Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 16th November 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

John Hutton: what effects will the SNP government's opposition to new nuclear plants have in Scotland?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 March 2008
Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Our country faces its most important energy challenge in a generation. No one who understands the science of global warming can dispute the urgency of climate change. No one who wants to keep the lights can dispute the dangers of energy supplies be
coming more politicised around the world.

These challenges are faced by many countries around the world. But in the UK this pressure is even more acute. North Sea Oil and Gas reserves are diminishing. We are moving from being a net energy exporter to importer within a decade. This at a time when almost a third of our coal and oil fired power stations will probably close by 2030.

Energy security is one of the things that binds us together as a nation. We have a national grid for a simple reason. We are energy interdependent. Electricity generated in England doesn't stop at the border. Wind power from Scotland flows through the national grid into England. There's a good reason for this. Different parts of our country have different natural resources. For energy security to work for every part of the UK, we have to work together. We can't have a pick and mix approach to energy security in different parts of the country.

Part of that mix for nearly half a century has been nuclear power. It is one of our most important forms of low carbon energy. It gives us 'baseload' power. The power we need when the wind doesn't blow. The power you can depend upon day in day out, night in night out. Our reactor fleet is ageing. All but one of our nuclear power stations will shut down by 2023. That's why the UK Government decided recently to give power companies the option to invest in new nuclear capacity in the UK. It will be a critical source of power to meet our energy security and climate change challenges in the decades ahead.

As well as contributing to energy security, a renaissance of new nuclear across the UK today has the potential to be the most significant economic opportunity for our energy economy since the exploitation of North Sea oil and gas. I don't want Scotland to miss out.

Scotland knows how immense the contribution from North Sea oil and gas was to the transformation of its economy three decades ago. Nuclear has the potential to be just as important to its economic future.

I want Scotland to take every advantage it can of this new reality. Scotland could play a tremendously important role, helping the UK to become the number one place in the world for companies to do business in new nuclear.

Being number one in the world will bring thousands of high skilled jobs to the UK. 10,000 of these alone could be in Scotland. Your companies were key players in past nuclear programmes. You could be well placed to win new orders. But today, Scotland stands to lose out on these economic benefits because the SNP has decided to turn its back on nuclear power.

Whilst the North Sea's oil and gas remains a crucial resource, and we must continue to maximise the economic recovery of our remaining reserves, including the currently stranded gas reserves West of Shetland, we are becoming more reliant on imports.

Of course renewables and new low carbon technologies will play an increasingly important role. But the reality is that it cannot be a case of either renewable or nuclear. An energy policy that ruled out one of our key energy sources would be a disaster for both our energy security and for the economy in Scotland.

Scottish consumers disproportionately benefit from nuclear's existing contribution to our electricity supplies. Nuclear contributes to around a third of to Scottish electricity generation, compared to 19% across the whole of the UK.

This of course could continue if the Scottish Executive had an open mind on the role of that new nuclear could play. Investment in new nuclear could be great news for Scottish consumers and workers.

Companies from across the world increasingly see new build in the UK as a gateway to the rest of the European market and I want Scotland to be a part of that. As politicians we need to work together, both in Westminster and Edinburgh, to secure our low carbon energy future.

Politicisation of energy supplies may be happening abroad but they shouldn't be allowed to happen at home.



The full article contains 763 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 March 2008 10:40 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Nuclear energy
 
1

FrancesP,

30/03/2008 02:36:28
"I don't want Scotland to miss out."

Anyone else feel the tears well up in their eyes as they read those words? The selfless devotion of Blairite clones to the best interests of Scotland is never less than profoundly moving.

They bring us the fruits of their unconditional love. Unfortunately it all seems to be highly radioactive.
2

druidh,

edinburgh 30/03/2008 02:41:50
Or, put another way. . .


As well as contributing to energy security, a
concentration on renewables across the UK today has the potential to be the most significant economic opportunity for our energy economy since the exploitation of North Sea oil and gas. I don't want Scotland to miss out.

Scotland knows how immense the contribution from North Sea oil and gas was to the transformation of its economy three decades ago. Renewables have the potential to be just as important to its economic future.

I want Scotland to take every advantage it can of this new reality. Scotland could play a tremendously important role, helping the UK to become the number one place in the world for companies to do business in renewables.

Being number one in the world will bring thousands of high skilled jobs to the UK. 10,000 of these alone could be in Scotland. Your companies were key players in past nuclear programmes. Today, Scotland stands to win even more economic benefits because the SNP has decided to concentrate on renewables.
3

The west awake,

Argyll 30/03/2008 08:32:10
This is utter tripe from a party who are dragging anything and everything associated with politics into the gutter.
Scotlands energy future lies in our gaining control of our oil and gas, which has transformed THE UK economy, Mr Hutton, (not just Scotlands), together with investing heavily in renewables, such as tidal, wind, biofuels and photovoltiac. There is apparently enough tidal energy in the Pentland Firth alone to satisfy Scotlands needs. These are the energy options of the future, - not the dangerous, costly and dated nuclear technology which Labour are selling us, a technology dominated by players like the US and France, with whom Scotland could only play a small and unimportant role.
The SNP would invest our oil and gas revenues in a future fund, like the intelligent Norwegians, whose oil and gas has provided them with a comfortable wealth which it is difficult for us Scots to even contemplete.

Another "Union Dividend" from Labour - unwanted, poisonous, inefficient and doomed policies from an unwanted, poisonous, inefficient and doomed party.

Go to hell Hutton, and take your "Scottish" lackeys bussed up to Aviemore back there with you!
4

Ken Mac,

Glasgow 30/03/2008 09:04:07
#3 I'm with you, utter tripe.
5

,

30/03/2008 09:22:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Margaret L,

Edinburgh 30/03/2008 10:53:27
Actually for the last year for which figures have been revealed nuclear power provided only 26.4% (14,141gwhs)of Scotland's production. This was because of our years of neglect of the industry.

And the consequence - Kyoto blown out of the water by Scotland. Production of electricity from coal, gas and oil went up by 35% (23,174 gws to 31,322 gwhs). Overall CO" emissions in Scotland went up by 14%. Easily the worst performance in the developed world.

And wind (sorry nearly forgot) went up by .9gwhs. What a joke.
7

Jwil,

30/03/2008 11:04:52
you can be sure that the Wendy Commission will be trying to block the SNP's opposition to new nuclear by taking powers back to Westminster.
8

Jwil,

30/03/2008 11:06:35
The Westminster government said that there would be thousnds of jobs in building the new nuclear stations in England but the actual contracts are to go to a French company.
9

David MacVicar,

web 30/03/2008 11:14:48
"What effects...". What are the effects listed in the article?

Lets rephrase some of the parts for accuracy and honesty:

"We are moving from being a net energy exporter to importer within a decade."
The UK is and is already a net importer of Oil, Scotland is NOT.

"We are energy interdependent. Electricity generated in England doesn't stop at the border. Wind power from Scotland flows through the national grid into England"
Interdependent - true.
Energy flows almost exclusively from Scotland to England, the 400KV interconnects need upgrading to handle more exports and increased imports.


"That's why the UK Government decided recently to give power companies the option to invest in new nuclear capacity in the UK"
Actually EDF will have the lions share and was involved in closed meetings with UK ministers as well as in on the 'public' sic. consultation. Makes the scale of the Trump deal look like negotiation for a market stall.

"most significant economic opportunity for our energy economy since the exploitation of North Sea oil and gas. I don't want Scotland to miss out."
We were and are 'exploited' alright. He doesn't want Scotland to stop propping up UK interests.

"Scotland could play a tremendously important role, helping the UK"
Sorry, Scotland and its extra region territory has and still props up the UK and acts as a guarantee to UK international loans, financing Browns growing debt mountain. Scotland will continue to export Energy and revenue to the rest of the UK, without any need for Nuclear.



10

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 30/03/2008 11:22:10
"No one who understands the science of global warming can dispute the urgency of climate change."
Comments like this show just how ill informed this man is ! Did he crib this from the BWEA website ?
The man is a total and utter idiot who clearly is a mouthpiece for the anti SNP labour government.
Having said that, he is actually correct about needing nuclear power generation because the likes of wind simply can't cut it.
All we need is to replace our existing coal and nuclear ower stations with new ones. We have plenty of installed generating capacity with the existing coal, nuclear, hydro and CCGT power stations. We don't need scams like wind power and we certainly do not need to strengthen the grid.
11

David MacVicar,

web 30/03/2008 11:42:56
contd.

"Scotland knows how immense the contribution from North Sea oil and gas was to the transformation of its economy three decades ago"
Scotland , only knows due to the FOI act and the McCrone report in the public domain. The lies, theft and iniquitous nature of successive UK governments is now there for all to see.

"Nuclear has the potential to be just as important to its economic future." No it doesn't. Latest report by the Adit commision shows Nuclear decommissioning costs have been underestimated by about 30%. The CO2 cost of refining Uranium ore is going to make New Nuclear power stations worse than Gas powered stations, withing their lifetime.

"But the reality is that it cannot be a case of either renewable or nuclear. An energy policy that ruled out one of our key energy sources would be a dis
aster for both our energy security and for the economy in Scotland."
The UK needs Nuclear, Scotland does not. Scotland has already rejected Nuclear energy and wants the Nuclear Weapons Southern UK MPs put on its territory. Where is any proof to back Huttons claims of economic disaster?
All the evidence shows that the Energy poor UK state now needs Nuclear because it cannot support its dense population. It needs as much energy exported from Scotland and France that it can get its hands on.

"Scottish consumers disproportionately benefit".
What a distortion that is! He has attributed all Nuclear energy produced in Scotland as being consumed here. He is a lying barsteward that knows that a large amount of that produced got transported South. Just follow the pylons!!

"Investment in new nuclear could be great news for Scottish consumers"
More lies.. he is thinking 100% about what consumers in the South need...and HIS job security!


"Politicisation of energy supplies may be happening abroad but they shouldn't be allowed to happen at home."
OK - Give Scotland full fiscal and Energy control then. Its that simple.



12

Brian M,

30/03/2008 11:44:42
"I don't want Scotland to miss out"

aye, right
13

,

30/03/2008 11:55:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

John (Again),

Bury St Edmunds 30/03/2008 12:04:14
The fuel for Areva's EPR reactors would come from France, which like the UK now has no indigenous supplies of uranium as its mines are exhausted. It takes uranium from Canada, in which mining production declined 20% in the last two years and from Australia where it declined 10% over the same time.

A small contribution could be gained from reprocessing spent fuel and enrichment tails, but with massive investment in plant at failed Sellafield and at great cost.

So how does John Hutton imagine nuclear power will provide security of supply when its fuel is 100% imported?
15

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 30/03/2008 12:50:47
More failed economic development policies for Scotland championed by our pals in Westminster. After using Scotland as the primary location for generating lots of employment in Call Centres and Electronic Assembly, areas that have now moved to greener pastures in India and China respectively. The Whitehall brain trust has now designated Scotland as the primary location for another failing industry. Nuclear Power. Unfortunately when this one packs up we will be left with power plants whose decommissioning costs will mean a whole in public finances that will last for generations as well as toxic waste that will be dangerous for thousands of years.

Thanks Pal, but no thanks.
16

Blarney,

Leven 30/03/2008 12:53:53
And heres me thinking it was the majority of MSPs that were against any replacement of nuclear power stations. Silly me.
And I was also foolish enough to think that Gordon Brown had blocked development of the subsea generators that will provide more power than Scotland needs and have a surplus for England and indeed Europe.
Yeah it must have all been a dream. That's right, SNP bad, Nuclear good.
17

Neil,

Glasgow 30/03/2008 13:26:15
"No one who understands the science of global warming can dispute the urgency of climate change"

No one who understands how our political system works can dispute that this Labour apparatchik, representing a party who refused to allow nuclear plants to be developed for 10 years, until the threat of blackouts was upon them, can believe he gives a **** about the truth or otherwise of anything he is saying. Doubtless in 10 years he will also be saying that he was always against the claims of warming & calling for more government controls to stop the ice age or whatever other eco-fascist scare is fashionable.

Nonetheless his party has been marginally better at recognising the inevitable than the SNP.

The answer to the question in the headline is either that we shall have massive blackouts & far more hypothermia deaths than the eco-fascist inspired 2,500 Scotland already has annually or we shall be totally dependent on electricity from England, making "independence" impractical but allowing Alex Salmond to girn that the nasty English are charging us for the stuff.
18

Bodee,

Kirkcaldy 30/03/2008 14:41:08
Beware Scotland!

Brown has mentally lost it and we are about to be sacrificed on the alter of "Glory to the South East of England"
For as long as anyone can remember Scotland and it's People have suffered at the hands of Scots seeking English gold.
We have a Press and Media who have sold out to the South and it will be up to every true Scot to stand firm in the face of the oncoming torrent of lies, deceit and scaremongering about to descend on us. It will I fear make the rubbish churned out before the election look like a picnic.
19

Alex, Young Laird d' Drumchapel,

Madrid 30/03/2008 15:16:29
Bodee, don't worry about it - Broon's irrelevance enhaces every time he opens his gob. His leading of this campaign against independence is the best thing we could hope for. He's mad and soon he'll be gone and his weird campaign will be gone with him. This is what desperation smells like.
20

The Tin Man,

Over the Rainbow 30/03/2008 15:28:45
Build more golf-course holiday resorts in Scotland and power them with electricity generated in England.
21

OscarMacApfel,

Dumfries 30/03/2008 16:34:07
Anybody else get the feeling when reading this that a giant hand was going to point at you out of the sky proclaiming, "It could be you!"

This is purely and simply an attempted energy grab by Westminster. Presumably those lovely Labour people in Holyrood will stand up for their principles, say for example Malcolm Chisholm, who said.

"I think the majority of people in Scotland would like to see a mix of non carbon-based energy production, without nuclear, if it can be done." He added: "I personally don't think the case has been made for new nuclear power stations in Scotland."

Malcolm Chisholm Communities Minister on BBC Scotland's The Politics Show (16th July 2006):

or Sarah Boyack who tabled two motions supported by other Labour MSPs requesting that Parliament reject new power stations in Scotland.

On top of all that you have the Crown Estates actually grabbing money from Scottish renewables for Westminsters pockets.

WESTMINSTER will plunder nearly £40million a year in “windfall” profits from Scotland’s renewable energy industry.

In a move similar to the one which saw billions of revenue from Scottish oil fields diverted to London, the Crown Estate will levy a “stealth tax” for every megawatt generated offshore.


http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/39621/Chancellor-s-40million-energy-raid
22

Neil,

Glasgow 30/03/2008 17:08:02
Since Holyrood is subsidising the "renewables" indusrty by nearly £1 billion a year the eindfall profits seem rather low.
23

baron george foulkes etc...,

same mental hospital as Gordon Brown! 30/03/2008 17:19:43
18#
Quite right broon is bonkers for sure!
24

Amaury,,

30/03/2008 17:22:34
ANDREW MARR: If things are going so well why do only a quarter of Scots say they actually want independence?

ALEX SALMOND: Well it's interesting that the poll last Sunday, the one you're quoting, showed a number of things, actually. It showed that the SNP government was far in the lead, in a double digit lead. But on the question of independence the support for independence now is about a quarter but they also asked the question 'would you vote for independence under certain circumstances', and it was two-thirds of the people in the same poll, the same people, said they would vote and therefore?

ALEX SALMOND:
"But on the question of independence the support for independence now is about a quarter "

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/andrew_marr_show/7321392.stm
25

,

30/03/2008 19:42:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

An Beal Bacht,

30/03/2008 20:54:01
tinyurl.com/2usaz7

* We have the biggest dump of nuclear bombs in Europe, at Coulport. 25 miles from Glasgow

* We have the longest runway in the world (now mothballed) at Machrihanish in the Mull of Kintyre, built to allow fully-loaded B52 bombers take of to incinerate Warsaw, Prague, Berlin, St Petersburg, Moscow, and dozens of other cities

* We have largest dump of conventional high explosive in Europe at Glen Douglas near the not so-bonny-bonny banks of Loch Lomond.

* We have Britain’s largest base for cluster-bomb carrying Tornado war planes, at Lossiemouth on the Moray Firth

* We have the UKs only outdoor Depleted Uranium weapon range at Dundrennan on the Solway Firth

* We have Europes largest live-firing range at Cape Wrath, the only place in Europe where NATO air-forces can drop live 1,000 Ib bombs on land.

* We have virtually all the UKs Ultra Low Flying areas, where military jets can fly at roof top level.

* We have the most radioactive polluted coastal waters of any nation in Europe thanks to Sellafield
27

Eve,

Scotland 30/03/2008 21:14:06
2 Artcles for 1 subject!!!

Nuclear = Land poultion!!!!!!

No more Nukes!
28

The Tin Man,

30/03/2008 22:29:59
An beal - when you refer to europe, I presume you mean the eu, and not the european continent? You will find a vast amount of atomic detritus north of Murmansk.
29

An Beal Bacht,

30/03/2008 23:24:31
28 - TTM - You are quire right. Scotland more closely resembles some radioactive wasteland of a Soviet era Russian colony.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is Alex Salmond right to oppose building a new nuclear power station in Scotland?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.