Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 11th May 2008 Change Date

Great Dobbies offer with Scotland on Sunday

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Drive to name and shame firms that let roadworks run too long



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 May 2008
SCOTLAND'S 'Roadworks Tsar' is planning to name and shame contractors who infuriate motorists by allowing roadworks to run on too long.
John Gooday, the Scottish Road Works Commissioner, is drawing up plans to analyse and publish how long roadworks are taking and whether drivers are given enough warning of major disruption. He has also threatened to fine persistent offenders up to £5
0,000.

Gooday has also said he wants to investigate whether companies are side-stepping rules on notifying councils by classifying repairs as emergencies.

Drivers' organisations and businesses have complained about the amount of roadworks across Scotland's network. Shops in Edinburgh city centre say their takings have been down since large sections of the city centre were shut for works on the city's tram scheme.

Gooday has ordered his team of officials to compile data on how well or badly roadworks across Scotland are carried out. Criteria will include how long the scheme takes to complete, how long they overrun, and whether councils and drivers have been given enough notice and details about the works.

Although Gooday's office will not publish his findings as league tables, the data will be made available in ways that would allow analysts and media observers to draw up league tables of which firms, contractors and councils are the worst for delaying traffic.

Motorists' groups hailed the move as a relief for hard-pressed drivers. Neil Greig, director of the Institute of Advanced Motorists Motoring Trust, said: "This is excellent news, naming and shaming the worst contractors will make a difference.

"And drivers have suspected for years that firms and utilities were misusing their right to set up emergency repairs.

"John Gooday and his staff are in the ideal position to look at this question because they can access all the information."





The full article contains 310 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 May 2008 7:17 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 04/05/2008 01:12:44
Why don't thay have penalty clauses in the contracts they give to these people? Then if they are too slow at doing the work, or make a hash of it, they automatically pay a hefty penalty.
2

deek006,

edinburgh 04/05/2008 06:23:11
COUNCIL........TO MANY BACK HANDERS... LINING THERE OWN POCKETS.
3

Haleakelaman,

St.Andrews 04/05/2008 08:38:42
#2. Exactly.
All contracts already have penalty clauses, mostly draughted along the lines of the JCT. Councils are too scared to utilise the clause. As previously mentioned by deek006, there really should be a commission or investigation unit set up to eradicate public servant crooks and the so called bona fide company directors that oil the crooked council machine.
That would be an excellent use of tax payers money. Name, shame and imprison them, after all why should crooked local council workers and crooked company directors laugh at us in their 4 x 4's?
4

Upbeat,

04/05/2008 14:20:52
Can we complain before anything even starts, when a plan is daft in concept.

It is planned to close the A85 at Loch Awe, for a week,in th near future , so that ' essential' safety barrier fencing can be installed at a recognised inadequate Railway bridge. ( Traffic has negotiated this bridge as it now is for over 60 years.) This " essential " work will lead to all traffic to and from the area around Oban having to make lengthy detours...well over 30 miles extra, in order to avoid this.

This is bad enough , but the plan is even more stupid still . The Transport Scotland plan will leave this road only sufficiently wide for single line traffic . They intend to install "temporary" traffic lights at this point.

( Is this to mean ' temporary' as in the 'temporary' Pulpit Rock traffic lights on the A 82 which were installed over 35 years ago and although transport ministers come and go still remain to this day ? . )

If this was anywhere else but the western highlands would this stupidity be permitted on a Trunk road.

The obvious and ugent need is for a replacement railway bridge. This could be built in a fresh location adjacent to the existing road bridge , and once complete the road would be realigned over it.

If Transport Scotland are authorised to spend more than £1,00,000 simply on safety grounds to reduce a lifeline route to single carraigeway status, which idiot, exactly, is really in charge of the Public purse ?
5

Moder8,

EDINBURGH 04/05/2008 17:56:29
I don't understand how "naming and shaming" will make any difference.The use of words will not have any effect on those firms whose contracts are in reality a carte blanche to make money, issued by Councils who are generally inept in the field of contract procedure.
Included in all contracts should be penalty clauses for such as
1. Unsatisfactory work
2. Deviation from original specification
3. Unnegotiatied overrun of time
4. Failure of work done within a specified time span (guarantee
etc.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.