Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Downing Street panics as Levy points finger at Blair

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 July 2006
DOWNING Street was last night plunged into panic amid claims Lord Levy had pointed the finger of suspicion at Tony Blair following his arrest over the 'cash-for-peerages' inquiry.
In an emergency summit with party chairman Hazel Blears following his arrest last week, Levy insisted he would tell everything he knew about Labour's secret loans operation, even if his revelations propelled the Prime Minister further into the spotlight.

Scotland on Sunday understands Levy's police statements will make clear Blair was central to the campaign to secure multi-million-pound loans from supporters, and that he was well aware the transactions could look politically questionable.

The party hierarchy is now terrified Levy's evidence will bolster attempts to establish a crucial link between the operation to sign up 10 secret loans worth £14m for party coffers, and the decision to nominate four of the lenders as Labour peers.

Levy's response last night ratcheted up the pressure on Blair as he faced attacks from all sides over his role in the affair.

But Labour maintained there was still no suggestion that the Prime Minister or any other party figure was involved in criminality, specifically the award of honours, in return for cash.

"There is a high degree of panic," one senior Labour insider conceded of the reaction to Levy's conversation with Blears, the day after his second visit to Colindale police station in north London. "Michael cannot be expected to do anything but tell the truth.

"We understand he went through the process by which the loans were decided upon, who arranged them and what the motivation was. There was some unease about taking loans instead of donations and I understand he covered that.

"The very strong feeling in the party is that no one has done anything wrong, but the thought of him giving every cough and spit is unsettling."

Reports of Levy's response to police questioning come four months after a Blair confidant insisted the Prime Minister had known all about the loans operation but authorised it in an attempt to save the party from bankruptcy. Blair is expected to be interviewed by Metropolitan Police within the next month.

The police investigation exploded into life with Levy's arrest on Wednesday, and the subsequent revelation that 48 people, including at least two ministers, had been interviewed during inquiries so far.

The net closed tighter around Blair last night when it emerged that the former head of Labour's "High Value Donors Unit", dedicated to attracting wealthy supporters to the party, had also been questioned.

Nick Bowes sparked alarm at Labour headquarters when he said: "The whole peerages thing is corrupt. It is still one of the biggest forms of patronage in the hands of the PM."

The Prime Minister is expected to launch a counter-offensive against his critics when he gives a live interview to the BBC's Politics Programme, live from the G8 summit in St Petersburg later today.

In another interview due to be broadcast today, former deputy Labour leader Roy Hattersley will urge the Prime Minister to resign in September.

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Ted,

16/07/2006 00:25:42

Roy's right, Blair must go. It's just a shame he thinks that Gordon Brown has an inch of credibility left or anything to offer this country. It's doubtful that Labour does under any circumstances, but if it does, the new leader would have to be utterly untainted by the scandals of this administration.

2

Johnni,

Edinburgh 16/07/2006 07:02:51

New Labour, Old Sleaze.

3

Tick Tock,

Argyll 16/07/2006 07:27:49

I'm certain "peerages for cash" or something like it, has been going on since politics began. But it doesn't make it right - it should be stopped.

I was one of the jubilant when Blair swept the tories away in '97. Now I'm just sad. "Whiter than white" today inevitable means "sleaze tomorrow".

What can we do about that?

4

Al Capone,

Perth 16/07/2006 07:59:42

As the old saying goes:'All power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.'

5

edward,

16/07/2006 08:01:12

Let's nail the impression that G Brown is not in this with T Blair. The notion that the country's chief financial officer did not know what was going on is risible - failure to enquire and/or turning his blind eye does not excuse him. Brown, the architect of unprecedented waste of resources, spun to us as 'investment', should be swept out with Blair. Anyone, left or right, would be preferable to these deceitful joint leaders.

6

,

16/07/2006 08:10:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

silemairin,

England 16/07/2006 09:20:51

The day that bLiar swept into Downing Street the nursery ryhme 'The King with no Clothes' came to mind. it wasn't so much him but her that made my hackles rise. the picture of her in a see through nightie and rollers coming to the door to accept flowers, [yeah] and the orchestrated entrance into Downing St with party members waving the union flag, then not paying her train fare,that was the day I felt disenfranchised, and when Peter Killfoyle walked out of the cabinet that was when I left the Labour Party.

8

freetalkscotland,

16/07/2006 09:53:52

We in Scotland have benefitted from increased democracy from Labour through the establishment of the Parliament.

The "reform" of the Lords was supposed to increase the democratisation of Westminster by removing the hereditary peers - those whose ancestors had grovelled to the King. What we've got in their place are those who pay for their peerage in a different way.

With the revelation that 30% and more of English voters now want independence according to an opinion poll reported on today, there'll soon be a need for the complete restructuring of Westminster within the consitutional settlement for an independent Emgland. Let's hope they use that opporunity to have a completely elected second chamber - or go unicameral as in Scotland.

You can debate the peerages issue and the English independence poll at http://www.forumspring.com/freetalkscotlan

9

Sanny,

Portugal 16/07/2006 10:08:56

The manipulation and party politicisation of the House of Lords in recent times has negated their once damping effect on the excesses of the government of the day. Perhaps the time has come to replace the Lords with an elected Chamber and thereby remove the power of patronage from the politicians. At the same time we should look closely at the Party Political System under which true democracy is denied! Abolish the “three line whip”; indeed abolish the whip system altogether. Make all MP’s directly accountable to their constituents only and not to the party machine – today most MP’s are simply “cannon fodder” to their party. I would also like to see the local constituency given the power of recall and dismissal. This latter power would bring all politicians quickly to realise they REPRESENT the people and are not in thrall to their political masters.

10

Budgie,

Inchinnan 16/07/2006 10:32:33

We are often reminded that we get the Government we deserve because we fail to cast our votes. Well, the conduct of recent administrations - Labour and Tory - leads me to believe that casting our votes or otherwise , makes little difference to the probity of any Government.

11

Firozali A.Mulla MBA PhD,

Dar-Es-Salaam Tanzania 16/07/2006 10:50:40

By Downing Street 10, do you mean all the workers and the sweepers and so????
Leave Mr. Blaire alone. He is having tough time with the cash he received from the voters as donations and there is the THREE ENRON that America took from England without any papers and locked them up IN USA. Now they have a follow through chip that will monitor them every step they take and they are to report to the US Marshal every time they are called.
Is this what the English wanted?
Mr. Blair should leave the seat now fast.

12

tommy,

chesham 16/07/2006 11:13:34

I think we need to get away from "Major's government was just as bad" arguments. The "sleaze" that surrounded the last government came from the actions of individual MPs some of whom may have been "baddens". This sleaze goes to the top, to the heart of the regime. The cash may have been used to finance moles and dirty tricks. In the Nixon era it was nicknamed ratf***ing.
This does not mean that they are as bad a each other it may mean our own PM is a wrongen

13

larhen1,

manchester 16/07/2006 11:17:04

Blair and Co. should all be locked up. What a disgrace this man is. Even worse than the useless Tories.

14

The hawk,

york 16/07/2006 11:30:31

Watch Teflon Tony get out of this one!

15

AS Well,

USA 16/07/2006 11:33:15

For a political abuse of Engish power refresher you may want to take look at the BBC series from the '90's with Ian Richardson: "House of Cards", "To Play the King". It is available for rent on DVD. Same 'ol same 'ol... as they say. Peerages traded for favors seem to be the least of the ethical problems.

16

skeptic griggsy,

augusta, ga., usa 16/07/2006 11:34:07

I hope Lord -to-be Blair today effectively starts to derail his critics. Should the House of Windsor play out , then the Lords might vote for one of their own as monarch[Yes, sleaze could ensue.]. Just think, it could be a New Labour peer! May Blair get the reforms needed .

17

silemairin,

England 16/07/2006 11:52:24

In answer to post 15 .

John I just have seen it with my own eyes in his interview on the politics prog. God this man would make an eel/snake look static.

He still won't take responsibility for what is happening in Iraq. The man has more front than buck House.and dismisses Prescott sleaze with a raise of the eye brow.

Oh and hes looking forward to next years G8.

18

de-fi,

UK 16/07/2006 12:17:15

Blair is finished, whether he’s arrested or not. One thing is certain, if arrested, under the rules he cannot stand as an MP, so he will be disgraced and out of politics for good. As for handing over to Gordon Brown? There are problems there, like - who voted for a Labour government led by Gordon Brown?

The Prime Minister’s ‘handover’ of his Office to Gordon Brown as though it were a frivolous relay race would not be democratic and would not satisfy the majority of those people who care about politics in this country. Were it as simple as passing on the leadership of an opposition political party it would not be so contentious. But we are talking here of the serving Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, arguably the most influential political Office in Europe.

As a democratic country Britain should not have a Prime Minister foisted upon it under the flawed principles of the Right of Succession, - a Right, especially when granted to Royalty, which many Labour members say they abhor, and one which every citizen should abhor when it applies to privileged high office. I cannot see even Labour backbench MP’s as being so hypocritical about this, especially when even the Leaders of the other political Parties are elected by their members and/or their MP’s. Why does Labour think it is above Democracy?

There should, at he very least, be a leadership election amongst candidates to succeed Mr Blair. But, with something as important as who is Prime Minister of this country, a snap General Election might be more appropriate. This would avoid the situation of a leader without the support of the country, - a disaster in any democracy.

As for the appointment of peers? Once this mess is over peers should either be appointed entirely by the Monarch or become a completely elected second chamber. This would remove this particular temptation for corruption from bent, power mad politicians.

Personally, I think th

19

bigkev,

Shanghai, PRC 16/07/2006 12:53:31

Torries, new labour... all the same.

Anyone wanting to be in politics is in it for themself (Prescott) or on some huge control-freak ego trip (Blair, Brown).

Having said that aren't local councils, PTA and sports club committees just the very same on a lower run of life ladder?

Must be genetic.... off to the pub!

20

Bob,

Aberdeenshire 16/07/2006 12:54:47

It is interesting to contrast the reaction of the parties when discovered with their 'fingers in the till' as you might say.

The Tories tend to say fair cop and fall on their swords, wheras labour seem to me to apparently believe that what they are doing is not wrong simply because its them thats doing it, and they then attempt to justify their wrong doing by pretending that everybody else does it anyway.
An argument that is not born out by the facts and in any case no other party has claimed the moral high ground like new labour has or fallen so far below acceptable standards of probity

21

Peter,

Aberdeen 16/07/2006 12:59:14

Are you as fed up as I am?.... with politicians of all hues lining their pockets with noses in the trough.Both Parliaments in the UK are filled with people who believe they can get rich at the expense of the people.These politicians also believe they can run a country but the truth is they are a waste of space.Blair swans of on holday leaving a balloon in charge and closes the book on the mess of Iraq.I am appalled by the citizens of the UK who are prepared to put up with these dangerous jokers.The sooner they are all kicked out at election time the better.....and it is not Blair's right to saddle us with Gordon Brown who has done nothing to deserve the PM appointment.I am 6 months away from selling up and emigrating to escape the asylum that is now the UK.

22

Ruskie,

16/07/2006 14:34:06

What is all the fuss about? The tories did the ame in the 80's and 90's.

23

Muriel,

Stonehaven 16/07/2006 14:40:15

I wish there was a polital party that was honest. As far as I can see there appears to be slease in them all

24

Maybe Jo,

USA 16/07/2006 15:34:35

Politicians have been corrupted, by the greedy rich, from the start of government, as we know it. Et tu Blair? or in our case...." Et tu Bush?" The question is...What can we POOR proles do about it? Got any ideas?

25

Jim Hendry,

Romania 16/07/2006 15:34:46

Institurional sleaze and spin based on lies has been the hallmark of this fundamentally corrupt administration. The "ecclestone" affair put the electorate on notice followed by Vaz, "Cheriegate", Byers, Mandelson, WMD, Blunkett, Prescott, Lord Levy et al. By comparison the Tories were innocents abroad.
At last with any luck, Blair will have his collar felt in line with the probable treatment meted out to a Chief executive in the private sector with such a questionable record of misdeeds by his or her company. He should be in jail now for his war crimes against humanity.

26

thomas,

midlothian 16/07/2006 16:25:23

the problem remains the same with corrupt government's, few people with too much power.
Blair and Bush destabilised the middle-east which made the whole world unsafe.dictators of this calibre should be removed and replaced with committees that are responsible and accountable.
the people got what they deserved when casting their vote for a wolf in sheeps clothing.
the loss of john smith is still being felt even more since the exposure of Blair and the gutless wonder called Brown.

27

David Ex-Pat,

Texas 16/07/2006 16:43:14

About time there was an investigation actually, after the Asian businessman who complained that his 50K donation didn't get him a peerage. This isn't a new thing though, alarm bells should have been ringing shortly after Labour's election when Gus McDonald (of STV) was created Lord McDonald. Why? It was stated that he was a friend of Tony Blair's. That is as maybe but he is not a politician and in no way earned that peerage. That for me was always suspicious. Any peer found to have gained a peerage by this or any other suspicious & similar means should be stripped of it. Ironic really that Blair has emptied the Lords with people who did not earn the right to be there, only to replace them with more people who shouldn't be there. Time for yet another overhaul of the Lords. Should be senior politicians and not just rich men rewarded for doing the PM a favour.

28

David Ex-Pat,

The Glasgow Barras 16/07/2006 17:01:08

Rollup - Rollup get yer genuine peerages here...

29

Cecily,

smithmeg@telus.net 16/07/2006 17:20:23

I agree with posts 22,25,and26.Blair should be held accountable as an individual,and made an example of,not allowed to leave power scot free (no offence meant)with a fat pension, after raiding others' pensions. Breach of trust and war crimes are plain to everyone who informs themselves.Don't wait till the Labour Party Convention.Every day he does more damage.He got us into this obscene butchery in Iraq and Afghanistan. Impeach him, see www.impeachblair.org The remedy is available. Britain needs proportionate representation too, to regain the voter's confidence that his vote will count; and the vigilance necessary over elected office holders that is the only safeguard for democracy.

30

Geo,

Glasgow-ish 16/07/2006 19:10:21

from no 23's - 'What is all the fuss about? The tories did the same in the 80's and 90's.'

Then arrest and charge ALL those to whom the evidence leads. Pointing and saying 'Oh they did it' is no defense under the law. Lets have a long needed clean out and perhaps people might take an interest in politics again.

31

Sholtodhr,

Edinburgh 16/07/2006 20:25:22

I think we all know that however bright Gordo is, he has the charisma of a barnacle. Under him the Labour party will fall apart and finally the tectonic plates of politics will shift again back to the tories or even the Lib Dems if they can find a leader that we believe in. (month of sundays springs to mind)

32

RR Syndaxi,

Southgate, N London 16/07/2006 20:29:38

Jack Dromey is very quiet on all of this and so is Gordon Brown; Dromey was the treasurer - was he asleep? or did he think these funds just appeared, also if they were loans why did he not consider what would happen if they had to be repaid?
As to G Brown, well he demanded to be on the NEC, so to claim ignorrance is risable but given the depth of Gordons arrogance no real sursprise.

33

Lynn,

Madison, Wisconsin, USA 16/07/2006 21:02:46

To Thomas, in Midlothian (#27):

Just for the record, we did NOT get what we voted for in either of the last two presidential elections on this side of the pond. Bush stole them both times. Presidant Bush. God, not only is he a moron, he's an oxymoron!

34

DannyL,

North Wales 16/07/2006 22:23:19

Bliar has oft-times repeated that he will not stand in a 2009 election. My fear is that that may be because there isn't going to be one. Pretty soon he won't need to wriggle his way out of things like this, he'll just kick

35

James Wallace Liddell,

Georgia USA 16/07/2006 22:26:36

How Droll--bLair!! Clever!

As a "furrener", I ought not comment on your fine land's internal affairs but I can't help noting that Mr. Blair--now with apparent considerable woes of his own--was a creature of Bill Clinton who instructed him in the "third way" (being left while pretending to be center).

So, Mr. Blair has been associated with Bill Clinton--who had considerable woes of his own, and who is now thoroughly discredited in the United States except as the object of jokes.

And Mr. Blair is associated with George Bush--who has considerable woes of this own, and who is now thoroughly discredited in the United States except as the object of fear and misgivings.

Mr. Blair, it would seem, ought to have chosen better company to pal around with--yes?

Aye! For Scotland For Ever!

(The way things are going over here my good Scot ancestors should have "hung in tough" and stayed the course. Dang that Bonnie Charlie guy, anyhow!)

36

Pete W,

16/07/2006 23:47:36

Pfft, I don't really care anymore. Come 2007, we'll be shot of the lot of them anyways. Roll on Scottish independence.

37

john,

Texas 17/07/2006 03:57:39

Reminds me about the story of the frog and the scorpian! In other words, that's what politicians do! You can grich and moan, but its their nature to do what they do. Wanta ban something that is hazzardous to your health? Ban politicians!

38

Andromeda,

Canada 17/07/2006 05:29:35

Why are we "ordinary folk" always so surprised when politicians don't do what we expect? Think about it. How many of us have the education, guts, money and chutzpa to push ourselves into the forefront of life? How many of us would want to be the person to give the goahead to start (or finish) a nuclear war? How many of us would want to devise and implement policies that throw people out of work and keep poor people down? Not many. So we rely on the people with the large egos, small consciences and large bank accounts to get elected and speak up for us. How silly can we get?

39

Renfrew Rant,

an undisclosed location 17/07/2006 07:34:47

There is a process by which all of this will be examined. If there is any wrongdoing then the PM will have a problem. Until then he deserves the benefit of the doubt just as anyone else would like to have. In reference to the talk about politicians, I would say they are doing as expected. The biggest problem today is that we are lacking in Statesmen, politicians seem to be in limitless supply.

40

Mike1,

West Midlands 17/07/2006 07:37:34

Aha. An inspector calls.

41

George,

Scotland 17/07/2006 07:49:50

I wonder if Lord Levy will now have to get a visa to enter America since he has been arrested?

42

Procrastinator,

Edinburgh 17/07/2006 08:23:31

Please, please, please let Blair be arrested and finally be held to account for the multitudinous uber-misdeeds which he has perpetrated not only on us but decent folk world-wide. It is truly vomit-inducing to think that in 2 year's time he could end up earning a mint on the after-dinner speaking/lecture circuit when the only things he's really qualified in is Greed and Hypocrasy, BA (Hons.) Or maybe that's a science? :)

43

Dungbeetel,

Falkirk 17/07/2006 08:56:39

re 43.- and was he DNA tested ?

44

Iain Howard Adam,

Perth, Western Australia 17/07/2006 13:50:32

Tony Blair; his arrogance amazes me, he was elected by the people to govern the UK, he has failed the people - he must go - the sooner the better.

45

Pointmade,

18/07/2006 22:03:37

I agree that our whole political system needs a complete overhaul, but not like the one envisioned by Tony Blair. From the moment this man came into power, I felt that he had the potential to be the next dictator of the UK. He has created nothing but chaos, and when the light of misdeeds is shone upon him, he quickly makes a comment or sends out a story to the media, to get people panicking or arguing. Such as the 'bird flu thing' or the empahasis put on England v's Scotland football thing. We are getting beyond all this stupidity. With so many of us either living in or visiting each others country, and appreciating each others point of view, one thing most of us have in common is our shared view that this man (Blair) has made a complete nonsense of our constitution. He is coming under the guise of Labour, but was a young conservative, but to be truthful, I don't think he really knows who or what his values are in a political or national sense. He is extremely confused and beyond that is a very greedy and power crazy man, this is what is at the root of his style. He is changing the lords, so that he can install who he wants in there (cash for peerages). I could see he was getting his cronies in (even in the party itself, those who will tow the line to him and fail to keep him in check) and once in, when he needs the vote to change the constitution or the law as he has seen fit to do in recent years (challenging our human rights, changing the 'innocent until proven guilty' to 'guilty until proven innocent', the terrorism laws). If he scares us enough we'll accept anything, even the loss of our liberties!!! He is creating a situation where he puts into place ministers of his choosing to run the country, both in the lords and in the commons. We have NO real democracy, it is a sham. Did you know this man was once a member of 'green peace' How changed is his tune. Who's tune is he dancing to? Someone above mentioned something about polititians being the

46

Reverend Brown,

20/07/2006 11:39:09

New Labour Old labour New Consevatives old conservatives, they all lie they all rip off the electorate they're all a liability!!
Give democracy back to the masses, proportional representation, and encourage more independant MP's with no allegence to anyone apart from the electorate they represent.
If Blair or Cameron get their way we'll wake up one morning to Jackboots pounding the pavements.
We've been conned plain and simple conned.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.