Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


FSA sent banks red flag alert about risky lending practices six years ago

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 February 2009
BRITAIN'S High Street banks were warned by the Government's financial watchdog more than six years ago about their lending practices, leaving them highly vulnerable to a collapse in property prices.
Scotland on Sunday has learned that the Financial Services Authority issued a red flag letter to all the major retail banks in November, 2002.

The banks – including RBS, Lloyds and the former HBOS, all of which have since been part-nationalised –
were told they must carry out urgent internal checks on whether they had enough capital to back up their loans in the event of a crash.

The FSA letter is understood to have warned them that they would be exposed by either a fall in property prices or an increase in interest rates.

Taxpayers have now spent £37bn underwriting the banks contacted by the FSA, after they were forced to ask for a bail-out or face collapse.

The FSA is facing growing criticism from opposition parties that it failed to follow through on its warnings.

They also say the Labour Government is to blame for putting pressure on the FSA to lay off the banks in the good times.

A stream of evidence is now coming forward to show that warnings about the banks were not heeded. Earlier this month, former HBOS risk adviser Paul Moore revealed that he had warned that the bank was "going too fast", had a "cultural indisposition to challenge" and was a serious risk to "financial stability and consumer protection". He claimed that as a result, he was fired by former HBOS chief executive Sir James Crosby.

Crosby was also the FSA's deputy chairman at the time. The FSA carried out internal reviews of HBOS but stopped short of enforcing change..

HBOS was among the banks written to by the FSA in 2002 when the body took the unusual step of writing to them all. The letter is understood to have flagged up a fall in property prices as being the biggest concern facing them.

The letter ordered all the banks to carry out so-called 'stress tests' to check the quality of their mortgage books, to see whether they would be able to cope with a sudden collapse in property prices or marked increases in unemployment. It appears that no further stringent action was taken.

Scotland on Sunday has also discovered correspondence between the FSA and the then Prime Minister Tony Blair, after Blair accused the body of being too heavy-handed in its regulatory practices.

In a 2005 letter replying to Blair, the then chief executive Sir Callum McCarthy wrote: "We make extensive use of advisory letters ("Dear CEO" letters) warning companies of problems which our contact with regulated firms has identified, so that direct intervention and enforcement action can be avoided."

He added: "The thrust of our work is to make the markets work effectively and avoid the need for regulatory interventions."

With regard to HBOS, the FSA has now revealed that, after making its concerns clear in 2002, it then carried out a full risk assessment of the bank. It concluded, in 2004, that "the risk profile of the group had improved and that the group had made good progress in addressing the risks highlighted".

Two weeks ago, the new Lloyds Banking group declared losses of £10bn, almost all due to risky corporate loans made by the former HBOS bank.

Lib Dem shadow chancellor Vince Cable said

: "It's about having more effective supervision of the banks. You can have intelligent regulation that isn't obstructive."

He added: "One of the lessons coming out of this, which they (the FSA) themselves have acknowledged, they're going to need high quality people."





The full article contains 622 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 February 2009 9:38 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Scotland's banking crisis
 
1

Jimmy Le Pie,

22/02/2009 00:21:03
Was this around the time Our Dear Leader, Comrade Broon was abolishing 'boom and bust'??????
2

Daveunderwater,

22/02/2009 00:21:52
#1

And encouraging risk takers...
3

TWC,

22/02/2009 10:11:34
3 Canes Pugnaces

I don't know why Brown keeps his job not why the press are not publishing his speches of the past.
He is up to his neck in this.
4

Liberal for life,

Dunblane 22/02/2009 10:13:21
There is little doubt now that the leaders of these banks have ignored sound advice and to that end are culpable of criminal negligence on a grand scale.

If Nick Leeson could be jailed for bringing down one bank then these fat cat bankers should be charged and given a sentence to match the crime of bringing down whole countries economies.

Vince Cables suggestion of using French guillotines is now too good for these people, so we should simply lock them all in the Tower and throw away the keys.
5

lulach mac gille coemgain,

22/02/2009 10:48:30
Come in ma pants!
6

Bolivarian Scot,

22/02/2009 11:29:10
# 6 Liberal for life, Dunblane said: "Vince Cables suggestion of using French guillotines is now too good for these people, so we should simply lock them all in the Tower and throw away the keys."

You're a liberal?!

Shurely shome mishtake.
7

,

22/02/2009 17:29:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 22/02/2009 20:54:31
It's all very well doing "red flag alerts" for all the good it did at the time. It's like the FSA saying that well we told you about it so we're in the clear.

No they're not. This could be the attempt to clear the FSA paying bonuses because they "got it right". If anything this was more than an abject failure to exercise their regulatory powers and bring a halt to it in a very practical way, instead of just sending a wee note. The key phrase is "stringent action" which was not taken. And no doubt having red-flagged something, the Chancellor would or should have been made aware of it so the trail still goes back to...

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.