr. Tall? He is a good guy...
4

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 13:39:10
McDonald elbows Bougherra and gets a free kick and then fouls Papac and again no yellow. VOH should be off also ... the ref is a homer as usual!
5

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 13:40:59
These idiot Celtic fans sing who's the mason in the black! Irony is lost on these bhoys of the poor!
6

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 13:47:05
This ar&ehole Crocker on Setanta would make you sick! Is he supposed to be impartial?
7

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 13:53:35
Hartley goes for the repeat broken foot tackle on McCulloch although this time he misses and gets a yellow. Nice little mason eh?
8

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 13:57:16
Blatant penalty not given for McManus on Miller in the box! Not even mentioned as a shout by the impartial mugs on Setanta! Rangers are knocking at the door even in the face of the refereeing adversity!
9

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 14:08:03
Brown should now be off for foul on Ferguson right in front of the biased ref!
10

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 14:10:08
Ferguson gets booked for complaining about a corner that was yet more pro Celtic cheating!
11

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 14:11:15
I would rather chuck it! Shame on you bhoys!
12

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 14:13:29
Hartley gets a well over due smash from McCulloch!
13

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 14:14:15
Nakamura dive and again given by the cheat that is Murray!
14

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 14:16:29
The Celtic fans again have the cheek to boo the masonic ref! Laughable!
15

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 14:18:02
McDonald kicks Naismith and again avoids booking!
16

Fine Wine,

15/02/2009 14:22:03
Another step closer for Rangers and Walter as the title is now in Rangers own hands! A win at Ibrox and a few more droppedpoints by this struggling Celtic side should be enough for the mighty Gers! We really are the people!
17

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 14:44:51
Thanks FW for the real-time commentary.

Take a break now, I reckon you need it :)

Having spent all week predicting a draw, I can express no surprise at the outcome. Both sides will spin a positive result out of this 0-0, as is their right. My own view is that their is a slightly greater onus on the home team in these games, so it's a marginal advantage for Rangers.

To the game itself, I thought that Rangers just shaded it over the ninety minutes, and were certainly the better side in the second half in particular. The referee seemed fairly neutral over the piece, although did become a little card happy towards the end (just why was Naismith booked?).

My heart sank when Fleck was replaced by Miller, who went on to treat us to his obligatory "miss the target by a mile" attempt on goal. I'm afraid that while Walter insists on putting his faith in journeymen like Miller and McCulloch, we'll never move to the next level. Boyd's absence once again betrayed WS's lack of faith in the player when the chips are down, and I reckon that he'll leave in the summer. He might want to consider taking Ferguson with him, because his best days have clearly come and gone.

Anyway, very winnable SC games coming up against Forfar and Hamilton, and straightforward SPL matches against Kilmarnock, Hamilton and Inverness, so onward to glory and, let's hope, a domestic treble.

C'mon the 'Gers.
18

C_M_S,

15/02/2009 14:45:31
You really are blinkered, Fine Whine. The ref was rank rotten for both sides today.

Celtic in total control in the first half without creating anything.Rangers with the upper hand in the second, but their best chance fell to McManus. As my old man used to say, "A draw, nae fitba'".

Still a long way to go and dropped points by both sides should mean it'll go all the way to the last game, more or less.
19

C_M_S,

15/02/2009 15:15:07
BE: why was Naismith booked? For chinning Brown. What I found strange was that Brown was booked at the same time.
20

Bosco Bhoy,

----Donegal---- 15/02/2009 15:21:51
An unbelieveably poor match filled with error after error. For the record i agree with Walter Smith who said on Setanta that Celtic dominated the first half and Rangers were the better team in the second half. IMHO over the 90 minutes RFC shaded it and had more quality to what they were attempting to do than Celtic,although that wouldnt be hard.

Now we have 13 games left and most sensible CFC/RFC fans would agree that their is a high chance of us both dropping points to the wee teams again so for me its hard at the moment to see where the title is heading.

If Celtic were to come out of this slump in form then maybe we can do what we did last year and energise ourself for a big push in the last dozen or so matches but at the moment that seems a big 'if'.

Not much between us at the moment so it could come down to the last game or 2. Probably one of the least skillful 22 players seen on a pitch for a derby match in many a year. Some of the football was mid table Championship stuff.

For me and other Celtic fans i have to ask what does the likes of Hinkel and Naylor think they are doing when they just aimlessly h-u-m-p a ball up a pitch to a guy 5 ft 6.
Can Voh try and look like he is willing to put in a shift and stop giving away so many petty fouls.

Can McDonald please try and get into shape by losing a stone thus allowing him to get back his mobility and his burst of speed over the first 3-5 yards that he had when he was at Motherwell and on a fraction of the wages he now gets for playing CL football.

Better shape up soon or it will be too late.
21

C_M_S,

15/02/2009 16:26:34
#21, BB
I agree JVOH needs to cut the niggling fouls out of his game; he could easily have been booked earlier than he was.

When he did see yellow, though, it was ridiculous. I didn't know stumbling had become a bookable offence. Even McGregor seemed to be telling the ref there was nothing in it.
22

,

15/02/2009 17:00:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

,

15/02/2009 17:16:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 17:57:52
There is a lack of quality, but the economic reality is that neither team is likely to spend the kind of money needed to significantly change that.

For both teams, the main aim is to be the best team in Scotland, and hopefully receive a CL windfall every season as reward for being domestic champions. They will both try to do that while spending as little as possible; Celtic because they don't want to spoil their enviable financial position, and Rangers because, frankly, they've got no meaningful money to spend in any case.

Who has the stronger team is anybody's guess. Celtic at least know that if RFC do turn out to be the better side, they have the leeway to spend a little to turn things around next time. Rangers, unfortunately, have no such luxury, and can only hope that what they already have is good enough, as well as hoping that the current crop of Murray Park youngsters are as talented as is being claimed in some quarters.

Speaking of which, I was pleased with young Fleck's contribution today, as I have been for the last few weeks. People are looking for something special from the lad, but he's only seventeen, and if he can hold a first-team slot at this level without looking out of place, then that in itself, IMO, is a special achievement. After all, the lad can improve season after season for a full decade yet before reaching his peak. He has the potental to be a superstar. How RFC could do with a few more.
25

Bosco Bhoy,

15/02/2009 18:30:27
26 invictager

I am trying my best to offer an impartial view of that Miller chance were he was hacked down a second after getting the shot off. IMHO the ref got it right as you cant give a team the opportunity to score then give them the penalty when the player misses and its important to note that the tackle didnt effect the shot.

Bemused
I accept your point about the financial realities of the SPL that we both have to live with but considering the wages CFC and RFC pay to many of the players on display i do expect better than mid table Championship football we were served up today.
Frankly that was an embaressment to both teams and the SPL.

Remember the football the Arsenal 2nd string packed with teenagers played earlier in the season against Wigan in the League Cup? Its about coaching and confidence and players striving to make themselves the best they can be. Look at young Fleck. One article in the week said he had been attending training 4 to 5 times a week for the last 3 or so odd years and it was obvious in his technique and his ability to retain posession.

It was pure shoite today and forget about the points.
Whoever wins the league this season will hardly worry their CL opposition next season.
26

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 19:13:27
I'm about to settle down to the Milan derby. I'm not sure which is the home team, but I don't think that it matters in this case :)

Wonder if it can live up to the excitement and skill of the OF game?!
27

,

15/02/2009 20:08:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

,

15/02/2009 20:18:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
29

,

15/02/2009 20:42:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 21:22:17
I don't think that measuring Fleck's impact in his first few games compared to McStay 25 years ago is in any way relevant. Bear in mind that Fleck started this season as a 16 year-old, so to force his way into the first team at Rangers while there's an SPL title to be won and lost is a tremendous feat at his age, and the future can be nothing but stellar as long as he continues to progress.

Can't understand the thrust of post #40 regarding Boyd. WS has clearly made Kris a normal first choice throughout the season, and he has repaid him by being far and away Scotland's top scorer. However, WS has never seen Boyd as the answer when he employs a "one up front" formation, which he did today, so I don't see where there is any feud.

My own feeling is that 0-0 was a decent result for Rangers today, and WS will feel justified in the line-up he selected. Restricting Celtic to one point from two OF games at CP is a decent achievement, and will probably be seen as significant if RFC push on and claim the title from here.
31

,

15/02/2009 22:09:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

,

15/02/2009 22:16:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 22:21:47
Can't see what a seventeen year-old making his OF debut would have to be "sorrowful" about, personally.

I imagine he's buzzing, and if he happens to pop out for a soft drink or two then he's earned it.

Bougherra's "green-and-white sweatband"?

Why would anybody object to that?
34

,

15/02/2009 22:32:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
35

Shape to Shoot,

15/02/2009 22:34:01
I've only seen the first half because for some reason the second half isn't available on channel 67.

McDonald missed a sitter and he should have put us ahead ...had that happened, we'd have seen a different game entirely. A very bad miss from the wee man...it looked easier to score.

Lafferty in the first half did nothing. Fleck did nothing...in fact I don't think rangers put us under any pressure at all in the first 45 preferring instead to seek to contain Celtic on the edge of their final third, which they did fairly well.
But coming forward, they were simply dreadful and generally lost the ball whenever it came into our half, often, straight away.

I think Smith cow-towed to media / rearrangerz fan pressure by fielding Fleck. He sank without a trace but the laptoployal will doubtless be kind to him.

I can't say I'm that bothered that I've been unable to watch the second half ...much huffing and puffing by Celtic with les gerz almost stealing it but for a fine stop by Artur , or so I'm told.

We remain two points clear and should now be looking to start butying teams and going on a run of wins.
36

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 22:36:24
What a load of nonsense.

I doubt that the item in question will be an issue for anybody, and only the saddest individuals would even attempt to bring it up.

The fans will be far more concerened with how the player actually performed, which was excellently, as it happens.
37

,

15/02/2009 22:38:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 22:40:37
"much huffing and puffing by Celtic with les gerz almost stealing it but for a fine stop by Artur , or so I'm told."

You need to be more choosy about who tells you these things, Patrick.

Or try watching it, and seeing for yourself that RFC were well on top and playing the better football.
39

Shape to Shoot,

15/02/2009 22:47:55
RFC well on top ?

Not having seen the second half I'm in no position to challenge your opinion, but I'd be surprised if many Celtic fanz would go along with that.

Certainly in the first half rangers looked as though they wouldn't score a goal in a month...they were absolutely appalling coming forward...the sight of Laugherty knocking the ball on to an imaginary strike partner only for the ball to trickle through to the arms of Artur Boruc was becoming painfully familiar, even to a Celtic fan....it must have been bloody awful for a rangers fan to watch.
40

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 22:49:50
As you say, Patrick, you didn't see the second half.

As WGS himself said at the end, Celtic didn't deserve anything more than a draw.
41

,

15/02/2009 22:51:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
42

Shape to Shoot,

15/02/2009 22:54:02
Bemused I haven't said that Celtic ought to have won even on the strength of what happened in the first half.

We had the only chance in the first 45, an absolute sitter which mcdonald should have buried. The only moment of any significance in the second half, as I'm told, was a fantastic save from boruc, so , actually, on balance a draw seems to have been about right.
43

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 22:55:04
"Rearrangerz fanz want answered"

"put through purgatory"

Who do you speak for? I'm a RFC supporter and you don't speak for me. We've come out of the window with our squad intact, and today we've gone to CP and eased to a draw, finishing by far the stronger team.

So I'm pleased with how things have turned out.
44

,

15/02/2009 22:59:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

Shape to Shoot,

15/02/2009 23:02:17
Will boydchenko now refuse to to play for rearrangerz until a new manager is appointed ?

Or, given the financial implications, will the cat get his tounge ?

Methinks the latter...the spineless don't bite the hand that feeds them.
46

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 23:04:32
What doubts?

What con?

SDM has given Smith around £30 million to spend in the transfer market. It's clear and obvious that RFC's debt is too high and that the books must be balanced, especially considering the lack of European income this season, so any realistic bids for our best players have to be considered.

Nothing remotely scandalous about that.
47

Shape to Shoot,

15/02/2009 23:07:07
I think it's definitely time for the laptoployal to take down the Fleck bunting, to stop beating the drums and to sober up.
48

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 23:09:58
Patrick

Why is your side so obsessed with trying to belittle RFC individuals?

Idee's tried to single out Boyd, Lafferty, Fleck, Bougherra this evening, and you've tagged along by having a pop at Lafferty, Boyd and now Fleck.

Go worry about your own team's failings and shortcomings. We both know that there's enough of them.
49

Shape to Shoot,

15/02/2009 23:15:41
69

Well, these last two weeks, the laptoployal have gone into overdrive about Fleck on an unprecedented scale ...it really has been relentless hype for a fortnight.

Also , Laugherty has been bigging himself up in the press (foolish young man...we've all got the t shirt I s'pose) and publicly stating that if given the chance against Celtic, he'd show us all what a fantabulous striker he is....

Ahem ....both sank without trace. I think that after a major laptoployal offensive for nigh on two weeeks we're entitled to a snigger or two.
50

,

15/02/2009 23:16:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
51

Daillyman,

15/02/2009 23:19:06
Unable to watch the match today as I was travelling back to Toronto from Chicago.

Reading some of the more sensible posters from both sides and their comments on the match, a draw seems to be the fair result.

As for the usual rubbish/bias comments they are there for all to read.

Looks like the league will go down to the wire again.
52

,

15/02/2009 23:19:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
53

Daillyman,

15/02/2009 23:21:56
75 Idee

I thought he had mentioned he was moving back to the UK.
54

BEMUSED EXILE,

15/02/2009 23:22:38
Patrick

As I've said, Fleck started this season as a 16 year-old. He was playing in his first OF game, and was out of position and up against a seasoned German international (and I think we can both remember the superlatives that you were throwing at Hinkel when e signed a year ago. I reckon that the lad did himself no harm today.

Lafferty had a thankless task up front by himself, and like Fleck, has had very limited first team exposure.
55

Shape to Shoot,

15/02/2009 23:25:31
78

That sounds like a euphamism for the fact that they were both pants.
56

,

15/02/2009 23:30:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
57

Shape to Shoot,

15/02/2009 23:30:12
I think it was a major mistake to start Fleck.
He was nowhere near ready for today's game. Mabey coming on after 60 odd minutes with a fresh pair of legs would have made sense.

But he's far too inexperienced for a match like today's and he isn't as talented as Wayne Rooney...if he showed half the talent of Rooney he'd have been whisked of to the prem during the window.
58

,

15/02/2009 23:33:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
59

,

15/02/2009 23:36:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
60

,

15/02/2009 23:37:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
61

,

15/02/2009 23:39:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
62

,

15/02/2009 23:41:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
63

Shape to Shoot,

15/02/2009 23:41:46
When men thirst in the desert, it is said that suffer mirages ...their fevered minds hallucinate about running streams.

Fleck is a mirage so far as I can see....Rangers have two cups to show for nearly four years off trying, and have been, allegorically, wandering in the desert for much too long.

Fleck is a running stream to parched mouths, but when they reached out to drink today, they grabbed at the dusty sand.
64

,

15/02/2009 23:43:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
65

,

15/02/2009 23:45:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
66

,

15/02/2009 23:47:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
67

,

15/02/2009 23:48:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
68

,

15/02/2009 23:51:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
69

,

15/02/2009 23:54:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
70

,

15/02/2009 23:55:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
71

,

15/02/2009 23:56:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
72

,

16/02/2009 00:02:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
73

,

16/02/2009 00:04:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
74

,

16/02/2009 00:06:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
75

,

16/02/2009 00:06:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
76

,

16/02/2009 00:08:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
77

,

16/02/2009 00:09:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
78

,

16/02/2009 00:17:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
79

,

16/02/2009 00:18:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
80

,

16/02/2009 00:21:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
81

,

16/02/2009 00:22:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
82

,

16/02/2009 00:27:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
83

,

16/02/2009 00:29:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
84

,

16/02/2009 00:30:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
85

,

16/02/2009 00:35:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
86

,

16/02/2009 00:37:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
87

,

16/02/2009 00:41:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
88

,

16/02/2009 00:44:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
89

,

16/02/2009 00:48:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
90

,

16/02/2009 00:51:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
91

,

16/02/2009 00:53:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
92

,

16/02/2009 00:56:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
93

,

16/02/2009 01:00:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
94

,

16/02/2009 01:04:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
95

,

16/02/2009 01:06:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
96

,

16/02/2009 01:11:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
97

,

16/02/2009 01:15:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
98

,

16/02/2009 01:17:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
99

,

16/02/2009 01:27:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
100

,

16/02/2009 01:40:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
101

,

16/02/2009 01:45:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
102

,

16/02/2009 01:46:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
103

,

16/02/2009 01:50:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
104

,

16/02/2009 01:53:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
105

,

16/02/2009 01:54:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
106

Fine Wine,

16/02/2009 08:25:56
So despite the usual Celtic posters claiming that I am talking rubbish it is then pretty much established that Rangers were refused a blatant penalty and Celtic were again aloowed to get away with multiple fouling without a yellow for the 1st half hour. Face it bhoys, the title is heading back to Govan!
107

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 31/05/2009 20:29:01
nice to see this old report,as we all know it was won by rangers
just wish someone would break their strangle hold on scottish football,as both of teams carve up the massive slices of cash for temselves,poach others players,just so they 2 can finish 1st and 2nd
if all clubs had a level playing field cash wise wonder where this 2 would truelly be
if one of them was going to be relegated,the spl would declare no relegation this season,thus depriving a first div team entry to spl ,spoilt and brats come to mind

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.