Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Labour funders backing party despite loans scandal

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 September 2006
CASH-STRAPPED Labour chiefs have managed to persuade all but two of the tycoons who gave the party secret loans worth £12m extra time to pay the money back.
Annual accounts to be presented to the party conference today reveal that, amid the embarrassment of a police investigation into claims that the government offered honours in return for party donations, the party remains on good enough terms with mos
t of its 12 big-ticket donors to prevent them pulling the rug away and demanding immediate repayment.

Labour was plunged into the "cash-for-peerages" scandal earlier this year when it was disclosed that the party had used funding rules to keep loans worth £12m secret. Scotland Yard started an investigation into the practice after it subsequently emerged that a number of the lenders had been nominated for peerages by the party hierarchy.

A report to conference by Labour treasurer Jack Dromey - who originally blew the lid off the questionable practice - today confirms that Labour agreed to repay the loans at a "commercial rate" of interest, which cost the party £436,000 in 2005 alone.

But, despite the party giving an obligation to repay the huge sums to its backers within 180 days or one year at most - and even though a number of the lenders have since expressed frustration that they have been dragged into the police investigation - 10 of the lenders have agreed to reschedule the loans to give the indebted party more time to pay the massive sums back.

The respite will help Labour keep a lid on its massive debts, which have soared beyond £25m since the last election.

The revelation comes a day after it emerged that exclusive access to Cabinet ministers and other senior Labour politicians is being offered for thousands of pounds at this week's party conference.

Labour is offering companies and special interest groups the opportunity "to engage first hand" with ministers and policy advisers who work in areas relevant to their business for £1,500 a head.



The full article contains 366 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

scottwebb,

24/09/2006 02:55:59

Quote : Labour is offering companies and special interest groups the opportunity "to engage first hand" with ministers and policy advisers who work in areas relevant to their business for £1,500 a head............So what are we saying here....we have to pay them now to listen ? ......Independence please

2

Ted,

24/09/2006 16:14:20

How about all parties get their funding as follows? Membership fees, donations by individual members up to an annual limit of £500, and a public donation by ballot of 50p per voter. The last would be a tickbox, allowing voters to direct a small amount of money to the party of their choice at each election. At the last Scottish election, it would have cost less than £1m, and could replace the pretty undemocratic public funding that already fills the coffers of the larger parties.

3

David Ex-Pat,

TX 30/09/2006 20:24:56

This really is a disgrace. The thinning down of the Lords (under this government) was a good thing - removing the unelected deadwood could only be good for the nation - but little did we know that Tony was only making vacancies which his financial backers would later fill.

An overhaul of the Lords where the Life Peers are exclusively senior politicians would be an improvement.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.