Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


New fingerprint agency 'shambolic'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 February 2008
REFORM of police forensic services in the wake of the Shirley McKie fingerprint scandal has been branded a "shambolic" failure by staff.
A damning survey of employees at the Scottish Police Services Authority (SPSA), carried out eight months after it was set up, uncovered a wholesale lack of trust in the organisation, with staff declaring it was "directionless" and "lacking in any firm leadership".

The conclusions are a severe embarrassment for the previous Labour administration, which claimed the creation of the SPSA would deal with all the major failings revealed by the McKie case, in which a female detective was wrongly placed at a murder scene by fingerprint experts.

As well as taking on responsibility for all fingerprint and forensic work in Scotland, the SPSA also runs the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency (SCDEA), which tackles many of the country's biggest criminals.

The report on the SPSA includes the views of forensic staff in Edinburgh following a meeting with senior management before Christmas.

One forensic expert declared: "I've come to the conclusion that SPSA is as directionless as it was on day one and is lacking in any firm leadership at the top."

Another added: "Overall, I came out of the meeting with less faith in the SPSA executive than I had before I went in. I got the impression that the upper echelons of the SPSA are a shambolic mess."

A third said: "How can anyone trust anything that comes from anyone in the 'Executive'. No trust whatsoever."

"I no longer trust the SPSA at all," another member of staff said.

A staff survey, conducted last October, and also obtained by this newspaper, found a wholesale lack of trust in the new organisation. A total of 71% of staff said they did not feel informed about decisions, 70% said they were not positive about its future, while 72% said that they did not understand their role.

The report concluded: "There is a perceived lack of direction from management in terms of the future projects, structures and roles. Perceptions exist that management are too focused on saving money and not recognising the skills within their teams.

"Concerns have been highlighted in the general culture and management style within the Fingerprints discipline."

The fresh revelations come with attention soon to return to Scotland's forensic services. Ministers are expected to announce a judicial inquiry into the McKie affair within the next few weeks.

Shirley McKie, a former police detective, was wrongly accused of having left her fingerprints at a crime scene 10 years ago by experts at the Scottish Criminal Records Office (SCRO), now part of the SPSA.

McKie was then prosecuted over the offence and found not guilty. After the debacle, a police report into the affair concluded that the SCRO had attempted to cover up their mistakes. She was awarded £750,000 in compensation.

Pressure for a full judicial inquiry was led by senior legal figures such as former Lord Advocate Lord McCluskey and senior QCs who warned that the scandal had left the reputation of Scotland's judicial system in tatters.

Last night, McKie's father, Iain McKie, said: "We were told time and time again that the SPSA would be a model for the rest of the world and would lay all the problems of the past to rest. Now we see that the same problems remain and you have to ask how can you trust the evidence that they come up with when this is how they feel about their own organisation?

"The staff are clearly far from happy about the way their organisation is being run. I thought it would get better after the old days but now we find it is not the case."

A spokeswoman for the SPSA said: "Like any responsible employer, we are keen to consult with our staff to better understand their needs and concerns. This year has been a time of significant change for our organisation, bringing five separate policing businesses together and a sense of anxiety and frustration from some staff is to be expected. We are committed to ensuring our staff are given many opportunities to feed back and this is something that our executive team is engaged in across each of our business areas.

"We have already undertaken a series of actions to address the issues raised and this will remain one of our key priorities over the coming months".


The full article contains 736 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

,

10/02/2008 00:29:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Peter Cherbi,

Edinburgh 10/02/2008 02:18:20
Iain McKie is correct - how can evidence be trusted when there are such problems with the SPSA.I thought all the problems with the SCRO were to be 'put to bed' but now we have 'more of the same' .. why is that ?

Over to John Swinney (sorry I mean Kenny MacAskill) to save the day for justice to be done !
3

2Right,

On Location 10/02/2008 03:20:33
Colin
I see no lie from Alex Neil and Mike Russell about any enquiry, Far from it they are the ones who pushed for the enquiry which i am told will be announced in the next few weeks.
Following from the McKie forum i think they are in the final stages and trying to sort dates for the enquiry, there is nothing to suggest it wont take place.
Peter to follow on from you and Iain McKie's comments.
Until such time as an open debate there will be no trust in any forensic experts from Scotland.
I hear Fiona McBride (Disgraced SCRO Expert) Has Been appointed Editor of "Fingerprint Whorld" the official organ of The Fingerprint Socity "What a sham"
I also hear the Americans are not too happy about it and are threatening to Boycot it.
4

GMCD,

dndy 10/02/2008 14:31:15
Should get Mr McKie in to run it...he seems to know all the answers..
5

A Scott,

Glasgow 10/02/2008 15:25:34
#1 Colin R.What a complete load of rubbish .The real victims here are the 4 INNOCENT Fingerprint Officers hounded by Mckie senior and a BBC and media coverage which was biased and disgusting .And that diddys like you would beleive....shameful.
"Joiners dont murder for £30" so if it was £31 they would murder for that????.Wit planet do you live on.
So everybody except Mckie has lied......Nae chance of a sympathetic jury?? Wit a diddy you are.
I bet you dont even know the name of the old lady who wis murdered ???................IDIOT
6

,

10/02/2008 18:57:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

,

10/02/2008 20:20:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

An Beal Bacht,

11/02/2008 06:07:19
Elish Angiolini - what a chancer.
9

kamiddler,

Glasgow 11/02/2008 09:44:41
Hopefully a Judicial Inquiry will get to the bottom of this once and for all. Anyone who watched the fingerprint expert evidence sessions to the Scottish Parliament would have seen that it is still far from clear whether it was Shirley McKie's print or not. Personally, I was persuaded by the SCRO people and the 5 or 6 independent fingerprint experts from elsewhere in the UK who were adamant that it was.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.