Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


TV nanny investigated over qualifications

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 October 2007
AN INVESTIGATION has been launched into the qualifications of a controversial TV nanny whose approach to childcare has prompted a furious response from parents and doctors.
Claire Verity, who has worked for Mick Jagger and Claudia Schiffer, stars on Channel 4's Bringing Up Baby and among her recommendations are limiting cuddling to 10 minutes a day and leaving babies outside "to air".

Her comments have infuriated pa
rents and children's charities such as the NSPCC which labelled her suggestions "outdated and potentially harmful".

But now, the broadcaster has revealed a full investigation into Verity's qualifications has been launched after receiving claims that awarding bodies from where she claimed to have obtained diplomas said they did not have any record of her.

The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health was reported to have said Verity's recommendations babies sleep in a separate room from their parents contradicted Department of Health guidelines on reducing the risk of cot death.

The 42-year-old said she held diplomas in child daycare and pre-school practice from a body called Aset.

However, a spokesman was reported as saying: "There is no trace whatsoever of this lady on our database."

The spokesman added that Aset did not even offer a diploma in pre-school practice.

Verity further alleged she had qualifications in maternity practice, sleep training and paediatrics from Maternity Nurse Training.

Its spokesman also denied this. He was reported as saying: "This person has never enrolled on any of our courses and as such has never been trained by us."

A third group, Goal, from which Verity said she had obtained a diploma in childcare also stated it did not have any records of her and had never offered her a diploma.

Her agent Chloe Cunningham has claimed her client was "highly qualified" but admitted Verity had not taken the post-natal depression or care of multiple baby qualifications Channel 4 had originally said she had.

As a result of the inquiry, the TV station now refers to Verity as a "maternity consultant" and not as a "maternity nurse".

Last night, a spokesman for Channel 4 said: "Claire Verity was recommended by her established and reputable agency, who assured Silver River [the production company] that they personally interview all maternity nurses on their books.

"And in addition, Silver River contacted a number of parents who had supplied references for her to check they were authentic."



The full article contains 405 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 October 2007 5:52 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Pregnancy and birth
 
1

Anne,

28/10/2007 03:09:21

Is "consultant" now the most abused word in the English language?

2

Crank Parent,

28/10/2007 04:20:45

I think the word abuse is very apt in these circumstances, but I would be looking at the babies in her care...

3

49th State,

Our house in the middle of the street 28/10/2007 05:32:21

We ateke care of our own children in my family and so should all parents.

4

GalacticCannibal,

28/10/2007 09:33:50

1. Anne / 3:09am 28 Oct 2007

Is "consultant" now the most abused word in the English language?

---------------------------------------------------------

NO its not.

SEX is the most abused word in the English language.

GC

5

Yane,

& drugs & hip hop 28/10/2007 09:50:00

#4 Huh?

6

I'm no really here,

28/10/2007 09:55:43

I didn't know Mick Jagger and Claudia Schiffer were together.

7

McMicrogal,

28/10/2007 10:03:45

My initial reaction to this dreadful harridan was to quote the NSPCC advert "Miles is a quiet baby, he knows no-one will come whether he cries or not".

Her methods are tantamount to neglect if not actual abuse. We also have to ask ourselves why so many new parents lack the confidence to parent by instinct. Nanny state anyone?

8

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 28/10/2007 10:46:27

#5

No, it comes after "expert". Any person with a minimal training and spurious credentials is invariably referred to here in North America as an "expert".

Look at GC in Californian - PLEASE, don't look at him (shudder) - he is a prime example of being an "expert" in nothing but the non sequitur and the lameless, brainless comment and the stoner world-view.

Poster # 6 Yane may agree with me by his one word comment to GC's stupid posting: "Huh?"

I suppose that sums up GC's who raison d'etre for inhabiting this planet and polluting it with his marijuana smoke and small-minded, undereducated pronouncements.

9

Yane,

& drugs & hip hop 28/10/2007 10:51:48

No, I quite like GC - I only wish he hadn't pinched Firozali's style of quoting the headlines. I notice Firozali has stopped doing that now.

10

Proximaking,

Dundee 28/10/2007 12:05:05

I think the idea that you time cuddling for children is ludicrous but the idea that everything she says is wrong is just as ludicrous. The most stupid ideas you will ever hear on "child-rearing" come from so-called child psychologists and anyone who has the NSPCC against them must be doing something right. I complained to the Advertising Standards Authority about NSPCC ads that show men as by far and away the biggest abusers of children when in fact the figures in every Western country show exactly the opposite and so these adverts are putting children at risk by distorting the facts. The ASA said they could only control things such as numbers in these cases in other words if the NSPCC put numbers up on the screen saying 80% of all forms of abuse on children were by men then they could act to have them put the true figures up but misleading by "implication" was not in their remit to guard against. It seems that all forms of commonsense are under attack in this country. The most important thing in a childs life are it's parents and if they are not happy the child will never be happy and if putting a baby in its own room at say 3months leads to happier parents then in the long run that is almost certainly better for society than for millions of jaded parents to be wandering around the house lashing out at one another and their other kids because theycan't get any sleep. As I say whenever you see the letters NSPCC in that order look very very very carefully at what you are being led to believe and remember over 50% of every penny they take in goes on TV ads or should I say TV propaganda.

11

Masque,

28/10/2007 14:40:30

#9. Coming from you, that's a joke, isn't it? You do nothing else but make out that you're pontificating from "on high" over "us lowlies", and then you go on to assassinate anyone who questions you, with a finesse unworthy of a mad Torquemada in the torture chamber, teaching butchers where to cut.

Boy Wonder sure nailed you!

12

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 28/10/2007 16:13:26

I am impressed, Masque.

You actually have enough education to drag in the name of one of my idols, Torquemada.

FYI, other posters yesterday came to my defence because Boy Wonder seems to have been having a REALLY bad day and took it out on me.

Google "Palace Quieton Philip Heart Scare, The Scotsman" and all will be revealed.

Thank you for your continued kindnesses and support, Masque.

13

Masque,

28/10/2007 16:43:05

#18. Not the way I read it.

No-one came to your actual defence.

You just got BW's comments deleted because you're a coward who can't take criticism!

Are you commenting on this forum because you're banned in Canada??

You're still a twonk!

14

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 29/10/2007 05:30:06

Masque

What, exactly, is a "twonk".

And "the way" you read it is obscured by your obvious inferiority complex and you have MUCH to feel inferior about.

And exactly what have I "banned in Canada" from?

Pure speculation and I had BW's comment deleted for security reasons that are privy only between myself and the moderators. It had nothing to do with his offensiveness.

Could you get the facts straight for once?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.