Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Nationalist MP's email swipe at Scots law

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 October 2009
A SCOTTISH National Party MP has criticised the Scots legal system for "repeatedly" releasing criminals on technicalities and claiming it "caved in" to public opinion by convicting the Lockerbie bomber.
In what represents a major embarrassment to the Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill, John Mason said he had a "very poor impression" of the legal system adding that cases appeared to "drag on for ages".

Mason, who secured one of the SNP's
greatest-ever by-election victories by winning Glasgow East from Labour, made his remarks in an email to a member of the Scottish Youth Parliament, Kenneth Faulds.

In the message, he said: "It seems to me that the courts may well have caved in to public opinion on the Lockerbie case and convicted someone who was only a bit-player.

"Also they repeatedly let people off on a technicality who have clearly committed the crime."

Mason complained about the time it takes to process cases in an email he wrote when asked for his views on having Fatal Accident Inquiries in Scotland for Scots who died abroad.

"My other complaint is how long everything takes," he said. "What is the point of a teenager committing some minor offence and it takes two years to come to court?

"Once cases are in court there seems to be no time limit and cases can drag on for ages."

Labour MSP Margaret Curran said: "John Mason's comments are bizarre. He clearly has not thought through the implications and is either confused or has a very poor grasp of the criminal justice system."

Yesterday Mason said: "I was happy to offer my personal views about lawyers, courts and the Lockerbie trial to a member of the Scottish Youth Parliament, who unfortunately, chose to play party politics."

MacAskill's spokesman said: "The government are in no doubt about the Lockerbie conviction, but parliamentarians must be free to express their own view."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 October 2009 11:58 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Scottish National Party
 
1

,

04/10/2009 01:02:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

redcliffe62,

04/10/2009 01:31:59
so mason said cases take too long to be heard. shock about that, and hard to deny. with all that baggage i think megrahi would need to have lived to be a hundred for that appeal to have been heard.
3

Fifi la Bonbon,

04/10/2009 01:45:27
He's got a point about criminals getting off on a technicality and about those lawyers. Well done to Mr Mason for speaking out. We haven't heard very much from him since he was sent down to the fleshpots of London but it's good he's keeping in touch. Let's hear more from him.
4

Edward,

04/10/2009 02:49:49
Its just Labour spin story, you can tell as it was written by Tom Peterkin
5

Andrew D,

Brisbane 04/10/2009 07:14:35
Does anyone actually disagree with anything he said?
6

Observer,,

Glasgow 04/10/2009 08:53:18
3 He wasn't speaking out. He was giving his, presumably solicited, views to a member of the Youth Parliament who then went running away to the papers.

What he said was wholly unremarkable. We all know that cases take too long in the courts and that a clever lawyer can get people off on a technicality. Most people also think that Megrahi was a bit of a patsy. So, ''SNP MP reveals himself as being pretty much like everyone else in the country'' should have been the headline.
7

,

04/10/2009 09:07:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

,

04/10/2009 09:07:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

,

04/10/2009 09:07:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

,

04/10/2009 09:07:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

04/10/2009 09:07:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

,

04/10/2009 09:07:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

04/10/2009 09:08:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

,

04/10/2009 09:08:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

04/10/2009 09:08:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

overshot,

perth 04/10/2009 09:57:24
"In the message, he said: "It seems to me that the courts may well have caved in to public opinion on the Lockerbie case and convicted someone who was only a bit-player"
Would this have been american public opinion?
17

Joe McT,

04/10/2009 10:41:13
Perhaps the obviously very bright and well informed Mister Mason could comment on Blair/Brown making a new prisoner exchange/extradition treaty with Libya?

Given that there was only one Libyan prisoner in a Scottish jail - Mister Megrahi - who does Mason believe that Blair/Brown were setting up legislation to free?

My second question for him would be when the heck did either the Government or our Legal system EVER take public opion into account?
18

Lys Alf,

Scotland 04/10/2009 12:14:31
We cannot entirely dismiss the statements contained in his e-mails, they deserve closer scrutiny and examination!
19

Shave,

Edinburgh 04/10/2009 12:22:39
MP gives his opinion to another politician and complains because that opinion is passed on to a paper.

Seems like the bizarre actions of an amateur.
20

Shave,

Edinburgh 04/10/2009 12:23:50
I mostly agree with him, though.
21

JC1,

Glasgow 04/10/2009 14:50:53
John Mason as an expert on the Scottish legal system should be allowed to speak about it for his party at Westminster. DOn't let them muzzle him
22

JoeMiddleton,

Edinburgh 04/10/2009 18:35:30
John Mason is an excellent MP and he's entirely correct.
23

Vista,

11/10/2009 03:54:47
7 to 15, Ripoff.

Lots of time on your hands then???????
24

lulach mac gille coemgain,

11/10/2009 12:15:50
There is no law - only the argument that can be won or lost on a case by case basis!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.