Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Women warned not to wear perfume during pregnancy

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 August 2008
PREGNANT women have been advised to avoid using perfumes or scented body creams after research suggested the products can cause unborn boys to suffer infertility or cancer in later life.
Research on rats carried out by Professor Richard Sharpe has found that the reproductive system of male foetuses can be damaged as early as at eight weeks' gestation by chemicals including those found in many cosmetics.

The damage can result in in
fertility or testicular cancer – both growing medical problems across the world – said Sharpe, principal investigator at the Medical Research Council's Human Sciences Unit.

Sharpe, who will unveil his findings at a major conference on fertility in Edinburgh this week, has discovered a "time window" at 8 to 12 weeks' gestation – before some women even know they are pregnant – during which certain hormones in the foetus are activated and the male reproductive system is established.

Sharpe has found that future problems with male fertility including undescended testicles, low sperm count and the risk of testicular cancer could be determined at this time if these hormones, such as testosterone, do not work properly.

Experiments on rats have confirmed that if the hormones are blocked the animals suffered fertility problems.

Sharpe told Scotland on Sunday: "We have found the male programming window, which occurs far earlier in foetal development than was previously thought, before the reproductive organs fully develop. This is when the androgens such as testosterone in the foetus are at their most active.

"If the male foetus does not receive enough androgens it may not realise its full reproductive potential, including the size of the penis and testes, undescended testes or the sperm count. The chances are, something will be wrong with the reproductive system. It may be one thing or several things.

"Women could stop using body creams and perfumes. Although we do not have conclusive evidence that they do harm, there are components about which there are question marks; for example it could be certain combinations of chemicals. If you are thinking about how a baby might be exposed, that's one way, and it's something positive you can do. It might have no consequence, but it's something positive women can do for their baby."

Sharpe will reveal his findings this week at the Simpson Symposium in Edinburgh, a gathering of fertility experts organised by Edinburgh University.

Up to 8% of boys are thought to be born with undescended testicles, which is the most common birth defect in boys and is linked to infertility. The condition is also a risk factor for developing testicular cancer later in life.

Sperm quality and number have declined in the last 30 years. About one in seven couples in the UK will have difficulty conceiving at some time. About one third of cases are due to problems in the man.

Testicular cancer is also increasing worldwide by between 1% and 6% a year. The annual number of new cases of testicular cancer in the UK grew from 850 in 1975 to 1,889 in 2004.

However, campaigners urged women not to panic over the suggestion until further studies are conducted.

Susan Seenan, spokeswoman for the charity Infertility Network UK,

said: "A lot of women will not even know they are pregnant at this stage, or how far along they are. I would be very concerned about alarming women until these tests have been done on humans. We welcome any new research in infertility but we would like to see a lot more research in this area before the findings on animals can be said for humans."





The full article contains 601 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 August 2008 9:00 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Pregnancy and birth
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 31/08/2008 01:08:46

This research has been known for some time, for over 10years in-fact.

It has been widely ignored and forgotten or maybe people just turned a 'blind-eye' to it!

As you all know my DYW (Suzanne) is having our embryo transfer, this week, and me being me, researched the WWB (web) to find out our best chances to help our IVF work, and sure-enough, there it was, "DONT USE PERFUMES"

I told my DYW about this, and she has heeded my advice, and stopped using perfumes already.

As for the "male foetus" this danger was also in the news over 10years ago,

Why was it forgotten, ignored or did we all choose to rubbish-it?

We hope the work and research and conference that,
Professor Richard Sharpe, is doing, will bring the subject into the 'lime-light' again, but this time we all pay attention to it!
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 31/08/2008 01:12:06

Ford Transit ~1,

I had a brilliant comment on this one, I posted it and the bleeding pc or something lost it on posting it, comment is not as good as the intended one.
3

Mr A Roy,

31/08/2008 01:21:46
Here we go again, another scare story. Waiting for the ban it brigade now, And now heres..................
4

somerferg,

perth 31/08/2008 01:51:30
Oh goodie another thing to blame women for - oh yes because you were wearing Chanel no5 when you conceived your unborn boy will have little or no tackle!! What alot of pi$h. Hows about you lay the blame where it really belongs i.e the pharmacutical and chemical industries who have been lacing our air, soil, food, drinks, cosmetics, perfums etc, etc with deadly chemicals for at least the last 50 years. Do something about that and I can guarantee '----- quality' will improve over the next few generations. Apparently I can't use the real word for male swimmers as the SOS thinks it might be unsuitable - changed days eh.
5

,

31/08/2008 02:22:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Kipling,

Fresh 31/08/2008 06:21:53
What, no reference to sp**m whales ?

We have detected some potentially unsuitable words in your post:
Sp**m
Your comment has not been processed.

Well, as they say, processed meat does you harm.
7

,

31/08/2008 09:11:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Douglas,

Bathgate 31/08/2008 09:46:44
#8 The McKellarator: That's been found to result in more Ponds life. :o)
It's long been known that the sex of a baby can be influenced by handcream use, hence the expression 'chapped skin'.
Oh and don't get mixed up and use that anti-wrinkle stuff or it's two olives and a swizzle stick for you.
9

siochain,

Oregon, USA 31/08/2008 10:05:31
for more information on negative effects of cosmetics, especially carcinogenic artificial fragrances, google "skin deep" (AKA-) http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/index
Many of the items advertised to make us attractive actually harm us. surprised?
Money to be made by the UNREGULATED cosmetics industry. includes hair dye, moisturizers, deodorants, toothpaste, sunscreen, etc etc.
Save yourself and your children some damage, and a lot of money by going back to older ways, simpler body care. You will look and feel better, and be free from all the corporate hype. The Europeans have a long tradition of herbal knowledge. Americans are getting back to those "roots". nature knows best. the chemical companies only exist to profit from our fear and vanity. wake up and smell the disgusting perfumes, or is that insecticide? hard to tell. . cough cough..
10

Miss Pixie,

formerly of Dinleyhaughfoot Cottage, Roxburghshire 31/08/2008 12:28:28
#9/ "...two olives and a swizzle stick..." I hooted with laughter! Thanks, I shall chuckle all day on that one!
11

Matt there,

somewhere 01/09/2008 00:00:03
More bilge from people who should know better. It is "research" of the: "We fed the rats the equivalent of 30 pounds of sugar a day, and they fell ill! Therefore, we proved conclusively that sugar is bad for you."

12

liknmylife,

US 01/09/2008 06:24:09
Actually the component they are referring to in perfumes and lotions is a preservative called paraben. Look at the ingredients in your lotions, perfumes, and creams. It can be under different names but they are derivatives. What this article doesn't explain is why preggos are told to avoid- because Parabens are absorbed and treated as an estrogen (female hormone) in the body. Thus exposing a male fetus to excess female hormones would be harmful. It's also suspected in cancer especially types of breast cancers which are found to have tissues with large amounts of estrogen.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/bodycare/paraben011304.cfm
13

OldWife,

01/09/2008 10:16:32
There is more danger to the male foetuses from the vast intake of soya products that women are told to eat because 'it's good for you.....low fat....low cholesterol....blah blah blah'. The amount of damage from a bit of handcream is negligible compared to soya damage.
14

t0msawyer,

North East England 01/09/2008 23:26:59
If its true perfume can cause harm then it makes you wonder how they can give pregnant women with HIV,DNA disrupting drugs like AZT.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.