Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Nathan Hines: 'This was sporting cruelty. We deserved to win'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 June 2009
DOES RUGBY get any more devastating? I doubt it. This was the epitome of sporting cruelty. We deserved to win, we should be heading off to Johannesburg level in the series and confident of our chances of making it 2-1 on Saturday. The fact that we're not is surreal.
Let's clear up a few things. Schalk Burger should have been sent off for gouging Luke Fitzgerald. It was a red card, plain and simple. I spoke to Stuart Dickinson, the touch judge, after the match and he said Burger was going to be in trouble for tha
t incident. The game was a minute old and he should have been off.

That said, we don't use it as an excuse because we were good enough to beat 15 Springboks, never mind 14.

Next, the winning penalty. I don't blame Rog (Ronan O'Gara]. When the ball came to him I was willing him to kick it out of the ground. I was thinking that a draw keeps us alive in the series. We couldn't win it but we could level it so I was wanting him to put boot to ball and rifle it into the stand.

Rog was looking to win the match. He was trying to be positive. He chipped ahead and kept his eyes on the ball and clipped the guy, Fourie du Preez. Nightmare. I was sitting next to Gordon D'Arcy in the stand and as Morne Steyn was preparing to kick he had his jumper pulled up over his eyes. I felt like doing the same. It was Steyn's home ground. I feared the worst. Over it went and down we went. I still think it's incredible we lost.

We were so dominant in the game for 40 minutes. We battered them up front and they didn't know what hit them. Then it turned, a bit like last week in reverse. Our guys started getting injured. We lost our props and that was a horrendous blow because Gethin Jenkins and Adam Jones were causing damage. You see, those two getting on top of their opposite numbers wasn't just a physical thing, it was also a mental thing.

For the South Africans to be losing the scrum battle after what they did to us last week was a psychological blow. Doubts start to enter your head when you start losing these one-on-one battles. Had our props not got injured and had we not gone to uncontested scrums then the Boks would have been in a bad place.

It was a game of so many turning points. Losing Drico (O'Driscoll] and Jamie Roberts with about 15 minutes to go was a savage blow because we had to scramble then. Stephen Jones and Tommy Bowe went into the midfield. They're brilliant players but they didn't wake up yesterday morning thinking they'd end up as the centre partnership, that's for sure.

South Africa's bench was pivotal. Heinrich Brussow was a massive influence in the Springbok comeback. He made the breakdowns an absolute mess and grabbed the momentum across to the South African side. Some player.

Jaque Fourie came on and scored the try in the corner which sickened us. And Morne Steyn came in and kicked every goal he got whereas before Ruan Pienaar was missing them. Those three subs did it for them, just.

South Africa have won two Tests they shouldn't have. The only thing we can do now is avoid them getting a third. We have to be motivated by the fear of a whitewash. It would be the final twist of the knife. Everybody's heartbroken but we cannot allow them to go three in a row. It would be a travesty.

The South African fans will be cockier than ever now. We heard some of it right after the game, some of the crowd shouting that they were gonna stuff us in Jo'burg as well. The gloating was a little too much for my liking.

We've got a mountain to climb because we've got injuries. I'm not sure what the story is with Gethin and Adam, Drico and Jamie but some of them will struggle to make it next week. If I was prop I'd be confident of getting a game. Alas, I'm a lock and even though my suspension will be up in time for the third Test I'll hardly get a look-in. Shawsy (Simon Shaw] was fantastic and there's no reason to change things there.

My ban was a joke. That's the only word for it. It was ridiculous. They said it was a dangerous tackle. Well, in that case, there are going to be suspensions in every single game we play from now on because tackles like that are made all the time. I came back from the hearing and told the boys that they'd given me a week and they thought I was winding them up.

We could have appealed it. But I said to Geech (coach Ian McGeechan] it wouldn't do us any good. It might be disruptive on the squad and might take from our focus and I didn't want that. Better I take it on the chin than a circus developing around the camp.

Anyway, not a good week personally and collectively. I was in the dressing room afterwards when Geech came in and told the boys how proud he was of them. It was quiet in there. Horribly quiet.



The full article contains 914 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 June 2009 9:43 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: British and Irish Lions
 
1

Rambling Sid Rumpo,

28/06/2009 00:45:16
I gather Nathan is not happy with the result?!? Well, nor are most of the rest of us here, except that gloating fellow "Media at One Eye" or whatever his name is. But Geech has made a slew of mistakes (starting with selection of coaching staff and players) which have finally caught up with him. All coaching - as well as political - careers end in failure? Good Luck for the third test anyway!

I have not seen the tackle for which Nathan was suspended, but by all accounts other games have had much worse foul play from the opposition which has gone unpunished, or only lightly penalised.
2

Mairangi Murray ,

NZ 28/06/2009 02:45:45
Hines ban was a joke. The tackle was a nothing but it was just another example of the Commissioner getting involved when it was never warrented. The 3rd test will be won by the Boks and the tour will be over. All it does is highlight that Southern Hemisphere rugby is stronger than in the north and no matter what is said about bigger crowds or more money, the fact of the matter is that the best of the Norther Hemisphere has been unable to beat the big 3 in the south in 3 outings. Sad really because the game could be balanced better if there was genuine competition. The boks will win the tri-nations with Aussie 2nd and the AB's will need to keep rebuilding.
3

Jack Barr,

Tokyo 28/06/2009 05:04:53
#2 Genuine competition?
What are you talking about? The match was decided on the last kick of the game. The first match if it had gone on 5 minutes longer would have been won by the Lions. There is very little between the two sides - how often does a visiting team win?
The All Blacks have never won a World Cup outside their own country and they have been the most dominant team over the last 20 years.
Quinlan was banned for gouging - Burger should be for a similar amount of time. In the France-NZ game yesterday, Isaac Ross also had his eyes gouged by a Frenchman it will be interesting to see the consistency of the citing officials here also.

Sheridan should also be cited for a low blow on the SA replacement lock. That too was inexcusable as was the clenched fist of Du Plessis in the first test when directed at O'Driscoll who was on the ground. Rees was sin-binned for a similar action in that game also.
Too many inconsistencies - enough however to separate two equally matched sides.

It is a shame that the South African support cant match the Lions support when their team tours the British Isles. It seems SA need the Lions more than the Lions need SA. Lions management need to take a more professional approach on commercial activities, itinerary and provincial team policy should Lions ever tour South Africa in the future.



4

Media at One,

28/06/2009 08:18:18
Jack Barr -
We had enough support, but the stadiums are only filled to the rafters when Australia and New Zealand visit. Also the Lions is a tour in which 200 000 ex-pats forget their South African status only to follow a losing team.
Anyway back to the game - The Lions played out of their skins, perhaps the best game they have played as a collective side in 12 years and they lost. The Boks on the other hand played one of the worst games they have played in the last 5 years and won.
Champions can go onto a field be out of sorts and win, that is the difference.
5

RonSA,

28/06/2009 09:22:15
SA missed 4 kicks at goal that would have put them out of sight - 3 tries to 1! Should never have been as close at it was. If you watched the Super14 you will have seen how the Sharks and Bulls win countless games on the counter - absorb, absorb, then strike. Lions played well yes but for 40min. To win a marathon you need to pace yourself not sprint the first half of it - same here. Sorry chaps but the best team won.
6

weeveggyhaggis,

alnmouth 28/06/2009 16:20:13
What the hell was O'gara playing at.He is a professional player and with only about40 seconds to go he should have kicked the ball over the stands.There would no have time for the BOKS to even get a throw in.
HOW IS THAT FOR THROWING AWAY THE GAME.
7

Edburgher,

28/06/2009 21:26:38
Media at one, in the land of the blind the one eyed man is king.
8

Jaimeson,

29/06/2009 12:42:46
It's true that the Lions won the 1st half and a bit. And in doing that they were bullying the Boks. It's not often you see Bakies Botha getting all wound up and flustered. And it was really pleasing to see Bo'D smiling as he ran away after having a thump at Victor Matfield. Clearly part of the plan. However it couldn't last. The injuries completely disrupted the Lions' game, they tired, and the Boks replacements were better than ours.
Nevertheless I thought it would be a draw until ROG's futile attempt to win the game ended in disaster. But great credit to all. It was one of the best games I've seen even with uncontested scrums. And Kearney was a wonder to behold.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.