Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Scotland loses out as architects go for gold at London Olympics

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 June 2007
IT GAVE the world William Adam and his son Robert who, along with Glasgow's Charles Rennie Mackintosh, put Scottish architecture on the map.
But the country that has traditionally produced a stream of world-renowned architects is now suffering a severe shortage in one of its most revered professions.

Up to 40% of the young architects now graduating from Scottish universities are being
lured to the southeast of England to take part in the construction boom leading up to the 2012 Olympics.

After spending seven years learning their profession they are attracted by the higher salaries being offered on the big-money projects that will precede the £10bn games.

And now architectural practices across Scotland say they are experiencing severe difficulties in recruiting recently qualified architects. Large infrastructure projects will be affected, as well as the house extension market, with home- owners facing longer waits for their dream additions.

Douglas Read, president of the Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland (RIAS), said the whole range of architectural work would be affected.

"We are faced with an incredible construction boom at the moment in Scotland, as well as elsewhere, and there are not enough architects to go around.

"Then we are faced with the Olympics down south, which is drawing increasing numbers of our recently qualified architects away.

"This will affect everyone, from the big multi-million-pound projects at the top to the home extension market at the other end."

Architectural practices were having to turn work away because they did not have enough staff, Read added. Practices were being "run off their feet", which meant clients having to find other architects or wait longer for their plans to be drawn up.

"One of the problems is the effect of Changing Rooms and other TV makeover programmes. People see projects completed in very quick time and it raises their expectations. With practices finding it more difficult than before to recruit, they may now have to wait longer."

Some 200 architecture students graduate from the gruelling courses at Scotland's six architecture schools every year.

Peter Wilson, the director of the Manifesto Foundation for Architecture at Napier University, which monitors trends in the profession, said: "Up to 40% of graduates now leave for London as soon as they qualify, attracted by the higher wages and sheer volume of opportunities. The problem is, once they are down there, very few ever come back."

Major housing projects - such as Glasgow Harbour, Edinburgh Waterfront and the £1.2bn Ravenscraig new town - could also be hit by the architect exodus.

According to Alan Dunlop, of the Glasgow practice Gordon Murray and Alan Dunlop, experienced architects are also being targeted.

"What we are short of is people with around five years experience and up to 10 years. They can get between £45,000 and £50,000 down there, compared with £30,000 to £38,000 here."

Allan Lundmark, director of planning at the umbrella group Homes for Scotland, said the shortage would affect plans to double the number of new houses being built in Scotland to meet demand.

"People know there are shortages of plumbers, plasterers and brickies but what they don't realise is there is a shortage of skilled professionals as well," he said.

"There is now a shortage of architects working on housing developments. As it already takes two to three years to get new developments through the planning system, a shortage of architects can only make it worse."

Some practices have tried to fill the gap with architects recruited from other countries such as Germany, Spain and Poland. Others have bought architecture firms in eastern European countries so that more routine work can be carried out before being e-mailed back.

Read said: "A lot of them are very competent people, but the problem is there is not enough of them to fill the gap and there won't be for the foreseeable future."

One further problem for homeowners is that if they do secure an architect, the team of builders and craftsmen they employ to build extensions may also have gone south. Read said: "Architects like to work with certain people they trust. If they disappear to England then the situation could get even worse."

Mother of all building sites raises bar


The 2012 Olympics will be the biggest construction project in British history with, first, the preparation of a 246 hectare (2.5 sq km) site in East London as the Olympic Park and then a series of major building schemes.

The planning application includes plans to construct five permanent sporting venues: the Olympic stadium; aquatics centre; velo park, handball arena; and Eton Manor - as well as three other temporary venues.

Plans also include homes and office space to be used after the games extravaganza.

There already 500 building workers on the Olympic Park site with a figure expected to peak at 9,000. But the London Development Agency estimates that as many 30,000 additional workers may be needed for Olympics-related projects.

The overall budget for Olympic-related preparations and regeneration costs has now more than tripled from the original estimate to £10bn. The budget for venues, regeneration and infrastructure alone has climbed from £2.4bn to £5.3bn.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 June 2007 7:19 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: London Olympics 2012
 
1

www.scottwebb.co.uk..,

09/06/2007 23:22:02

The Olympics is a ridiculously expensive farce that people cannot afford :)

2

I'm no really here,

09/06/2007 23:32:11

Will they have Trams at the Olympics?? It's so bl@@dy expensive, it looks as though they might be.

3

Buchanan,

California 10/06/2007 00:34:04

So at £10bn I guess Scotland's contribution to this latest British folly is ~10% so £1bn. Let's have a debate as to whether this is really how Scots would choose to spent this massive amount of money. Of course the Unionists will argue that Scotland benefits reflectively from being part of the glorious world class British stature that this no doubt enhances.

Would be nice to at least have Scotland as a separate team with our own flag and anthem - then we would at least get something out of this.

Of course the London times will just see this as another opportunity to report on whinging, whining, drunk, self-pitying Scots :)

4

Alan Reid,

NZ 10/06/2007 01:32:52

3: Spot on, and we're told it's another benefit of the union,
AM: waiting for a comment to this one!

5

Buchanan,

California 10/06/2007 02:11:35

A bit more background for the Unionist to digest -
Economic impact of the Olympics.
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/ttri/pdf/2005_5.pdf

Of course not only will Scotland need to again subsidize England to built their London infra-structure, but we
can also reasonably expect that the economic
benefits will be somewhat localized funnily enough in and around London. One interesting comparative would be the Sydney games where
"In the Games year it is noticeable that the gains to Australia as a whole ($1,128 million) are lower than the gains to NSW ($1,237 million).
implying that the rest of Australia incurred a loss in GDP during the Games year"
Substituting London/England for NSW and 'Scotland'
for 'rest of Australia' we can gain a clue as to the likely impact. So not only will Scotland have the honor of further funding the British empire world stage posturing, but the Return On Investment will likely again be concentrated in Southern Britain, but we are all 'equal' partners so we should rejoice that Britain will be so much stronger :)

6

Mallory,

10/06/2007 03:52:04

Surely the award winning Edinburgh Architect can find somewhere in London to put up even more glass fronted five star hotels, office blocks and luxurty flats? For example that large green space beside Westminster is only ever used by TV crews.

Should be possible to include a few 'affordable homes' in any development.

7

james 1st,

nz 10/06/2007 05:42:58

another union bonus for scotland, losing its qualified young professionals

8

walter,

10/06/2007 06:46:38

I have met very few Scots, Welsh N.Irish or English that agree with the Olympics.
They like me do not see any benefits to the rest of the UK and only see London and the S.E. gaining from them.
Why do some on here believe that they have the right to insinuate all Unionist are up there shouting their support on them.
Nationalist cannot seem to separate their hatred for the Union and Unionist from facts.

9

Chaplin,

10/06/2007 06:52:09

There's a few chips on shoulders with the posters above !!
Just imagine: University degree (ink not even dry) thrust out into the world to find a job. Stay in Scotland and spend the rest of your career on Mrs Mcginties extension and the occasional refurbishment of the youth club, starting salary between £25 -30g. Or catch the train to London, be on the design team for the Olympic buildings, starting salary double if not treble. Whose CV looks better !!
I might also like to remind some of those posters above that we went to Spain to find an architect for our most important building and it was built mainly by foreign workers.
Apart from that they'll return wiser for their experiences. If you haven't ever lived and worked in the deep south you wont realise how lucky we are to live in Scotland.

10

S'me,

10/06/2007 08:00:00

moan, moan, moan...

11

donald,

weegieland 10/06/2007 09:04:59

Plenty to moan about. Labour would never stick up for Scotland. It's time ...

12

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 10/06/2007 09:32:58

Dundee would run rings roond it.

13

The Strategist,

10/06/2007 09:34:37

A quick look at any modern housing estate will immediately dispell any concept that Scottish architecture is alive and well.

14

Caliwag,

york 10/06/2007 09:41:32

They should be paid more then...surely the fee percentages are the same, or are Scottish buildings cheaper?

15

Myles,

Central Scotland 10/06/2007 10:28:40

And the news is?

How long have young people from Scotland headed to London. Weren't we under the illusion that their 'streets were paved with gold'?

It is a well known fact that architects and engineers will earn more down south - there are more jobs, bigger projects and the companies pay more!!

Perhaps if the RIAS, ICE and other 'Institutions' encouraged their member companies to pay decent salaries in Scotland we might not lose so many graduates down south and indeed abroad.

As an experienced engineer myself I am well aware that there are far more opportunities for me in London and further afield in Europe, US and Australia. I remain in Scotland purely so my kids get a decent school education. Once they are through that (only 7 years left for the youngest now!!) who knows where we might end up!!

16

city man,

scotland 10/06/2007 10:38:00

i think its rediculas that london got the games.
what better place would have been but paris. it had all the transport infurstructure in place and stadiums
instead its given to london and i can see the rest of britain being sucked dry to finance this and if the new logo got anything to do with it it doesnt give one much confidence

17

Ralph Kramden,

10/06/2007 11:22:48

I'm sure there will be any number of Polish or Romanian architects willing to take there places in Scotland - should make for some interesting, if uninspiring, designs!!

18

Brian Hill,

Edinburgh 10/06/2007 15:29:41

Most unfortunate timing of this article with the officials from the Commonwealth games arriving in Glasgow today to check up on the facilities now and still to be built.

But Ralph Kramden makes a very good point re East European architects coming here for what they will see as very good salaries. Nice piece of thinking outside the box Ralph.

19

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 10/06/2007 16:01:15

The extra salaries are balanced out by the cost of living. The projects down there may be larger but so what.

Young Scots feel a need to try London. I did it and was more than happy to come back. Trouble with me was my CV had some prestigeous landmarks on it and that went against me. Not as an architecht but related to construction.

20

Jimbo Jones,

10/06/2007 16:58:32

Surely the "London Weighting" paid by to key workers is exacerbating the problem?

If nurses, teachers or clerical civil servants can't afford to live there, the lure of living in a city with no hospitals or schools would be greatly reduced.

By falsely inflating wages, the government are feeding the inflationary boom in London, and increasing the gap between there and everywhere else.

21

SandyPierce,

caledonia 10/06/2007 19:06:27

I hope they pick a better calibre of architect than the quality of designer used to create that pathetic epileptic fit-inducing logo...

22

WHISTLEBLOWER,

Far awa fae Killecrankie (preferably) 10/06/2007 19:52:35

Don't you mean the orally suggestive logo?

23

Haggis MacBagpipes,

Central Canada 11/06/2007 03:49:56

Britain's Olympic logo looks like it was done by the 3-year-old son or daughter of a designer.

It is a pi$$-poor job of designing whomever came up with it. IMHO.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.