Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 29th June 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

SNP plans to swap tick-box culture of government for US-style reform



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 May 2008
ALEX Salmond will pledge to end the culture of "tick-box form-filling" in the Scottish public sector as part of an American-style reform of Government to be unveiled this month.
Instead of measuring their progress by the number of reports filed or initiatives launched, ministers will order civil servants to judge their work against the Government's five "strategic objectives" – to make Scotland wealthier and fairer, smarter,
healthier, safer and stronger, and greener.

The results will then be displayed on an online scorecard where the public will be able to see whether Government policies are helping to improve the country.

If policies such as the plan for 1,000 extra police or cutting school class sizes are not working, the SNP says it will then abandon them, as having failed to achieve the "strategic" goal. The programme is to be called 'Scotland Performs', a title borrowed from the US state of Virginia which has pioneered the scheme.

People can go online to look at "indicators" such as levels of obesity, college graduation or workforce quality. Arrows will show whether the "indicators" are improving, stationary or getting worse.

In Scotland, Salmond has drawn together 45 such "national indicators" which will be publicly measured. They include generating 50% of electricity by renewable sources, reducing the number of public sector bodies by 25% and cutting treatment waiting times for all patients to 18 weeks.

Salmond said: "This is not just about a Government getting plaudits and popularity by launching individual initiatives. It's not just about the SNP proceeding to its constitutional objective of an independent Scotland. It's about changing the nature and style of governance of Scotland so that we measure ourselves by what is actually happening and not by the number of initiatives."

He added: "It's not modern or appropriate or efficient to judge things by the number of initiatives or task forces that you launch or the cash you spend. It's not even efficient to test things by the output – such as the number of papers that are generated or strategies initiated. You have to measure it by outcome, by what happens to the fundamental measurements of how Scotland is performing."

Aides say the programme marks a major change to the way in which the previous Lib-Lab administration ran the country, when a partnership agreement or some 300 objectives were laid out. "The approach was to go and tick each one off as they went along," said an SNP source.

The SNP says it will continue to set national targets – such as the commitment to find an extra 1,000 police officers – but that generally it will "back people to know how to improve things in their own area".

In a briefing to mark his first year in power, Salmond also said that if he failed to secure an independence referendum in this Parliament, he would bring forward plans immediately if he won the 2011 Scottish elections.

He said: "If you care to reflect, in 1997 there was an election in the May and a referendum on a Scottish Parliament held in September 1997… we wouldn't be waiting three years into the next term in office for the referendum."

Salmond also again backed the idea of keeping the Queen as the head of an independent Scotland and said he would oppose holding a referendum on the monarchy post-independence. He said: "We can see no reason for not having the Queen as the head of state. Any Parliament of Scotland can determine any referendum it wants but I don't suggest we should do such a thing."

The First Minister also expanded on his belief that a 'social union' would continue with England following independence. "Independence will mean a new relationship between the countries of these islands. We put it as the United Kingdoms."



The full article contains 647 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 May 2008 7:08 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Scottish National Party
 
1

Angus Ogg,

03/05/2008 20:38:10

Just thinking outside the box.

How about Alex Salmond for Prime Minister ?

There is certainly a vacancy arising shortly as half the marginal Labour MP's in Cabinet sharpen their political knives ready to exorcise the poor incumbent back to Kircaldy.

Alex Salmond is certainly a fine leader, and I can't think of any of the current Labour selection that measure up.

It might even help preserve the Union. No, really, it just might.

Think about it?

Only dyed in the wool Unionists want the current status quo, which isn't an option. Whist, with all due respect, the voters don't seem to be giving their majority for Independence just now.

So one way or another the most likely outcome as mentioned before, is the United States of Britain.

Ergo, as Scotland would be as strong as any American State, and they have great powers, and any American State can produce an American President, then why can't we in Scotland send Alex Salmond down to London to be Prime Minister of the U.S.B.

Just being Devil's Advocate. A bit wicked really, but sometimes it's good to let the imagination wander. I do think Alex Salmond would make a much better Prime Minister than Gordon Brown. Also, I am one of those poor critters who still remembers the Tory Poll Tax, so I just can't bring myself to trust, or tick David Cameron's box !
2

Richardinho,

04/05/2008 00:16:14
Is this another initiative? What targets are set for it?

just joking-or am i?

This sounds on the face of it a good idea. In general we should have less government and less administrators-but saying it and doing it are different things.
3

Senga Jean,

Scotland 04/05/2008 00:19:03
No Angus. I would NOT like to see States or Federalism. I think that Independence is the only solution. We could then choose to join or leave all the alliances , partnerships etc that accord with the interests of the people of Scotland. Anything less is not worth it.
4

Jwil,

04/05/2008 00:59:26
Having Alex Salmond as prime minister may be quite attractive to English voters! Look at the benefits it would bring.
5

Guga II,

Rockall 04/05/2008 01:24:46
This sounds like a good idea wee Eck. However, most of us, especilally the younger ones in this country, neither need nor want these parasites as our head of state. We should be a republic.

Incidentally, a helluva lot of us want out of the EU as well. We could well do without that thieving, corrupt organisation. It is just as bad as the New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party.

#1 Angus Ogg. A posting at 20:38, yesterday. You must definitely work for the Hootsmon. However, having any sort of political connection with England is not on. You don't seriously think that they would give Scotland equal rights, do you? Remember, under the Treaty of Union, we were supposed to be equal. Does it look to you as if we are treated as an equal?

Independence is the only answer; preferably as a republic, and outwith the EU.
6

A Better Way,

Edinburgh 04/05/2008 02:22:35
I tend to agree with Guga although I understand where Angus is coming from. As Guga said, we have been down that road before and see where it has got us. There is absolutely no way I would compromise Scotlands Sovereignty in a United Kingdoms, and I definately agree that being in the EU is too limiting for the Scottish Economy. I donr want one foreign vessel fishing in Scottish Waters. I want Scottish Fishermen not only catching the fish but also adding value by packaging it and creating a Scottish Type Birdseye. The opportunities for wealth creation and employment for Scots could be enormous. We must run our own race and do whatever is necassary to create a buoyant long lasting Scottish Economy. I would just like to remind you all that there is some foreign EU Minister here trying to tell us whether we can give our vital ferry service to CalMac. We have been down this road before, and the local Scots on the Islands come first everytime. We dont need some squarehead or frog telling us what is good for our people, thats what we have had in the Union.

As for the open measuring system, it makes so much sense if the information is also there to check out. A nice clause stating the system must be open and spin free would make me feel better about it. Look at New London Labours spin on figures or the lies that spew out of their mouths.

As for a Queen of Scots, I would sooner have that than a President of Scotland. Lets not forget that under the treaty of Arbroath the Government and the King/Queen are servants of the people, not the other way around. The other thing is what a good way to stick it up the English. Make her our Queen. She likes it up here better anyway.
7

GBscot,

Idaho Falls 04/05/2008 02:25:23
Call in Audit Scotland! They have the final say don't they?
8

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 04/05/2008 03:18:15
The saddest thing about this story is that Goverment actually measuring policy by real world results is considered radical.

Whether an Independant Scotland:

-is a Constitutional Monarchy or Republic.

-using the Euro or Pound.

-Inside or outside the EU.

Is at this point irrelevant.

Before we can even start to make these choices we must first achieve Independence.

The true strength of the SNP is that it is pragmatic and willing to think outside the box and try new ideas. This is the approach that will win people over to the idea that Scotland is better governed when it is governed by Scots, not by some parliament hundreds of miles from our border.

As far as the questions about what form an Independant Scotland will take it should be left for the Scottish people to decide in referendums after Independence has been achieved.

Putting your trust in the common sense of the people is probably the most radical reform of all.
9

W U Merchant,

Aberdeen 04/05/2008 04:26:56
Salmond's neocon views prevail.
10

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 04/05/2008 06:43:27
A Federal solution to this defunct Union is far better than what the numpty pseudo nationalists demand. Britain is one small island and we indigenees are of one race-the Britons. Britons are the only true Nationalists here.
11

Nikostratos,

04/05/2008 07:03:55
Targets.........Oh no groan..Gordon liked them
12

acanthus,

Moscow 04/05/2008 07:33:58
10. 'Britons are the only true Nationalists here'

What a disgusting statement this is! There never has been such a thing as an 'indigenous' race..so i suggest you read some history before making ill-founded statements like this as it makes you look like a numpty. Not content with that you take a false statement further and one can conclude then that all people who are not 'Britons' cannot be nationalists. What utter nonsense...what a numpty!
13

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 04/05/2008 07:49:19
#10

What are you on about?

"Britain is one small island and we indigenees are of one race-the Britons."

Given the fact that you are a LibDem supporter and therefore ignorant of everything except how the single transferable votes work and how committees should function, let me educate you.

Their once was a people called the Britains. They lived in what is now England when Julius Caeser arrived.

In the intervening 2000 years we have seen inward migration from, Saxons, Jutes, Angles, Normans, Scots, Norsemen, Albanians, Greeks, Poles, White Russians, Arabs, Jews, Pakistanis, Indians, Australians, Irish, Chinese and many many others too numerous to mention.

The fact is that regardless of their Genetic line the vast majority of the People who live in Scotland primarilly identify themselves as Scottish.

The majority of people who live in England identify themselves as English.

Most people in Wales similarly identify themselves as Welsh.

The identity of British is an artificial construct designed to create a sense of fake kinship between different peoples who are the subjects of the same Monarch.

That this is how you primarily identify yourself is really quite sad.

14

Haleakelaman,

St.Andrews 04/05/2008 08:00:01
I'm not a fan of any of these feelgood schemes they all waste time and money in administration costs.
Changing the subject, what I do want to know is why the Scottish Parliament didn;'t investigate ALL the other Local Authoritis and not just Aberdeen. How many millions of Scottish Tax payers pounds is milked away by so called bona fide company bosses, procurement officials and public servants(servants- that's a laugh)? Set up an investigation commission now and eradicate these crooks.
15

BIG EYE,

Paisley 04/05/2008 08:57:09
Alex should look at some of the web based systems being introduced in Eastern Europe to limit or even eliminate the need to go to see anyone at your district council or government departments.

They are highly efficient (change house, report this once and the system changes your name and address on every Government system) and would greatly help the government meet its efficiency targets.
16

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 04/05/2008 09:03:15
#13

A vain attempt to distort history! Starting with your quite erroneous claim that I am a LibDem supporter, you then ignore he fact that the Britons (note the spelling) include the Picts and all spoke Gaelic and shared a common culture, even down to religion, weights and measures and laws. Caesar commented on the sophistication of what he found here. Ten thousand years of shared history, possibly thirty thousand or more, explain island solidarity. Obviously several invading alien cultures have tried to upset all this, and the SNP is doing likewise. We must resist this if we are to remain true to our roots. Immigrants must integrate or leave. The idea of Scotland is of very recent origin and is an alien one. Study your own history before making all those silly remarks, please.

Finally, tell me what makes you think that an independent Scotland will be a success, when so many small nations are failures?
17

Cincinnatus,

Edinburgh 04/05/2008 09:16:38
First the union and then the crown.

Don't kid yourself Alex, no one in the party bar the very old are pro-monarchy.
18

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 04/05/2008 09:23:24
#16

"Finally, tell me what makes you think that an independent Scotland will be a success, when so many small nations are failures?"

I have faith in the abilities of the people of Scotland to be a success.
19

Alfred E. Neuman,

04/05/2008 09:25:14
Oh my god! Alex Salmond and the mickey mouse club. Does he not have an advisor who can tell him honestly what a fool he looks like?
20

Ananurhing,

04/05/2008 09:31:18
10# Rules

I've not been here much recently, until the last couple of days. Whilst I don't always agree with you, I used to recognise you had something to say. What happened? Have you had a bad fall, or some other kind of trauma?
For someone who promotes anarchism i.e. local independence and accountability, no rulers, you seem to have become a bit extreme. Ha ha, an extreme Libdem, now there's an oxymoron.
Federalism is the least popular, or likely option of the three between, union, independence, and federation.
Independence is the natural state of any country, and a special case has to be made for any other option.
Judging from your post here, and the way you insult everyone who believes in the normality of independence, your views seem to have become borderline fascist.
For what it's worth, in future, whenever I read you describing those of us who desire to live in a normal country, free from remote colonial rule, as " Numpty nats", I will just stop reading. You simply insult me, and the majority of multi cultural Scots that I know, and do nothing for the federalist argument which has some merit.
BTW, I am a Scot, I have a French Huguenot name, and my Mother's people are of Scandinavian stock. Whilst I would agree that perhaps we are all mongrels, you're statement that we're ALL Britons is ridiculous.
What makes you think that an independent Scotland would fail, when so many other small countries with less going for them, thrive?
21

walter,

04/05/2008 09:32:43
Salmond also again backed the idea of keeping the Queen as the head of an independent Scotland and said he would oppose holding a referendum on the monarchy post-independence.

That cannot be right, Salmond opposing holding a referendum. Surly not?
There was me under the impression (due to the vast majority of posts by nationalists in the past)that only unionists by refusing to give the people of Scotland a say in a referendum were undemocratic.


As for this initiative 'Scotland Performs' it is just a way for government to change or scrap the promises they make when they cannot deliver.
22

Ananurhing,

04/05/2008 09:54:04
21# Walter

"As for this initiative 'Scotland Performs' it is just a way for government to change or scrap the promises they make when they cannot deliver"

What about the council tax freeze then? Eh, eh, eh?
Even better, what about the small business rates relief over the next 3 years?
23

,

04/05/2008 10:24:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

Publius,

Girvan 04/05/2008 10:33:20
Couple of interesting points about this article.
(1) No mention of local income tax. Has Alex given up on LIT? If so, he is wiser than I thought. LIT could do for the SNP what the ten percent thingy has done for Labour in England.
(2) "Salmond also said that if he failed to secure an independence referendum in this Parliament, he would bring forward plans immediately if he won the 2011 Scottish elections."
But what happens if he wins in 2011, but still can't get a majority for his referendum? My guess is that he'll resign. He'll have had enough of politicking by then.
25

brownlie,

04/05/2008 10:53:12
19 Alfred E.

The usual congratulations on your escape. What a godsend you are for our unionist cause with your intelligent, rant-free and rational arguments.

You are quite right - Salmond should employ an advisor who would make him look as acceptable to the voters as Gordon Brown.
26

Richardinho,

04/05/2008 11:28:46
'Finally, tell me what makes you think that an independent Scotland will be a success, when so many small nations are failures?'

Please don't judge others by your own lack of ability. Isn't it funny how unionists always seem to have such a low opinion of themselves and their fellow Scots?
27

Union is Best,

04/05/2008 11:38:52
26. Quite right! We know our place! Scots are uniquely less able than Norwegians, Icelanders, Irish, Swedes or just about anyone else to run a country, for reasons we Unionists have yet to crystallise. We Unionists know that Scotland is inferior to these other countries, as that is what our arguments are based on! Wendy save us and preserve us.
28

Geoff,

sa 04/05/2008 11:44:11
1Angus Ogg- great post!And I agree with you about Alex-he would make a brilliant Prime Ministerof the federal Kingdom of Great britain and NI! Have just watched him make mince meat of Sky News's Adam Boulton-the nats are really lucky to have a man of his calibre-he is relaxed confident,answers questions honestly and concedes a point plus he seems a nice guy with a Scots twinkle in the eye! Notwithstanding my admiration for AS I am a passionate believer in the UK but realistic enough to know that it can not persist in its presnt form. A federal solution is, I believe one that if properly thought out, would appeal to a majority in these isles
29

acanthus,

Moscow 04/05/2008 11:45:49
16...Pics spoke Gaelic?
You had better contact the Scottish History Departments of all the Universities and give them your proff that the Picts spoke Gaelic, i though their language had (apart from a few instances) died out and contained a lot of 'shock' non--British language!
Another 'numpty' statement...this word interestingly enough has survived from Old Pictish..it means 'bag of wind' i believe ;-)
30

pehman,

sussex 04/05/2008 11:59:28
Sounds like more good news, more fresh thinking.

Just in case anyone was wondering what the Welsh English election results mean to Scotland, one thing has already happened ------- maggie, it appears has given wendy, nay told wendy, to back a referendum on Independence.
31

The Tin Man,

Over the Rainbow 04/05/2008 12:09:18
#16 Rules etc..

Your made-up history is most entertaining... more please!
32

The Tin Man,

Over the Rainbow 04/05/2008 12:11:19
How about a 'national happiness index' as per Bhutan?
33

karinxxx,

04/05/2008 12:21:24
16 rules """"Finally, tell me what makes you think that an independent Scotland will be a success, when so many small nations are failures""""""


small nations are failures? please define what you mean by this? interesting that you think small and also think failure? glass half empty?

34

Proximaking,

Dundee 04/05/2008 13:01:22
Why not a unique experiment? I call it representative democracy, here's how it works. All political parties are banned as they are by definition not inclusive. We take the voters roles, we print them out in random order in each constituency, we take a dart from a dartboard and we have an eight year old, male or female,throw the dart to pick the representaive from their constituency. Every two years we would choose members using this method and every two years one third of parliament would be changed out for these new members. I call this system the three R's, Rolling, Random, Representation. There would be little corruption in such a system as no-one would be there long enough to benefit and as there were no parties no-one in future years would want to cover up for any wrong-doing that came tolight later on. The problem with this idea? As Churchill once said privately I believe "If putting an X on a piece of paper allowed them to change anything we wouldn't allow them to do it!" In other words we want to control the people who are "allowed" to have power and that means getting them into parties where we can manipulate them more easily. Now hasn't the minority government we are having at the moment shown that such a cooperative way of discussing things, that the random system would automatically impose each time, really can work? Do you think the system in Scotland will work as well if the SNP or any of the others get a majority at the next election? Don't be daft. The "success" of the last year in Scotland has had nothing to do withthe parties and everything to do with arithmetic, .... isn't that one of the three R's? At the same time why not allow people to decide on how their personal taxes are spent? Now that would be a breakthrough! lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllll llllllll
35

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 04/05/2008 13:50:10
Sorry to sound sceptical but the changes detailed in the article appear to be largely cosmetic. We used to have "national priorities" - now we are getting "strategic objectives". We used to have targets - now we are getting "national indicators". The public sector has frequenly given the impression of reform when it is merely rebranding its procedures. This does not appear to be a significant departure from that process.
36

Bob10,

04/05/2008 13:54:09
18. KampungHighlander.

"Finally, tell me what makes you think that an independent Scotland will be a success, when so many small nations are failures?

I have faith in the abilities of the people of Scotland to be a success."

So, your plan is to........keep your fingers crossed?
37

Al Ford,

Insch 04/05/2008 14:09:08
Another brilliant initiative from the SNP.

One of the salient features of UK politics at the moment keeps on being demonstrated to be the sheer adroitness and drive of the politicians in the Scottish Government.

If the intellectual and motivational superiority of the autonomists over the unionists continues, further constitutional change is inevitable.
38

Methalions,

04/05/2008 14:13:27
Geoff

Download TVants (free)

Go to channel live4

Hibs v Rangers
39

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 04/05/2008 14:41:48
38 Al Ford
Please spare us the hype. The introduction of this "initiative" is is a classic example of spin doctoring. If you look at how the public sector has operated recently in Scotland and look at areas such as education you will see that work undertaken had to be described as meeting one of the "National Prorities". Now we are being told that they have to meet "Strategic Objectives" - essentially the same process.

We have seen this so many times in the public sector - change the name of what you do so that you give the impression of reform.
40

MartinR,

04/05/2008 15:02:11
"If the intellectual and motivational superiority of the autonomists over the unionists continues, further constitutional change is inevitable"

Well, if you can give us an example of this intellectual superiority, please do, but in the mean time it looks like we're stuck with re-hashed policies from the Clinton era!

Keep up the good work, I always thought Salmond and co would do more for the Unionist cause, and so far I've been right!
41

W U Merchant,

Aberdeen 04/05/2008 18:05:02
The SNP have shown in the first year that they are the party of big business.
42

ptdoug,

04/05/2008 19:16:53
SALMOND: TIME TO TAKE BACK OIL.

Sunday May 4,2008
By Mark Stevenson

ALEX Salmond will this week take the first steps in an audacious bid to seize control of North Sea oil from Westminster.

The First Minister has already met with senior aides to discuss the controversial battle plan to shift energy powers to Holyrood.

Sources say now is the optimum time to strike at London with Gordon Brown’s government in disarray following the Prime Minister’s worst week since taking office.

The Scottish Sunday Express can reveal Finance Secretary John Swinney will fire the opening shot by writing to Chancellor Alistair Darling to demand an immediate increase in the share of oil revenue.

It is estimated North Sea oil will be worth around £56billion to the UK economy over the next six years.

A source close to the First Minister said last night: “Gordon Brown’s difficulty is Scotland’s opportunity. The Scottish Government will be stepping up our efforts to secure fair access for Scotland to our own North Sea revenues.

“And in his present enfeebled political position the Prime Minister is in no position to say ‘No’.”

Before the Holyrood election, the SNP pledged to make it an early priority to begin discussions with Westminster on “options for the transfer of responsibility for our oil and gas resources to the Scottish Parliament”.
43

mesmiths,

fife 04/05/2008 19:50:45
Superb idea! Another thereof.

This is the first article on the SNP in the sos or Scotsman that isn't dominated by anti snp spin and moaning labour spokespeople.

A NEW DAWN FOR THIS PAPER?
44

Scotindy,

Los Angeles 05/05/2008 02:35:14
By the time england wakes up, SCOTLAND will have moved FORWARD so far and fast, that we will only be a memory to them of what they LOST. INTRANSIGENCE, IGNORANCE and ARROGANCE comes to mind. Goodbye and good luck england, your going to need it!!!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.