Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 29th June 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Frustrated Harry flies home to his family - and an uncertain future



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 March 2008
PRINCE Harry returned to the UK yesterday amid growing questions about his future in the military and claims his tour of duty was a "PR stunt".
The Tri-Star military transport plane carrying the Prince touched down at RAF Brize Norton at 11.30. Prince Charles was the first to congratulate his 23-year-old son. He said: "Along with many parents who have experienced the same sense of anxiety ab
out their sons or daughters serving on operational deployments overseas, I feel a great sense of relief and pride on the day my son, Harry, returns home – albeit somewhat earlier than expected."

The head of the army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, said it would be at least 18 months before Prince Harry saw service again.

Evidence that the tour had created a potential security nightmare continued to mount as one radical cleric, Omar Bakri Mohammad, speaking in Lebanon, accused Prince Harry of "carrying out war against Islam and Muslims".

Meanwhile, PR guru Max Clifford claimed the Afghan tour had been a "PR stunt".

The Prince had completed 10 weeks of a planned four-month tour when news of his deployment leaked out, resulting in him being withdrawn from the desert by special forces and put on a regular RAF flight home.

After greeting his youngest son, Prince Charles said: "That he is safe and sound is indeed an immense blessing, but I think particularly at this time of those whose loved ones may not have returned, or of those who have been terribly wounded during the course of their duties and about whom we hear so little."

On the same day that a British airman was announced to have been killed in a rocket attack on his base in Basra, Iraq, Prince Charles added: "There is a real and often overlooked need to reflect upon the extraordinarily selfless, dedicated service given by all the members of our armed forces, so often in the most hazardous and dreadful of conditions. They, their families and loved ones, who give them such support and understanding, deserve our most wholehearted gratitude."

Prince Harry himself told how his own experience had been put in context by flying back to the UK with two seriously injured colleagues.

"I wouldn't say I'm a hero. There were two injured guys who came back on the plane with us who were essentially comatose. One had lost two limbs – a left arm and a right leg – and another guy who was saved by his mate's body being in the way but took shrapnel to the neck... Those are the heroes, those were guys who had been blown up by a mine that they had no idea about, serving their country, doing a normal patrol.

"I was a bit shocked. It is a bit of a choke in your throat because you know that it's happening. There's a lot of time when you are actually in theatre it isn't even mentioned that much."

As speculation mounted about the Prince's future, Dannatt said there was "no immediate prospect" of him returning to active service.

Although there were harrowing moments, Prince Harry had spoken of his desire to return to Afghanistan as soon as possible. It was, he said, an atmosphere where he felt as comfortable as he ever has in Britain.

Clifford questioned the Prince's role, saying: "To me it's blatantly obvious. It's a PR stunt, the whole thing has been put together. The climate when he went out (he] was getting increasing bad publicity from hanging around in clubs and pubs, and coming out drunk."

Meanwhile, it is understood that lawyers acting for Prince Harry's girlfriend Chelsy Davy over journalist and paparazzi intrusion have threatened referral to the Press Complaints Commission after a day of alleged harassment.





The full article contains 637 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 March 2008 7:43 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Prince Harry
 
1

AJ Fife,

02/03/2008 00:29:16
At least Charlie Big Lugs had the good grace to mention the lads who don't come back, or come back badly wounded!

I wonder if the penny has dropped with CBL?

2

kilkerran57,

hertford 02/03/2008 01:32:10
#1 What an infantile posting! Resorting to playground name calling illustrates the vacuous nature of your comment and does you no credit.
The Royal family will always be in a no win situation. If Harry hadn't gone to Afganistan, he would have been accused of cowardice or receiving special treatment. Now that he has gone, Max Clifford states "authoratively", its just a PR stunt.
As to AJ from Fife, I assume you have met and spoken at length with Prince Charles, whom you affectionately refer to as Charlie Big Lugs,to enable you to have come to your well informed position of hoping that "the penny has dropped with CBL", whatever that may mean??
3

brian mcc,

the arctic 02/03/2008 02:05:17
The prince has a reputation and a legacy to foster future royalty from Wales. He is a young man with a heavy burden. Drink and smoke, but returning from the world capital of heroin production, a substance test may be in order.
4

Joe M.,

Edinburgh 02/03/2008 03:18:38
'I'm not a hero' says Harry. Yeah you're right mate you're not and this whole publicity campaign has been a gross insult to genuine war veterans.
5

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 02/03/2008 05:43:22
If the outcome of this episode is to highlight the onerous task of the lads already out there then it will have been worthwhile.
Apart from his hypocritical hebdomadal tributes to the fallen at PM's question time, when is Brown going to give the Armed Forces real credit for the job they are doing in carrying out HIS government's policies.
6

Jim A,

02/03/2008 05:44:28
#4 Joe M. Are you one of those "genuine war veterans" that you feel he has so grossly insulted?
7

gus1940,

Edinburgh 02/03/2008 08:07:56
How much of a drain on the cash-strapped MOD's budget was this royal deployment?

How much would it have cost to deploy a non-royal 2nd. Lieutenant?

Although initially sympathetic when the story first broke, the relentless saturation coverage on TV and in the press for what is now a giant PR exercise for the royals is driving me up the wall.

How much of the TV License income has been blown on the round the clock coverage by the BBC?

When are the media going to learn that total overkill of a story leads to at best boredom with the subject and at worst antipathy?
8

Freedom for Scotland,

02/03/2008 08:23:23
This whole affair is a charade mastermindinded by the Palace and MOD and intended for a gullible public with the aid of a compliant media.
Harry was never in any really danger, surrounded constantly by a his personal protection Ghurkas. He was kep well away from any real action. Did you notice that the tv footage purportedly showing him on patrol did NOT show the Ghurkas just out of the shots?

It is absolutely unacceptable to treat this guy any differently since what is being implied is that it is OK for all other forces personnel to be fodder for the guns and bombs but not a member of the royal family. If members of the royal family are NEVER to be targets then they should NEVER be accepted into the military in the first place.
What is needed now is an Inquiry into the issuing of D-notices and why our so-called free press still goes along with them. Harry's safety is NOT a mattern of national security. Rose Gentle's campaign on under resourcing of the military is NOT a matter of national security. Why was a D-notice slapped on her?
Why was a D-notice slapped on a young man going to court against the military last week subject to a D-notice?

As is shown by the sh@t written by Eddie Barnes elsewhere in this newspaper the media have well and truly nobbled by the "Establishment".
What cowards they are!
9

Ron Thomson,

calonge 02/03/2008 08:48:34
More than likely Filmed in a Quarry in Yorkshire with Toy Soldiers in the background, he still wants to be a Soldier if he passes the test let him join the Salvation Army, sorry i don't think a Ginger Minger, Lager Lout, Drug taking, Prince would be allowed in.
Today there is TV Show called Prince Harry in Afghanistan he has not been there long enough to have seen anything, big deal what a load of Royal Sh#t what about all the Dead Lads that have never came back, but of course Harry is a Royal, what other Royal has GINGER HAIR.???????????????????????????????????
10

Pilrig.,

Livingston 02/03/2008 09:42:18
(sigh... it must be a hard life being a royal...(sigh)...
11

Bob Christie,

02/03/2008 11:01:44
#8
Absolutely spot on. If these royals are at increased risk both for themselves and others then they should never be allowed to join the forces.
From other posts on these pages in recent times these parastic wasters of space are quite popular in the colonies and dominions. Could not a sinecure be found for them in Ottawa or Cape Town or, even better, Tristan da Cunha?
12

Hunky Dorey,

Glasgow 02/03/2008 11:17:31
May I suggest that this royal layabout be sent into a factory, office or building site, with the purpose of doing a days work. This I am sure will give him an insight into THE REAL WORLD.
13

Bob Christie,

02/03/2008 11:53:21
No word yet on the National Service of Thanksgiving at Westminster Abbey for the safe return of the heir's spare?
14

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/03/2008 15:38:03
"Frustrated Harry flies home"
Take some advice from your 'Uncle Charlie'
'Harry mi Lad'
Find yourself a good woman and give us interesting News to talk about! :-)
15

mk-ultra,

Edinburgh 02/03/2008 17:00:47
An uncertain future?
At least he can be fairly certain that he will have a future, unlike the folks who are still there fighting a totally unnecessary war.
Bring the troops home.
16

Jacobite,

02/03/2008 18:10:59


AT THE END OF THE DAY - WHO GIVES A SH*T

BUSH AND THE POODLES BIG F**K UP WITH WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION - YEAH RIGHT

BUSH IN THE OIL COMPANIES BACK POCKET - WITH THE PRICE AT THE PUMPS DISGUSTING AND ALL THE OIL COMPANIES PROFITS TOTALLY OBSCENE.





17

Aeternum Vale,

Wellingborough 03/03/2008 08:06:38
This has been an operation to help drive the Army recruitment PR machine - one photo op' after another. Good for the military, good for the royal family. It looks as wise a decision to my eyes as did the 'It's a Royal Knock-out' all those years ago, except this time 9/10th of the UK press are still in lapdog mode with the story.

I find it ridiculous anybody could think Diana would have supported this venture. She was vehemently opposed military violence, (one reason that made her unsuitable to continue as the future monarch's mother, another being that she was having a sexual relationship with a man of Arab extraction).

For a member of our royal family to enter into this questionable military conduct is a highly political statement. Our action in Afghanistan is not defensive but commenced with the 'need' for a Turkmenistan to Pakistan oil pipeline with troops readied before 911 allowed the operation to commence.

This gullible young man has been taken advantage of. His expression of enthusiasm for killing people is foolish to the extreme. Sure he has put himself where our political class dare not encourage their kids to go - I see no young Blairs alongside of him. But that makes him no more a hero than any other of our military personnel - there are many heroes. We do not need this shirtless fool to respect them.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.