Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 11th May 2008 Change Date

Great Dobbies offer with Scotland on Sunday

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

New drug for cancer in 5 years



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 May 2008
THE lives of half of all cancer victims could be saved or prolonged as a result of clinical trials set to start within five years, Scotland's leading researcher in the field revealed last night.
Professor Sir David Lane said work on his earlier discoveries into the link between genes and cancer had reached the stage where drug trials in humans were likely to begin in "four to five years".

Lane, in his first interview since returning to Scotland from a three-year post in Singapore, predicted that if the trials were successful up to 7,000 Scottish cancer sufferers annually could be saved, 10 times as many in the UK and millions across the world.

Lane, who is based at Dundee University, is revered in scientific circles for his discovery of the p53 gene and work on how it helps prevent cancer by "switching off" the damaged cells that can cause tumours.

Speaking exclusively to Scotland on Sunday, he revealed that his own groundbreaking experiments, as well as research by other scientists across the world, had reached a "very exciting" stage.

Many tumours begin when p53 is prevented from doing its vital anti-cancer work by other chemicals in the body. According to Lane, a molecule has been created which allows p53 to carry on fighting the disease. The molecule, Nutlin 3, works by blocking a protein called MDM2 which itself can inhibit p53.

Theoretically, a drug containing Nutlin 3 could be used to help treat virtually all types of cancer, including lung, leukaemia, breast and colon. Approximately half of all cancers involve the p53 gene being blocked by MDM2.

Lane said: "There are things coming to clinical trial soon and that's very exciting. I expect in the next four or five years there will be clinical trials of drugs that work by turning on p53. It's very clear that it's getting very close now and that's a big excitement."

He added: "The thing we would start with would be trials of leukaemia because it's easier to monitor how drugs are working there by taking tumour cells from the blood and seeing if they are being damaged."

Lane predicted: "Cancer will become more and more a treatable disease where the expected outcome is a successful treatment. We are getting towards that already with breast cancer. It's a combination of early detection, trials, and treatments.

"The difference I feel now is that it feels like we are really on the right track. You can feel the progress. There were times 20 years ago when there weren't drugs coming though and this was such a difficult disease to treat. Now we know we are doing the right things. That's not to be complacent because with the ageing population cancer is going to be a major disease but I am really optimistic about what we are doing."

Lane called on the scientific community to work together. "There are a lot of hurdles and the costs go up enormously, hundreds of millions to do full clinical approval, so it's a long staircase," he said. "In the end it's not just one person that gets it there, it's a combination of the scientists, the clinicians, the patients and the public who fund it."

Lane discovered the importance of p53 – since dubbed the 'tumour suppressor gene' or the 'guardian of the genome' – in 1979.

It is hoped that new treatments based on p53 will be more effective and less toxic than traditional therapies such as chemotherapy.

Although cancer deaths are falling in Scotland, the disease remains the nation's biggest killer, claiming 15,000 lives in 2006.

Dr Karen Vousden, director of the Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, said: "There are very few types of cancer that would not be helped by this. It could benefit up to 50% of all cancer cases.

"Potentially this could have an enormous impact. There are still hurdles to overcome. But you can't help but be excited by this."

Andrea Stiglianou, coordinator of the Leukaemia Society, said: "Anything that leads towards better treatments and enables people to lead better quality lives is really gladly welcomed. Sadly, we are still losing patients, so this is welcomed 100%."

Lane has returned to Dundee after three years at Singapore's Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology.

He will now spend most of his time at his research base in Dundee University as well as taking a strategic role with Cancer Research UK, steering its research and investment.



INTERVIEW

'Cancer will become more and more a disease we can treat'

IT STARTED with a conversation over a pint in a Dundee pub more than 15 years ago and could end up saving thousands of lives every year.

David Lane and a colleague dreamed up an experiment that would eventually show how the cancer prevention gene – p53 – worked in humans and open up the possibility of new life-saving treatments.

Now research by one of the world's most famous scientists, Professor Sir David Lane, has taken us to the brink of human trials for drugs that it is hoped will save up to half of all cancer patients.

In an exclusive interview with Scotland on Sunday, 56-year-old Lane has revealed fascinating details of his latest research, and that of other scientists worldwide, and told of his excitement about the prospect of cancer drug trials in as little as four years.

Lane has returned to Dundee University after a working break in Singapore with his wife Birgitte, an eminent scientist in her own right, whose interest is in skin cells.

Despite the string of prestigious awards, his new appointment as chief scientist for Cancer Research UK, and the fact that his work has greatly advanced world science, Lane is unassuming and down-to-earth. When he talks about the mind-boggling potential of his discovery for saving human lives, it is with genuine enthusiasm.

"Cancer will become more and more a treatable disease where the expected outcome is a successful treatment," he said.

"If this work can lead to treatments for half of cancers, I will be a very happy man," he added.

Aside from his own work on p53, Lane is hugely confident about what is happening now in the field of cancer research, with new treatments that target individual cancers.

"There are a lot of active developments happening in the cancer field," he said. "The idea of understanding individual tumours in individual patients is very prominent and many of the new anti-cancer drugs are linked exactly to the particular patient or they are not going to be effective. They are very specific, and that is a challenging process, because we are not just treating everyone with cancer with the same drug.

"They have minor side-effects and are effective. We want more of those and the key is what do you do to make that happen.

"These big successes have come from a breakthrough in basic science understanding, to some translational work to identify the molecules, and finally to the clinical work to make sure it's safe and that the right patients get it."

Returning to his own field of expertise, Lane said that one crucial recent breakthrough was the development of a molecule by US scientists. Developed as a result of his own p53 research, the molecule Nutlin 3, is of growing interest.

Made by Roche pharmaceuticals, Nutlin 3 allows the p53 gene to perform its anti-cancer functions properly by blocking a protein that inhibits the gene.

Lane added that the fact that Nutlin 3 works well has led to "a lot of excitement" in the cancer research field. The next step is to make sure it is safe and effective in humans. Once that has been established, Lane's reputation as one of the world's leading cancer scientists will be assured.

"I am sure it won't work on its own; it will have to be used with other things, but it's a real boost," he added. "We are working on the idea of what combinations work best. We have used it in combination with other molecules and that suggests that using it in combination with other drugs is best."

It has been a long journey for Lane, who, as a 19-year-old science student, witnessed his own father die slowly from bowel cancer. With a younger brother who was aged just six at the time, the experience had a profound effect on him, and he decided, while helping his mother to nurse his father, that if there was anything he could do to help the fight against cancer, he would do it.

And he did. After studying auto-immunity at University College London, he published his 1979 landmark paper on the discovery of p53. It demonstrated that this previously unknown gene played a key role in cancer cells.

At first it was thought the gene actually caused cancer. But further investigations by Lane and a few others over the years revealed it actually did the opposite. In 1990, Lane moved to a post at Dundee University to continue his research, setting up labs funded by Cancer Research UK.

By 1992, much more about the theory of p53 was known because it was fast on its way to becoming the world's most researched gene.

Lane was determined to crack the next big problem: how it worked in the human body. He was so impatient that one evening in a Dundee pub, over a pint, he and a colleague, cancer specialist Peter Hall, dreamed up an experiment – using Hall as the guinea pig – that would avoid the lengthy wait for licensing approvals that human experiments normally require.

The experiment involved subjecting Hall's arm to radiation from a sun lamp, equivalent to 20 minutes on a Greek beach, and taking a series of skin biopsies to watch the activity of p53. They saw what they hoped: the accumulation of p53 in the cells in the radiated skin as it rushed to the rescue of the sun-damaged cells. This finally proved that p53 went to the aid of damaged and potentially cancerous tissue.

Tests involving p53 drugs, however, are currently at the animal stage. But this will change within five years. Lane has previously made the dramatic claim that a 'cure' for cancer will be found within his own lifetime, and he is now on his way to making that claim a reality.

Lane's most recent work involves using zebra fish embryos, which are transparent but have been genetically modified to glow a florescent green when the p53 pathway is switched on. "We can use it to study how drugs interact with p53 and potentially it's a new way of studying how drugs work," he said.

"We are working very closely with others and there are things coming to clinical trial soon that work through this particular pathway and that's very exciting. I expect in the next four or five years there will be clinical trials of drugs that work by turning on p53."

The revelation is a massive boost for Scotland's reputation in scientific research. When Lane left Dundee for Singapore there were concerns that he might not return. But he says he was always going to come back. And it has not only taught him more about cancer, but much about the importance of encouraging scientists.

"It was the spirit of adventure that led me over there," he added. "In my own career it was a good point because my kids had gone to university.

"On a personal level that was a big experience for me, leading 500 scientists in a big institute, and it was jolly hard work. It taught me the lesson that science is dependent upon people and if you want the best scientists your country has to compete with other countries and create attractive environments."

Lane also believes that his new strategic role with Britain's biggest cancer research charity, Cancer Research UK, will allow him to play a role in deciding which projects to fund, and in balancing funding for research with funds for patients.

Around 27,000 Scots were diagnosed with cancer last year, and although some types of the disease, such as cervical and stomach cancer, are decreasing, others, including skin, prostate and breast cancer, are on the rise.

As well as the genetic role of p53, lifestyle factors such as diet, lack of exercise, smoking and alcohol are all known to play a major role. Around 15,000 Scots die from cancer every year.

Ultimately, it is not just his and others' scientific research on finding 'cures' that will help beat cancer, but prevention, screening and early detection.

Lane added: "My job with Cancer Research UK is strategic. We are raising a lot of money from the public and funding places like the Beatson Institute in Glasgow and increasingly supporting translational work for clinical trials. The job is trying to balance these so that we don't put all the money into one thing, such as the university research. Making sure that we support activities in different centres is important.

He added: "If we step back a bit and look at the whole of cancer in society, prevention and early detection is important and the charity has been very active helping to control it.

"Detection is also important, including things like the NHS breast screening programme. This is very exciting; the fact that we are seeing these things rolled out means that we can predict the number of lives that are going to be saved."

Curriculum vitae

PROFESSOR SIR DAVID LANE

Born: Purley, Surrey, 1952.

Educated: Undergraduate and postgraduate degrees at University College London. Post doctoral research at the Imperial Cancer Research Fund in London and the Cold Spring Harbor Labs in New York. Awarded honorary degrees from the universities of Abertay, Stirling, Aberdeen, Birmingham and Nottingham.

Research: Published more than 290 research articles and is internationally recognised for his original discovery of the p53 gene.

Fellowships: Fellow of the Royal Society, the Royal Society of Edinburgh, the Royal College of Pathologists and a founder member of the Academy of Medical Science.

Academic Prizes: Winner of the Joseph Steiner Prize, the Meyenburg Prize, the Yvette Mayent Prize – known as the Nobel Prize of cancer research – and the Paul Ehrlich Prize.

Accolades: Knighted for his contribution to cancer research in the New Year honours list in January 2000.

Employment history: Currently professor of molecular oncology at Dundee University and chief scientist of Cancer Research UK. Former Executive Director of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore. Founder and former chairman of the Scientific Advisory Board of Cyclacel. Former principal scientist for the Imperial Cancer Research Fund.

Schools need science funds to inspire

SCOTLAND'S future as a nation for groundbreaking research is at risk unless more money is spent on science in schools, Professor Sir David Lane has warned.

Science is hugely encouraged in Singapore schools, with state-of-the-art laboratories and equipment. But schools need to be better funded in Scotland to ensure children are "inspired", he said.

Lane recently spent three years in Singapore on an extended sabbatical, visiting a number of schools to see how science was being taught.

He said he quickly became aware of a difference between the education systems in Scotland and Singapore, and that while top-level university research was comparable in both countries, schools in Singapore were better at teaching science to children.

His comments chime with the results of a recent survey of Scottish schools, which found serious shortcomings in science classrooms, including a lack of equipment and poor assessment.

Lane said: "In Singapore, kids at a young age get good experience of science, and free scholarships are given to the brightest students.

"I noticed the funding for schools and the sense of science being very important for education. A much larger fraction of Singaporean students are trained in science at school than we see in Britain.

"You start to wonder why, and when I visited the schools, the teaching materials were very modern and good, and I don't think that's true in all the schools I have seen in Scotland.

"We need to make sure schools have enough money to do that. Some of these things are happening in Scotland and I hope they continue."

A recent survey by the Save British Science Society found three-quarters of Scottish science teachers warned of a lack of funding for expensive laboratory equipment, and that half of Scottish schools had cancelled practical lessons because of a lack of equipment.

LEADER: Giant strides in cancer battle


The full article contains 2768 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 May 2008 11:48 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Cancer research
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 04/05/2008 00:17:16
Hopefully good news for cancer sufferers. Will it also help people with bone cancer?

How does it tie in, if at all, with this new "super protein" hSSB1 they have discovered in Australia?
2

,

04/05/2008 00:52:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

,

04/05/2008 00:53:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

,

04/05/2008 00:54:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Evolution in action,

St Andrews 04/05/2008 00:59:08
I hate to pour cold water om such well intentioned optimism, but I must have read substantially the same story 2o times in the last 30 years. I see no evidence that any great cures have been achieved.
6

,

04/05/2008 01:01:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

,

04/05/2008 01:02:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

,

04/05/2008 01:09:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

Guga II,

Rockall 04/05/2008 01:29:52
Scott, thanks for these links mate. I have copied them and will look at them later. I have an interest in the subject as my partner recently died of bone cancer. She was misdiagnosed to begin with.
10

,

04/05/2008 01:34:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 04/05/2008 02:43:22

Guga, I to have the same sentiments as Scott #10, I only know 'to well' how it feels to have lost a Loved one.

What makes it worse, as in cancer, is the dismay caused by misdiagnoses in the first place.

Scott #7,

Yes you may be correct, many a comment, seems to be removed for no good reason, but I think it has to be someone that, 'Reports Unsuitable' before any comment is removed.

Unfortunatly, there are some 'sad' people out there, that have,..'never lived'.
12

Lanna,

04/05/2008 03:33:56
Hi Guga,
I'm sorry to hear of your loss.

Hi ScottWebb,
Good to see you about. I'll have a look at the links as well.

Hi Charles
13

Navvy,

04/05/2008 04:06:51
I have had the privilege of meeting David Lane and his wife.
He is a good and unassuming man and Scotland would do well to listen to his advice on education.

Whe a man like that spends 3 years in a very different culture his eyes are opened and he learns as well as teaches. He was very well received in Singapore
14

W Smith,

MIddle East 04/05/2008 04:09:01
A big thank you to Englishman Sir David Lane for helping put Dundee University on the world map - FOR THE RIGHT REASONS!

1) George Galloway started his political career in the '70's by hanging out a Dundee University Students Union with Palestinian students.

2) Osama Saeed stood up at a meeting recently at DU and encouraged muslims not to cooperate with the Special Branch and referred to the SB as 'tyranny'.

3) Englishman Craig Murray is now rector ar DU and supports Islamic militants and is against the 'war on terror' He did a very taxing degree in Modern History - a real workaholic this guy, eh?

Out of these four guys (Lane, Galloway, Saeed, Murray) which one doesn't Alex Salmond associate with?

Yep, you've guessed correctly - Mr Lane!

BTW
Mr Lane shouldn't have to look to the public for cash.

Who has ever heard of useless quangos having to beg for cash?

Single teenage mums, drug addicts and illegal immigrants can get their hands on government cash but Mr Lane is going round having to raise funds.
15

Sonare,

04/05/2008 05:58:30
What an incredible story,

...we are blesssed to have such a passionate and gifted prson return to Scotland - and well done the University of Dundee in ensuring the correct environment is present for him to continue his pioneering work in Scotland.

and yes...#14, he shouild not have to seek funds...how/where can we donate to this cause?

16

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 04/05/2008 06:17:37
I'm told that if you don't die of something else first then cancer will finish you off. I wonder what a cancer-free world might be like; and will we like it?
17

Conan the Librarian™,

04/05/2008 08:28:32
16
What an inane comment.
18

The Strategist,

04/05/2008 08:45:21
As is often the case I am hugely impressed with our ingenuity and inventiveness.

The question now is whether Sir Fred Goodwin or Andy Hornby will ringing Lane up on Monday morning to ask how much money he needs to keep this technology in Scotland and to create a Scottish company.
19

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 04/05/2008 08:46:45
#17 It takes one to know one.
20

Red Tower,

Dunoon 04/05/2008 08:48:48
Of course all this depends on whether the Government's healthcare-rationing authority, the cynically-named, National Institute of Clinical Excellence, will allow the drug,once developed, ever to be used.

If anyone wants to find out what I am talking about I would suggest that they research the restrictions placed on the drug, Temodal, by NICE. This drug was invented in Britain by Cancer Reseach UK i.e. using money donated by all of us, is widely used throughout the World and is rationed rigorously in this country by NICE.
21

Conan the Librarian™,

04/05/2008 08:55:19
19
What the f*ck are you on!?

You say "will we like a cancer free world"

I say yes, we would like one.
22

ddmc,

04/05/2008 08:58:59
The story of royal raymond rife & his inventions is an interesting one as well.

23

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 04/05/2008 09:13:09
#12,
Hi Lanna nice to see you arround, hope you are keeping well.

Ror everyone else here are some stats, if you find it boring just scroll over this comment, to the next,

____________________________


Around 12,600 males and 13,300 females were diagnosed with cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) in 2003. These figures are similar to 2002 but may increase slightly due to the continuing accrual of late registrations.
Over the last decade (1993-2003) age-standardised incidence of cancer has fallen steadily in men (significant 11% decrease) and has begun to fall in women (significant 3.5% decrease)1. Note however that due to an ageing population the number of cases of cancer diagnosed has risen.
Lung cancer is the most common cancer in men and the second most common cancer in women. The long-term decline in men has continued with a significant fall in incidence of 27% in the last ten years. In women, the increasing trend in incidence may have reached a peak as there was no significant change in the last ten years.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Incidence continues to rise with a significant 10% increase in the last ten years.
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. Incidence continues to rise with a significant 9.5% rise in the last decade. At least in part, this may represent an increase in detection through use of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test rather than a genuine increase in the risk of developing the disease.
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in both men and women. Incidence in men is unchanged in the last ten years whilst incidence in women has fallen significantly with an 11% decrease in ten years.
Stomach cancer is the 7th most common cancer in men and the 9th most common cancer in women. Incidence continues to fall significantly with decreases over the last ten years of 27% and 28% in men and women respectively.
Malignant melanoma of the skin is the 11th mos
24

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 04/05/2008 09:15:22
continued......

Malignant melanoma of the skin is the 11th most common cancer in men and the 6th most common in women. Incidence continues to increase significantly in both men and women with rises of 36% and 13% respectively over the last ten years.
Non-melanoma skin cancer is not routinely included in cancer incidence figures as there is a degree of under recording. Around 3,900 cases were recorded in men in 2003 and 3,500 cases in women. Incidence is rising steeply in both men and women with increases of 25% and 32% respectively over the last ten years.
The decline in bladder cancer incidence since 1997 is an artefact due to a change in coding practice across cancer registries in the UK. Around a quarter of bladder tumours are no longer coded as invasive bladder cancers. This also impacts on the figures for all cancers.
25

subrosa,

04/05/2008 09:44:50
Part of the problem with Mr Lane's funding is the fact he works with Cancer Research UK. Now I'm all for any cancer charity but all the UKs charities money goes to London and is distributed from there. Thus we're back in the situation of being given handouts.

There is a charity purely for the use of Scottish Research and I didn't find out about it until my father died. It's the Ninewells Cancer Campaign and the money stays with the likes of Mr Lane.

# 14 Where is your proof that Alex Salmond has nothing to do with Mr Lane? Mr Lane has been in Singapore for 3 years - do you expect Alex Salmond to be popping over there to see him? Daft.

As for the Scottish government neglecting research at Dundee that's another unionist fallacy. Medical research will always say they don't have enough money - it's part of their job to raise as much as possible.
26

 Ayrshire Scot™,

04/05/2008 09:54:24
14. What an odious and repulsive comment, and as usual ill informed.

The SNP government just announced funding for a new biomedical research centre in Dundee to help develop exactly such work as this.
27

cokebottle,

Oz 04/05/2008 09:57:38
My mother & sister both died of (hereditary) liver cancer,I watched a friend's father die of lung cancer,this year a friend died of drink related liver cancer and I have four friends who have survived, 2 skin(over here they call it The Australian disease)1 from throat and 1 prostrate. Yes I would like to live in a world without cancer,I don't see it but good luck just the same.
28

Senga Jean,

Scotland 04/05/2008 10:29:44
#14 Middle East?...Middle Ingerland more like. Your comments are contrived nonsense. Scotland would appear to have exported the cringe and as for the rest of your home counties(sic) parochial patter I would guess that Mr Salmond and the SNP have exactly the correct approach to Mr Lane. A realistic one that recognises the cogent truth of the curates egg..."good in parts"
29

JimC,

Kilmarnock 04/05/2008 10:33:13
Early detection is crucial in all cancers. X-rays do not show the tumour in the early stages and by the time symptoms develop there is a period of time before referral to hospital. In many cases the cancer has spread to other parts of the body. I wish Dr. Lane well in his research but I think new methods of detection and regular screening for a specific age group is necessary to improve the possibility of a successful outcome. For many with lung cancer, from the date of diagnosis to death can be as short as 2-6 weeks if other parts of the body are effected. A truly horrible disease.
30

Rabhairt,

Cannons Creek AUSTRALIA 04/05/2008 11:48:09
EVOLUTION IN ACTION NO.5. I agree with part of what you are pointing out, however I blame the media for the BIG HEADLINES; we all know that research into cancer takes time and it would seem that a lot of progress has been made towards a cure and I am sure that one day there will be the break through cancer sufferers are hoping for, there is heaps of current information available via the Net and this is where I would advise interested parties to look.
31

Red Tower,

Dunoon 04/05/2008 11:53:41
# 25 I too would like to see research being more home-based but as your comments imply Ninewells Cancer Campaign has less resources than Cancer Research UK. But Cancer Research UK does not have enough money to be effective.

The trouble with Cancer Research UK is that although it can fund research and come up with some remarkable and internationally-acclaimed drugs, it does not have the necessary resources to market them. The result is that the marketing side is left entirely to the drug industry and it in turn does its number crunching on how many will need the drug?, what will be the cost of production?, what price can we charge for the product? etc. So in spite of us, the general public having funded the research, and in consequence having subsidised the extremely lucrative drugs industry, they can shelf the lot if the sums don't come up with highly profitable answers.

Short of Alex Salmond setting up a nationalised drug-marketing organisation I can see no way round this private enterprise veto. And cancer sufferers North and South of the Border will suffer as a result
32

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

04/05/2008 12:56:00
#14
Your point being?

You really are a sad, bitter, twisted person, aren't you? Has it never occurred to you that the reason why Englishman Sir David Lane has chosen Ninewells Hopital and Dundee University is because it is a world renowned centre of excellence in this particular field?
Something to be celebrated, surely? And yes, many non-Scots do ground-breaking and important research in Scottish institutions, just as Scots do, and have done over the years, similar reseach in English and other foreign institutions and research centres.

Science is international, you complete numpty!
33

wistful,

04/05/2008 13:29:33
16
Yes I would love a world without cancer, then I know I will see my young children grow up and some wonderful people I knew would still be with us. And there are so many of us fighting this horrible disease or who have lost loved ones. Even though the reality of these articles are further away than they let on, it gives us hope and a positive attitude makes ALL the difference. Although I know my children have a 50% chance of inheriting my faulty gene, I am relieved to know that in 20 years time, they will have even more options at their disposal, as I have had this year, 16 years since my Mum's diagnosis. This IS exciting.
34

Algy,

Chelmsford 04/05/2008 16:04:41
I am about to have oral surgery for suspicious spot. I hope all is ok but if not it would be fantastic to have Professor Sir David Lane's refined results as available treatments now.

Good luck to him and anyone else who can contribute to solving the cancer conundrum.

The Scotsman is always great for comments.
35

Peter Adams,

Kirkcaldy 04/05/2008 20:01:36
For those who cannot wait the 4 or 5 years for this drug to begin trials, go to www.canceractive.com or www.campaignfortruth.com and find out what you can do to help yourself right now.
36

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 04/05/2008 21:48:47
Good news, well done to Prof Lane and his supporting staff! Excellent progress is now being made on many fronts against cancer. Monoclonal antibodies can seek out certain types of cancer cells, and drugs and radionuclides attached to these antibodies then kill the cancer cells, like guided missiles. Stereotactic radiosurgery, tomotherapy, and hadron therapy are becoming more freely available, and can deliver lethal radiation doses to fairly complex tumours while sparing healthy tissue. New methods such as voxel-based spectroscopic MRI and new diagnostic techniques using positron emitting radionuclides are allowing cancer to be dedicated with greater sensitivity and accuracy. One of my uncles has survived two different types of cancer for more than 5 years, and both were considered deadly just 20 years ago!
37

Billy Boy,

Sherman Oaks California 05/05/2008 06:15:14
A cure would be nice, BUT what about eradicating the cause? We continue to keep poisoning ourselves through the use of chemical substances in everything from furniture to food. Most of this usage makes it easier for industry to make money. We then -taxpayers- spend tens of millions of pounds on research ostensibly to find a cure for the poisons we are producing. Makes a lot of sense doesn't it? Not that I want to detract from the work done by Dr lane and others, they are doing their best, as are Greenpeace etc.
38

thinking,

Scotland 05/05/2008 08:47:00
#25 #31
This is taken from Cancer Research Uk's own website where they list who gets funding
'Professor Sir David Lane is a research scientist of international renown and directs the Cancer Research UK Cell Transformation Research Group at Ninewells Hospital and Medical School.'

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.