Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Scotland has sights on 'Saudi Arabia' of marine energy as firms bid to build big windfarms



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 October 2008
SCOTLAND has taken a major step towards becoming a green energy powerhouse after more than a dozen companies applied to build a series of giant offshore windfarms.
The Crown Estate, the agency which owns the British seabed out to the 12-mile territorial limit, has revealed that 14 private development consortiums are bidding to build the farms in 23 locations off the east and west coasts.

Each farm is expecte
d to have scores of 1,000-tonne turbines, up to 300ft high, anchored to the seabed and spread over tens of square miles. Although only a selection of the farms will be built, each one is expected to produce around 500 megawatts of power – enough to light about 300,000 homes – and make a significant contribution to Alex Salmond's dream of turning Scotland into the "Saudi Arabia" of marine energy.

Difficulties and long delays in gaining planning permission for large onshore windfarms because of environmental concerns are fuelling the move offshore into territorial waters. Advances in deep-water windfarm technology – gained from North Sea oil industry expertise – have made offshore farms more viable.

They are likely to be sited several miles offshore to avoid opposition to their visual intrusion that has dogged onshore turbine developments. Potential locations include the northern Irish Sea and the outer reaches of the Solway Firth off the coast of Dumfries and Galloway, where undersea cables could be constructed to connect the farms to the national grid via existing nuclear power stations at Hunterston and Chapelcross. Sea areas to the east of the Angus and Lothian coasts are also strong contenders.

Scotland currently produces 4.5 gigawatts of renewable energy, putting it just 400MW away from meeting its targets of generating 31% of its electricity demand from renewable sources by 2011.

At a conference earlier this month, Salmond said he was confident of meeting the future target of producing 50% energy from renewables by 2020 as by that time there would be "gigantic stuff offshore".

As an incentive, the Crown Estate is offering exclusive development rights for locations to developers and will also pay for up to 50% of the cost of gaining planning permission, a sum likely to be worth millions of pounds.

The Crown Estate opened the bidding for Scottish territorial waters in June, saying the rapid development of offshore wind capacity was central to the delivery of the UK's share of the European Union target of 20% renewable energy by 2020.

The deadline for applications was on October 10. Ian Pitchard, the Crown Estate's head of offshore operations, said: "We are encouraged by the strong response. There have been applications from 14 developers involving 23 locations spread around the Scottish coast."

The Crown Estate will now carry out an initial assessment of the applications, with decisions being made in December.

Scottish Natural Heritage, the Government's nature adviser, says it has been approached for environmental advice by a number of developers.

It revealed in a report that it has also been told by the SNP Government to "ensure that conservation issues and other potential constraints are addressed and do not create a barrier to development".

The minimum size of development asked for by the Crown Estate, which will earn money for the Treasury from leasing seabed sites, was 100MW, but commercial windfarms can now be five times that size.

Among the likeliest candidates to be among the developers are Scottish and Southern Energy, which is already involved in building the world's largest offshore windfarm, at a cost of £1.2bn, off the Suffolk coast. Another will be Ramco, an Aberdeen-based energy company.

Jason Ormiston, chief executive of the Scottish Renewables Forum, an industry lobby body, said: "We are pleasantly surprised by the level of interest. It seems we are gearing up for major developments off the coast of Scotland but at this stage we don't know whether we will get a handful or many more.

A spokesman for Ramco offshoot SeaEnergy said: "We are interested in bidding, especially as this is our home patch. There is a better wind resource out at sea and you don't have the problems of visual impact that you have on land."

Environmental groups – many of which have opposed windfarm developments on land because of their visual impact – welcomed the move offshore.

Dan Barlow, head of policy at WWF Scotland, said: "We have tough renewable energy targets to meet and offshore windfarms will help us to do that."









The full article contains 756 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 19/10/2008 08:14:50
Offshore or onshore, they are still a ripoff and useless at producing electricity. These companies that want to do this simply want more of the gravy train provided by ROCS.
It is time the Scotsman stopped this nonsense about powering X number of homes or saving X thousand tonnes of co2. They do neither.
You can also forget the 300ft high quoted, more than likely they will be in excess of 500ft and anything up to 800ft high.
In these days of economic crisis, it is nothing but madness to build these wind monstrosities which are guaranteed to push prices up even more.
2

Unimpressed one,

19/10/2008 09:22:53
"Each farm is expected to have scores of 1,000-tonne turbines, up to 300ft high, anchored to the seabed and spread over tens of square miles."

If any needed proof that ALL environmental pressure groups are hypocritical basta*ds then compare the above with the bile they vented when Shell wanted to sink an oil platform in the North sea just a few years ago. Greenpees and WWF were beside themselves with grief on the effect it would have on the environment. Seems like whole-scale industry on the sea bed is OK now so long as it conforms with their twisted pseudo-religious views.
3

Mallory,

Edinburgh 19/10/2008 09:27:03
Why does the English crown own the seabed?
4

carrottop,

Dumfries 19/10/2008 09:28:25
Scottish wave turbines are the way to go, dont interfere with the marine life but stop fishing in the area so would give us conservation areas with no ugly blot on the landscape and with a bit of luck, made in Scotland.
Why do they persist with wind turbines as the majority of Scots clearly dont want them. Are they deaf, stupid or is it just about money.
5

noswod,

Honestas 19/10/2008 13:09:12
Its the UK crown not only the English. Building windmills in the sea to save the planet from C02 has a certain irony. Unfortunately not much work on the hardware will be done in Scotland and the wind doesn't blow all the time or it has a habit of blowing too much. Wind energy cost more in whole cycle cash and energy costings. The billions that are going to be spent on windmills would produce more power and less CO2 if spent on improving the existing system of generation, distribution, usuage and insulation. The windmills project will result in more expensive energy, unreliable, a long way away from where its needed - West Cost of Scotland generated South of England use and unfortunately theres the problem in putting a new wire into the grid through the Highlands. Our dear politicans are using windmill thinking on this one costing us more and putting the lights oot.
6

danielrober,

19/10/2008 20:26:33
I personally welcome competition into the UK.

I hope through that this opportunity to operate technology in UK waters and have technology purchased, with financail support by UK grants is returned.

So if the 'original' countries from where this technology is purchased from, also allow UK companies to operate and bid in their national economy, everyone would be happy. After all competition is good and FUN.
7

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 19/10/2008 22:26:00
-- Why does the English crown own the seabed?

Because they signed a pact with Satan to own the whole planet and all the humans still aboard it. It also owns vast tracts in both North and South America. Through the City of London it controls commodities, minerals and energy supplies and perhaps Australia. Of course, they publicly say, there are far too many of us, and from various famines, diseases and wars their great military-industrial complexes have promoted, we're getting thinned out. It's not been good news for cows and sheep neither.

What with the amount of nuclear weapons, biowarfare and this newer fangled electronic scalar weaponry, nowhere's safe at all. Still it has to be better fighting for the planet and going down with it, than sharing a bunker with them.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.