Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 7th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

£500 fine threat over home surveys



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 March 2008
HOMEOWNERS face swingeing fines of up to £500 if they fail to provide the Government's controversial 'seller surveys' for potential buyers in Scotland.
Despite widespread unpopularity, Home Reports, which include a survey, an energy report and a property questionnaire, are being introduced across the country in December, one of the biggest ever shake-ups in the house-selling process.

Sellers will
have to pay out hundreds of pounds for the reports to be compiled, with no guarantee that they will later be reimbursed. Failure to comply is to be made an offence, punishable with fines of up to £500.

Trading standards officers have been given powers to enforce the new fines, which are more than twice the levels of those being imposed on similar offenders in England.

Opponents of the new system said the differing fines were unfair and would add to the general concern about the implementation of the scheme.

David Alves, chairman of Real, an umbrella organisation for estate agents in the Lothians, said homeowners should not be turned into offenders over a scheme of dubious value.

"The Government has gone down the compulsory route because it realised that a voluntary system of Home Reports would not work," he said.

"The fines have obviously been set at a level that will put people off from not complying, but it seems unfair that they are higher than in England. They obviously think people in Scotland are richer than in England."

David McLetchie, the MSP and former Conservative leader, who voted against the introduction of Home Reports, said the fines were a consequence of forcing the scheme on homeowners.

"Unfortunately, when you make something like this compulsory then you make it an offence and fines flow from that," he added.

A voluntary pilot scheme launched in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Dundee and Inverness in July 2004, had to be scrapped after seven months, when only 74 sellers commissioned surveys compared with a planned 1,200. At the time, critics said this demonstrated the public lack of support.

But the Scottish Parliament finally voted through Home Reports last month after almost five years of development.

The packs will include a single survey, commissioned by the seller rather than the buyer, a report on a home's energy efficiency and a guide to remedying faults, and a questionnaire on basic details of a property.

Originally, Home Reports were conceived partly to help end the problem of multiple surveys, in which buyers were paying out hundreds of pounds for surveys on homes they did not go on to purchase. But since the subsequent adoption of the offers-subject-to-survey system in the Scottish housing market, that problem has largely disappeared.

But many estate agents and solicitors believe buyers will not trust surveys commissioned by the seller and will want to commission their own. "The majority of solicitors, estate agents and surveyors in Scotland believe that Home Reports will be a terrific waste of money," said Alves.

On report

A property questionnaire will be the only part of the Home Report package that homeowners will have to fill out themselves. It is split into 16 sections and will take a considerable time to finish.

Length of ownership, council tax band and parking arrangements are straightforward enough. Alterations, additions and extensions will be more of a problem, as you have to provide legal documents and guarantees, while "issues that may have affected your property" will involve memory recall and a temptation to fib.

As for planning applications on nearby land – if you are tempted to forget that new nuclear power station, the solicitors point out that the questionnaires are likely to become part of your transaction's legal missives. See you in court.



The full article contains 621 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

TheTerminator,

09/03/2008 00:11:50
Another "Fine" to be added to the long list of fines in this miserable country.
2

Marvin the Martian,

09/03/2008 00:16:47
Excellent! Well done that government, new and creative ways of taxing the middle (working&saving) classes.

Shuggie gets less punishment for punching someone in the face. Once you deduct his legal aid fess, housing, groceries, fuel poverty bills. There's only enough left for... ahh wait, I see.

Make up the deficit with... recycling fines, punitive council tax rates with no service, littering fines for biodegradable, speeding fines, 20% tax on fruit juice and a a fuel duty (to get to work to pay for shuggie) that is sickening.

Keep up the good work chaps.
3

subrosa,

09/03/2008 01:21:37
That's pushed me into a decision. I'll gift my house to my family and they can rent it out until this nonsense stops.
4

bill inch,

EDINBURGH 09/03/2008 03:15:48
subrosa it will never stop
5

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 09/03/2008 07:51:57
It seems that nobody wants these reports except government.
I know for sure that when I buy a property I will have my own survey done.
This is simply another tax on an already overtaxed public
6

donald,

glasgow 09/03/2008 08:14:33
It'll go the profit of selling the hoose? What's the problem. Potential buyers are put of from multi viewing if they have to pay multi costs.
7

Jimmy the Pie,

09/03/2008 08:16:41
Another non story. Call this a newspaper??
8

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 09/03/2008 09:06:20
6

its only one cost per viewer and only if they are considering a bid. I doubt there will be any difficulty for an unscupulous seller to forge the necessary paper work.
9

yockel,

09/03/2008 09:08:07
#3 Sorry subrosa but you have just commited an offence under the Anti Social Behaviour Act as a relevant person discussing the letting of a property you own without being a registered landlord.

This country is *)&*ing nuts.

P.S. a relevant person is anyone other than Local Government and a few of their pals.
10

subrosa,

09/03/2008 09:31:57
# 9

Aye yockel but it was unintentional so I'm sure I'll get off :)
11

Reckless,

Gordon the criminal 09/03/2008 09:55:46
Neo Nazi, Neo Labour scum. Gordon Brown and his Brown Shirts can go to hell. I won't cooperate with their fascist regime. I won't move, ever. They can shove their HIPS. Become independent, don't fall under their control.
12

JoeMcT,

BlairsFantasyIsland 09/03/2008 10:17:08
HIPS have helped kill off the housing market in England, and house buyers don't trust or use them.

Who wants to spend say, £ 600 to find out about how well insulated their Loft is?

This is just another dumb law from Brussells adopted by New Labour's Poodle Government against the wishes of most people.......
13

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 09/03/2008 10:29:53
#11 Unfortunately, this is an SNP initiative in Scotland not a Labour one. As an avid SNP supporter I was really disappointed in them for bringing the HIP to Scotland, without any consultation and despite seeing what a disaster it has turned out to be in England.
14

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 09/03/2008 10:31:26
Also, at fines of "up to £500" would it not be cheaper to be fined than to pay the £600+ for the HIP?
15

Mcsnagpile,

09/03/2008 10:40:35
One good point about seller surveys is the seller is in control. There is nothing worse than a surprise bad survey. All problems can be resolved up front before an offer is considered. The surveyor working for the seller cannot be bad.
16

Klaus Dubois,

Edinburgh 09/03/2008 10:51:20
#2 - so true. Kick a random punter half to death & you'll end up with a fine equivalent to buying a round of drinks next weekend.
Is there any binding element to these surveys; or are we just substituting one low-value-adding document for a tarted up version of the same thing ?
17

Denis,

Maidenhead 09/03/2008 14:27:20
subrosa, you may find that the same applies to rented property. Certainly that's the case for the core element, the Energy Performance Certificate required by Article 7 of EU Directive 2002/91/EC:

"Member States shall ensure that, when buildings are constructed, sold or rented out, an energy performance certificate is made available to the owner or by the owner to the prospective buyer or tenant, as the case might be."

As this has come from the EU it doesn't matter whether the SNP has to push it or Labour has to push it.
18

Van (not white) Diesel,

Amsterdam & Augsburg 09/03/2008 19:27:46
#17 Denis
Is it my imagination, but why does it always seem to be Article 7 of whatever EU Directive? It seems very unfair on the number 7, which I seem to recall used to indicate good fortune of biblical proportions.
19

WKKB,

12/03/2008 12:30:52
Time to build the cost of the report into the selling price of the house and then hope it sells. If the report were priced more reasonably it wouldn't be so bad but c'mon... and the fine... be reasonable someone!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is it a good idea for builders to offer incentives to first-time buyers?
Yes, it gives them the chance to get on the property ladder.
It helps, but they’ll struggle to get a decent mortgage rate.
No, first-time buyers should wait for the crisis to pass.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.