Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


The Steamie

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

MSP urges support of pub licence price hike



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 January 2008
A MINISTER will this week appeal to MSPs not to block a Scottish Government move to impose big increases in the cost of alcohol licences for pubs.
At present, all pubs pay an initial fee of £172 for a three-year licence, with further fees for renewals.

But some could pay up to £2,000 in regulations for which Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill will seek MSPs' approval this week.

Tory MSP Bi
ll Aitken, convener of Holyrood's justice committee, has tabled a move to block the increases at the committee's meeting on Tuesday. And the drinks trade has accused ministers of failing to justify the "excessive" increases.

But MacAskill will argue the new fees will end years of the licensing system being subsidised by the taxpayer.

Fee income at present covers only 63% of the licensing system's running costs and the rest is met from other council resources.

"We are in danger of opting for a bargain-basement licensing system that doesn't meet the needs of Scotland," the minister said.

"I believe it's simply wrong that the taxpayer is having to subsidise the cost of those who profit from the sale of alcohol and I don't think it should continue."

He added: "I have heard all the complaints about us doubling fees and that's simply not true.

"Some parts of the licensed trade have set out to protect their profits under the guise of complaining that fees are too high.

"The fees proposed are fair and reasonable to both the trade and to local authorities."

Under the new system, licensing boards will be allowed to charge businesses applying for a licence to sell alcohol up to £2,000.

The increases form part of major overhaul of the licensing system.

The new fee system will create a banding system based on the rateable value of pubs, clubs and other licensed premises.

At the lower end of the scale – premises with a rateable value of up to £11,500 – there will be a maximum application fee of £800, plus a maximum annual fee of £220.

But for premises with a rateable value above £14,000, the maximum licence application fee is up to £2,000.

The Scottish Beer and Pub Association said in evidence to MSPs: "Scotland's licensed and hospitality industries are more than willing to pay the costs of the licensing system in Scotland, where these costs are transparent and evidenced, but we do not believe the current proposed fee levels meet this requirement.

"Scotland's licensed industry isn't asking for special treatment, or a government subsidy in offsetting the costs of licensing reform.

"All we ask is that the licensing fees are not set at excessive levels, which haven't been justified."



The full article contains 457 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 January 2008 8:13 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Alcohol & binge drinking
 
1

Peter McCann,

Castle Craig Hospital, West Linton 20/01/2008 06:46:57
If Scotland is going to do something really really positive about alcohol misuse it must find someway to increase the cost of alcohol. This is not just to save lives but to save our own scciety. Overwhelming evidence shows that increased prices curbs consumption. I have spent the last 50 years, first as an excessive consumer and the last 30 years helping alcoholics of all classes, from Doctors and politicians who have ruined their careers to wee lassies with serious liver damage. Since Gordon Brown wont let us deal with this in the only effective way , this is a chance to help ourselves as a nation. Bill Aitken MSP should think further than the profits of liocensees. Consumption must drop and this is a powerful way to achieve this. In fact the proposed invcreases are far too modest.
2

donald,

glasgow 20/01/2008 08:22:02
Those who abuse alcohol will always prioritise their income that way regardless of the cost, financially or socially.
3

the_figures_are _fudged,

Galashiels 20/01/2008 11:02:23
£2000 compared to the profits pubs make , makes sense to me.

Who pays for the police to pick up all the drunks at closing time anyway ?
4

Mr. Lachie Todd,

20/01/2008 11:06:23
According to the E.U. website, Ireland, Poland, Slovenia, and the U.K. have the least expensive liquor licences.

Licences vary in price from one Member State to another depending on whether, or not, it is an individual, family run, or a company with a chain of cafes, inns, or hotel sites.

In particular countries, like Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and Portugal, licences vary between 690 and 5,200 Sterling!

5

Heather Brass,

South Ayrshire 20/01/2008 13:30:51
People are not realising that it is not just pubs that sell liquour it is garages, shops, SUPERMARKETS, hotels and restuarants. All your small family run rural businesses are going to be hit hard with the cost of implimenting the act. We are all for the new licencising act but not the cost to go through the transistion.
People need to realise the cost of everything involved in the process, the fees, the training, the business plans that you need to get drawn up. This is okay for all the big firms that have more money but all your rural places which depend on summer trade from your tourism to get through are going to be hit. The fees should be done on a fairer scale to take into account the area of premises ie, rural, town centre and actions of owners if there has never been trouble etc,..
Rural premises do not have the same effect as city centre premises and police themselves also.
If the Government really want to help public saftey then supermarkets should not be allowed to use liquor as a loss leader which they then encourage people to buy more, it is mad to think you can get a bottle of beer in supermarkets cheaper than buying a pint of milk!!! does that not make people wonder.....

Everyone needs to look at the bigger picture, if people cant survive in the trade then you will see lots of closures of the small run businesses, which will then effect the tourism and rural villages when they become ghost towns and all culture that is around especially in rural areas like music, dance, poet clubs, fishing etc etc will cease to be heard, what will happen to Scotland Cultural Society.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.