Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 20th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Anti-terror police bug Muslim Labour MP



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 February 2008
SCOTLAND Yard's anti-terrorist police secretly bugged a leading Muslim Labour MP during private meetings with one of his constituents, it was claimed last night.
The Ministry of Justice confirmed it was investigating the allegation that Sadiq Khan, who is now a government whip, was recorded by a device hidden in a table while he visited a constituent in prison who is facing extradition for terror-related offe
nces.

It also emerged last night that officers initially had misgivings about bugging a parliamentarian – which is in breach of a government edict banning eavesdropping on politicians – but that they went ahead with the surveillance operation anyway.

Justice Secretary Jack Straw has ordered an immediate inquiry as a leading Muslim MP said that the Islamic community in the UK would be dismayed and in fear as a result of the incident.

According to a newspaper report, the Metropolitan Police's anti-terrorist squad used a hidden electronic listening device to record two conversations that Khan had in 2005 and 2006 with Babar Ahmad, a constituent who is facing deportation to the United States.

The US government has accused Ahmad of running a website that allegedly raised funds for Taliban and Chechen terrorists in the late Nineties. Ahmad faces no charges in Britain, but is wanted in the United States, where his website is registered.

Scotland Yard secretly recorded both his conversations with Khan at the Woodhill prison in Milton Keynes. Ahmad was campaigning against his extradition.

Mohammad Sarwar, the MP for Glasgow Central and the UK's first Muslim parliamentarian, reacted angrily to news of the bugging.

"I am saddened, I am shocked and I am angry. I am deeply dismayed. And the view among many Muslims will be that if the authorities are bugging a senior MP, then who else are they bugging? Muslims feel afraid, marginalised and very nervous, and incidents like this do nothing to help. There needs to be a proper inquiry. It needs to be swift. And it must ensure that nothing like this will happen again."

Sarwar added: "In my view this is very, very wrong, Conversations between an MP, any MP, whether Muslim or any other faith, and a constituent are confidential and they should remain that way."

Khan is a lawyer and a rising star in Gordon Brown's government and has taken a high profile in attempts to help his party win the support of Britain's Muslims. He is also a former chairman of human rights group Liberty, and he once served as a legal adviser to the Muslim Council of Britain.

Khalid Mahmood, MP for Birmingham Perry Barr, said: "I don't think for a minute Sadiq Khan would do anything not in the interests of this country. He is a member of this country, of Parliament and is a whip and what has happened is highly questionable.

"It's very regrettable. If he felt there was an issue of national interest Mr Khan himself would have made police aware. It is the wrong way for police to act."

Thurrock MP Andrew McKinlay said the bugging of MPs by police has been barred since eavesdropping scandals during Harold Wilson's governments.

He said: "It is wholly unacceptable for MPs to be under surveillance."

Khan was reportedly "outraged" over the bugging allegations and said he discussed sensitive personal and legal matters during the recorded meeting. "This is an infringement of a citizen's right to have a private meeting with his MP," he said.

Justice Secretary Jack Straw said he had ordered an immediate internal inquiry. "Though I have no knowledge of the facts in this case, it is completely unacceptable for an interview conducted by an MP on a constituency matter – or on any other issue – to be recorded," he said.

A spokesman for Scotland Yard said it was "not prepared to discuss" the allegations.



The full article contains 642 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 February 2008 12:40 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Secret services
 
1

,

03/02/2008 01:17:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

subrosa,

03/02/2008 02:29:50
Are all the Scotsman's political journalists on a weekend off? They've known, like other journalists, what went on in our Parliament on Friday. Obviously they're too scared to report it.
No wonder the sales are dropping like a stone.
3

2Right,

On Location 03/02/2008 03:21:43
Good for the Goose

See

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=510991&in_page_id=1770
4

An Beal Bacht,

03/02/2008 06:50:26
5. 2Right,

Great link. Scares the shyte oot ae me. Where will this end? Her Majesty's Prison U.K.?
5

donald,

glasgow 03/02/2008 07:40:31
Only a class traitor would join the Lumpen Party.
6

steve 1511,

aberdeen 03/02/2008 07:53:08
your m p voted to allow hundreds of organisations to bug joe public,so i do not see why they believe they should be exempt,we are all aware of the corruption on a grand scale amongst them
7

nell from falkirk,

03/02/2008 08:23:20
They did the same thing to Tam Dalyell during the Belgrano affair.
It's nothing whatsoever to do with "national security", and everything to do with government keeping itself in power, and constantly increasing that power.

Our hard-won liberties are disappearing, and Britain is sliding down the slope towards totalitarianism

#4 Dragonhead, we don't WANT to live under your well-beloved Chinese system of bugging and fear and complete lack of any rights whatsoever thank you. Why don't you just have a quick check that they're not bugging YOU?
8

Paul Mack,

Mandela Towers, Hades, Paisley. 03/02/2008 09:24:21
Classic New Labour spin doctoring. A diversionary tactic worthy of the Mandelson-Cambell axis, circa, 1997.
Stick to to the advice Bernstein and Woodward were given.
'Follow the Money'. Con-way, Wendy et al.
9

madrab,

edinburgh 03/02/2008 09:30:28
Why is this "newspaper" not reporting on the fact that Wendy has been reported to the proculator fiscal?

Were all their journalists in the pub watching rugby yesterday?

Or are the editorial staff still trying to protect her?

You'd all be better off reading the Herald, at least they report on news in Scotland.
10

higginm,

glasgow 03/02/2008 12:29:18
Any MP showing a severe lack of judgement in the kinds of people they visit should be bugged (exactly as any member of the public should be too).

It's irrelevant whether the MP showing the lack of judgement in who they associate with or visit was Muslim, Christian or any other religion.

I'd like to think that other MP who lacks judgement in his associates (Galloway) was also bugged when he visited Sadam Hussain in Iraq.
11

IDB,

Wales 03/02/2008 13:41:15
Mr Khan, according to the they work for you website, is a strong supporter of ID cards, therefore he is in favour of monitoring the population, you and I.

The motto for the detractors is "if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear."

So Mr Khan, have you got something to hide then? ;)
12

El Sabio,

South Africa 03/02/2008 17:12:25
I carry an ID card. So do most of us in South Africa. It does not bother me. So why the fuss?

13

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 03/02/2008 19:24:08
The fuss about the bugging is a small matter. The reason Babar Ahmad is in jail is more worrying. This is another case of the current extradition "agreement" between the UK and the USA.

The activities Babar Ahmad is charged with in the USA took place in the UK. It's similar to the recent case of the Bo'ness couple who are charged in the States for activities that they undertook here and which aren't illegal here. These cases make a mockery of justice. If Babar Ahmad is a terrorist, then charge him here.
14

Hunky Dorey,

Glasgow 03/02/2008 19:45:25
# 1 ........ Its hard to bug someone without a name.Heeee Heeeeee Heeeeee.
15

barbour,

northumberland 03/02/2008 19:50:35
#16
The naivity of folk never cease to amaze me,terrorists operate worldwide and know no borders.Multinational cooperation is a must thats what "extradition" is all about,Ahmed and others of his ilk cannot just move to another country,not commit any crime and be safe from prosecution.Whether one calls it "rendition or extradition"these people should have no safe haven.
16

henrymanchester,

UK 03/02/2008 19:55:00
If its OK to bug us, its OK to bug MP's.

17

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 03/02/2008 20:08:45
#18 barbour

This is the opposite of cooperation. If he has committed a terrorist act in the States, he gets extradited. I have no problems with that. If he has committed terrorist acts in this country, he gets charged here. That's fine too. But if he has committed activities here for which he hasn't been charged, why does he get extradited to the States for those acts?

By your logic, we should have sought extradition for all US citizens who contributed to the IRA, rather than press for them to be charged in the States. (We did neither.)
18

barbour,

northumberland 03/02/2008 21:12:46
#20
Re the IRA subscribers,we could not request extradition because simply the numbers involved!As for the USA seeking charges,again too many first generation "Pads" in the executive.it was only when terrorism was at their door did the yanks cooperate with us.
As an aside,it was interesting to observe how many people attended the so called Bloody Sunday Rememberance March in Glasgow held recently.Once a supporter of terrorists always a supporter of terrorists.
19

An Deasach,

Argyll 03/02/2008 21:38:55
#21
How many terrorists were killed on Bloody Sunday?
I think we should be told.
Or were they just simply Pads (sic) for whom you seem to lack any respect.
20

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 03/02/2008 21:49:36
#21 barbour "we could not request extradition because simply the numbers involved"

And also because they hadn't committed a crime here. But if we had had a law that made it illegal for US citizens to contribute to the IRA, do you think the US would have extradited them? No way. That would have been and still is illegal in the USA, and with good reason. What independent-minded country would let its citizens be ruled by the laws of another country?
21

2Right,

03/02/2008 22:23:18
# 6 An Beal Bacht,

Here is another example of Good For the Goose:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=511210&in_page_id=1770
22

RAV,

Canada 03/02/2008 23:17:04
# 22: To the best of my recall the British Army sufferred no fatalities that day.
23

Turkey Jerky,

04/02/2008 13:42:07
I am not going to argue that this MP should not be bugged. If its fair for us it should be fair for them too.

However, I disagree that MP'sshould not meet members of their constituency because of "suspicions" around them. If he is not proven guilty of a crime yet he remains innocent in my book, regardless of colour, race or creed.

And extradition should only occur if the crime he commited has a complementary law in the extraditing country. Also the crime must have been performed in the country seeking extradition. Also it needs to be shown that a fair trial will take place. If its straight to gitmo, then morally it is repugnant to contemplate sending an innocent man to be tortured.

Ironically if he were from a foreign country he could request asylum and probably actually get it. He's british and so gets less rights.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.