Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Fish suppers take battering in crackdown on takeaways

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 June 2008
SCOTLAND'S unhealthiest takeaway meals are being named and shamed by the Scottish government in an attempt to wean the country off battered fish and creamy curries.
Ministers have announced a crackdown on carry-outs in an effort to tackle the obesity crisis gripping Scotland.

The £500,000 Take Life On campaign, being launched this week, will ask us to choose healthier alternatives to chips, curries and kebabs as well as to consider the health benefits of cutting down on alcohol and taking more exercise. The advice includes: "Try not eating all of the batter on your fish" and "Avoid creamy sauces".

Shona Robison, the Minister for Public Health, said: "The major message of Take Life On is that simple switches in our daily lives can make a real difference to our health and give us a feel-good boost.

"It doesn't mean making big sacrifices or cutting out pleasures altogether. Small changes like walking to work, aiming for at least two alcohol-free days per week or cutting down on crisps and biscuits by making switches to fruit or vegetables all add up."

The new campaign by the SNP Government will feature TV, radio and billboard adverts as well as a website. The adverts, which will run until September, will urge us to make small changes in our everyday lives in order to reduce the risk of serious illness.

Bad takeaways to be highlighted include chicken tikka masala, battered fish with chips, doner kebabs and deep-pan pepperoni pizzas.

The better alternatives, according to the Government, include tandoori chicken, fish in breadcrumbs, shish kebab and thin-crust pizza.

In addition to the advice to shun the unhealthy takeaways, the campaign will also try to persuade the public to have at least two days a week completely alcohol-free and to have a brisk 30-minute walk at least once a day, five days a week.

Scotland is the second-fattest nation in the developed world, according to figures published last year. Only the United States is suffering higher obesity levels.

Some 25.5% of the adult population in Scotland was obese in 2003, compared with 32.2% in the US.

The campaign has been criticised by opposition MSPs. Scottish Tory public health spokesman Jackson Carlaw MSP said: "This is the sort of intrusion into people's personal freedoms that we can well do without. Scots are perfectly capable of deciding what foods they want to choose from their local takeaway without the assistance of the Government."

But the campaign has been backed by a top health expert.

Carina Norris, a registered nutritionist, said: "Although this might be seen as nibbling round the edge of the problem, if you'll excuse the pun, I think this has quite a lot of potential to make a real difference. This campaign seems quite realistic, in that it recognises that people are not just going to change their behaviour all of a sudden. It recognises that people will still go out for takeaways and then suggests maybe have a healthier takeaway."

Restaurateurs had mixed views on the campaign. Chris Reilly of the Townhead Cafe in Biggar, the Scottish and UK Fish and Chip Shop of the Year 2008, said: "There's no particular danger, as far as obesity is concerned, from fish and chips cooked in the right way. It largely comes down to the standard of the shops concerned. It's wrong to pin the blame entirely on takeaways; there's plenty of high-fat food available in supermarkets."

Mirza Nawaz, an Indian restaurant proprietor in Aberdeen, said: "Recently, there was a meeting of a large number of Aberdeen takeaway restaurant owners, where we discussed ways to encourage healthy eating. We recognise that excessive consumption of takeaway food can lead to problems. The Government's right to act: kids need to be looked after."


The full article contains 643 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 May 2008 8:03 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 01/06/2008 00:39:18

For Gods Sake! Here we Go again!

If its not the 'fags' its now the 'Chippy'!

What Next,?

And them kids in the pic don't look fat, and if like mine will never be fat! just enjoying a "Fish Supper" Like we used to get our children for a treat! say on a Saturday night!

'Ciggy's',... off the shelfs!

'Chippy's,...get closed down!

I tell you this!

Stick it where the,..'Sun Don't Shine'!

MY CHILDREN WILL HAVE A "BATTERED FISH" FOR A TREAT IF THEY WANT ONE,,!!

AND YOU KNOW WHAT YOU CAN DO, IF YOU DONT LIKE IT!

'STOP',, TRYING TO RUN OUR LIVES,!!!!!!!
2

Conan the Librarian™,

01/06/2008 00:57:36
1
Agree Charles.
Well meaning people try to stop f u c k wits from killing themselves and their children, slowly.
Like my parents tried to kill me by feeding me chips,deep fried bacon and bubble and squeak.
But they failed miserably.
And I still have some
teeth;-)
3

Cincinnatus,

Edinburgh 01/06/2008 01:24:01
The SNP are just LABOUR in an Independence context - you'd be better cutting the money on any of these programmes and giving it back to the people - they can decide for themselves.
4

Guga II,

Rockall 01/06/2008 01:31:15
Who came up with this idea? We've had enough of the Stalinist, totalitarian control freaks in the New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party. We don't need the SNP telling us what we should or should not eat. All governments should get off our backs and leave us alone.
5

brian mcc,

the arctic 01/06/2008 01:46:01
Children eat what the parents feed them. The body will absorb a certain amount of fried food. Once or twice a week is okay, beyond that comes obesity.

No matter what you eat, exercise is the key to digestion.
6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 01/06/2008 01:55:47

#5 brian mcc,

You 'of-course' speak sense!

But STOP speaking 'sense' and give them,..'WHAT-FOR'!!

Or they will be testing the,..'air you breath' next!

And thats every breath!
7

Fanling,

Switzerland 01/06/2008 02:11:19
In recent times Scotland (and England & Wales) has been swamped with government "awareness campaigns". Where the hell did these frighteners originally come from? Who are these pen-pushing miserabilists who spend their every living moment scaring the living daylights out of the population at large? There is almost not a day that goes by without obesity, and every damned disease under the sun, coming under the spotlight of government-sponsored bullsh!t.

Any parent with a grain of commonsense will feed their children sensibly and see that they have regular exercise. Trouble is, many don't give a monkey's. Thank god (and I'm a non-believer) I was brought up in an era when we all played outdoors all night (all day in the holidays) and weekends were spent exploring the countryside or more often kicking a football. We were fitter than fit by doing what used to come naturally.

Comparing the amount of taxpayers' money spent on health scare campaigns, where does the prevention - and punishment - of the filthy crime that is an everyday feature on the streets of the UK have its place? Priorities?
8

,

01/06/2008 02:12:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

,

01/06/2008 02:15:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Jimmy the Pie,

01/06/2008 03:13:20
Can anyone afford a fish supper these days??

Last one I bought was nearly a fiver.

Mind you when you look at Lard Foolkes, there is living proof of what will happen to you if you over indulge at the trough. Perhaps we could use a photo of his Lardship in a poster campaign warning of the dangers of overeating and taking excessive alcohol?


Maybe a shot of him lying in the gutter???

TV adverts could also show him lecturing on the dangers of getting a criminal record???
11

Stuart W,

Dundee 01/06/2008 04:53:22
"...have a brisk 30-minute walk at least once a day, five days a week"

Does this actually make sense?
12

JT,

01/06/2008 05:25:16
When those doctors and politicians stop drinking, smoking, taking drugs (prescribed and illegal) and eating bad food in the quantity that they do may be the rest of society will do. Is the government that stupid that most of us know that the take away or fish supper is something to have once in a while? The amount of wasted time and money for awareness campaigns I guess theres your answer. If they put half the effort into cheap, good quality healthier foods for us, then we wouldnt be in the state we are in. Its all about balance.
13

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 01/06/2008 07:19:01
In a paper published online Monday in the Public Library of Science Medicine journal, Dutch
researchers found that the health costs of thin and healthy people in adulthood are more expensive than
those of either fat people or smokers.

Van Baal and colleagues created a model to simulate lifetime health costs for three groups of 1,000
people: the "healthy-living" group (thin and nonsmoking), obese people, and smokers. The model relied on "cost of illness" data and disease prevalence in the Netherlands in 2003.

The researchers found that from age 20 to 56, obese people racked up the most expensive health costs.
But because both the smokers and the obese people died sooner than the healthy group, it cost less to
treat them in the long run.

On average, healthy people lived 84 years. Smokers lived about 77 years and obese people lived about
80 years. Smokers and obese people tended to have more heart disease than the healthy people.
Cancer incidence, except for lung cancer, was the same in all three groups. Obese people had the most
diabetes, and healthy people had the most strokes.

Ultimately, the thin and healthy group cost the most,
about $417,000, from age 20 on.
The cost of care for obese people was $371,000, and for smokers, about $326,000.
The results counter the common perception that preventing obesity will save health systems worldwide
millions of dollars.
14

Loki - The Scourge of the Schemies,

EH1 01/06/2008 09:11:06
I will make a point of eating a fish supper this very night with a view to annoying the interfering busibodies who would seek to prevent me.
I have been eating the delicacy of the fish supper for 62 years and anyone who knows me would be obliged to agree that I am a perfect physical specimen.
Salt and vinegar please!
15

Unimpressed one,

01/06/2008 09:38:30
"The new campaign by the SNP Government will feature TV, radio and billboard adverts as well as a website. The adverts, which will run until September, will urge us to make small changes in our everyday lives in order to reduce the risk of serious illness."

Another expensive public information campaign. Swinney will need to look again at his spending otherwise SNP are on track to spend as much on useless info promotion as the last administration.
16

Stephen fae Scotland,

San Francisco (& Edinburgh) 01/06/2008 09:55:52
Has Anyone noticed how just how fat fatty Salmond is?

Do as I say, not as I do - eh?

Same old socialist claptrap.
17

Mcsnagpile,

01/06/2008 10:05:20
Most take-aways are jammed packed with fats and sugars. The mugs get hooked on them. These foods are just as addictive as heroin and more dangerous. A heroin addict can survive after 20 years of abuse. The damage caused by 20 years of eating excessive fats and sugars can be irreversible and fatal. The amount of added sugar and fat to a meal should be on the menu. In fact the law should ban it.

Many of the food preparations on TV cooking programmes are criminally unhealthy adding masses of cream and sugar and no consideration given to healthy eating. They should carry public health warnings. These programmes give licence to unhealthy eating.

And another thing-----Military service adds should also carry public health warnings.
In real terms the state is anything but nanny.
18

Stephen fae Scotland,

San Francisco (& Edinburgh) 01/06/2008 10:13:29
#17

If those fatty and sweet things are so, so, so terribly fatal - how about you and all your food fascist have a haggis supper or two - on me!
19

Citylocal Fife,

Fife News 01/06/2008 10:25:50
Not a sensible solution! If people want to eat unwisely then that is their problem, not the tax-payers. I am appalled at the £billions spent on various supposed advisory campaigns which do not work.

'Everything in moderation' would be a more apt campaign banner in many cases.
20

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 01/06/2008 10:37:20

Just do what Hitler did, put everyone into 'Camps' but this time it will be for, 'Your Soo Called Benefit'.

You will be only fed, Veg and Water!

Problem Solved,..'HUH'.!

HI! H$TL£R!! and all that!

And rename Edinburgh to,.. 'Auschwitz1',,'whatever'

VE HAZE VAVES OF MAKING YOZ EAT, WHATZ VE VANTS YOUZ TO EAT!

HI SALMONDZE!!,..'whatever'

_________________


'AYE' IS THIS WHAT WE ALL REALLY WANT, REALLY, REALLY WANT,?
21

Mike555,

01/06/2008 10:43:54
This is the next easy health target some fat government official has dreamed up while sitting in a lovely office paid for by you and me.

Nanny state comes to mind and its a shame I can't stop these to$$ers spending my money on another useless campaign.
22

ddmc,

01/06/2008 11:13:09
500 k to tell us what we already know, a deep fried pizza supper is a heart attack waiting to happen

add this to the 6 million being spent by the NHS to tell us we drink to much

no s h ! t sherlock
23

Dougie, Edinburgh,

01/06/2008 11:19:59
More tax funded government bullying of the general public.
24

Rod,

Champfleurie Estate 01/06/2008 11:56:54
#16 Stephen : Has Anyone noticed how just how fat fatty Salmond is?

Yes, I have. He is not the same slimline Salmond I used to see until fairly recently sprinting along Linlithgow High Street to place his bets.
25

jdships,

01/06/2008 12:18:23
19

Thank you for a common sense reply.
I stopped smoking 45 years ago because I wanted to.
I eat from the F & C shop when I feel like it ( maybe twice a month)- I do enjoy the meal !!.
I have a pint now and again mainly because I can't afford it.
I do not eat sweets as I have diabetes.
I eat an apple an orange and a bannana most days.

These things I do because I choose to ,not because of a Government obsessed with "Political Correctness" .
If we listened to all they say surely we would end up living in a tent on the top of Arthur's Seat eating grass. !!!!
26

Maurice,

Fife 01/06/2008 12:18:50
And rightly so. The government is only helping its citizens who are obviouly to cesspool stupid to think for themselves enjoy be little remote control creatures that run off to illegal wars etc without question. Cummon Scotland, can you not see what is happening here. Brainpower is being diminished daily and the ability to think for oneself and make decisions for which the individual is accountable obsolete. Its you, the citizens of this country who are allowing this to happen. Take responsibility for yourseves people. Get rid of this greedy compensation, blame assigning culture and soon youll start to live again.
Anyhow, this is only my opinion. That of a dumb uneducated African who is often a subject of scorn as an immigrant by your vastly superior interlectual subjects who are seemily more on the dole and disability benifits or God forbid, employed by foreigners like me.
27

The wilkman,

Isle of Skye 01/06/2008 12:22:19
Posted fro Jakarta (was Batavia when my grannie lived there:-)
"""Ultimately, the thin and healthy group cost the most,
about $417,000, from age 20 on.
The cost of care for obese people was $371,000, and for smokers, about $326,000.
The results counter the common perception that preventing obesity will save health systems worldwide
millions of dollars."""

That's looking solely at the medical costs; rather narrowly too - expenditure deferred is money saved, was compound interest over half a lifetime taken into account?

But the real saving from having people healthy is that they work much more productively, making a longer old age affordable. Not to mention that retirement age can and will be higher than it now is - fit people won't want to give up work as soon as the last generation did.

And as for the notion that a health campaign is Stalinist - grow up! Stalinism is when you're not allowed to ignore government control, gentle suggestions are just gentle suggestions. Irate fat posters with eyes glued to their monitor screens, rerolling the douts from their overflowing ashtrays, - just carry right on doing what you're doing, and blame no one else for the consequences, you were warned.
28

fife runner,

01/06/2008 12:56:37
so lets not give cholestrol lowering drugs to those who become obese because we do not need nannying.
29

macca,

Asia 01/06/2008 14:21:23
over fed and over watered where is this Shangrala :-) I would would die for a battered haggis. never mind tempura any way up is okay. there was a chef one day being told of by the king, who was getting fat from over indulging, the chef replied you majesty I do not control your mouth!!!!!!
30

Upandunder,

01/06/2008 16:11:19
I wish these health fascists would just leave us alone.

They fail completely to see the "bigger picture".

They blame fatty food for obesity. Wrong! It's the mouths that are the problem. I eat fish and chips, curries etc but also eat plenty of fresh veg etc - and weigh a healthy 12st.

It's like booze: the so-called experts blame "alcohol" for drink-related crime and health issues. Wrong again. It's alcopops, spirits, strong ciders & lagers and ever-stronger wines that are the problem. As a person who drinks cask ales moderately, I feel offended to be lumped in with a teeny-tipplers who down buckets of sweet strong cider or Buckfast.

"Cars" don't cause car crashes, "food" doesn't cause obesity and "alcohol" doesn't cause alcoholism. It's the PEOPLE who can't handle cars, food and booze properly who need EDUCATING.

Please stop lumping those millions of us who can eat, drink and drive sensibly with the morons who can't.
31

celtic4,

USA 01/06/2008 17:48:55
I am sorry the government seems to think you all have no brain of your own. Of course you do! I don't understand all this health stuff suddenly appearing in news. And stringnet too it seems. But all of us (myself included) can make up our own minds. I weigh a healthy 130 pounds. And I give myself a treat but also eat vegetables, and little sweets. It's a simple think for ourselves thing,who needs government telling us how to live. I am sincere with this posting.
32

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 01/06/2008 18:33:10
The nazi state strikes again.
33

ConnorD,

01/06/2008 18:50:45
#28 - And let's not treat those joggers, runners and fitness fanatics for the various strains, joint complaints, arthritis treatment and physiotherapy that they need and use up precious resources from the NHS. No? I thought not.
A fish supper cooked properly is a perfectly reasonable food to eat, like everything else, in moderation. Quality fish (btw not cod, I wouldn't feed my neighbour's cat on that!), light crisp batter, quality potatoes and good cooking oil. Doesn't need salt, sauce or vinegar - what a treat!
34

Christie,

petaluma 02/06/2008 03:22:38
You got it,ConnerD, moderation and the best ,freshest ingredients..a joy.
35

Statsman,

Edinburgh 02/06/2008 05:59:35
The government wants healthy slaves. That's all we'll be when Chatham House is done. Stop the NWO.
36

alba nach,

Tarbert 02/06/2008 14:18:25
Hang on - maybe folk should take a look at the campaign, before castigating the new totalitarian regime they think has descended upon Scotland:

www.takelifeon.co.uk/takeaways-step-5.html

Looks like they say Fish and Chips "can be nutritious" and offer some pretty sensible ways that you can use to enjoy the odd chippy and make it a little better for you.

I don't see any "crackdown on takeaways". Could it be sensationalism from the journalists? Surely not...

37

,

03/06/2008 22:14:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.