Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 24th August 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

S&N plans to scupper Carlsberg bid with release of £8bn valuation dossier



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 January 2008
SCOTTISH & Newcastle hopes to scupper its unwanted suitors Carlsberg and Heineken within two weeks with a report which will show the Edinburgh company's value far in excess of any offer made so far.
An independent consultancy is understood to be working on a study which will hint at the value which S&N can extract from its Baltika joint venture with Carlsberg. That would raise S&N's prospective value above £8bn, compared with the £7.3bn offered in the latest approach from Carlsberg and Heineken.

That would put more pressure on the suitors before the January 21 'put up or shut up' deadline by which they must make a formal offer or walk away.

Lead bidder Carlsberg has come under pressure in Denmark because its falling share price will make it harder to raise the cash it needs to buy its 54% share of S&N. The situation has been eased by the pound's recent fall against the Danish currency, but not enough to make up for a 25% drop in Carlsberg's market value in recent months.

S&N chief executive John Dunsmore hopes more detailed financial analysis will encourage analysts to lift their valuations on the group's 50% share in BBH, maker of Baltika beer, to at least £4bn. That would imply S&N's shares are worth more than 800p, compared with Carlsberg's offer of 750p and a closing price of 729p on Friday.

Analysts have suggested that Carlsberg and Heineken would come up with an offer of around 770p per share for S&N before January 21. But such a modest increase would probably strengthen the board's resolve to hold out for more.

Dunsmore told employees before Christmas that he would be willing to talk to Carlsberg and Heineken if the European brewers came up with "a more sensible approach", admitting that a "thumping great offer" may lead to discussions.

Any bid approach would be complicated by a legal dispute between S&N and Carlsberg over whether the latter triggered a clause in their BBH joint venture agreement which would allow S&N to buy the whole of BBH. Sweden's arbitration court, which is ruling on the matter, last week said it would produce a judgment by July 3. Carlsberg claimed the date was only prospective and that the whole process could take months longer.

The BBH venture is considered particularly valuable because the market for beer in Russia is seen as having greater growth potential than that in western Europe, where S&N, Carlsberg and Heineken get the bulk of their sales at present.

The full article contains 440 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 January 2008 4:35 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Scottish and Newcastle
 
1

sceptic,

06/01/2008 09:22:02
Obviously I should like a takeover at the highest possible price, however, I am amazed at the claimed value for S&N a company which has operated with a moribund management able to pay a dividend in 2007 less than in 1997. They did however manage a 100%+ increase in pay for the dead beat directors.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.