Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 12th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

McKillop joins Goodwin as RBS fall-guy



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 April 2008
ROYAL Bank of Scotland chairman Sir Tom McKillop will join Sir Fred Goodwin in mounting a defence of his job this week when the bank is set to reveal details of its plans to raise as much as £13bn in cash.
As anger over the bank's U-turn on its capital position continued over the weekend, there is growing pressure for one or more heads to roll on Wednesday when the board will face disillusioned shareholders at the bank's annual meeting.

Investors sa
y McKillop and Goodwin will have to make a convincing case for retaining their jobs after they both rigorously denied that RBS would need to raise extra capital earlier this year. News of the cash-raising initiatives was met with calls for resignations from some shareholders on Friday as Goodwin's and McKillop's credibility was undermined.

Sources close to the bank said RBS board members are meeting to thrash out the plans this weekend, with a rights issue and a sale of its general insurance companies Direct Line or Churchill also up for grabs. It is thought the sale of Direct Line and Churchill, which RBS views as less critical to its core banking strategy, would raise as much as £5bn.

The rights issue, which could be launched as early as Tuesday or Wednesday, is likely to break UK banking records. Even if RBS raises the £9bn at the bottom end of analyst predictions, it would vastly overshadow the £5.9bn raised by British Telecom in 2001.

To add to McKillop's and Goodwin's woes, analysts say RBS will also be forced to report further credit crunch-related write downs of between £4bn and £5bn on Wednesday. Citigroup was forced into a similar move on Friday when it revealed a $5.1bn loss in the first quarter of this year, a figure which reflected £16.9bn in sub prime-related write downs.

Latest estimates place the sum that RBS needs to raise in order to boost its capital reserves, close to £13bn. The balance sheet was stretched to the limit after the ?71bn (£56bn) joint takeover of Dutch rival ABN Amro. Goodwin in particular attracted criticism for pushing ahead with the buy-out last October after the credit crunch had already led to substantial devaluations in global banking stocks.

Some analysts suggest that RBS may have been cajoled into the U-turn over raising capital by the Financial Services Authority, which is understood to have been talking to the major banks, including RBS, Barclays and HBOS about their capital reserves.

And the City is expecting a string of banks to follow RBS's lead over the next few weeks, with Barclays and HBOS named among the prime suspects. RBS shares closed up 5% at 374p on Friday in anticipation of the rights issue.





The full article contains 469 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 April 2008 1:21 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Royal Bank of Scotland
 
1

Senga Jean,

20/04/2008 01:03:12
RBS are one step ahead of the field. Sound as a pound as the saying goes!
2

The Strategist,

20/04/2008 09:03:23
The RBS spin doctors have been out early. Only they could possibly try to kid us into believing that simply because RBS is first off the block to go and raise additional capital then this somehow demonstrates what a smart and intelligent bunch of managers it has.

The reality is that it has to go and raise this money because it has made a number of very fundamental cock-ups including playing in the derivatives market and the badly timed and hugely expensive ABN deal.

3

vinnie52,

Glasgow 20/04/2008 14:07:53
Strategist # 3

Spin doctors out in force? By that do you mean those 'commentators' who are putting it about that the only person that can get RBS out of this unholy mess is the very man that dropped them in it?

Main thing is, if the Board sit tight and the shareholders let them off the hook (which is what I expect will happen) can anyone really believe anything that comes out of Gogarburn these days?

The only people here who are 'sound as a pound' are McKillop and Goodwin.

And Memo to McKillop - get a backbone in 2008....
4

The Strategist,

20/04/2008 16:02:29
#4 I agree - I think it unlikely there will be any board changes. But, that should be a signal to the country and to Govt that once RBS have availed themselves of taxpayers money to get them out of the hole they've dug then it will be business as usual.

They will go on lending as much as possible on mortgages because its in their interest to keep house prices rising, helping others swallow up our companies by lending to overseas buyers and of course private equity companies and not investing in Scottish start-ups.

Don't expect any change of tack from these guys. They're not on our side but they've got the Govt by the short and curlies.
5

chiller,

Dunfermline 20/04/2008 19:44:26
I'm sure there ok, but now with the selling of Direct Line and Churchill I'm sure there not being open and honest about the real position there in.
6

boudica,

Glasgow 22/04/2008 17:51:47
And Wee Eck said that when Scotland is " Independent " he wants the RSB to be in Charge of Interest rates as the Bank of England is in the UK ...Lucky we aint Independent and depending on this Greedy Bunch *&%^&*

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.