Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Pass marks for maths exam lowered after complaints over hard questions

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 August 2008
PASS marks for Standard Grade maths were reduced by examiners this year after teachers complained the exam was too hard, Scotland on Sunday can reveal.
More than 8,000 students were awarded the top grade in the exam after the pass mark for a Grade 1 was reduced by 3% and the boundary for a Grade 2 reduced by 2%. However, despite the adjustment, the percentage of entrants getting the highest marks dr
opped 1% from last year to 16%.

The Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) insisted the exam was at the intended level, but markers decided to lower the grade boundary because it was "perceived to be difficult".

Concerns have been raised that adjusting pass marks in these circumstances could suggest a lack of pupil achievement.

Industry leaders warned that numeracy skills needed to be maintained to support Scotland's business sectors.

Complaints were made to the SQA about the difficulty of the credit paper, taken by the brightest students sitting Standard Grade maths, in May.

Teachers claimed some questions were of Higher standard, putting students at a disadvantage. But when the results were announced on August 5 they showed an increase in the number of passes in maths, from 97.4% to 98.7%.

Mike Haggerty, spokesman for the SQA, said: "In a meeting about the credit paper of Standard Grade maths, examiners agreed there was a degree of difficulty that was necessary and intended.

"They assured themselves all the elements were in the curriculum but there was a recognition that the paper had been perceived to be difficult, so the grade boundaries were adjusted accordingly."

Haggerty said the setting of the grade boundaries, done after papers are marked, was an "inexact science" but examiners used their professional opinion and took into account marks and feedback from teachers.

The grade boundary for a 1 was 66%, 3% lower than in 2007, and 8,475 entrants were awarded the top mark.

Brian Cooper, spokesman for the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS), representing 80% of Scottish teachers, said: "It would be unfair on pupils to be disadvantaged by sitting an exam in a year when the paper was particularly difficult.

"While setting the same level of difficulty in exams can never be exact from year to year, the processes that are in place help to ensure that the system is as fair and consistent as possible."

Last year businesses complained literacy and numeracy skills among new recruits were so low they have to retrain them.

Iain Ferguson, policy executive of CBI Scotland, said a lot of employers praised the school leavers and the graduates they took on, but standards must be maintained.

"It's absolutely critical to retain numeracy standards. Particularly around the Lothians there is a very strong base of financial sector companies, not even just companies but headquarters of companies."

Alistair Gillespie, chair of the Scottish Maths Council,

said: "The area where there is a real worry which impinges on Standard Grade is the number of primary teachers who are not confident in numeracy because they don't need Higher maths to go into primary teaching."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 August 2008 7:21 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

jarmon,

17/08/2008 06:58:54
Guess i need a math refresher course to figure out all the percentages in the article.
2

Chaplin,

17/08/2008 08:15:52
Recently I helped my child with revision of past papers for this exam.
The questions were reminiscent of the ones I did in late primary/senior one and the formulae for all answers was given on page two.
3

Eric D,

Renfrewshire 17/08/2008 11:51:07
"perceived to be difficult", and that's the way it should be. I was a mature engineering student recently(at a joke Uni (Paisley)). The Foreign exchange students eg German, Spanish etc were miles ahead of the Scottish educated counterparts ( but not the matures). Indeed the lecturers expected it.Some of the students couldn't even put 2 numbers together and these kids had Highers. I also did Maths modules at a FE college (difficult to find these days) and saw their teaching methods first hand. Both lecturers were school teachers by day and in their late 20's. What they did was to show you how to pass the (assessment, no exams here), which isn't the same as understanding. So when the less able go to Uni they are found out very quickly .

I detect the liberal educators and theorists foot- print all over this. A large dose of social engineering going on, where everybody despite some as thick as two short planks, achieve a qualification and nobody fails, which is counter to life experience.

At the root of the problem is the SQA and the meddling politicians. It doesn't surprise thay send their managers on the COMMON PURPOSE ,matrix leadership couses. who are more about social engineering rather than education some say even sinister.(www.commonpurpose.org.uk)



4

ThePeter,

Glasgae 17/08/2008 12:18:27
What is 2+2 ?
Oh, does not matter, we'll give you an A anywahy if you find it too difficult....
5

GW,

Aberdeenshire 17/08/2008 17:20:58
If 66% earned a grade 1 pass, what percentage earned a grade 2 pass? I suspect the figure will be well below 50%.
6

High Heid Yin,

Edinburgh 18/08/2008 15:32:30
My daughter sat her standard grade this year. She came home in floods of tears saying that there were two questions which had not been covered by the school in the curriculum. It transpired that the school too formally complained that the content of the standard grade indeed had Higher standard questions.
Now I am all for testing pupils and stretching them but to set questions in an important examination that weren't even in the standard grade curriculum is just ludicrous.

Fortunately my daughter handled all the other questions okay and managed a grade 1 pass.
I think the SQA actually are a bit embarrased about this but are fudging the issue with all the "baffling" statistics and precentages we see in the above article.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.