Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Sunday, 30th November 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Time Scotland made its mind up



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 September 2008
IF TOM Brown thinks that "the English Broadcasting Corporation" does not sufficiently identify Scottish and Welsh sportsmen and women he clearly did not listen to much of the Olympic coverage ('True test of national identity is what you feel', Comment, August 31).
The British Broadcasting Corporation was quite punctilious about describing successful Scottish and Welsh participants as such. It has learned well the need to doff their caps to Scottish and Welsh sensitivity. English medal winners were, on the other hand, invariably referred to as "British". The inconsistency was quite glaring and obviously deliberate.

Mr Brown suggests that the English should do more to foster togetherness. For what reason? Even those Scots who, like Mr Brown, claim to be in favour of the Union, spend most of their time proclaiming how different and Scottish they are. The debate in Scotland centres on how much more power the Scottish Parliament should have and on how much richer or poorer Scotland would be within or without the Union. Such a mind set is no basis for a common identity, or a viable partnership. The Scots should make up their minds whether they want the Union or not, without demanding further concessions from the English. If Scotland wants to go, it should go, and go quickly.

James Matthews, London





The full article contains 222 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 September 2008 8:14 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 07/09/2008 08:49:28
The author fails to mention he is a campaigner for an English Devolved Parliament, although why he wants a second legislature is a mystery, when by reason of its constitutional position, England has always dominated the U.K., to the demographic exclusion of the Celtic Nations?

Perhaps, if the English had not previously adopted the patronising position that stand alone England was THE United Kingdom then there would never have been a massive resurgence of nationalism, especially in Scotland!

As we know a famous American President defined it perfectly when he paraphrased Jesus in the Bible with the oft quoted saying: "A house divided (against) itself cannot stand"!
2

Greenheatman,

TAIN 07/09/2008 09:04:36
.....the British team was referred to, on several occasions, the English team by the BBC presenters.

.......was it planned to fly the Union Flag upside down in front of the Team GB during the opening ceremony or just incompetence?
3

donald,

glasgow 07/09/2008 10:25:47
"If Scotland wants to go, it should go, and go quickly."
For chrissakes hurry it up.
4

Hugo of Garven,

07/09/2008 10:27:43
" . . without demanding further concessions from the English."

I thought it was the British parliament we wanted concessions from?

If James Matthews is a campaigner for an English Devolved Parliament, then he has my support.

Many Scots want the Union but not on the present London-centric terms.
5

Colin Wilson,

Aberdeen 07/09/2008 11:12:11
"English medal winners were, on the other hand, invariably referred to as "British". "

"the British team was referred to, on several occasions, the English team by the BBC presenters."

Not only from this, but also from the years I spent living in England, it's obvious to me that the majority of English people simply don't understand that the terms "England" and "Britain" mean different things. This can only be because their educational system just doesn't teach them properly.

If James Matthews achieves his aim of a devolved English parliament, then there will have to be educational change first. Otherwise, if there is an English parliament as well as a British parliament, a lot of English people are going to be very confused.

"If Scotland wants to go, it should go, and go quickly."

Absolutely.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.