Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 7th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Changing the face of a nation



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 April 2008
It's been a year of constant warring with Labour, some victories, some wounds and a never-ending row over a golf course. Now as the first anniversary of the SNP's historic election victory nears, Kenny Farquharson embarks on a road trip to see if Scotland is a country happy with its new horizons
UNDER an azure sky a spring sun dapples the waters of the River Ness. A saltire flying lazily from the flagpole of Inverness Castle catches the breeze. A young waiter from The Mustard Seed, one of the growing number of chic restaurants on the city's riverbank, is pinning up a menu for that day's lunch specials. Sea bass baked with goat's cheese on a mint and honey sauce, anyone?

If ever a city represented a newly-confident Scotland it is the capital of the Highlands, named last month as the fastest-growing city in Europe. Once derided as the most parochial of provincial towns, Inverness now has a spring in its step, a shine on its shoes and a glint in its eye.

Where better, one year on from the Holyrood election that brought Alex Salmond and the SNP to power, to start asking if Scotland, too, has become a happier, more confident, more forward-looking place?

Last week I took a 145-mile journey down the spine of Scotland, starting on the banks of the Ness, making stops on my way down the A9 and ending up at the notorious Raploch estate in Stirling. Along the way I asked Scots what they thought about the state of the nation, 12 months on from the most momentous political change in Scotland for a decade. Has the past year seen a change for the good? Or is it a case of the same-old, same-old, with different faces at the top but little change on the dreary political landscape? My journey would confirm some preconceptions and pour cold water on others. For Scotland's First Minister it would produce cause for both quiet satisfaction and deep concern.

Checking out The Mustard Seed's lunch menu are mother and daughter, Linda and Rachel Sellar. Linda, 49, knows a thing or two about the feel-good factor – she runs The Health Shop, devoted to improving the wellbeing of folk from Inverness through aromatherapy and herbal tea.

"I do feel there's a new energy in Scotland since the election," she says, "and more of a feeling of national identity. I think they're doing well. There's more pride in our country."

Rachel, a 21-year-old student of international relations at St Andrews University, agrees: "I don't like the Scottish cringe – people need to get over that. We need to talk about the things that affect Scottish people. And it's good to have a little bit of banter with Westminster – that doesn't worry me."

Both women voted Nationalist a year ago, and both have a soft spot for Salmond. "He comes across as quite a down-to-earth honest politician," says Linda. "He's quite cute!" adds her daughter.

Can it get any better for Salmond? Lauded for his vision, his integrity and his cuteness? One answer can be found around the corner in a pub called Blackfriars, one of the best places in the north of Scotland for traditional music. In a corner of the bar, Andy Munro, a sandy-haired 35-year-old water commissioner, is sampling a pint of An Teallach from a brewery near Ullapool. He knows his beer and he knows his politics. For him, Salmond himself is the governing party's Achilles heel. "I think the SNP are a well-run bunch and they're doing some good," he says. "If they just work for Scotland and the Scottish people, and try to be different from other politicians they can be a breath of fresh air. It'd be grand."

You can tell by his tone that there is a 'but' coming, and it duly arrives. "But I've brushed with Salmond a couple of times socially and he's an obnoxious so-and-so. He's a bullish character and I think he's going to come unstuck. He's a brilliant orator and I'm sure his political mind is really quite sharp. But a lot of people I speak to think he's just a little bit too cock-sure. He's got to mind that."

Munro's feelings about Salmond are crystallised in the Donald Trump saga, in which the First Minister is accused of bringing undue influence to bear on Government planners to ease the passage of the US tycoon's £1bn golf resort on the Aberdeenshire coast.

"This thing with him and Trump had all the smell of something nasty going on," says Munro.

Salmond is usually regarded as the SNP's most potent asset, a seasoned politician with a merciless line in political invective. But Munro is not the only Scot who believes the First Minister may also be his party's undoing. Throughout my journey, I'm surprised to hear two themes raised again and again: questions about Salmond's temperament, and concern over his handling of the Trump affair. Over the past year the Scottish public has clearly been paying attention. While still enamoured with the novelty of an SNP Government, it seems people have been watching Salmond and assessing him, and the verdict on him as a national leader and as a man is only now beginning to emerge.

The road beckons, and the weather begins to change. By the time I pull into Carrbridge, 26 miles down the A9, the sunshine has been replaced with smirr and the temperature has turned decidedly chill. Carrbridge is an unpromising strip of guest houses surrounded by clumps of silver birch, still leafless in April. The local golf club's corrugated iron clubhouse is deserted. In the middle of this dreariness is an unlikely tourist attraction. The Landmark Forest Theme Park tries to bring a wee bit of Disney-style magic to the heart of the Highlands, with water slides, climbing walls, adventure playgrounds and – wait for it – a steam-powered sawmill.

Huddled against the cold, Deirdre McBride, 42, from Kinning Park, Glasgow, is hesitating in front of a sign that advertises the entrance fee as £10.05 for adults and £7.85 for children. With her are her mother, her husband and three kids.

"The weather doesn't bother us," she says. "We actually went to Aviemore to see Santa Claus Land, but we were told it was shut 10 years ago, so that was a bit of a bummer." Deirdre, 42, a student at Cardonald College in Glasgow, studying child care and early education, is a long-standing SNP supporter and is delighted with a government she says has the nation's best interests at heart.

"It was good to see them get in – Nicola Sturgeon did a lot of work for us to get us on the housing list. She personally wrote some letters that were a big help at the time." The McBrides' son Ben is autistic, and the SNP deputy leader's assistance was warmly appreciated.

Tellingly, this is not the first time on my short trip that I have encountered someone with personal experience of help from a prominent SNP politician. In Inverness I spoke to Charles Leakey, a second-hand bookseller who works from a wonderful 18th-century church hall heated by a massive cast-iron wood burner. Leakey told me how impressed he was with the work done by Fergus Ewing MSP, the minister for community safety, with the city's traders' association. Both testimonies illustrate one of the universal truths of politics, as true in Scotland as it is on the US election trail – the personal touch is priceless.

Salmond, says Deirdre McBride, is "one of the good guys. He's for the people. He comes across like that anyway".

Back behind the steering wheel, the weather takes another turn for the worse. The A9 is a smear of slush, and the Drumochter pass is a blind swirl of mist and snow. But it eases before the next stop, around 15 miles north of Perth. Dunkeld is a tidy, prosperous town on the banks of the River Tay. Outside the local florist shop, neat rows of primulas and pansies are laid out, ready for spring bedding – whenever spring decides to arrive.

In Dunkeld Post Office, postmaster Andy Granger says the mood of his customers can be divided into two distinct categories: "People are optimistic about the country, but pessimistic about the economy. The 49-year-old believes that in the short term the public will pin the blame for economic woes on global financial turmoil rather than the Scottish Government. A couple of years down the line, though, if Salmond hasn't achieved anything, it'll be a different story."

Granger, who spent 20 years as a policeman in Glasgow before moving to Perthshire, voted Conservative last year, but is wishing the SNP well. "People think the country is in good hands and is going forward," he says. But he has reservations about the First Minister – in particular his trademark swagger. "I'm not an admirer of Salmond's style – it's not a typical Scottish way of going about things. The Scottish way is a bit more modest, a bit more reserved."

In Dunkeld's main street, Martin Brooks is walking his dog, Sally, a 14-year-old lurcher. "The lurcher's a collie crossed with a greyhound," he explains. "It's a poacher's dog – not that I'm a poacher, mind." A retired firefighter who now works as a taxi driver, 54-year-old Brooks has grey coming through in his beard. Once an SNP supporter he now admits he is disillusioned with the party – and particularly its leader. Yet again, Salmond gets it in the neck over a certain curiously-coifed American millionaire. "I think he's made a right arse of himself with this Trump thing in Aberdeen. He gave them the OK, didn't he, even though he won't admit it. I think he's wrong. He should have kept out of it."

What of the Scottish public's view on the SNP's raison d'etre – independence? Salmond's theory is that an SNP Government at Holyrood will gradually build confidence in Scotland going it alone as a sovereign state. One year into the process, is he right?

The verdict from my day on the A9 is a mixed one. Taking the pulse of the nation is hungry work, and a Little Chef on the A9 between Perth and Stirling proves too hard to resist. Finishing a cup of coffee in the corner is an SNP voter who believes independence would be bad for Scotland.

Karen Britten, a 46-year-old primary school teacher from Dundee, is adamant. "I wouldn't like to see us totally independent. In Britain we need to be one – we're got a lot of history there. Yes, we need a government in Scotland that makes decisions for us and knows what we really need. But looking at the wider world it's important that we're unified within Britain."

A few miles down the road, however, in the shadow of the Wallace Monument, a convert to the independence cause is bringing his two sons to visit a shrine to a true Scottish patriot. William Gartley, a 42-year-old local authority employee from Tayside, says Scotland needs to be unshackled. "I'm a socialist and I'd always voted Labour," he says, "but in recent years I've been more interested in Scotland being in charge of its own destiny. So I voted SNP last time. They've done reasonably well, but the way the Westminster Government is treating them, Alex Salmond's fighting with one hand tied behind his back. They're not getting a fair run. As a nation we need a chance to make our own mistakes."

Approaching the end of my journey, having spoken to dozens of Scots along the way, a conclusion or two starts to take shape. One year on from their Holyrood triumph, the SNP is clearly still riding high in the public's affections. Even people who didn't vote for the Nationalists are willing to give them the benefit of the doubt for now. As for leadership, Alex Salmond is emerging as a man you either love or hate, and he has the ability to alienate some voters who are sympathetic to his party's aims. Almost all the negatives I heard about the SNP on my travels were criticisms of the party leader's judgment and personal style.

And so to the Raploch. Lying between the Wallace Monument and Stirling Castle it is, like them, a Scottish icon of sorts. Once infamous for its deprivation, drug abuse and crime, its reputation has improved slightly in recent years. But it is still a place where life seems to revolve round the off-license and the bookies, and where everyone seems to be "on the sick". A woman with a lined face and dyed blonde hair hurries out of the former carrying a bottle of High Commissioner whisky in a plastic bag. "Ah'm away for a wee drink, son, then watching the Rangers," she says. Nearby a tubby teenage boy in a yellow and black shellsuit is swinging a three iron around his head – and he doesn't look like a golfing enthusiast.

Sandra McKenzie, a 57-year-old woman with kindly eyes, was born in the Raploch and has lived here all her life. "There's good and bad everywhere," she says, "but this place is not as bad as people make out. I can walk around here at night with no bother."

A lifelong Labour supporter, she backed the SNP at last year's election, largely in the hope that Salmond would abolish the Council Tax that forces her to find £107 a month from her slim wage packet as a carer. But McKenzie is not yet willing to say if her decision was the right one. Her final word stands as a warning for the SNP as it celebrates a year in power: "They've not really had a chance to do what they said they would. The SNP still has to prove itself. If they mess it up I'll be back with Labour, like a shot."

She purses her lips: "We'll just have to wait and see."

THE SNP: A YEAR IN POWER - THE VERDICT

So how have they done? From pledges on class sizes, bridge tolls and the council tax to the all-important question of independence, Eddie Barnes looks at what was promised and what's been delivered

EDUCATION

What they said they'd do

Increase nursery provision for three and four-year-olds by 50%. Cut class sizes in P1-3 to a maximum of 18. Reform the curriculum in secondary schools. End student debt and reintroduce grants. Wipe out the one-off graduate endowment payment.

What they've done

In the "concordat" with Scotland's councils, local authorities have pledged to make "substantial progress" on increasing nursery provision. They have also agreed to cut class sizes in primary "as quickly as possible". No progress on student debt or on grants, although a consultation document is promised. The graduate endowment has been abolished. Started a review on the future of Scotland's universities. "Curriculum for Excellence" is being rolled out

SoS verdict

SNP pledges on nursery provision and class sizes are now in the hands of councils and, with cash at a premium, major doubts linger over their ability to deliver. Education Secretary Fiona Hyslop has had a tough time explaining ambitious pledges - particularly over cancelling student debt, which looks doomed. But the abolition of the graduate endowment was a crowd-pleaser.

HEALTH

What they said they'd do

Reverse the closure of the A&Es in Monklands and Ayr. Abolish prescription charges for the chronically ill and phase them out for the rest of the population. Introduce direct elections to health boards. Protect GPs and nurses in the community from harm.

What they've done

Monklands' and Ayr's futures are guaranteed. Prescription charges reduced from £6.85 to £5, but the chronically ill still have to pay (although fees for them have been cut by a half). Elections to health boards is out to consultation. GPs and nurses have got extra protection. Cervical cancer immunisation will soon be rolled out. Ministers will do more to boost public health, in a new bill soon to be launched. Meanwhile, the private sector has been told to forget any involvement in NHS.

SoS verdict

Health ministers Nicola Sturgeon and Shona Robison have turned in a competent first year. Expensive policies on prescription charges and hospital closures will gain them popularity. But with structural reform for the £1bn-a-year Scottish NHS pushed aside, questions linger over whether it will be able to meet rising costs.

ECONOMY

What they said they'd do

Scrap council tax and replace it with a local income tax. Freeze council tax in the meantime. Introduce a small business bonus, cancelling business rates for small firms. Cut the fat from the public sector by making savings of 1.5% of the entire Scottish budget. Slim down Scottish Enterprise. Phase out PFI with a new Scottish Futures Trust. Offer grants to first-time buyers.

What they've done

Council Tax frozen across the country at the beginning of this year. Local Income Tax plans published. Small business bonus introduced, offering major savings to small firms. Agreed with local government to find efficiency savings of 2% per year. Scottish Enterprise has been savaged. But the Scottish Futures Trust is still consigned to the future. The first-time buyer grants look set to disappear altogether.

SoS verdict

Finance Secretary John Swinney has made a highly impressive start. The council tax freeze was a masterstroke of political manoeuvring. Meanwhile, small firms are delighted with the bonus scheme. The gloss has come off in recent weeks following the half-hearted publication of the government's LIT plans. And the apparent scrapping of the first-time buyer grant looks bad - but overall a highly satisfactory first year.

JUSTICE

What they said they'd do

Recruit an extra 1,000 police. Demand Westminster hands over control of firearms legislation, in order to ban air guns. Crack down on binge drinking and cheap alcohol. Hand out community sentences to petty offenders, instead of jail.

What they've done

Ministers will make an "additional 1,000 officers available in communities". Air gun ban has got bogged down after the UK Government rejected changes. A crackdown on alcohol is to be unveiled this summer, but plans for an end to cheap drink have been pre-announced. Unveiled a 'Prisons Commission' headed by Henry McLeish to study early release and community punishment.

SoS verdict

Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill has got stuck into the justice brief with commendable gusto, even if he has a tendency to go over the top, especially with his war on drink. The determination to distinguish petty repeat offenders from serious and dangerous criminals has been impressively argued. But the 1,000 police officers pledge has - if not unravelled - been a little tarnished, after it emerged many of the new coppers would be sought through "redeployment".

TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT

What they said they'd do

Build a new Forth crossing. Scrap tolls on the Forth and Tay bridges. Update the Glasgow to Edinburgh rail line to reduce journey times. Improve the A9, A96 and A77. Boost links to the Islands. Introduce a climate change bill with mandatory cuts in carbon of 3% a year. Prevent new nuclear stations from being built. Quadruple support for micro-generation. Scrap the Edinburgh trams.

What they've done

Forth crossing plans have been announced, and the Forth and Tay bridges are now free. Plans for the Glasgow to Edinburgh line are under way. Plans to increase the amount of dual carriageway on the A9 are being investigated. Ferry prices to the SNP-controlled Western Isles have been slashed by as much as 50% (unlike in Lib Dem Orkney and Shetland). A climate change consultation has been issued, with ministers insisting they will block nuclear power. Forced to concede and proceed with the trams.

SoS verdict

Dumping the tolls on the Forth and Tay bridges has handed the SNP the backing of thousands of motorists. But with both petrol-heads and tree-huggers among the ministerial team, no one can yet be sure exactly what the SNP stands for.

CONSTITUTION

What they said they'd do

Publish a white paper on independence and deliver a referendum in 2010. Open discussions with the UK Government to transfer responsibility for North Sea oil and gas to Holyrood. Restart meetings of the Joint Ministerial Committee. Press to take the lead in EU negotiations over fisheries.

What they've done

Launched the "national conversation" on independence, setting out the options for future constitutional change in Scotland. Referendum bill still to be put before Parliament, but 2010 remains the planned date. Raised the debate over Scotland's control on broadcasting, Trident nuclear weapons and firearms legislation. Renamed the Scottish Executive as "The Scottish Government".

SoS verdict

The "national conversation" has had a difficult time, having to jostle for space alongside the Unionist parties' "Constitutional Commission", leading to confusion among the public. However, the SNP's bid to keep the constitution at the top of the agenda has been a success. Salmond has also picked his fights cleverly, only attacking when his opponent's position is weak.

VOICES FROM AROUND THE COUNTRY

THE STUDENT

Annabel Fleming-Brown From Glasgow

The SNP has had a very positive effect on Scotland. It is clear to me that Alex Salmond is a politician of some stature. I think he is a very competent steward of the office that he holds and has gained wide respect in Scotland. I do have to question, however, whether he is pushing his political agenda on independence at a pace that may be uncomfortable for many Scots.
I also think that Nicola Sturgeon (right) is a quality player. She has shown determination to examine local issues as well as national ones. I found her recent stance on the 'Go Ape' project for Pollok Park in her constituency just as significant as her intervention in the retention of A&E departments early on in her office last year.

THE CROFTER

Geordie Riddle From Kirkhill near Beauly in the Highlands

On an agricultural front I do not feel the SNP has made any significant changes. It seems to me they have continued down the same road as the previous Government. Similar to the Labour Party, the SNP is just trying to make things more bureaucratic. I would much rather just be left to my own devices.
It seems Scotland is getting ever closer to gaining its independence and I think it is only a matter of time before the SNP Government gets what it wants, and that will be the end of us. Scotland will lose its identity and it will be sucked into Europe. We already pay them a colossal amount of money and I think they squander it. I have not yet seen any benefits for me and my community.

THE TEACHER

Andy Roony From Edinburgh

The only significant changes I have seen in Scotland over the past year have been in ethos, not in practice. There has been a lot of emphasis on Scotland's role within Britain. I don't think we have come any closer to getting our independence. It seems that the Government is thinking long-term and so is working slowly and subtly. If the SNP get re-elected than I predict we will see a much more aggressive leadership style.
I would like more discussions about the practicalities of Scotland breaking off from Britain. Instead of fussing over football issues or whether there is enough Scottish perspective in the news, I would like to hear about the Government's financial plans and how it plans to cope without the extra support.

THE BUSINESSMAN

Paul Macdonald Director of IFDNRG, a web and video hosting company in Edinburgh

As a small business, we are very happy with the way the Government is doing things. Because of the small business bonus we are better off by £2,600 this year and will save £8,000 over the next three. For a small business, these sums make a big difference. The barriers to getting office space have been alleviated and it is now easier for small businesses to expand. There are many support schemes out there from organisations like Scottish Enterprise but you have to jump through so many hoops, whereas in one fell swoop the SNP has given tangible support.

I am not a Nationalist, but from an economic perspective, I am much more supportive of them now.

The full article contains 4099 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 April 2008 11:55 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Scottish National Party
 
1

Spotter,

13/04/2008 01:13:56
well done alex salmond and the SNP

poor kenny must have been choking writing this :-)
2

Richardinho,

13/04/2008 01:22:51
'A lifelong Labour supporter, she backed the SNP at last year's election, largely in the hope that Salmond would abolish the Council Tax that forces her to find £107 a month from her slim wage packet as a carer.'

wonder how'll she'll feel when she finds out her Income tax has went up from 10% to 20% this months thanks to Gordon Brown.
3

Hen Mc Stoorie,

Port William 13/04/2008 02:43:32
Richardinho
I won't tell her if you won't
4

R.I.P. HONEST BALANCED JOURNALISM,

13/04/2008 04:09:23
"
It's been a year of constant warring with Labour, some victories, some wounds and a never-ending row over a golf course. Now as the first anniversary of the SNP's historic election victory nears, Kenny Farquharson embarks on a road trip to see if Scotland is a country happy with its new horizons"

What victories? It has been sleaze and trough feeding like time is running out.

Supermarket sweep has more dignity
5

R.I.P. HONEST BALANCED JOURNALISM,

13/04/2008 04:11:16
#2- would that be the SOCIALST reforms Wendy was guffing about?

Talking of which. Wheres Wendy? Has she decided a life in politics is one where you hide?
6

The west awake,

Argyll 13/04/2008 06:54:12
We're talking about ONE YEAR here! A year after which even this arch-Unionist paper couldn't find one person to criticise our new Government. The only doubts are about Salmond himself, not the Government.
When did this paper so diligently assess the last lot of under-acheivers after one year?
Kenny wouldn't have had to travel the length of the A9 for the last lot, they did so little of any value in any year a wee daunder roond the block would have done fine.
7

R.I.P. HONEST BALANCED JOURNALISM,

13/04/2008 07:27:08
#4 - I miss read it as Labour victories! DOH! I need specs!
8

Phil C,

13/04/2008 07:43:22
What they said they'd do

Restore some dignity to the Scottish people. Establish a foundation for independence. Increase fairness in the deployment of tax and public finances.

What they've done

Restored some dignity to the Scottish people. Established a foundation for independence. Increased fairness in the deployment of tax and public finances.

Peoples' verdict

So far so good. Despite constant nit-picking, Trumped up muck-raking and fight stirring by a bemused opposition (Council Tax Benefit, trams, bridge toll plazas, 1000 police officers etc) Salmond and the SNP have governed with a sense of statesmanship and fairness unseen in Scottish politics in living memory. They put Scotland's people first.

How Labour's discredited, and dishonest 'team' has maintained a sizeable rump of support (I don't mean Wendy's figure!) is a miracle. I for one hope they come to their senses soon. The Alexander twins and their mates can't seem to get the pigswill off their snouts.
9

Guga II,

Rockall 13/04/2008 07:52:56
Scotland, the Scottish government and the Scottish people are not helped by Unionist rags like the Hootsmon, continually pushing propaganda for the Mouth of the South and the New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party (North British Branch). It must choke them having to print anything complimentary to, or about, our goverment.

It's a pity they never bother doing any form of investigative journalism on all the sleaze, corruption and total incompetence of Labour, either in Scotland or as regards the Westminster government. Have they, for example, ever sent their "roving reporter" out and about to ask what people think of the elimination of the 10p tax band, or the virually invisible Wendy (I didn't intentionally break the law) and her dodgy donations, or the rest of the Labour "snouts in the trough" mob?
10

Nebulous,

Aberdeen 13/04/2008 08:53:27
It may be a surprise to the journalist, but those views pretty much represent the views of people I meet on a daily basis. Small things really do make a difference. I have reason to cross both the Forth and the Tay bridge at least once a month. I could demand a receipt and claim it back as expenses from my employer, but I never have done. Even though I am only saving £25 a year or so I get a warm glow every time I go over one of the bridges.

With Trump Aleck Salmond is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. Trump's development is very much wanted in the North-East. We are acutely aware of putting all our eggs in one basket with oil and we want to begin to prepare for its eventual rundown. The North-East is largely ignored by tourists who head up the A9 to Inverness and many people feel this development would put us on the map. Personally I remember what happened to Trump during the last recession, with Canary Wharf, and I doubt if it will ever be built. However people outside the North-East do seem to view this development much more sceptically.
11

Hugo of Garven,

13/04/2008 09:09:46
"I do feel there's a new energy in Scotland since the election, and more of a feeling of national identity."

A fair overall assessment.
12

beckypumps1,

Fife 13/04/2008 09:57:53
Well done The SNP. Labour as well as the hootsman have no shame.
13

danielrober,

13/04/2008 10:29:57
I should think my comments clearly show that i'm from a labour family, though my views have changed. I still get on with most Labour guys.

Yet one of the things i really hated was the obssesion that was the labour party only correct party. That if the Conservative, SNP, Greens, or heven forbid the Lib Dems came up with a plan, it was rubbished. This lost many good ideas and policy plans.

Unfortunitly I see the same tend happening to the SNP. This time though its anyone who is not in favour of full separation. Its not a good trend, as it lessens the scope of ideas.

There's no need to go down this path.
14

Tynietiger,

13/04/2008 12:32:34
SNP do not stand for "full separation" read Alex Salmond's piece on his positive agenda about people (and Nations) being in charge of their own destiny in to-day's Sunday Times.

Then read Wendy's bit and cringe.
15

saltire.1,

Moray 13/04/2008 13:04:22
Well done the snp,am more than happy
16

Calummac,

13/04/2008 13:11:26
Eddie Barnes, your style is dreadful! I have seen more highbrow analysis in the Daily Record.

Go take a read of Iain Macwhirter and then compare your student journalism.
17

Tam O` Shanter,

dundee 13/04/2008 13:26:22
Very disappointed with the pro unionist editorial agenda.I find the Herald takes a more balanced view.
Good on the SNP-it`s brilliant to have a team on your side at last,rather than the wee fearties from the unionist parties.RIP the hated council tax.
18

Rob7,

England 13/04/2008 17:52:32
Next step English Freedom and you can take Brown back!
19

senza nome,

13/04/2008 20:40:36
When are we going to get rid of that dreadful statue of Wallace in the picture? I cringe every time i see it at the foot of the Monument.It's dire.
20

Kenny Farquharson,

SoS 13/04/2008 21:38:54
# 19
If you're not hearing any of these concerns about Salmond from the people you live/work among, then I suggest you're not listening hard enough. Or you only choose friends who agree with your politics, which is a bit sad.
The people interviewed in this article are real, not "invented" as you suggest. But just because their views are inconvenient to youtr point of view you deny their existence. That too is a bit sad.

21

Hen Mc Stoorie,

Port William 13/04/2008 21:58:22
Kenny,
I have read, and reread Jackies post, and nowhere in that post did she say that the people interviewed were invented.
What she meant was the poll we were promised this w/end,the results of which are unknown to us , but can be 'invented' by SOS to read what you want.
22

Kenny Farquharson,

SoS 13/04/2008 22:00:30
# 19
As for the online poll, there was an astonishing surge in responses at one point last week...just after the SNP sent out an email (we have a copy) urging party activists to skew the poll.
'Twas extemely shortsighted, because the results of an unskewed poll, accurately reflecting general public opinion, would perhaps have been encouraging for the Nationalist cause.
A wee example of how the dark arts of politics can sometime rebound on those who exercise them.
23

Kenny Farquharson,

13/04/2008 22:01:38
#23
"This article is invented trash"
24

Kenny Farquharson,

13/04/2008 22:02:52
# 21
I agree wholeheartedly about the statue!
25

subrosa,

13/04/2008 22:33:50
# 24

Kenny you have to understand many people who comment on here are not members of any political party although they may support one. I find the fact that this newspaper stated they would publish an analysed poll and then retracted the decision not in the least professional.

I'm sure in every poll there are problems with parties contacting their membership. You can't tell me this never happened when labour was in power.
26

ptdoug,

13/04/2008 22:38:23
KENNY,

Good article, enjoyable and informative.

It is refreshing to have a journalist willing to come online to answer criticism of their writing. I wish more at SoS would have the balls to follow suit.

As an SNP supporter and admirer of Alex Salmond, I think the concerns of some of those you spoke to with regards to AS, and I've heard these concerns voiced too, are for the most part not as a result of any direct dealings or meetings with Alex, but rather the result of a concerted campaign in the Unionist press to portray Alex Salmond as smarmy and arrogant.

Alot of mud has been thrown...and some of it has stuck.

I, and many other SNP supporters (I'm not a member) simply see a man with Scotlands interests as his 1st, 2nd, and 3rd priorities.

Confidence and vision is often mistaken, or portrayed by your opponents, as arrogance.

I think this is clearly the case with regards to Salmond.

Anyway, good piece. Keep up the good work and just tell it as you see it.
27

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 13/04/2008 23:07:27
"just after the SNP sent out an email (we have a copy) urging party activists to skew the poll."

Even if that's true, how does it equate to "skewing the poll"? It's hardly dishonest - SNP voters would simply be expressing their honest opinions. The URL has been given out here several times, so Labour voters or anyone else are equally at liberty to "skew" it with their own honestly-held opinions.
28

Kenny Farquharson,

SoS 13/04/2008 23:08:31
# 28
Cheers, PT. Appreciated.
29

Mìcheal a Eilean Rùim,

Richmond, British Columbia, Canada. 14/04/2008 15:46:38
For me there is only one goal; that Scots should be masters in their own house. We are an intelligent people who for example, are considered to be the best immigrants the US has ever had in terms of success, wealth creation and education (according to the US Dept. of Statistics).
What some 50 millions of us have done overseas in countries like Canada means that we have nothing to fear when it comes to looking after our own house and our own affairs.
30

Boggle fey the Bog,

14/04/2008 16:54:15
Hi Kenny, I read your article yesterday, however I decided to take Eddie Barnes to task ;-).
Your article is a fairly good piece of work (I don't want you to get big-heided), and IMHO reasonably well balanced. Nice Work!!

However in your replies to various posters, you mention that the SNP sent out an E-mail to members(activists) 'to skew the poll'. As a member of the SNP, I can honestly say that I have received no such E-Mail from the SNP, or anyone connected with the SNP.

As a former Auditor, my first question to you concerning that E-mail would be 'Show Me', and as a respected Journo, with the Scotsman, you will have no problem accessing my E-mail address.

I look forward to receiving a copy of aforesaid E-mail from you.

Cheers Boggle
31

Campbell Gibson,

15/04/2008 00:51:12
It must really hurt the journalists of these pro-Unionist papers to say anything positive about Mr Salmond and the SNP. I don't think I have ever read any editorials in this paper that haven't have something negative to say about the SNP. Even their least biased articles have something negative to say. If anyone even considers going back to voting Labour then they deserve everything they get. These people have no pride in themselves or their country.
32

Campbell Gibson,

15/04/2008 00:51:13
It must really hurt the journalists of these pro-Unionist papers to say anything positive about Mr Salmond and the SNP. I don't think I have ever read any editorials in this paper that haven't have something negative to say about the SNP. Even their least biased articles have something negative to say. If anyone even considers going back to voting Labour then they deserve everything they get. These people have no pride in themselves or their country.
33

Campbell Gibson,

15/04/2008 00:51:23
It must really hurt the journalists of these pro-Unionist papers to say anything positive about Mr Salmond and the SNP. I don't think I have ever read any editorials in this paper that haven't have something negative to say about the SNP. Even their least biased articles have something negative to say. If anyone even considers going back to voting Labour then they deserve everything they get. These people have no pride in themselves or their country.
34

Queen D,

Glasgow 15/04/2008 16:26:51
You will forgive my doubting Thomas attitude to the e-mail telling SNP activists to hit the site, we have been fed 23% by unionist activists for some time now and at last they are having to accept that support is on the rise.
I am not an activist nor am I member of any political party , I am however, persuaded that independence is the only way forward for my country.
I also feel obliged to point out that anti SNP media is
prevalent here in Scotland .Just take a look at your own newspaper in the list more SNP politics and count how many spun stories there are.
I would love to see the e- mails "clearing " Ms Alexander almost as much as I would like to see the e-mail in your possession ,claiming that the SNP skewed the results of the poll.
Incidentally the Times had a "just for fun " poll which put independence at 85% , thought you'd like to know.
Meanwhile I , and many others , await the e-mail publication and the results.
35

Michael,

Edinburgh 15/04/2008 18:47:28
You know I've given up even bothering to read the Scotsman publication papers on the basis of their ridiculous daily, "SNP are still evil" type stories. However, I'm interested in polls and read about SoS refusing to publish theirs on a Herald discussion thread. As other posters have said, any political party can contact members and activists and let them know about any online survey. That the SNP appear to have done so and no-one else has suggests that the SNP are cleverer, more on the ball and that their supporters are keener to do something than anyone else.

In view of the Unionist monoculture which dominates the Scottish press it is remarkable that anyone votes SNP far less that the party is actually in government. The constant attempts by Scotsman publications newspapers in particular to smear the SNP and fabricate ludicrous stories about individual government members would be risible were it not for the fact that for around ten years this paper had virtually nothing critical to say about the contemptible people who ran and represented Scottish Labour. The intense scrutiny to which the SNP was and is subjected was never replicated with Labour. For years Labour was treated uncritically by a press which in the case of the Scotsman publications saw them as the next best thing to the Tories. What the Scotsman really wants is to support the Tories but they know they can't - Labour stood in for them for a while even though it was clear to anyone with half a brain that Scottish Labour could never deliver on the Thatcher agenda that the Scotsman remains thirled to.

Now that the SNP are in government the Scotsman people haven't a clue what to do. The SNP are supposed to be evil - the fact that they aren't has confused the editorial crew. Rather than engage with reality, they now decide to make stuff up.

Amazingly they retain the ridiculous position that the desirability of independence can be measured by the attractiveness of one party leader. Turn the tables
36

Michael,

Edinburgh 15/04/2008 18:49:30
Turn the tables to see how absurd that position is.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.