Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 7th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

House prices grind to a halt in squeeze



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 April 2008
HOUSE prices in Scotland are now at a virtual standstill with the global credit crunch and the mortgage squeeze starting to affect owners throughout the country.
Figures to be published this week will reveal that house price inflation in east central Scotland, where double-digit rises have been common for the past eight years, dropped to less than 2% in the first quarter of 2008.

This includes the hotspot
capital Edinburgh and compares with 10% for the same period last year. House price growth last fell to such levels in 1992/93 when Britain was in the grip of recession and 15% interest rates.

In the west of Scotland, centred around the Glasgow area, house price inflation has dipped to below 3% for the first time since December 2000.

The nationwide slowdown is also affecting the northeast around Aberdeen, where owners have also enjoyed double-digit rises for several years.

Analysts said house price inflation in many parts of the country was now "static", largely because of the effects of the credit crunch and a growing mortgage famine.

Buyers were becoming more scarce because they couldn't afford to enter the housing market, trade up to bigger properties or obtain mortgages, analysts said. Some sellers were reluctant to put their homes on the market, reducing supply, because they were no longer attracting the big premiums over the asking price experienced until recently.

Anyone wanting a mortgage, even those at the top end of the market, will now have to wait longer for their applications to be processed. And in an increasing number of cases deals are falling through, with some analysts reporting that up to one in three mortgage buyers are discovering there is no money available.

In a further setback, the UK's sixth largest building society, Skipton, has taken the unusual step of starting to charge £800 for a variable rate home loan while Halifax is demanding a minimum 5% deposit.

Housing economists said if the downward trend continued into negative equity there could be a rash of owners defaulting on loans, leading to house repossessions.

Professor Gwilym Pryce, of the Urban Studies Department at Glasgow University, said: "In real terms we are at zero growth now and what happens next depends on the wider economy.

"It may be that the market bottoms out at zero and then turns back up again, but if the credit crunch feeds through to recession then that could have en effect on repossessions.

"The high end of the market will probably be OK, but my worry is the lower end. Many more people own homes in Scotland than they did in the early 1990s and the level of mortgage indebtedness has been increasing. The bottom end of the market could be flooded with people wanting to sell."

The biggest surprise in the figures from the Edinburgh and the Glasgow Solicitors Property Centres was the dramatic fall in house price inflation in the capital, which has led the boom in home inflation in Scotland for the past year.

David Marshall, the business analyst at the ESPC, said: "House price inflation has dropped to between 1% and 2% in the first quarter. That is down from 10% for the same period last year, so that is a significant slowdown."

The last time inflation rates were so low – below 1% – was in 1992/93. "This is the slowest start to the year since then.

"It's pretty much a static market compared to what we have seen over the last four or five years, when with the exception of 2005 there was annual growth of 15% across the board."

Marshall said most other areas of Scotland were also likely to be slowing to much lower rates than before. "1% or 2% is likely to be the national average."

In Glasgow, house price inflation has plummeted from around 8% at the end of December to less than 3% now.

Mark Hordern, marketing manager at the GSPC, said: "The start of the year was quite positive in the market, given the worries about the credit crunch, but the effects had not started to kick in at that stage. In the last two or three weeks the market has slowed noticeably.

"That's not as a result of lack of demand. People still want mortgages to buy new homes, but it is increasingly difficult to get a mortgage to allow you to pursue the purchase. Effectively there are no 100% mortgages any more."

Last week saw another turbulent seven days in the mortgage markets, with the number of mortgage products declining by 13%. The number of mortgage products available to borrowers has declined by two-thirds since last July, with more than 800 withdrawn by lenders. On Friday, Halifax, Britain's biggest mortgage lender, announced it would be increasing rates for borrowers with smaller deposits.

Builders urge lenders to release more cash to first-time buyers

Natalie Thomas and Jeremy Watson

HOUSEBUILDERS in Scotland are holding emergency talks with mortgage lenders to persuade them to release more funds to help first-time buyers.

The industry is concerned that demand for starter homes will drop sharply because of the change in lending conditions caused by the credit crunch and the withdrawal of thousands of mortgage products.

Mortgages of 100% and above of the value of a home – popular with first-time buyers – have virtually disappeared and lenders are now demanding deposits of up to 20% of the purchase price.

There is a growing sense of unease among housebuilders who concentrate on city centre flats and smaller homes as they fear they will be left with a glut of unsaleable properties.

Proposals to help first-time buyers with grants of £2,000, first pledged in the SNP's election manifesto, have been ditched for being too small.

John Slater, group managing director of Stewart Milne homes division, one of Scotland's leading new home builders, confirmed they were among those talking to the major lenders about "making sure we're practical and responsible in the way we lend to first-time buyers".

Another housebuilder, who declined to be named, said it was critical that the problems facing the first-time buyers market were addressed urgently. "It is vital to the economy that this part of the market is actively supported."

Housing experts said the industry was taking the right approach. Mark Hordern, marketing manager for the Glasgow Solicitors' Property Centre, said: "The builders are absolutely right to talk to the lenders to make sure that finance is available for the buyers of their properties.

"The irony is that, as the housing market has now slowed, it is an outstanding time for first-time buyers to buy. They are not facing the competition from buy-to-let landlords and they will not have to pay as much as previously. But because they have to find bigger deposits, they cannot get the mortgages. There are no 100% mortgages any more."

"It's very frustrating for them and if they can't raise the deposit then they may have to go the 'Bank of Mum and Dad.' Even that is not an option for some."



The full article contains 1191 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

iain,

edinburgh 06/04/2008 00:56:38
Q1 average prices only include completed sales for this period -deals struck in Q1 will only in some cases come through in Q2. The real average house price for Edinburgh was negative in Q1 and will also be in Q2.
2

,

06/04/2008 07:42:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Frae Bentos,

Russia 06/04/2008 07:49:54
"dropped to less than 2%" means they are still going up ? What's is the problem. I still don't see prices actually coming down. Sellers still ask high prices. fair enough the house takes longer to sell - but the do sell.
4

Me, myself and I,

06/04/2008 08:32:17
#3
Inflation at 2.5% to 3% effectively wipes out the price increase. That is if you believe that figure of inflation. Been shopping at Asda or bought petrol lately?

As for the housebuilders ... sod em. They have been selling overpriced tat for a decade.

Similarly buy to let landlords. If you can afford a second house you can afford to lose some money on it. There are thousands of flats lying empty waiting on "young professionals".
5

11+failed,

the pans 06/04/2008 09:02:22
Where is our ESPC eternal optimist to reassure us about the marvel of the ever rising Edinburgh property market?
"We currently have 7,465 properties for sale or to let."
Up from under 4000 in December and up another 250 this week.
6

Alexander,

Edinburgh 06/04/2008 09:11:28
"The irony is that, as the housing market has now slowed, it is an outstanding time for first-time buyers to buy. They are not facing the competition from buy-to-let landlords and they will not have to pay as much as previously."

The real irony is that they can still get a 95% mortgage at 7%+ with the likelihood of being in negative equity by next year.
7

Jeff, Surrey,

06/04/2008 09:11:44
Expect all properties to lose 40%+ from their peak over the next 5-7 years.

Many will lose up to 60% of their value and plenty over 60% of their value.

The upcoming housing crash is going to make the 1990's look like a minor downturn.

Don't listen to the vested interests in property they will be the last ones to admit/understand where we are heading in the housing market.

US, Spain etc are ahead of us in the housing cycle, yet they have not reached anywhere near the bottom of their crash.
8

Brian M,

Edinburgh 06/04/2008 09:21:49
This is not a problem for homeowners, that is the vast majority who will be using their property as a long term home.

Bad news for property investors
9

Vincent-W,

06/04/2008 09:35:13
#4 - Me, myself and I - at nearly 2% last quarter that means that prices are still rising at roughly 8% per annum. Now 8% minus 3% is still a pretty hefty return in investment.

Also as Brian M points out many of us are into housing as living accommodation not investment.

Jeff - waht you say might apply to Surrey but generally speaking, houseprices in Scotland have moved less markedly than yours and there is nowhere near the same level of fluctuation. I would think that adjustments in house prices here are likely to be far more gentle.
10

traprain,

06/04/2008 09:41:05
"This is not a problem for homeowners, that is the vast majority who will be using their property as a long term home."
It really helps with the feel good factor when sitting back in the comfort of one's own home (Halifax actually) paying off a £200k mortgage on a house worth £150k musing on how much further prices will fall!
11

Scott_B,

06/04/2008 09:45:25
Of course house price growth slowed, and it will turn negative. It's reversion to the average - when you grow above the average for a long time, typically growth rates fall back well below the average. It's what markets do.

There's many who have profited from this, taken the profits and run, and many who have been cheerleaders for them - this newspaper among them. Others are left with the huge debts, overvalued housing, negative equity and accompanying stress.
12

Animal82,

06/04/2008 10:10:47
its amuses me to read everyone's expert opinion on property prices in Scotland - particularly Jeff from Surrey. he must be an expert on them coming from Surrey.
13

JimboJimbo,

06/04/2008 10:22:33
Bank of England has already stated clearly that house prices are too high and need correction. Best way to do this is to encourage lenders to restrict funding and bump up interest rates to create the market conditions for a price drop or "correction". But of course not lending enough can affect profits of these big institutions not something that the Boardrooms will tolerate - but the "sweetener" from the Bank of England is to cut the inter-bank lending rate thus increasing the differential between what banks borrow at and what they lend at - that way they stay in profit and it is joe-public that pays in the end! A nice little scheme or am I being too cynical? Interesting how our darling Chancellor is keeping quiet about this one - happy to speak out what a banking institution is at risk but totally quiet when the man/woman in the street is at risk"
14

JimboJimbo,

06/04/2008 10:24:15
Of course the Media talking up the House Market crash does not help, scaremongers and makes the Banks jittery - a self-fulfilling prophesy!
15

JimboJimbo,

06/04/2008 10:29:50
Also nice to see that the House Builders are trying to fix the problem by negotiating with lenders - but bet these will be exclusive loans for those buying new houses. No help for existing house owners.
16

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 06/04/2008 10:31:41
How can a house price grind to a halt?
17

Capital Boy,

06/04/2008 10:47:59
#8 absolute nonesense, i put a btl up for rent last week and was inundated with callers looking to rent
18

Drover,

06/04/2008 11:14:20
#17 Capital Boy. Your recent experience perhaps reflects the current state of the market. More people wanting to rent rather than buy, in the expectation of house prices falling.
19

Bien E. Bien,

06/04/2008 12:59:02
Fear not - there will be an article referencing some bod at the EPSC assuring everyone that, whilst house prices across Scotland may "stabilise", Edinburgh will continue to "buck the trend".

20

Neil,

Glasgow 06/04/2008 13:06:11
House prices are far to high. They are based not on real production cost but on the monopoly created by our government which prevents builders building.
21

House Price Crash,

UK 06/04/2008 13:14:27
Buy To Let landlords are no longer buying property.

First Time Buyers are no longer buying property.

With the state of the market who can argue against the possibility that property prices could CRASH 50% IN ONE YEAR!
22

mr angry,

ayrshire 06/04/2008 13:26:56
#21.cut your drug intake you idiot.
23

bumpkin,

06/04/2008 14:01:15
the property market is a house of cards, and the wind just got up .
24

bumpkin,

06/04/2008 14:07:01
Buy to let is a disgrace to modern society. It ensures the less well off will never have a chance to own.
The short assured tenancy should be outlawed so tenants can have some security and freedom from unaffordable rent rises.
25

House Price Crash,

UK 06/04/2008 15:13:11
#22

Mr Angry, why are you angry?

I am very happy at the moment, I am looking forward to the next couple of years. The future looks bright.
26

Alistair from the New Town,

06/04/2008 16:48:36
The comments on the "Buy to Let" brigade are hilarious. When I was in uni, I had to rent. When I got my first job, I had to rent until I could afford the deposit for a downpayment. There are people who need to rent and it is nice to get a decent place while you are in that position. I have a BTL and I get 60% of the mortgage covered by the rent. I think that the tenant is getting a really good deal as I hired an interior designer to kit out the place and it looks great. I'm happy that I have a nice place for retirement and the tenant is happy that the flat is well looked after with a reasonable rent. What is so bad about that???
27

House Price Crash,

UK 06/04/2008 18:21:04
@Alistair.

Mortgage companies now advise that your rent covers 125% of your mortgage. The extra 25% covers things like maintenance costs and void periods. If you dont have at least 125% they will not let you remortgage on a special deal. Looks you're gonna get stuck on the high SVR mortgage rates.

Your rent only covers 60%, this is crazy, you are going to be mince meat, you complete moron. Your rent doesnt even cover half of what mortgage companies advise.

REPOSSESSION REPOSSESSION REPOSSESSION!

Alistair, is your middle name Subprime?
28

House Price Crash,

UK 06/04/2008 18:23:42
@Alistair,

I hope you enjoy subsidising your tenants while the value of your property crashes in value. Looks like your are a victim of a get rich quick scheme.
29

Alistair from the New Town,

06/04/2008 18:29:27
To #27 - I put 25% down on the property and I have more than sufficient income to subsidise the mortgage each month. In fact, I don't need a mortgage, but it is more tax efficient to have interest expense to offset tehe rent for tax purposes. I found a property that I really like, but it is not suitable for my family's needs right now. If I want to rent out a property to a good tenant and give them a deal, then I think that everyone wins. Oh, one more thing. I work for the bank that loaned me the money!
30

bumpkin,

06/04/2008 18:41:41
A mere 20yrs ago it was illegal to rent out a property that had a mortgage on it. The reasons for this were simple, they knew the damage that buy to let could do to the property market ie overheating.
The rule was rewritten, and now we have the consequences-- a property crash.
The mortgage was invented early in the 20 th cent to help ordinary people buy a home, and so turn them into capitalists not communists.
It is now a vehicle to let a shrinking number of people own all the houses, and the result is a growing group of disenfranchised reluctant renters.
31

Reckless,

Money is debt 06/04/2008 19:53:19
We're in a global depression, and it's going to end in misery for the millions of sheeple who binged on debt.
32

Redhat Sly,

Morayshire 06/04/2008 20:07:13
Wait until the Home Information Packs kick in later this year. In England this flooded the market with properties just before the deadline, as sellers wanted to avoid the extra costs.

Unless you need to buy a house for a specific reason, e.g. moving job etc. Now seems a very bad time to think about a house purchase, as it is bound to become even more of a buyer's market later this year.
33

Silence of the Yams,

06/04/2008 22:17:28
Interest rates MUST come down at least 0.5% before the end of the year.
34

Rachman,

Edinburgh 08/04/2008 09:36:53
To Bumpkin

Your comments on Short Assured tenancies are odd, the whole point of a short assured is that the tenant can have a fair rent determined.

Your comment about it used to be illegal to rent property with a mortgage is made up.
35

bumpkin,

08/04/2008 18:24:32
Rachman, you are wrong.
I remember being told by a mortgage company in the 80,s that they would not lend to me if i was not going to live in the property.
As to short assred tenancy, if you have no security, you can never upset your landlord by resisting increases, you will get thrown out.
36

debsned,

west lothian 26/04/2008 20:14:37
It really doesn't make any material difference to most people what their house (home) price does. If it goes up - they do not profit, as all the others go up too, unless they sell and go and live in a tent. If it goes down, they do not loose unless they it is a second house or BTL, and they wish to sell. But if you don't sell your BTL, you will never loose. The profit/loss is all a paper profit/loss and you will only turn a paper loss into a real one by selling now, and only if you bought it very recently.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is it a good idea for builders to offer incentives to first-time buyers?
Yes, it gives them the chance to get on the property ladder.
It helps, but they’ll struggle to get a decent mortgage rate.
No, first-time buyers should wait for the crisis to pass.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.