Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Abused in the streets, their homes under attack, will Edinburgh's bankers ever be forgiven?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 March 2009
AS THE world's media gathered outside the vandalised stone villa of Sir Fred Goodwin, sympathy for the former chief executive of the Royal Bank of Scotland was in short supply. With pictures of his home in Edinburgh's salubrious Grange district being beamed across the globe, one passing man in a waxed jacket suggested the best course of action would be to "burn it to the ground".
Such comments were unthinkable only a year ago when he was announcing record profits at the world's fifth-biggest bank, but the attack on Goodwin's home and the threat of more violence against bankers has been met with a surprising level of tolerance.

Outright condemnation has been matched by a sense of indignation over the way in which bankers – in particular Edinburgh bankers – have been identified as the guilty men who have plunged the country into recession. Some have spoken of "Edinburgh's shame" that the city's big two banks have helped bring Britain to its knees.

It has clearly affected the standing of one of the country's most important professions as public respect has given way to general disgust. Last Friday, as two Scottish bankers walked through Haymarket station, a Big Issue salesman who they brushed past shouted after them: "I may be homeless, but at least I'm not a banker."

The mood is now turning ugly, with serious implications. A group calling itself Bank Bosses Are Criminals claimed responsibility for the attack on Goodwin's home and in a statement to the Edinburgh Evening News said: "This is just the beginning … We are angry that rich people, like him, are paying themselves a huge amount of money and living in luxury, while ordinary people are made unemployed, destitute and homeless."

The attack came as protesters plan to hang effigies of Sir Fred and other bankers from lampposts ahead of this week's G20 summit in London. Protest organiser and University of East London anthropology professor Chris Knight warned that "things could get nasty" as public anger with banks boils over.

"We are going to be hanging a lot of people like Fred the Shred from lampposts on April Fool's Day and I can only say let's hope they are just effigies," he said. "They should realise the amount of fury and hatred there is for them and act."

Max Clifford, one of Britain's most influential PR gurus, said: "If I was in his shoes, I would be a very worried man. He is in danger. That man should be genuinely frightened."

At the sprawling £350m Royal Bank of Scotland headquarters on the outskirts of Edinburgh, death threats aimed at the former boss arrive regularly through the post. On the internet T-shirts have gone on sale depicting Goodwin in a gun's crosshairs with the words: "public enemy number one." A picture of Goodwin enjoying himself has shot to number one on many freelance photographers' wish lists. It would fetch around £100,000.

Goodwin is understood to have fled the country. His exact whereabouts are unknown with reported sightings in the south of France, mainland Spain or Mallorca. He was last seen boarding a budget airline from Edinburgh to Nice with his wife and two children more than 10 days ago. According to one onlooker he checked in wearing dark glasses and sat in the departure lounge away from most people. Meanwhile his children have been taken out of their private school for their own protection after being bullied over their father's disgrace. His wife Joyce is understood to have been shouted at in the street.

The crisis is causing rising tensions across Europe. In France last week, workers burned tyres, marched on the presidential palace and held the manager of a US manufacturer hostage in the latest protests against job losses and executive payouts. In the US there have been protests outside the homes of executives of bailed-out insurance giant AIG.

While security is stepped up and all bankers feel a collective sense of guilt about leading the world into recession, those who believe Edinburgh has suffered a public beating are attempting to rebuild confidence. There are moves to restore the city's pride and battered reputation with a multi-million-pound initiative and a drive to deliver the message that a city famed throughout the world for its careful management of money can be restored to health.

But first it has to cope with almost daily reminders of its failings, not least its unwanted booby prize as home to the company that recorded the biggest loss in British corporate history.

When Goodwin was helping RBS post record profits, turning a provincial bank into a global powerhouse, the world lined up to shake his hand. Forbes, which once named him Global Businessman of the Year, has subsequently retitled him the world's worst banker.

With HBOS also being forced into a merger to save it from going bust, 2008 turned into an annus horribilis for Edinburgh banking. The city that was once home to Adam Smith – author of The Wealth Of Nations, the first modern treatise on economics – built an economy and a global reputation on financial services. But with its two major banks lying in ruins, many are now asking whether the financial crisis leaves Edinburgh's status in tatters. "The world has fallen off a cliff," said Ian Jones, executive chairman of the independent Edinburgh-based merchant bank Quayle Munro. "We are still picking up the pieces."

Publicly, the City's financial community is pulling together to argue that the Scots are resilient and will learn from mistakes and turn it around. But privately it is a different matter. Many claim the reputation of the city has been permanently damaged. They talk about the embarrassment of being associated with two failed banks and point to the chaos surrounding the ongoing tramworks as symbolic of the difficulties facing it. Aware of the deep public disgust towards Goodwin and Andy Hornby, his counterpart at HBOS, many in the banking sector feel decidedly uncomfortable.

"It is a bit difficult to maintain a reputation as a traditional high-probity country when your biggest bank, which is the fifth-largest bank in the world, goes spectacularly bust, is bought by the Government for a song and then hands its failed chief executive a £20m payoff," said one Scottish economist. "I feel a little embarrassed to be Scottish."

Another director of an Edinburgh brokerage said: "We do a lot of business in Bahrain, and Scotland – Edinburgh in particular – had always been a big selling point as we were highly regarded and respected. The city's reputation abroad has been tarnished by the likes of RBS."

Graham Bell, of Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, agrees: "The traditional reliance on Scots as good financiers has been dented because two of the major banks that have collapsed have Scotland in their title, and although they are big international companies they are regarded as Scottish products."

On Friday, Chancellor Alistair Darling urged the banks to clear their balance sheets in a bid to regain public trust against an anti-banking backlash, echoing comments earlier this month by Ian Luder, the new Lord Mayor of London, who told a meeting of Scottish Financial Enterprise that there was a need to end "banker bashing".

But their comments arguably add to the growing sense that the banking sector has been irreparably damaged and may even incite further reaction.

Now Edinburgh is preparing to fight back. In the next few weeks the city council will launch an Economic Resilience Action Plan designed to revive the city's flagging fortunes. It will be backed by a 25% increase in the economic development budget, with contributions from Europe bringing the total to £8m, the highest it has been.

In sectors barely touched by the crisis, such as fund management, an industry that manages £580bn of funds directly from Scotland, the mood is refreshingly upbeat. "I simply don't agree with the suggestion that Edinburgh is in some way 'damaged goods' following the banking crisis," said one London-based commercial lawyer. James Will, of Shepherd & Wedderburn, said: "The financial services industry in Scotland is not just about banks.

Scots are resilient, will learn lessons and will refocus on traditional values of prudence and innovation. With such traditional values – and ability to adapt – engrained in our heritage, Edinburgh should find it easier than perhaps many other financial centres worldwide to make the changes necessary to compete effectively in the new environment."

Others, such as Tom Miers, an independent public policy consultant, argue that more important to Edinburgh's economic success is not a reputation for financial prudence but the quality of life in the city. "It is more important for the council to build beautiful buildings than to meddle with the financial sector, which will take care of itself on the basis of the quality of its product."

Colin McLean, the fund manager who sounded the alarm over HBOS and RBS a year before their demise, remains sanguine. In his office overlooking Princes Street, the managing director of SVM Asset Management argues that most of his clients recognise the banking problem is distinct.

"It's not a helpful thing for Edinburgh," he says, "but given there have been banking problems in Switzerland and in other financial centres I don't think anyone comes out of it very well."

It is a view echoed by Bryan Johnston, director with private client investment manager Brewin Dolphin. "Specifically Edinburgh is no more caught up than anywhere else," he says. "Obviously what has happened to the banks is a tragedy and is disappointing, but it is not unique to Edinburgh, nor unfortunately to the UK. Things go wrong – the trick is how you deal with it." Sir Fred Goodwin would be advised to take note.


The full article contains 1634 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 March 2009 9:26 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Scotland's banking crisis
 
1

Jimmy Twoshoes,

29/03/2009 00:06:52
t has clearly affected the standing of one of the country's most important professions as public respect has given way to general disgust. Last Friday, as two Scottish bankers walked through Haymarket station, a Big Issue salesman who they brushed past shouted after them: "I may be homeless, but at least I'm not a banker."

Said Big Issue seller says this every day (he cycles through 4 or 5 'funnies'), amongst the lewd comments aimed at women passing.

It's an unfortunate consequence of democracy that everyone has an opinion - even the stupid people.
2

druidh,

edinburgh 29/03/2009 00:23:28
Ah yes - all those well known Scots like Andy McHornby.....
3

Scotty dog,

29/03/2009 04:12:29
This article is irresponsible in my opinion.

Violence and threatened violence should not be hidden under the cloak of humour as it plays into the hands of those who favour it.

Sir Fred and other bankers made serious business mistakes that have had a huge negative impact on many individuals but that is not a reason to threaten them, their families or their homes and property.

A civilised society accepts that and uses all legal means possible to seek a remedy.

The above "nudge nudge wink wink" implied threat to individuals is unwelcome and should be withdrawn.
4

Glasgow Expat,

Proud Short Seller 29/03/2009 04:56:19
Goodwin deserves to be sued for every penny and possibly go to jail but his family DON'T deserve to live in fear. However, this is all normal human behaviour in such circumstances. www.socionomics.net explains it all. The next phase will be to blame the governments and then we'll REALLY have social unrest. Vive la revolution!
5

Statsman,

Edinburgh 29/03/2009 05:32:46
The bankers have committed grand larceny and expect no fallout from the people? Weak politicians have no desire to stand up against them. Instead they throw more money at them and pat them on the back. The reason these banksters are not on trial is because Gordon Brown wouldn't have access to the millions in retirement perks that Blair now does if he dared do so.

Crash Gordon (Brown) is even going around the world just now telling leaders of other countries to give the bankers even more money and power. He is a disgrace.
6

Statsman,

Edinburgh 29/03/2009 05:40:34
"[A]ll bankers feel a collective sense of guilt about leading the world into recession."

No they don't. They are laughing all the way to their banks. This was a recession designed by bankers for bankers.

I don't support violence against them. I'd prefer the rule of law taking these people into the criminal justice system and putting them on trial. However, there are a lot of people that do and while the likes of Brown thinks the answer is giving bankers more and more money for their transgressions, the unemployed once working man isn't going to understand why this is going on.
7

Statsman,

Edinburgh 29/03/2009 05:43:50
2 druidh

Have you read the English blue top tabloids? They think Scots did it all. It doesn't matter that Halifax were the kingpins in HBOS, we did it all by ourselves.
8

JT,

29/03/2009 10:32:29
Im not defending Fred Goodwin, but targeting his wife and kids is a no no.I know people who work in Canary Wharf whose bonus was to keep their jobs in finance and who will be targeted by thugs next week as Gordon Brown and co horts blether on at the G20 summit.
9

JayJay,

Right here 29/03/2009 11:03:51
You see the problem here is that people are suddenly on to a culture that previously, they either ignored or simply did not know about. At the upper eschelons of both the Public and Private sectors, pay and benefits has grown out of all proportion in the last decade. Salaries of £1m plus are routine in UK boardrooms and there are umpteen heads of quangoes or Local Authorities or Health trusts who ar paid more than the PM.
They all use peer comparison to bump their already absurd salaries even higher. Pay and perks is huge and growing irrespective of performance. In a routine year, a slump in profits, under their brilliant stewardship will result in a further hike in salary for the elite, and a P45 for the rest.
And now these idiots, having claimed that their brilliance required, nay demanded, a vast benefits package are proven to be no better at running a company than you and I. With their organisations burning, they spend more time negotiating their own feather bedded exits than worrying unnecessarily about the fate of their employees.
I am afraid Fred must be aware that his hideous past track record of hectoring, bullying and sheer meglomania which came alongside his £4m plus package would have certain consequences should he ever fall from grace. Like a brutish Dictator now overthrown he has some nerve seeking respect, tolerance and understanding for people he previously cared little about. Perhaps he should have shown more regard for the little people when he was sooking a freshly peeled, imported grape in St Andrews Square.
Creatures like Goodwin are a bye-product of this horrible all-for-self world and I do hope all those other diddies in the Boardroom are taking a close hard look at what happens when you live your life in a bubble, utterly oblivious to the concept of social responsibility.
The mob mentality is plain wrong, but our Government shows little appetite for rooting out these self serving fools and making them pay.
10

eric,

lothian 29/03/2009 11:32:00
Edinburgh is a mess now just wait till the bank job losses really kick in !the trams were built around financial success thats gone now leith has been scaled down as builders pull out,back to being open a few weeks a year during festival with a very expensive white elephant tram line that doesnt reach the airport.
independence mmmmmm.
11

Dr Mike,

Edinburgh 29/03/2009 12:22:00
Goodwin should get a job shredding paper in an office. Hornby should have stuck to playing with model trains.

We also should realise that we have been in the grip of Emporers New Clothes syndrome, feting those who were wealthy and powerful with accolades that now can't stand the test of time, not even a few miserable years.

One of my mentors once said the only way to tell the worth of "management" was to put them on the loading bay and measure their ability to move heavy boxes. There should be a massive queue forming at the loading bay, lately joined by the Board of Dunfermline BS.

12

blackley,

Edinburgh 29/03/2009 13:53:57
It's all about finger-pointing and scapegoating isn't it? As if one man can be held responsible for the whole fiasco! We're all to blame for our greed and profligacy.
13

Jambo Number 1,

29/03/2009 14:28:32
The people who screwed RBS are actually not in Edinburgh at all but are all housed in Bishopsgate in the City.
14

stellarbluesky,

Edinburgh 29/03/2009 14:32:05
I agree with Comment 3 by 'Scotty dog'. This article is irresponsible journalism insofar as it slyly implies approval of a 'legitimate' illegality. The same goes for some subsequent reader comments. Whenever the words 'but' or 'however' follow a comment seemingly critical of real or threatened violence, sanction is being given to that violence. This is inflammatory and irresponsible.

99% of the hundreds of thousands of people working in the banking industry (I am not one) have had nothing whatsoever to do with the serious errors of judgement made by a tiny group of very senior bankers. The former are honest, hardworking folk who are more appalled than anyone about the mistakes of the latter few, who should be held to account by legal process - and nothing BUT legal process.
15

Lesley,

EDINBURGH 29/03/2009 15:00:10
I don't think the point is the failure of the bankers - particulary in Sir Fred's case. He is the most hated man in the country because he has taken such a huge pension, and intends to keep it. And that has nothing to do with other banking employees - many are paying for his mistakes with their jobs. Once again, the Scotsman (and posters on this site) are generalising - the problem is not "bankers" but those heads of banking, who failed in their duties, to the public AND their employees.

I don't agree with criminalising his wife and the bullying of his kids - however, they will benefit greatly from Sir Fred's ill gotton gains - won't they?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.