Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 12th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Scott Hastings: Unlucky Parks must be given time out if Scotland are to move forward



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 March 2008
YESTERDAY'S match in Rome was all about whether Scotland were going to play to win or whether they were going to play not to lose, and in the end it was a mixed bag of a performance. Ultimately, however, it was the errors by the players which resulted in the defeat.
It has to be one of the most frustrating losses by Scotland in recent times, and unfortunately that has to be linked to the performance of Dan Parks who I know will have been bitterly disappointed by his own display. He's thick-skinned and can take t
he criticism, but he and other players will have to realise that when you put on a Scottish jersey, you have to play at the highest level with some consistency or you cannot continue to be in the team.

He played extremely well for Glasgow and in last year's World Cup and he has not had the best of luck, but he clearly has not had a good tournament despite doing some fine work at times. One or two of his kicks yesterday were good but overall he did not play well at all. To allow Scotland to move on, he must be given time out.

Yet we cannot put the blame on one player. It was always going to be a tight game and it was always going to turn on mistakes. Unfortunately Scotland's errors came back to haunt them.

The opening 20 minutes was poor, especially up front in the scrums, and there was little possession for Scotland, but when they did start to take control in the second quarter it resulted in Ally Hogg's superbly worked try which was really the first time that Scotland had developed their phases of possession.

When Scotland were patient and when they did not force the game, they made a real impact on Italy. They started to open up and to offload the ball very well and for a time they looked ready to dominate the game.

There were also some very positive performances from the likes of Ally Strokosch and from Nathan Hines and Scott MacLeod. Obviously the injury to Simon Danielli caused a reshuffle in the backs but I don't think that caused too many problems especially as I believe Simon Webster's best position is out on the wing where he can play both as an out-and-out winger and as someone who can make useful intrusions inside.

Graeme Morrison had a reasonable game as did Ally Hogg, while Mike Blair's sharpness around the base of the ruck was never better displayed than in his try under the posts.

I thought Scotland would go on and win from there but the errors began to creep into their game in the second half and that allowed Italy to make inroads.

There's not much more I can say about Chris Paterson that hasn't already been said in terms of his goal kicking but yesterday I felt that some of his kicking from hand was poor, especially when the Italian pressure came on, and there were other wayward kicks from the likes of Simon Taylor which helped turn the game Italy's way.

I'm no expert on the intricacies of scrummage play but clearly we were under the cosh yesterday, especially in that opening quarter and the front five will be disappointed at their display.

In general, international rugby is about how you cope with the pressure, especially when mistakes are made, and at the moment the Scottish team just doesn't seem to have the confidence to overcome their mistakes and move on. There are some very tough tasks ahead with the two matches in Argentina against a big powerful side similar to the Italians, before the Autumn Test Series. We need to get back to the sort of attitude that was shown against England.





The full article contains 655 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 16/03/2008 08:33:05
Scott, sometimes you had got to drop personal friendships and say a player is not good enough.

Unlucky??? Just continual poor kicking, continual poor decision making - neither of them are 'unlucky' as you say. He wimped out of a crucial tackle and failed to pounce on a ball when required too. You should know as well as anyone that you can't do this even once a game in modern rugby.
2

Jack Barr,

16/03/2008 11:24:06
So according to Scott Hastings, 3 or 4 good kicks from a professional fly half is what Scotland is looking for. I go to work each day, make 3 or 4 good decisions for my company but also make real lousy ones which loses my company money, frustrates my fellow workers and has the competition laugh at my incompetence. Would i still be in a job - not freekin likely.
This guy's profession is a stand-off, yet Hastings states we should be thankful for 2 or 3 good kicks. The same player was voted best Scottish player in 2007 by his fellow international. Is the paying public missing something here that current and past Scottish internationals see in Parks?

3

Border Terrier,

terra firma 16/03/2008 12:25:02
Defends Dan Parks and criticises Chris Paterson. Unbelievable...
4

windturbiner,

gatwick 16/03/2008 12:44:58
Ive personally met this guy hastings, i mentioned a injury i got (which he had received in the past), he didnt show any compassion or inspiration for me to continue to play in rugby...once a idiot, always a idiot!
5

Sergeant_Truffles,

Falkirk 16/03/2008 12:49:49
Dan Parks is certainly not among the top stand offs in world rugby and never will be, but I've seen him play a lot better. At the moment he just looks like a player seriously short on confidence. And little wonder. The criticism of him during this 6N championship (and others) has been nothing short of hysterical.

There are inherent problems within Scottish Rugby and the way our players play the game. Parks may not have the all-round game needed for him to compete at this level, but he is not the only one, and to suggest that dropping him is the sole solution to Scotland's problems is at best simplistic, and at worst idiotic.
6

windturbiner,

gatwick 16/03/2008 13:11:14
what's unlucky?..its a continual mess! unlucky comes once!
3 Mins - Parks throws to Italy for interception
5 Mins - Parks not pouncing on ball clearly this almost allows Italy a try
10 mins - Park misses touch by long way
11 mins - Parks throws another interception, almost try but Italy get 5 metre scrum from which get penalty try
13 mins - Park overkicks by 20 metres
16 - Parks makes dreadful pass throws away possesion again
25 - Parks throws to stationary forward when attacking options available
29 - Parks knocks on, not spotted
30 - Parks kicks well???????
34 - Parks poor field cross kick gives away possesion

44 - Parks 10 yards too long with kick
48 - Parks missed tackle, Andy Nicol scathing about weakness of it, leading to Italy penalty
50 - Parks clears to midst Itay backs losing 30 yards
57 - Parks 1st break forward, but spills

59 - Parks gives a 3rd interception when we were about to score and ITALY get try. Hadden still not taking him off!! 17 - 17 , could been so different without Parks

62 - Parks throws forward again
76 - Parks wastes great oppotunity, all men left, throws to only man on right
7

parks is colin nish,

cape town 16/03/2008 14:12:42
why is scott hastings writing in this paper,
how can he defend the worst 10 ever to play for scotland. He was a fantastic player(hastings) but come on if you want to write, get off the fence and stick the knife in when it is needed,
I have read the article 3 times as I cant believe it.
'you can't blame one player' WHAT! if your number 10 throws two interceptions and countless other mistakes you can.

sad to see a top ex-player lose credibility through writing this rubbish.
8

windturbiner,

gatwick 16/03/2008 15:08:01
re number 7 comment...maybe it was someone pretending to be mr hastings :)
great player he was but no good as a human being (ive met him)
9

windturbiner,

gatwick 16/03/2008 15:08:32
re my comments, maybe this will be his last write :)
10

Francis,

16/03/2008 18:16:39
And I thought he showed guts when he recorded this little gem in the SOS of 17 February!

"Frank has had me in for a chat regarding my media stuff and he's asked me not to be too harsh of Dan Parks.At the end of the day I played for Scotland and I took the flack that came with it."

I wonder what's happened since then?
11

parks is colin nish,

cape town 16/03/2008 18:31:50
just went back and re read that article,
unbelievable on 2 counts
1 if hastings fancies himself as a journo he should of told hadden to stick it where's there's no sunshine and said he will right the truth whether it hurts or not.(which he hasn't)
2 what is FH up to trying to defend a guy who has 43 caps as if he was a 17year old rookie
The game is up for parks. get yourself on the next flight back to sydney with our money in your pension fund and play for a junior grade team which is and always was your level
12

stevross,

liverpool 16/03/2008 20:50:21
I dont believe it is just Dan Parks (although I do think he is a particularly poor rugby footballer). Frankie-boy Hadden has to take some of the responsibility for persisting with this man and others who have performed badly throughout the tournament. Parks and Hadden must go!!!
13

EDINBURGH'S FINEST,

MURRAYFIELD 16/03/2008 21:08:36
SCOTT - ABSOLUTE RUBBISH
PARKS MUST NEVER PLAY FOR SCOTLAND AGAIN AND HADDEN MUST NEVER COACH SCOTLAND AGAIN
14

Jammer,

London 17/03/2008 15:04:45
I have suffered watching Dan Parks for too long and am compelled to write here for the first time. He may be lacking confidence but that is because he knows he is no internationalist; he should never have played for Scotland; should be dropped with immediate effect and sent homewards. This guy wouldn't get a look in a Premiership side, let alone any of the southern hemisphere teams - he is spent, has one skill (alledgedly kicking from hand - although I have yet to see it) and is a no-body - the Aussies like the rest of the rugby world are laughing at us. For someone who has followed the Scots all round the world, it is overdue that we the supporters are compensated in some form.....pick a Scotsman for a start....pick a young one if no-one else....just dont ever, ever pick this clown Parks again.....please.....in fact pick old John Rutherford - he's probably fitter and tougher than Parks even today.

As for Hastings - where do I start....?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.