Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


SNP unveils £95m fund to create new jobs

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 April 2009
ALEX Salmond yesterday unveiled a £95m EU funding package that he claimed would create 8,000 jobs and offer another 75,000 people the opportunity to develop skills that will help them find work.
In his speech to the SNP's spring conference, the First Minister claimed the European cash would help Scotland through the recession.

He also said businesses and other groups in Scotland would be invited to make their case on economic matters direct to the Scottish Cabinet. The invitation to make presentations to Cabinet meetings will be aimed at "social partners" such as business and trade union organisations, the voluntary sector and faith groups.

Addressing delegates at the Thistle Hotel in Glasgow, Salmond claimed that the measures he was taking contrasted with the approach of Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government during the economic crisis of the early 1980s. "Many of you remember all too well the damage that was done in the early eighties when an uncaring London government walked away from the effects of the recession," Salmond said.

"They left a generation to struggle with the impact on jobs, on families, on lives. Our Government knows Scotland's got what it takes to equip our people with the skills they need and Scotland's got what it takes to help people hit by redundancy back into work."

A total of 129 projects across Scotland will benefit from £70.2m in new allocations from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and £24.7m in allocations from European Social Fund (ESF).

According to Salmond, the 50 new ERDF projects, focusing on business growth, urban regeneration and rural development, will support the creation of almost 8,000 jobs.

The 79 new ESF projects are expected to support 75,000 people gain or sustain employment opportunities through training.

The ERDF projects include the John Logie Baird project in Glasgow (£2.4m), which will create a national centre for innovation. This Innovation Village in the Merchant City will bring together enterprises and support services, while also assisting the continued regeneration of the area.

Under the Rural Action Plan for Moray (£1.61m), the projects receiving support include Buckie Business Park, Elgin Industrial Site, Moray Learning Centres and a Sustainable Travel Scheme. And the West of Scotland Loan Fund (£6m) will provide loans of up to £50,000 to new and growing businesses. It will invest in businesses that have failed to receive financial support from the private sector, including banks.

The First Minister's invitation to Cabinet was extended to Jim Murphy, the Scottish Secretary. Murphy was invited just one week after the Labour minister wrote to Salmond suggesting he could make a contribution to the Scottish Cabinet.

Last night Murphy said: "I am glad the First Minister has accepted my offer to make a presentation to the Scottish Cabinet. It comes after John Swinney accepted the central importance of the UK Government and the part it will play in getting Scotland through the downturn when he agreed to the joint publication of the Real Help for Scotland document.

"I welcome the recognition this is a time for the UK Government and Scottish Government to work together."

Salmond's speech made several references to the SNP's new slogan 'We've got what it takes', which was launched at the two-day conference, which also saw the SNP unveil the new leaders of their European and Westminster election campaigns. Both will be based in Dundee. The European campaign will be led by Joe Fitzpatrick, MSP for Dundee West, and the Westminster campaign by Stewart Hosie, MP for Dundee East.

Salmond's words failed to impress Labour. Anne McGuire, MP for Stirling, said: "This was a low-key speech from Mr Salmond. It's unsurprising, given his central claim – that Scotland would be better off separated from the rest of the UK – is simply not correct.

"When Scotland's banks failed, the Labour Government's action to protect savings, mortgages and as many jobs as possible shows that we are better off as part of the UK."

The full article contains 671 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

TheUnionisBritish,

19/04/2009 00:19:49
Compared to the murky things seeping from the sleazy Downing Street, Mr Salmond is at least focussed on his job.
2

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 19/04/2009 00:54:49
i hear the gut rumblings from stirling,and thats no the greggs pies either
you would think any cash help to create jobs would be welcomed,but no ,greeting face McGuire moaning that it was low key,compared to her party of sleeze,i know which one gets my vote next time
heeeee haaaaawww mcguire it is not
3

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 19/04/2009 00:55:11
What about the mendacious manifesto promising to scrap the council tax?
4

Los Angeles,

19/04/2009 01:15:50
What about the mendacious manifesto promising to scrap the council tax? (Mercutio)

What about Labour's announcement to rid politics of sleaze?

Well, the SNP can resurrect their policy as soon as finance allows, but Labour will take decades to erase the dirt on their reputation.

5

Still Scaredanaebdy, but a bit quieter.....,

Renfrew 19/04/2009 01:20:45
#4 Mer(brainsneeded)

If you want to talk about lies, try the L(ie)bour Party.

Europe, Iraq, Expenses, pretty much everything.

Big words.....small brain.
6

Still Scaredanaebdy, but a bit quieter.....,

Renfrew 19/04/2009 01:23:57
P.S.

Couldn't get the LIARS (labour) part past the censors of this site. Interseting.
7

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 19/04/2009 01:51:07
#5&6 I don't vote Labour, I voted SNP at the last Holyrood election.
8

Stan Butler,

19/04/2009 06:59:37

Hats off to the European UNION.

And well done to Fat N'Eck Salmond for being able to show the benefit of being part of a UNION.
9

RufusT-Firefly,

19/04/2009 07:08:11
INDEPENDENCE NOW! (But only under the control of the EU).
10

,

19/04/2009 07:55:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

19/04/2009 07:55:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Phil C,

19/04/2009 07:56:54
#4 Mercutio

The SNP manifesto contained some policies which have not been delivered yet. Keep the faith! Some are already making progress and others are waiting on the back burner.

You may have noticed that not enough people voted SNP to give them real power at Holyrood. I can't see many voting Labour next time (though some folk are incredibly stubborn!), or continuing to support our decrepit little union, so hopefully some switchers will boost SNP numbers.

You may have noticed a global financial meltdown which was exacerbated in Scotland by Labour's incompetence. Purse strings tightened. Plans have been rethought. All the time common sense and focus were watchwords.

You may have noticed that a big majority continues to support a fairer system than Council Tax, based on income. This policy is still alive, and will be delivered when more of the people vote for it again.
13

,

19/04/2009 07:57:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 19/04/2009 12:01:57
When Scotland's banks failed, the Labour Government's action to protect savings, mortgages and as many jobs as possible shows that we are better off as part of the UK."
and who in christs name caused it in the foirst place,sour face
aye yer smelly greedy corrupt comrades thats who
15

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 19/04/2009 12:02:35
typo first
16

Stan Butler,

19/04/2009 12:28:07
#17 im brian and so is my wife

'and who in christs name caused it in the foirst place,sour face
aye yer smelly greedy corrupt comrades thats who'



Naw, naw, naw.

It wuz the SNP's fawt.

How?

Cos if it wusnae fur the SNP Fat N'Eck Salmond would still huv been wurkin in a bank and wud huv saved them a'.

He's nae less than a super hero. A super banker.
17

W U Merchant,

Aberdeen 19/04/2009 12:30:28
Glorious Leader Salmond said that the financial crisis was caused by "spivs and speculators" and we must believe him.
18

Me Bungo Pony,

Dundee 19/04/2009 12:53:07
Anne McGuire wrote;
--------------
"When Scotland's banks failed, the Labour Government's action to protect savings, mortgages and as many jobs as possible shows that we are better off as part of the UK."
--------------

Which Scottish Banks would these be then? The RBS? Possibly, though it's only got a largely token HQ in Scotland. Most of the decision making and business is run out of London. HBoS? Hardly, Unionists have rammed the BoS part of the title down our throats as they take the opportunity to undermine Scottish confidence but fail to mention the extremely important and over-riding Halifax part. HBoS had a barely credible mini-HQ in Scotland (with BoS being essentially a marketing logo) but was overwhelmingly based in Yorkshire where ALL the decisions that led to ruin were made.

It amazes me how hypocritical Unionists can be when they claim to be fighting Scotland's corner while deliberately misleading Scots into believing something as deceitful as that to undermine the confidence of it's people. The ONLY truly Scottish financial institution to hit trouble was the Dunfermline and even that was largely orchestrated by the Labour Party keen to undermine confidence further.

The sheer hypocrisy of this claim McGuire makes is further highlighted by the fact Unionists claimed RBS and BoS could only have attained global status as part of the Union but an Independent Scotland could not have bailed them out. To paraphrase E. Crawford in his letter to the Herald .... So the argument is this: Scotland cannot be independent because an independent Scotland could not have bailed out financial institutions that would not have existed under independence. Such is the breathtakingly illogical argument they make.

An Independent Scotland could have supported an organisation the size of RBS and could easily have found the £20bn it took to bail it out. ALL other small W. European countries found far larger sums to help their banks (despite them not being in nearly
19

Me Bungo Pony,

Dundee 19/04/2009 12:54:11
(cont)
An Independent Scotland could have supported an organisation the size of RBS and could easily have found the £20bn it took to bail it out. ALL other small W. European countries found far larger sums to help their banks (despite them not being in nearly as much trouble as the UK's) but again we are led to believe, by Unionists, that Scotland alone is incapable of looking after itself. Shame on them.
20

hoblar,

19/04/2009 14:53:04
Labour indebted UK tax payers for generations with a bail out, boasted about by the obligatory labour last word in the article; the banks have NOT been saved, anbd neither have jobs.

We haven't seen evidence of the two enormous attempts at bank bail outs in England and Scotland come close to working!

Tax payers debt, added on as a wee extra burden among Labour's many many governmental mistakes before they get kicked out of office.

That legacy will alone see Labour in the political wilderness for some time to come, let alone the new corruption or scandal story we see every week!
21

Tartan Viking,

19/04/2009 15:39:41
SNP. With Scotland's interest at heart.
22

Tartan Viking,

19/04/2009 15:41:58
#23. The only evidence we have of the huge bank bail out is that the banks' balance sheets are healthier and the pension funds of the rich bankers are safe, so that rich greedy bankers can retire on rich greedy pensions funded by the taxpayer.
23

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 19/04/2009 19:52:24
So this is the equivalent of the Co-op divvy.

A divvy of a divvy inasmuch as it comes from the EU via the UK.

Oh, these union dividends are so expensive.

I suggest we get get rid of them one at a time.

Let's begin with Westminster.
24

Stan Butler,

19/04/2009 20:52:32
#22 Me Bungo Pony


Which countries?

Which banks?

What sums were involved?
25

hoblar,

19/04/2009 22:26:30
Scotland didn't have 100% control of any bank with the word 'Scotland' in it, the union dividend and global economy took care of that, so it is toxic uk assets being bailed out with our taxes (unsuccessfully as it happens), and the same toxic uk managed assets also made a mess of England's economy.

Of course it is a fact that there are indeed countries with smaller economies than the UK, and countries with bigger economies as well, who have indeed managed to stabilise the financial market without merely borrowing Billions of our taxes in advance.

I know that Norway have used monies from their oil profits to prepare for such a rainy day, and I note that the small minded non aspirational UK government's have had no such means to bolster our economy and help those within the UK with an oil fund.

The boasted about boom alleged by Gordon brown wasn't based on real tangible money or we'd be in better condition wouldn't we?

That difference in and visionless approach to the economy is one major and significant reason not to vote for more of the same, we don't need the type of government that can't cope with the economic challenges that have always faced us.

New Labour have shown only that they can't cope with changing economic conditions and have us in real debt, that is real money as opposed to the toy money of the housing 'boom' and the alleged economic 'boom' that may as well have not happened as much good it does us when the bad times roll.


26

Me Bungo Pony,

Dundee 20/04/2009 19:04:06
#27, Stan Butler

For example Stan, Norway bolstered their banks with £30bn (maybe £40bn) while Sweden laid out £100bn. None of this was to bail out any "ailing" banks they had but to prevent them being sucked into the maelstrom engendered by the UK/US casino banking system. The sums these countries used dwarf what was needed to bail out the only "Scottish" bank (which existed within the UK financial structure) and Sweden doesn't even have any oil. Proof that an Independent Scotland would have easily found the funds to support it's financial institutions .... assuming they would have been as exposed as they were within the UK structure.

There is no reason to believe a Scottish financial institution within an Independent Scotland would have been sucked into the dodgy practices (encouraged by Gordon Brown) used by the London-centric UK institutions. It can easily be argued that Scottish institutions would not have had to be "bailed out" had they existed within an Independent, more "prudent" Scottish environment.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.