Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


SNP trust branded an 'expensive scandal'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 March 2009
THE £23m Government body charged with rebuilding crumbling schools has only sent one e-mail on financing new education projects since its formation was announced nine months ago, it was claimed last night.

The SNP's Scottish Futures Trust was branded an "extortionately expensive scandal" after it emerged that correspondence offering advice on solving Scotland's classroom crisis was limited to a lone e-mail to Orkney Council.

The lack of help of
fered by the SNP's flagship organisation was revealed in a series of Freedom of Information requests asking the Government for all details of advice offered on "planning, delivery and financing" of projects by the SFT since it was set up under the chairmanship of financier Sir Angus Grossart.

At a time when 10,000 pupils are being educated in substandard buildings and 80 schools are judged to be beyond repair, the only SFT correspondence on education was an e-mail sent on January 29 to the Orkney Island Council's schools project. The Government refused to release the contents of the e-mail. But Orkney Council said it related to projects "which do not come under the SFT banner".

The message referred to plans for a new Kirkwall Grammar School, a new Stromness Primary and a new halls of residence to house pupils from outlying islands, all of which are to be built in partnership with a developer rather than through SFT.

The lack of help being offered by SFT was uncovered by the Liberal Democrats, who submitted a wide-ranging set of Freedom of Information requests. The results of their inquiries have added to suspicions that the SFT's failure to get off the ground has held up important public building projects.

Jeremy Purvis, the Lib Dem finance spokesman who was behind the FoI requests, said: "This is supposed to be a serious advisory body providing the kind of advice that public bodies require for the delivery of infrastructure.

"The fact that we have exposed that there is no written advice for things such as flood management, universities and colleges and just one e-mail to Orkney about schools is an absolute disgrace.

"We were then promised that it would be an advisory body and now we know that it is not advising.

"At £23m it is an extortionately expensive scandal – a scandalous waste of money that should be halted."

The SFT was originally proposed as a body to raise bonds for major projects and was introduced by the SNP, as it had ideological objections to Labour's public/private/partnership capital building schemes.

When the SFT's business case was unveiled in May last year it set out running costs of £23m for its first five years.

A Scottish Government spokesman said: "SFT staff have been in regular contact with a range of public bodies. Written material held by the Scottish Government only provides a partial account of the activity SFT has undertaken.

"Just this week, CBI Scotland offered its support to SFT as a new and better way of achieving maximum value for the public purse.

"The SFT is playing an active part in supporting infrastructure investment in Scotland, and will be used in the commissioning of a new school project later this year."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 March 2009 1:02 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Scottish National Party
 
1

RufusT-Firefly,

07/03/2009 20:22:15
Looks like the SNP is falling apart.

Every day brings a new scandal.

Independence? They are having a laugh.
2

webwise,

Scotland 07/03/2009 22:26:08
"The SNP's Scottish Futures Trust was branded an "extortionately expensive scandal"

Goodness, who has made such an accusation? There must be evidence to support this surely !!

Wait a moment, this is The Scotland on Sunday (The Scotsman in drag) - so we can breath a sigh of relief and basically ignore the tripe.

The headline is, as usual, the utterances of a Unionist politician. The policy in question is the Scottish Futures Trust, a sensible and superior mechanism for funding proposed by the SNP in order to replace the widely discredited PFI.

The Scottish CBI have already endorsed SFT as have Unison. In England PFI projects have been crippled by the state of the banks, to the extent that the treasury have had to step in with a £2 billion lifeline. This monsy is not available for Scottish projects because the SNP have sensibly avoided PFI.

The treasury have also underwritten £13 billion worth of PFI projects in England, again no such underwriting of Scottish projects.

Finally, UK advisors have stated that packages aimed at stimulating the economy be restricted to the South East (of England), they do not think other 'regions' merit such targetting.
3

RufusT-Firefly,

07/03/2009 22:38:01
2 webwise,Scotland 07/03/2009 22:26:08

"Wait a moment, this is The Scotland on Sunday (The Scotsman in drag) - so we can breath a sigh of relief and basically ignore the tripe."
=========================================================

Webwise ignores it by signing on here every night at 10-00 pm to pass comment on it.

Splendid.
4

Gussie Fink-Nottle,

08/03/2009 00:24:35
#1 Rufus, you're beginning to sound like a broken record. You've been dribbling the same mentalism since May 2007. Go home and prepare for six more years of whining...
5

Rasco,

08/03/2009 00:28:11
As i have said before Rufus you are a very sick person.£2 Billion to bail out PFI in England,what is Broon doing for Scotland nothing except slag off the SNP like you,Grey man says get ready for next election let him have the guts to stand up and call a no confidence vote in the SNP and see where he gets,Spud will not let him do that though,oh for Old Labour who i used to vote for at least they had principles.
6

famous 15,

Edinburgh 08/03/2009 00:31:55
The SNP are the only show in town. The opposition are a joke. But they are a very destructive joke. More than ever Scotland needs INDEPENDENCE.
7

frank mcbride,

lusitania 08/03/2009 00:38:56
#1, Rumpus (in his own head).

Rumpus, pray tell, where is this scandal?

Are you refering to Mr. Purvis's, misinformed, reference to £23m?

Or are you refering to the necessary preparatory work that is being carried out to establish a better sstem of funding for Public Works - something that the LDs, NuLab or the Tories would ever condone?
8

redcliffe62,

08/03/2009 00:49:40
i fyou read the headlines you would think there was a scandal. until you delve a bit deeper.
they should be mor eproactive though, pfi or not.
9

lulach mac gille coemgain,

08/03/2009 00:54:52
Very Thrifty - to be commended.
10

Edward,

08/03/2009 01:03:30
Ha another anti SNP story, more than likely fed by the Labour spin machine. Perhaps if this was a real paper with real journalists, it would have explained to the reader the bigger scandal of PFI/PPP and how Labour has cost Scotland billions of pounds in costs for capital projects that actually cost a third of what Scotland will end up paying!
Perhaps this papers journalists can also explain to its readers why successive Labour and Tory governments have taken all the oil revenue to spend on projects in the south east of england, such as the M25, but have given hardly anything to Scotland, despite the oil coming from Scotland, or explain that if Scotland had been Independent, it would be the richest country in europe an one of a few of the richest in the world.But this information was supressed and buried by successive Labour and Tory governments
Until our biased press gets its collective backsides out from the Labour breifings and start reporting freely and unbiased. Every story they come up with that attacks the likes of the SNP will be treated with contempt!
11

Thomas79,

Ayrshire 08/03/2009 01:04:15
RufusT-Firefly

You must need cheering up after the labour conference.

Here is something funny, an interview with Lord Foulkes sometime last year on Scotland at Ten.

The Lord "The SNP are on a very dangerous tack at the moment. What they are doing is trying to build up a situation in Scotland where the services are manifestly better than south of the border in a number of areas."

Reporter ""Is that a bad thing?"

The Lord "No, but they are doing it deliberately"

Labour, always good for a laugh.

12

Fifi la Bonbon,

08/03/2009 01:24:43
An extraordinary story, in more ways than one.

The SNP is saying that in fact the Scottish Futures Trust is firing on all cylinders, and has sent out not just one, but several emails. A school (literally, one) might be started sometime soon. Good stuff - we can all rest easy and confident that we're going to be getting best value at last in public procurement.

Now for some reason the on-line reporting of this story changed as I was writing this comment, but thanks to the miracle of the internet cache I was able to recover the deleted news. The thing that had caught my eye in the story as it was first written was this wee gem -

"... payroll costs of £1m for seven employees in 2008-09 rising to £4.3m for 20 staff in 2012-13."

That's quite high, I'm thinking. One million divided by seven is nearly £143,000 each. Even if that includes pensions, and the odd taxi, and luncheon vouchers, it's actually quite high. You should be able to get quite a few well-written emails from people on that kind of wage. And the average wages in 2012 will amount to £215,000 each.

Now either a decimal point has been misplaced here and there (a bit disturbing given that we're dealing with people who are supposed to be good at sums, even long division) or some people are going to be getting very, very well paid out of the Scottish Futures Trust. And I don't imagine they'll be doing without receptionists, caretakers and the like who will be on the usual £7 an hour.

The Scotland on Sunday is giving big licks today to the scandal of library assistants, gravediggers and home helps getting a pension. Would it not be a boon if its reporters were to ask a couple of questions of the Scottish Futures Trust about who's getting how much money for doing what seems like feckall?

And why has the real story – the eye-watering salaries paid to Scottish Futures Trust officials – been deleted from the on-line report?

I look forward to popping out for the paper later today to see what
13

Fifi la Bonbon,

08/03/2009 01:25:01
I look forward to popping out for the paper later today to see what appears in the hard copy.
14

subrosa,

08/03/2009 01:38:54
# 10 Edward

Don't forget it was Scotland oil which paid for the Channel Tunnel too.
15

subrosa,

08/03/2009 01:39:26
Should be Scotland's - apologies
16

Edward,

08/03/2009 01:40:35
#12
Actually the answer is full Independence and consign this union to the dustbin of history
17

Edward,

08/03/2009 01:43:01
#14 Subrosa
Thanks for reminding me
Im still fuming after watching the documentary Diomhair
which revealed how Labour and the Tories worked to deny Scotland its wealth
18

Fifi la Bonbon,

08/03/2009 01:47:08
Wouldn't it be nice if the cyberbnats stopped bickering with Rufus the gnat about this and gave us a couple of words defending public sector workers as Scotland on Sunday has a go at home helps' pensions?
19

,

08/03/2009 03:15:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

Fifi la Bonbon,

08/03/2009 03:24:29
a proud doonhamer, are you suggesting that average salaries for council staff would rise to £145,000 per annum under SNP governance?

Because the SNP run Aberdeen, Edinburgh and Renfrewshire Councils, anong others, and I don't think that's what is actually happening.

What is Angus Grossart doing with the Scottish Futures Trust and how much is he paying the six other people presently on the payroll? I know you won't know the answer to that question, but you and your fellow nationalists should be asking it yourselves.
21

Fifi la Bonbon,

08/03/2009 03:28:37
And Scotland on Sunday should be reporting on this part of the story.
22

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 08/03/2009 06:02:15
Looks like LibDem are measuring SFT by their own standards. Unless the organisation is furiously appearing to work by sending out thousands of useless letters and emails, then it can't be working.

Suffered from this myself in large organisations. Unless your running about like a headless chicken, you can't be working hard.
23

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 08/03/2009 07:15:17
"introduced by the SNP, as it had ideological objections to Labour's public/private/partnership capital building schemes."

Yes, if you count demanding value for money as an ideology, which would mean that Labour's ideaology is lining the pockets of contractors at the expense of tax payers.

Even more damning are the recent cases where PFI contractors have had to borrow money from the Government to complete projects because they could not raise it in the private sector.
24

W U Merchant,

Aberdeen 08/03/2009 08:03:29
Yet another national nationalist disgrace.
25

,

08/03/2009 08:46:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

noswod,

Honestas 08/03/2009 09:04:46
The Scottish Fututures trust is a waste of time. If it issued tax free bonds at 6% or inflation adjusted bonds at 4% with a UK Government Guarentee and security on the underllying contracts maybe. But it is attempting to be a middleman just like the PFI guys to the sources of finance. Unfortunately it does not have the experience of the PFI boys and the sources of finance have dried up. Another little detail it does not have the legistlative framework in Uk law to work. Otherwise a typical SNP wish list policy which has delayed the Waverely Line, your childrens school renewal and will stop the New Forth Road Bridge being built. The SNP is a busted flush just like the devisive and defeated Scottish establish priopir to the 1707 Union. Scotland is an integral part of the union and we do much better out of it than a devisive, smallminded, backward looking, effectual Nationalist run mafia.
27

TWC,

Ex Labour 08/03/2009 09:17:10
It concerns me that this paper only carries stories attacking the Nats or spinning for Labour. There are other political parties in Scotland.
Further there were plenty of negative stories available at the Labour conference but not a mention - what about Harriet Hasbeen being unable to understand questions from the floor - really funnny.
A half empty hall, McAveety missing the speech and the dour failure that was Brown

All missed in favour of poor political editorial guidance.
In the near future this paper will have to write on the collosal Failure of this party
28

Marian,

08/03/2009 09:38:53
Scottish Labour have recently taken to frequently claiming that the SNP has broken most of its manifesto pledges as their pre-election strategy even though the SNP as a minority government in its first 2 years in government have actually delivered 60% of their manifesto commitments so far and still have 2 more years to go!

Not bad going considering some of the pledges that were dropped were forced upon them by the Unionist parties ganging up to vote them down as a tactic to try and whittle down the SNP manifesto to one major policy - namely Independence.

It would appear that the Unionist parties chief arguments against the Scottish Government's policies tend to be "I'm sure there's a law against that somewhere";

For example:-

The SNP bring in plans to combat the country's alcohol problem, but it's ruled illegal by the UK Government.

The SNP bring in plans to issue bonds to raise funds for the Scottish Futures Trust, but it's ruled illegal by the UK Government.

The SNP bring in plans to implement Local Income Tax, but it's ruled illegal by HMR&C.

The SNP bring in plans to cut class sizes to 18, but it's judged to be illegal by the Tories.

Nevertheless the SNP has delivered 60% of its manifesto pledges in the first 2 years of minority government.

Who knows how much more they could have delivered for Scotland had they been able to form a coalition majority government .
29

Satire above all,

08/03/2009 09:41:39
However, Liberal Democrat shadow chancellor Vince Cable, who anticipated the announcement, said it signalled the death of PFI.

"It is now very clear that PFI has largely collapsed as a mechanism for funding infrastructure.

30

Satire above all,

08/03/2009 09:42:49
PFI doesn't work http://www.nce.co.uk/business/2009/03/pfi_bailout_expected_today.html
31

Satire above all,

08/03/2009 09:44:19
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/public_sector/article3652705.ece

The picture is no rosier in housing. A Department for Communities and Local Government review suggests that PFI social housing schemes cost “significantly” more than those funded by traditional housing grants, Building Magazine (March 28) reports
32

Satire above all,

08/03/2009 09:47:07
THE PFI BOMBSHELL!

http://dizzythinks.net/2008/11/pfi-bombshell.html

There has to be an alternative and the SNP are providing one.
33

Stan Butler,

08/03/2009 10:21:30

Have the SNP actually DONE anything to improve school buildings?

They talk a lot, they promise a lot, but they deliver nothing.
34

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 08/03/2009 10:33:25
This paper's circulation is going downhill.
Is there any possibility that a factor is its totally anti SNP position.
After all 40% odd vote SNP now and a similar number seem interested in independence, maybe a change of approach would see sales improving.
35

Walter Ego,

Durness 08/03/2009 11:03:16
Yet another SNP shambles. Scotland deserves better, far better.
36

tinyurl.com/dk73mb,

08/03/2009 11:26:33
"At a time when 10,000 pupils are being educated in substandard buildings and 80 schools are judged to be beyond repair, "



My goodness me did this just happen in 18 months. It is incredible that the previous regime pre May 7 2007 had managed to hold things together so well, and then it suddenly fell apart. Perhaps they had embedded a timed chemical reaction in the fabric of these schools that was triggered by the political eathquake caused by the rise in power of the SNP, what a clever use of nano technology.

Or perhaps it is jusr yet more evidence of the pro Unionist bias of The Scotsman. Mmmm, now let me see.
37

tinyurl.com/dk73mb,

08/03/2009 11:28:23
#38 Hey Walter I have a house in Melness, I am a regular visitor and do a lot of fishing up there. Maybe we could go for a pint?
38

tinyurl.com/dk73mb,

08/03/2009 11:30:29
#38.....We often have barbies on the Loch Erribol shore fancy joining us? We like the smell of burning flesh?
39

Linda,

Edinburgh 08/03/2009 11:30:43
'Dìomhair' (Secret), the UK Governments plot
to derail the SNPs Its Scotlands Oil campaign during the 1970s ­which
appeared earlier this year on BBC Alba, can be seen on BBC iplayer for one week only

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/search/?q='D%c3%acomhair'%20(Secret),%20
40

Patrick O'Reilly,

Coatbridge 08/03/2009 11:59:32
When are we going to get balanced reporting from the Scotsman? I am fed up with this pro nationalist garbage.
41

tommy M,

Scotland 08/03/2009 12:01:25
Have the "missing" marked up registers for the Glenrothes by election been found yet?
42

Billiam Wallace,

08/03/2009 12:26:50
#43 Tommy M. In answer to your question, NO, nor will they ever appear. They have been 'disappeared' to suit the NuLiebore Sleaze and Corruption Party, (North British Branch).

Any chance that the loss of these legal documents could render the result of the vote null and void as there is now no proof that the vote count as returned by the returning officer were in fact genuine?

The proper headline for this article should have been.

"NuLiebore Party Branded the Most Expensive Scandal in British History"

We all know that the SNP aren't perfect, but they are a damned sight better than the 'Trougher Party'.

Saor Alba

V for Vendetta
43

Thomas79,

Ayrshire 08/03/2009 12:33:41
These days Labour are very on the ball when it comes to telling us what is legal or not.

SNP's Scottish Futures Trust - Illegal

SNP's Local Income Tax - Illegal

SNP's Alcohol pricing plan - Illegal

Labour's War with Iraq without second resolution - Legal

Anyone notice a pattern?


44

,

08/03/2009 12:42:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

Tartan Viking,

08/03/2009 13:59:49
"The SNP's Scottish Futures Trust was branded an "extortionately expensive scandal"

Dear oh dear oh dear. Time this Unnionist rag realises that even 20, 30 or 1000 Scottish Futures Trusts will still be a lot less than the £1,300,000,000,000 bail out having to be made because of Lyebour incompetence.
46

Tartan Viking,

08/03/2009 14:05:18
#45.Thomas79,Ayrshire

Jacqui Smith's double expenses claim - legal

Tessa Jowell's non involvement with her husband's dodgy financial affairs - legal

Governments agreement to pay Sir Fred Greedwin £17 million pension - legal

Government's decision to award themselves an extra 25% pension rise - legal


47

ExpatBackinScotland,

Carnoustie 08/03/2009 14:24:08
noswod said
"Scotland is an integral part of the union and we do much better out of it than a devisive, smallminded, backward looking, effectual Nationalist run mafia."

Child Poverty in Glasgow, Scots killed in illegal wars, subjugation for 300 years, resources raped...yep we do smashingly well, unless of course the "we" you refer to is the "we" in London and the SE.

Listen, Im half English, my best firends ar vEnglish, Ive lioved in England, but that doesnt mean I dont think scotland would be better off independent.

Stop the "mafia jibes" Self determination is a right of any nation. To want it is not a bad thing, or is Swedens pride at being a nation wrong? Are they run by "mafia"?

Grow Up.
48

Lance Boyle,

Linlithgow 08/03/2009 15:17:12
While Scotland rots, the SNP procrastinate and prevaricate (look up the dictionary, nats). Disgraceful.
49

Fifi la Bonbon,

08/03/2009 15:53:17
When the SFT's business case was unveiled in May last year it set out running costs of £23m for its first five years, including payroll costs of £1m for seven employees in 2008-09 rising to £4.3m for 20 staff in 2012-13.

How much are Angus Grossart and his six colleagues getting paid, and what are they doing for the money?
50

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 08/03/2009 16:35:57
#2 if everyone who reads this red rag online or hardcopy,feels that its reporters,are lying or twisting the truth,then we should all bombard the press complaints commission,who sets ou the following code

THE CODE

All members of the press have a duty to maintain the highest professional standards. The Code, which includes this preamble and the public interest exceptions below, sets the benchmark for those ethical standards, protecting both the rights of the individual and the public's right to know. It is the cornerstone of the system of self-regulation to which the industry has made a binding commitment.

It is essential that an agreed code be honoured not only to the letter but in the full spirit. It should not be interpreted so narrowly as to compromise its commitment to respect the rights of the individual, nor so broadly that it constitutes an unnecessary interference with freedom of expression or prevents publication in the public interest.

It is the responsibility of editors and publishers to apply the Code to editorial material in both printed and online versions of publications. They should take care to ensure it is observed rigorously by all editorial staff and external contributors, including non-journalists, in printed and online versions of publications.

Editors should co-operate swiftly with the PCC in the resolution of complaints. Any publication judged to have breached the Code must print the adjudication in full and with due prominence, including headline reference to the PCC.
now after reading what newspapers should be doing,how many feel that this paper just rides roughshod over what is in the best interest of its readers and of scotland in general

51

Sanny,

08/03/2009 16:40:22
Perhaps I’m missing something but has the SNP only been in power – albeit as a minority government – for two years. During this short period have all our schools crumbled away and our class sizes zoomed up?

NO NO NO! This decay has been advancing unabated for fifty years at least. And who has been in charge for the last fifty years? Surprise; surprise! The Labour Party.
What was Labours proposed whiz solution to remedy this disastrous why the PFI which has turned out to deliver very very expensive solutions that in the end are not really solutions at all but still very expensive.

To there credit the SNP have come up with a solution that seems to have some merit and yet the central Labour Government does it’s best to ensure the proposal is still born. Perhaps it will have to wait until we are independent of this accursed Union then watch England flounder in Scotland’s wake.
52

Sanny,

08/03/2009 16:46:05
50 Lance Boyle,Linlithgow 08/03/2009 15:17:12

And your account for the previous 50 years is?

I don’t think Procrastination nor Prevarication come close but Gross Neglect does!
53

Westfield Bairns,

Falkirk 08/03/2009 16:49:52
The Scotsman - -OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASE PARTNER FOR LONDON LABOUR - Unionist Propoganda
54

,

08/03/2009 17:01:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
55

BIG EYE,

Paisley 08/03/2009 19:04:58
56. YES IT IS!
56

Fifi la Bonbon,

08/03/2009 19:16:05
#53, two years isn't a long time, is it?

But Mister Salmond and Mister Swinney probably thought of that, which is probably why the set-up was called the Scottish Futures Trust. It takes time to lease an office, buy office furniture, put in carpets, get business cards and printed stationery made up. Computers - they can be complicated and take time to learn. Then there's health and safety courses to go on. Possibly some of the team got that bug that's going around. Two years isn't a lot of time for Angus Grossart and his six colleagues to get the office opened.

I do wish they would get on with it, though. The seven of them are being paid a million pounds a year.
57

,

08/03/2009 20:35:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
58

Fifi la Bonbon,

08/03/2009 21:01:50
#59 - have no fear. I am sure that in the fullness of time justice will prevail. There will be no place in a Free Scotland for so-called Reporters who Report so-called "News" in such an Un-Patriotic Manner. Disloyalty to the Nation's Leaders will be a Serious Crime.
59

Brian Hill,

08/03/2009 21:28:22
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/search/Diomhair'%20(Secret),%20

Only the dead and dying will not be shocked by the last 20 minutes of this excellent documentary showing the Unionist Governments and Civil Servants deliberately lying and cheating to hide the facts of the true wealth and vast amounts of Scottish Oil and Gas.

In 1977 they even plotted to drastically change the border at Berwick so that it ran upwards at a sharp angle which would have put many of our Oil and Gas fields in 'English' waters.

I dare unionists to read it and not feel shame!
That dare applies to the Scotsman too. Excellent article there for some young reporter with blood coursing through his/her veins instead of cald tea.
60

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 08/03/2009 21:34:30
Freedom of Information Act is a joke. Freedom of Information on them Act is nearer the truth than the official spin on it.

Give me all Westminster details that are less than 2 years old and then we can discuss.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.