Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


BAE boss attacks SE and Executive for 'ignoring' engineering and defence

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 August 2006
VIC Emery, the boss of the Govan and Scotstoun shipyards, has accused Scottish Enterprise and the Executive of giving the defence and engineering industries the cold shoulder.
Emery, managing director of BAE Naval Ships, which employs more than 3,000 engineers and craftsmen in Glasgow, said defence and engineering should be included among the key industries which SE has pledged to support.

He said: "One of the big issu
es for us is that under the new list of key industries, engineering is not included. Engineering has lost a bit of visibility. The message to Jack Perry is that he needs to support us because we are one of the foundations of the economy round here."

SE's national priority industries were identified in June as life sciences, energy, financial services, electronic markets, food and drink, and tourism.

Shipbuilding and aerospace were classified as "regional industries" which are locally important but "unlikely to really drive economic growth for Scotland as a whole". Advanced engineering is classified as a niche where expertise can be transferred between sectors.

Emery, who is a board member of Scottish Enterprise Glasgow, said: "What we need is a recognition of the contribution we make to the economy in Scotland as well as the rest of the UK."

Industry groups last night backed Emery's stance.

Peter Hughes, the chief executive of Scottish Engineering, said: "Politicians want to support what they deem to be sexy industries, such as biotechnology. They can be very shortsighted.

"The danger is that more conventional industries do not get the recognition that they need."

But he added that the Executive had helped the industry behind the scenes with the new Scottish Manufacturing Advisory Service.

A spokesman for the Society of British Aerospace Companies in Scotland said: "What the aerospace, defence and naval sector wishes to see from the Scottish Executive is twofold: recognition and support commensurate with its contribution to the Scottish economy, a contribution of £2.1bn sales in 2005 alone.

"While not being recognised for its full contribution, the sector does invest significant amounts in research and development, is highly knowledge-intensive and is a global industry at the leading edge of technological innovation."

A spokeswoman for Scottish Enterprise said: "Advanced engineering has been identified, along with enabling technologies, as a key area where Scotland has strengths that cut across a number of industries. For example, energy, construction and aerospace.

"We consulted over 300 organisations, industry bodies and companies as part of our industry review and the strong feedback was that there were real growth opportunities where there was convergence across sectors."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 August 2006 12:35 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: BAE Systems , Shipbuilding
 
1

The Strategist,

13/08/2006 00:20:36

Is the same BAe that's been selling as many of its subsidiaries as possible to overseas companies including a couple in Edinburgh to an Italian aerospace outfit? And is it the same BAe that's selling off its Airbus business probably to the Germans? Is it also the same BAe that's doing it's utmost to sell itself off to merge with a major US defence contractor?

If I'm right and I'm pretty sure I am then although I agree absolutely that both the aerospace and naval shipbuilding industries are important to Scotland I think it might help BAe's case if they had demonstrated they thought so as well.

2

David n' Goliath,

Edinburgh. 13/08/2006 00:34:11

Come the massive oil shortages in the future, there will be no need for air defences because world war four, as Einstein once said, will be fought with sticks and stones.

These companies must make their money in the next thirty years as world war three is fought over control of oil reserves. Once that war is lost. There will be, and can be no winners, no oil left, no flying and no need for air defences.

3

Ronnie,

Midlothian 13/08/2006 07:25:34

I think part of the lack of status that the article stems from ignorance of what engineering is all about. The journalists of this country see engineers as spanner and hammer wielding giants who go to work in boiler suits and who have dirty hands. Nothing could be further from the truth. BAE made nearly 200 engineers redundant from Edinburgh Park in June and most have been snapped up by other employers and industries. So BAE oversaw the loss of some good people and they always said that it was people that was the core of their business. I have had lots of job offers as a safety engineer in the south of England but thus far I have been able to resist these overtures. In one sense the article is right tho. This country doesnt really appreciate the effort the engineers make to the country and what we actually do. For example I was watching the combine harvesters bringing in the harvest. It was engineers who designed and manufacturered the machines to enable this to happen quickly and efficiently. It is mechanics and technicians who keep them working.

4

The Strategist,

13/08/2006 08:55:31

Jim # 2

I agree absolutely but unfortunately the nature of the City doesn't allow companies to undertake strategic thinking of the type needed to ensure we develop the technologies needed to survive without oil and gas. With the exception of wave energy where we have a tenous technological lead virtually every new energy technology is being developed elsewhere in the world.

Ronnie #3 ... How right you are !


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.