Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Nick Clegg: Scotland needs to dare to be different

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 September 2009
It's the Liberal Democrats who have the record, the strength and the vision to change politics for good
THIS is a time of huge challenges for Scotland, and for Britain as a whole. The economy, rising unemployment, the threat of climate change and still a society that is too unfair and too unequal. It is time for a fresh start in Britain; time to turn a
way from the old mistakes of the past and try a different approach. The same old swinging pendulum of red-blue, blue-red politics in Westminster has been allowed to fail for far too long.

Labour's time is up. They didn't deliver what they promised, and now they've run out of ideas and out of steam. The Conservatives are just waiting their turn, so arrogant they think they deserve to be in power without even telling us what they stand for. And the SNP is irrelevant in UK politics – they aren't interested in getting a better deal for Scotland at Westminster, only in destructive politics to break up the UK. It's the Liberal Democrats who have the record, the strength and the vision to change politics for good, shifting power back to where it belongs – with the people.

It's liberals who invented the state pension and the NHS, liberals who were first to campaign to protect the environment and liberals who first put concern for human rights into our foreign affairs. The Liberal Democrats are a pioneering party – the party of Charles Kennedy and Ming Campbell, who stood up against jeers and derision to campaign against the illegal invasion of Iraq. We led calls for a Scottish Parliament while Labour and the Nationalists stalled, pushing for practical, workable devolution for Scotland. And we've pioneered policies for radical tax reform that would put £700 in the pocket of almost every working man and woman, paid for by taxing the very wealthy and polluters more.

That's what the Liberal Democrat conference is going to be all about this week: setting out why we offer the country a better future because we're different from the old establishment parties, and more ready than we've ever been to lead change in Britain. We are being honest about what we can deliver and what we stand for so that people know what they can expect from the Liberal Democrats: a fair society, a new, stable, green economy, and a politics free of corruption in which power is shifted to the people.

The next government has big challenges on its plate. The economic crisis has put huge strain on public finances. Based on the government's own figures we will borrow £175 billion this year alone – that is £5,550 every second. With national debt rocketing it is impossible to be sure what the next government will and will not be able to afford. The only thing that is certain is that when money is tight political parties have to make tough choices about how to spend what little there is. Because balancing the books mustn't be just an accountancy test – this process must be driven by our values or it could destroy our precious public services. We need austerity, yes, but it must be austerity for the purpose of delivering a better society.

That's why at this conference, the Liberal Democrats are adopting a strict spending rule. Where we have identified a need for new spending – to create jobs, improve education or keep people safe, for example – we will identify a cut we can make elsewhere to find the money, so that spending doesn't increase overall.

That's how we can make sure our aspirations for a better future will be deliverable even in these tough times. We can save money by slimming down the bureaucracy, databases and agencies of Labour's centralised command-and-control state, by scrapping the hugely expensive like-for-like replacement of Trident that we no longer need, and by reducing the cost of public sector pensions for the highly paid. By having the courage to take these big, long-term decisions, we will be able to free up resources to protect front-line services, and invest in improvements like extra police or creating new green jobs.

Our first priority has got to be a new sustainable economy. We want to put Britain back to work and fight climate change by investing in green economic growth. By focusing growth on renewable energy, affordable homes and green infrastructure we could create thousands of new jobs. Plus we need a totally new approach to banking. A crucial part of that is splitting up high-risk casino banking from high street lending and current accounts – to make sure ordinary people's savings aren't put at risk. As we re-privatise the banks, we need to break them up, creating a diverse, competitive banking industry that has a much bigger place for small, local and regional banks with their roots in the communities they serve. As part of this process, I believe we could and should try to give the Bank of Scotland back its independence rather than letting it be permanently lost in the leviathan of the Lloyds Banking Group.

Under the Liberal Democrats, Scotland would be a different, better place. We'd have a fair society, a stronger economy and a different political system where everyone's voice counted. So if you want things to be different, really different, then choose the party that is different – the Liberal Democrats. There is hope for a different future, a different way of doing things in Britain, if we're brave enough to make a fresh start.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 September 2009 9:10 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: SOS News columnists
 
1

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 13/09/2009 00:22:36
-- It's the Liberal Democrats who have the record, the strength and the vision to change politics for good.

From a 100 years in opposition moribund isn't the word.

Monetary reform is the key aspect of their federal agenda. But they haven't looked at it.

They've showed no expertise in local government and blown the chance to do something in Holyrood. Extinction is the kindest measure for the Libdems.
2

Bolivarian Scot,

UK 13/09/2009 02:03:58
Nick Clegg rushed to sink the boot into the Scottish government over the release of al-Megrahi. He could have "dared to be different" by checking out the facts of the case against the Libyan. The rightwing Economist magazine - no fans of the al-Megrahi decision - this week published a letter from Jean and Barrie Berkley of Hexham, whose son Alistair died on Pan Am flight 103. The key passage is perhaps the following:-

"Members of the group have varying views about the guilt or innocence of Mr Megrahi, which colour their reaction to his release on compassionate grounds. Some think that he is innocent. Others, including ourselves, believe that we are not in a position to know whether he was involved in some way or not, since much of the evidence at the trial was circumstantial and unconvincing to many, including an official UN observer and a prominent academic who is an authority on Scottish law. It is also a fact that in 2007 the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, after considering the matter for more than three years, concluded that there were six grounds for an appeal against the verdict in Mr Megrahi’s trial."

Read the whole letter at http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14400737
3

Bolivarian Scot,

UK 13/09/2009 02:21:25
A few more comments.....

"It was liberals who invented the state pension and the NHS". Well, up to a point. Bismarck beat Lloyd George by about 30 years, and Beveridge wrote his report but it was the Labour Party that delivered, and which has pumped huge amounts of cash into healthcare these last 12 years. One can of course argue whether that money was wisely spent - and indeed I would echo those arguments - but nobody can deny that the spending happened, and that at least some of it was well-intentioned.

Regarding the state pension - is it official LibDem policy to reinstate the link with average earnings, as maintained by "red-blue, blue-red" politics until Mrs T broke the post-war consensus?

One final word on Mr Clegg. If the LibDems had any commonsense, they'd have made Vince Cable their leader, solely on the strength of his performances during the "credit crunch", rather than an untested youngster who would, in all likelihood, have been overwhelmed by the complexity of rapidly-changing events.

http://alexandermilne.co.uk/articles/interesting-letter-on-the-lockerbie-bombing/
4

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 13/09/2009 07:30:46
The SNP was created by Scots for Scotland's independence. It has two main current roles. 1) We're trying to govern Scotland better, within the limits of the devolution settlement. The opposition parties do their d'mnest to thwart this and engage in a general bickering rather than constructive criticism. 2) We promote Independence. We listen to people, from the individual point of view, or from professional organisations which are a vital component of representative democracy. We consider things on their merits and don't intend to needlessly break up what's organised on a UK basis.

Nick Clegg wants the London Liberals to IMPOSE a new sort of government on Scotland. This is not government of the people, by the people for the people.
5

Group Captain Lionel Mandrake,

13/09/2009 10:19:56
4

"1) We're trying to govern Scotland better, within the limits of the devolution settlement."

Translation: we put things in our manifesto like LIT and SFT which are illegal and unworkable under the existing framework, either because we are stupid or liars.


"2) We promote Independence. ... We ... don't intend to needlessly break up what's organised on a UK basis."

See? A contradiction so blatant it can only be the product of delusion. Either that, or a lie.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.