Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Libyan bomber 'to be allowed to return home'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 April 2009
SPECULATION was mounting last night that the cancer-stricken Lockerbie bomber will shortly be returned to Libya.
The Crown Office yesterday confirmed it had written to the families of all 270 victims of the 1989 bombing to spell out how any transfer would take place.

Insiders said the move amounted to an acknowledgement that Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrah
i will be sent home after a controversial prisoner transfer agreement is ratified at the end of this month.

Megrahi, who is suffering from incurable cancer, is currently serving 27 years in Greenock Prison but is awaiting an appeal against his conviction. The letter to families, which was sent by e-mail, is understood to suggest that the 2007 agreement between Libya and the UK will be ratified on April 27, the day before Megrahi's long-awaited appeal is due to begin in Edinburgh.

Megrahi is the only Libyan national currently serving a jail sentence in Scotland and is understood to be eager to return home to end his life close to his wife Aisha and children.

A spokeswoman for the Crown Office declined to reveal the details of the letter but stressed that prosecutors had been keeping families up to date with the case.

She said: "Since the day the UK signed the agreement in 2007 we have communicated with the families about it because of their long-standing interest in any prisoner transfer arrangements between the UK and Libya."

The former Libyan security service officer was granted the right to take his case back to the Court of Appeal for a second time after the Scottish Criminal Case Review Commission found that his conviction "may be a miscarriage of justice". Late last year he asked to be released on bail pending the plea but was refused.

Megrahi's relatives believe that he would not survive the appeal, which is expected to take as long as a year, partly because the court will not sit full time. His prostate cancer, as revealed in Scotland on Sunday, has spread to other parts of his body.

Some reports have suggested that officials in both England and Scotland have encouraged Libya to apply for Megrahi to be transferred as soon as the agreement is set in stone.

Last month it was claimed that Robert Gordon, the most senior civil servant in the Scottish Government's Justice Department, had been instructed by Kenny MacAskill, the Justice Secretary, to hold talks with the Libyans. In theory, however, the agreement on prisoner transfer is between Libya and the UK.

Talks on prisoner transfers between the two countries started in 2005 but the foreign office has always denied that the negotiations have anything to do with Megrahi specifically.

MPs on Westminster's Committee on Human Rights last month said they felt the treaty raised concerns and asked for ratification to be delayed until the end of this month.

The committee, which wants to carry out a full investigation of the draft treaty, said: "In our view, when a select committee states that it intends to scrutinise a treaty, ratification should be delayed until the committee's inquiry has concluded."

First Minister Alex Salmond has previously said he feels Megrahi should serve his entire term in Scotland. The initial prisoner transfer agreement, dubbed "the deal in the desert", sparked fury north of the border.

Even after the deal is finalised, it will be up to MacAskill to decide whether to release Megrahi to the Libyans. The UK Government has no power over prisoners in the Scottish system.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 April 2009 12:08 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Lockerbie
 
1

Dougie - Edinburgh,

19/04/2009 00:40:48
This is one reason why we need the death penalty. Even somebody who kills hundreds of people is now going to be given his freedom. He should have been hanged long before he developed cancer.
2

2Right,

On Location 19/04/2009 02:31:39
Dougie away you go and boil yer heed ya eejit.

Please tell me what evidence you would have hanged this Innocent man on ?

And just for your info Gauci has never Identified Megrahi, he only said he was similar but needed to be ten years older to fit the bill.

Beltrami said when the Hanging was here people were less likely to convict in Murder cases so he would have got a Not Guilty or Not Proven either way he would never have been found guilty and come to think of it he had no Jury either.

We have three of our supposed best Judges in the world being brought into question, Can't have that can we now ?

He must be sent home to allow the Corrupt officials to continue their cover ups SCCRC included
3

Mallory,

Edinburgh 19/04/2009 02:38:10
How convenient this would be for Scottish Justice. Out of sight, out of mind and a redundant appeal process.
4

,

19/04/2009 08:29:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

huggs,

19/04/2009 10:35:26
So he is going home to die at a place of his choice.
The hundreds who died at Lockerbie that day had no choice!

I wonder if he will miss his luxuries such as his satellite tv his internet access and his own personall shower.

He is a convicted murderer and should be treated as one with no special attention.
6

Radge from the West,

Glasgow 19/04/2009 12:06:49
If transferred,this will be a day of great shame for Scotland.We should never have got involved in this charade.At best we got a minor gofer sacrificed for expediency.259 souls lost in the air and 11 fellow Scots killed on the ground with all the continuing trauma still being felt.
Al Megrahi's biggest mistake was not insisting on a jury trial in Scotland.Now the political fix is being constructed and slipped under the door.We will never know now who was responsible as the political balance has changed in 20 years.If it was Iran and Arafat's PLO,unless Deep Throat reappears it will be left to future students of history to stumble across the truth.We have no mechanism's for Truth and Reconcilation and that is the price we pay in this democracy.Revenge took place for the shooting down by the Americans of that Iranian civilian aircraft.That must now be clear to even the village idiot.
7

2Right,

On Location 21/04/2009 01:58:06
#7
Al Megrahi's biggest mistake was not insisting on a jury trial in Scotland.

I do not think Megrahi had any choice on this issue.

Why are the Crown Office sending out letters explaining the PTA ?

Is this not the job of Parliament and the SPS ?

However Mr Gordon knows the shame that will be brought to our supposed great Justice System.

#5 You said
And to cap it all they quote Beltrami who was defender of every scumbag and crook who could pay him out of his "earnings"

Are you suggesting that everyone who used Beltrami was a scumbag or guilty ?

Are you also suggesting we should not allow lawyers to defend people now because they are all Scumbags.

Great mentality you have mate, says a lot for you.

And could you please tell us all and give us a laugh exactly what evidence you would base a conviction on ?

Perhaps the witness relied upon by the drunken Lord Advocate who used witness's he later described as "Not The Full Shilling"

Please don't come back and tell me the Maltese shopkeeper, who has indeed not Identified Megrahi but Abu Talb.

His evidence of Megrahi was : He looked like the Buyer (Whom he originally identified as Abu Talb, An Iranian) but he would have to have been Ten years older.

Are you also suggesting our SCCRC are not fit for purpose ? who after all their investigations have said Megrahi's case is a "Miscarriage Of Justice"

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.