Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Meet the councillor with the 'twice round the world' miles claim

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 August 2008
A SCOTTISH councillor is at the centre of a £26,000 expenses row after claiming enough mileage in two years to have driven twice around the globe.
North Lanarkshire councillor Charles Cefferty claimed back 54,000 miles in work-related car travel between April 2006 and April 2008, four times higher than any other member representing the same ward.

Last year alone, Cefferty claimed mileage worth £16,000 – higher than his £15,000 salary – and thought to be the highest of any councillor in Scotland.

Cefferty, the head of the Orange Lodge in central Scotland and owner of a pub in Falkirk, last night insisted he is a hard-working councillor, spending up to 13 hours a day on constituency visits, and that local people know him as someone they could turn to.

But fellow councillors said they were shocked by the claims. Council figures show that the two other councillors who represent his ward, James Robertson and Malcolm McMillan, charged £4,173 and £1,876 respectively last year. At one point, Cefferty was asked by officials for an explanation of his "abnormally high" mileage and was allowed to continue after explaining he worked long hours and had a large area to cover.

Local Tory MSP Margaret Mitchell is unimpressed by levels of scrutiny at the council. She said: "This shows that there needs to be far more robust checks in place within local government over expenses. They now exist in the Scottish Parliament but there is no real scrutiny being placed on councils. This needs to be looked at and examined properly."

Scotland on Sunday obtained Cefferty's mileage claims under Freedom of Information legislation. They show he usually totted up 90 miles a day, charging the standard 49 pence per mile. However, during a three-month spell last summer the forms show Cefferty claimed exactly 220 miles every working day. Each entry states the same reason, that Cefferty was engaged in "constituency work", "visits", "meetings", or on trips to the civic centre.

One North Lanarkshire councillor said: "It's fair to say when we saw Charlie's claims, there were a few eyebrows raised to put it mildly. I saw the fact he had claimed £16,000 last year and went 'what!?'"

The records show that last summer, when Cefferty was claiming costs for 220 miles a day, council officials decided to query Cefferty. One official noted: "Spoken to Councillor Cefferty about his abnormally high mileage. Says he has a large area to cover and is working 13 hours a day." Having received this explanation, the council continued to pay out.

When a Scotland on Sunday reporter approached Cefferty outside his pub in Falkirk, he initially denied who he was and got back into his £30,000 BMW 5 series. Changing his mind, he said: "I have nothing to hide. I have a lot of miles because I do lots of house visits – that's a brand new car, and it's done 7,000 miles in three months. I am renowned for the amount of work I do.

"My ward was enlarged to three times the size in May last year, and since then everybody wants to speak to you. They phone up all the councillors and play them one against each other, and I want to be there first.

"I only do the work that I do and I don't claim for anything outwith the work I do. In the past I have claimed probably 40% less than the miles I do."

Cefferty said much of his mileage was due to journeys to and from his home to the North Lanarkshire Civic Centre, Motherwell, a round trip he claims 32 miles for. A Scotland on Sunday reporter and photographer made the same journey, using the B7066 from the civic centre to the councillor's house in Harthill, and measured it as a 22-mile round trip.

Cefferty lives on a private road in the former coal mining village, which still has many miners' cottages. The North Lanarkshire boundary fence is opposite his newly built bungalow. Cefferty's second car, a Peugeot 106, is in the driveway.

He said he stacks up so many miles because he works "in the daytime, at weekends, and even in the early hours of the morning". He said: "When I do my house visits it's not a milk round – you can't see people in one particular area all together. I'm a reactive councillor so I go where I'm needed.

"I'm in the civic centre most evenings because I have got peace and quiet there, but I don't go to all the meetings because sometimes you are more productive by doing constituency work. I'm a constituency councillor."

Cefferty added that being a councillor was a full-time job for him – despite owning a pub in Falkirk with his wife. "My wife runs the pub and I am a partner in that pub. I have to have an income – it's only recently they have started to pay councillors properly. My car isn't paid by the council, it's paid for by my business.

"I don't get involved in council politics for any self-gain – I get driven by what's happening in the community. That's why I get re-elected. If wee Jeannie needs something done, Charlie Cefferty goes and does it."

But Cefferty said he would try to cut down on his mileage. He said: "I am going to try and have better time management and work from home more in my office, because at the moment I don't have any spare time."

John O'Hagan, executive director of Corporate Services, North Lanarkshire Council, said: "Councillors' expenses are subject to regular and periodic audits as part of the normal internal and external audit arrangements. Beyond publishing annually the details of such expenses the council would not consider it appropriate to comment on individual claims."

The full article contains 984 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 August 2008 11:55 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Politicians' expenses
 
1

Teofilio Cubillas,

10/08/2008 00:09:23
Surely not - a Lanarkshire Councillor fiddling his expenses?

I'm sure the whole thing's a muddle, not a fiddle....
2

,

10/08/2008 00:22:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

subrosa,

10/08/2008 00:23:47
No new BMW for him this year then. How can anyone accept that as genuine? He should have been told to stop it or it should have been capped. Another snout in the trough...
4

,

10/08/2008 00:35:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

FTH22inarow,

10/08/2008 00:41:30
oh what a surprise weedge fiddles expenses was he claiming incapacity benefit too? look at the names bad stock
6

muppetfinder,

10/08/2008 00:44:25
his satnav might have got Perth confused with Perth Australia
7

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/08/2008 01:06:17
Unfortunately North Lanarkshire Council's site seems to be down, But Google suggests that the ward he represents is the area around Shotts, not some massive lump of countryside, and it's not that far from the Civic Centre. Most councillors I know don't run brand new BMW 5 series cars, but wee Renaults and Nissans. There are two other councillors representing that ward as well, and their claims are much more reasonable. Most councillors don't do home visits either, but make themselves available to the public at fortnightly sessions in the local library.

In short, his suspiciously exact claims suggest that he may be at it, and the Council's internal audit ought to give his claims a serious going over. He seems to behave like someone with something to hide as well, and judging by that photo, he's not spending the money on a a personal trainer or on beauty treatment.
8

Fanling,

Switzerland 10/08/2008 01:09:59
Why does this article not state which party Cefferty is representative of? Over to you, responsible Scotsman reporters. It's your duty to report the truth.
9

Ceartas,

bellshill 10/08/2008 01:40:39
The right Honourable Cha is an independant councillor, independant of any political influence other than that of the local District 30 . Althought not all the brothers are supportive of him due to some of his many and varied escapades over the years.It is true he is hard working as many of the folk over the years in Harthill , Eastfield find it very hard to get a hold of him even the Harthill community council members can vouch that he is so busy that over the years he missed quite a few meetings due to his busy schedule.
10

Fanling,

Switzerland 10/08/2008 01:41:10
Does anybody know who the "David Banks" filth is who has had numerous threads shut down due to his/her/its multiple disgusting juvenile postings? I've complained more than once to The Scotsman but this "responsible" paper does nothing. Yet it can play the holier-than-thou in disallowing certain words in common parlance. Pathetic.

Latest to be hijacked on Scotland pages: "SNP gives more funding to ally's Islamic group"

Surely there must be a way of detecting and ejecting this lowest of scum. The perpetrator is clearly in need of prompt psychiatric help. And a well-placed hefty kick in the nether region. Sicko.

11

senza nome,

10/08/2008 01:42:50
It's amazing that the article doesn't tell you what party he represents.In fact he's an independent but i had to google his name to find that out.He's a grand master of the Orange Order and he lives in Harthill.Why does that not surprise me?
12

Breezy,

Argyll 10/08/2008 02:08:39
Time this Orangeman walked !
13

Stuart W,

Dundee 10/08/2008 04:25:55
He makes it sound like he gains nothing from his partnership in the pub, but then states that it provides him with a £30k BWM.
14

McMillar,

Fife 10/08/2008 06:52:01
Let’s hope the press keep digging her and get to the bottom of his scams. Once fully exposed he should be removed from office and made to repay anything without clear justification. Would he also get paid expenses for the lodge work? Either funding those visits via claims for official work and may even be double claiming on that side too!? Whole thing stinks and another snout in the usual place. What did he vote on? Can’t trust his decision making now.
15

Jimmy Le Pie,

10/08/2008 07:52:00
I thought the Orange Order had disappeared up it's own stern!!
16

calum,

10/08/2008 07:56:54
Freedom of Information is a terrific piece of legislation for identifying and weeding out those who, quite frankly, are on the take at our expense. And exactly 220 miles every day for 3 months? And Officials accepted that? If I was Mrs Cefferty I would suspect that he "has a wee Jeannie" on the side!! Pond life!
17

Linda,

Edinburgh 10/08/2008 08:04:21
AS other threads have been hijacked must say here that
(1) On support for Mugabe.. it is not the Scottish Parliament but an investment company which is supporting regime but don't let facts get in way of cheap headline.
(2) On Government (not SNP) support for Muslim organisations. How much does government support Catholic faith through cost of extra schools?
Foulkes and others are using double standards.
In any event how much does Foulkes cost the taxpayer by his vexatious questions and regular flights to London to support his other two jobs.
18

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 10/08/2008 08:14:03
If he drove an average of 220 miles a day for three months he could not have spent much time on his house calls as around town the driving must take around 10 hours a day on its own.
In realistic terms roughly equivalent of driving from his home to Newcastle-on-Tyne and back again every day.
19

Pocket Dictionary,

10/08/2008 08:21:15
Is he paying tax on his mileage? The Inland Revenue allow 40p a mile free of tax. Anything above that is taxed.

Ask the health workers, some are still only on the 40p rate and compare that to the price of fuel.
20

Boy Wonder,

10/08/2008 08:33:12
Of course he's at it! The public aren't all that stupid. Sack this greedy pig now and have a bye-election!!!
21

calum,

10/08/2008 08:52:12
#23 Whilst I agree with your sentiments, the fact that Council officials accepted his limp excuse and that the Standards Authority at Rosyth are as useless as t1ts on a bull! They also just accept any explanation given by politicians because ....well, they don't lie, do they?
22

Guga II,

Rockall 10/08/2008 08:56:29
I wonder if he claims for his BMW (provided by his pub) on his income tax, given that he apparently uses it for nothing except driving around all day for his council work? Maybe the taxman needs to have a closer look at the activities of this character; the council certainly does need to have a closer look.
23

archie12,

10/08/2008 09:15:29
#25 - Yes, a wee call to the Income Tax hotline will sure get them to look. #24 - I agree, I have experience of the office of the Commissioner for Standards and their "investigations" consist of nothing other than "if the councillor said he did nothing wrong then that's fine". A useless waste of public money. Their "investigations" into some of the crooked dealings of Edinburgh Councillors are little better than farcical.
24

Alberto.,

10/08/2008 09:35:15
Taking what is said as 'The Truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth!' and although difficult to accept in these days of political 'meanderings' in such matters, is it possible this Councillor could be considered as a adanger on the road if, as alleged, he is working 13 hours a day and driving 220 miles - or so!

Surely needs some serious consideration - from many angles to do with road safety!!!

Presumably - and hopefully, his refreshments do not include partaking of any of the wares his wife's trade
plies! Never met a Pub Landlord yet who didn't participate in the 'Spirit' of their business - many who sometimes have been ruined by such 'weakness!'
25

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 10/08/2008 09:41:11
What a contradiction in terms?

Ironically, this local councillor, for an Orangeman, is a classic Tammanay Hall politician!

26

tommy M,

10/08/2008 09:45:46
unbelievable that nowhere in this article is the name of the party this councillor works for. This paper is a disgrace to journalism.
27

Soup kitchen,

10/08/2008 10:03:25
29 Tommy M

He's an independent you gimp.
28

LEAL,

10/08/2008 10:35:46
It is obvious that a crime has been committed and this man should be suspended immediately,and the whole matter investigated by the police.Council officers who accepted this claim are either complicit or stupid.They also should be suspended and investigated to find out their role in this matter.If other councillors were astounded by this claim,why did they not go to the police?Can we have an assurance from chief executive John Hagan that he will report any suspicions of illegality to the police as soon as they occur,and in every circumstance?
29

donald,

glasgow 10/08/2008 10:40:21
Eddie didn't mention his Labour party and concentrated on the Orange angle instead. The Unionist Labour Party in Scotland has got away with playing the sectarian card both ends to the middle for too long.

Parkheid has a Unionist ex Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on the Board.
30

donald,

glasgow 10/08/2008 10:40:42
Eddie didn't mention his Labour party and concentrated on the Orange angle instead. The Unionist Labour Party in Scotland has got away with playing the sectarian card both ends to the middle for too long.

Parkheid has a Unionist ex Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on the Board.
31

donald,

glasgow 10/08/2008 10:42:37
When is Eddie going to comment on the rest of the Unionists on the Parkheid Board? Where were they in their local Westmonster by election?

When is he going to comment on Orange Larkhall and Brigton weighing in the Labour Loyalist vote?
32

subrosa,

10/08/2008 10:45:43
When is the Scotland on Sunday and the Scotsman going to ban the spammer David Banks. They're losing a great deal of money because people are sick of this being allowed to continue and will not visit this site.

I want to say thanks to Eddie for replying to my post regarding the headline re Mugabe. Still think it would have been an opportunity for him to mention the fact that the Westminster government hasn't halted the expensive building of a British embassy in Harare though.
33

livilion,

livingston 10/08/2008 11:29:57
30 Soup kitchen
No-where in this article does it mention this councillor is an independent or that to do 54,000 miles would need him to do 75 miles on council business every day for two years.
I'm surprised he has the time to run a pub or the Orange Order.

Btw why should I be interested in his religious affiliations or non-council activities, isn't that for the people who voted him into his position?

The inland revenue demand that I keep detailed records of my journeys on business, aren't councillors claiming travel expenses bound by the same rules?
Claiming for trips to Motherwell when he was actually in Harthill or Falkirk the taxman eg could sort out quite quickly.
34

livilion,

livingston 10/08/2008 11:33:55
36 "Hoots" Fandango,
To sign in requires that we provide our email address, surely it is a simple enough task to identify a particular individual by this means and stop them this way than by expecting them to simply change nom de plume?
35

Colin McKay,

Coatbridge 10/08/2008 12:04:53
Congratulations to Councillor Cefferty. He has understood what North Lanarkshire and the Central Belt councils are all about and has his nose well dipped into the trough. It's a pity the area is a dump, but understandable when we have councillors of this calibre.
36

subrosa,

10/08/2008 12:49:27
# 36 Hoots

Thanks for the explanation. I retract my comment regarding the two newspapers but still think a better 'eye' could be kept on this type of thing. Mind you, spammers who wish to upset forums will always find a way I expect.


37

,

10/08/2008 13:04:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

Jimmy Le Pie,

10/08/2008 13:48:48
I see Comrade Broon and Ian Rankin were saving the Union yesterday!


Can we expect a new novel from Rankin, where Rebus signs himself out of the Priory and battles to save the Union, single-handedly from the evil LIT and the worlds #1 arch-villain Alex Salmond and his moll Nicola.
Rebus, who gets help from a secretive ex Ulster B Special secret agent, known only as AM2, who is licensed by the Queen, (God bless Her!) to bore people to death, battles his own demons (he's too fond of the Clan McPish, 3 year old) and the shadowy nationalist known only as Traquir and his gang of cybernats.
With the plot moving rapidly between the Hootsmon and the Herald this will be Rankin's greatest novel, despite Rebus topping himself rather than reading another line of AM2's statistical drivel and Scotland gaining her independence.
Rankin then bu6gers off to live in Switzerland, (like all good socialists) to avoid paying LIT.

39

Pilrig.,

Livingston 10/08/2008 13:58:37
16 - he only walks in water on the 12th of July !
40

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/08/2008 15:57:53
The NL Council website is working now. He does six or seven surgeries a month, in Harthill, Shots and Salsburgh. It doesn't take 220 miles a day to drive among those destinations.

More worryingly, the Council's Audit & Governance Panel is one of the few Council committees he sits on. I definitely think he needs to be taken off that committee before the auditors have a go.

Let's be serious. No councillor with the duties to which Cllr Cefferty is committed has any excuse for running up 220 miles a day - especially since it's the same distance every day. And his way of handling legitimate press enquiries - hand in front of the camera lens and denying he is who he is - is so obviously fishy that the meanest intelligence will see that this is a suspicious character. Let's hope that the Council's chief takes a similar view!

He needs to be investigated, and not just by the sunday papers. The Council should do its own checks and maybe the police should be interviewing him to check whether he really spent all that money on legitimate meetings, visits, etc. And is he really a fit person to hold a licence?

And what does his poor wife think about all this?
41

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/08/2008 16:33:03
Big hoose, too - thanks, Multimap aerial view.
42

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/08/2008 16:37:38
Hey - imagine if he is genuine and really drives that exact distance every day! Maybe he has some horrible condition like OCD and he has to follow the exact same circuitious route each day, not one mile more, not one mile less. It's no joke, OCD. We should keep an open mind, really we should.
43

Andrew.,

Oxford 10/08/2008 17:28:39
This is rather odd. If I recall HMRC guidelines correctly, they don't permit mileage claims "to and from your customary place of work".

I'm sure now that Mr C has advised this newspaper that his car has done 7000 miles in the last 3 months since new it will be easy to complete a further "Freedom of Information" request for the period to cross-reference.
44

Jambo 3,

EDINBURGH 10/08/2008 18:10:42
No, No, #12 He won't walk.

He has a lovely White Charger to ride on.

Wonder what the mileage rate is for that ?
45

the reporter,

Godalming, Surrey. 10/08/2008 21:15:13
"I did not get involved in politics for self gain"
Just the petrol money eh ? what a fine upstanding citizen.
46

Douglas,

Bathgate 10/08/2008 21:32:22
Is that a photo of the good councillor waving hullo, hullo?
47

whomthegodswishtodestroytheyfirstmakemad,

10/08/2008 21:58:23
Shouldn't his vehicle be fitted with a Tachograph ? He would seem to be singularly responsible for Global Warming judging by his daily CO2 output!
48

Fifi la Bonbon,

11/08/2008 00:40:54
#53 whomthegodswishtodestroytheyfirstmakemad, you have made an excellent point.

You know, I think I've maybe been a bit harsh, and I think we need to look for ways for this tribune of the people of Harthill, Salsburgh and neighbouring settlements to clear his name. A tachograph, or some sort of GPS tracking thingy, would be the perfect way for him to demonstrate how he managed to drive exactly 220 miles each day on the Council's business. Let's see him carry such a device in his car, and over the next three months have his municipal movements tracked. It could even be published on a special website so the residents of his ward, and the rest of us taxpayers, and indeed HMRC, can be assured of his innate integrity and decency.

Of course if he can't demonstrate this, he needs his collar felt and a spell in the jail.
49

Resolutions,

11/08/2008 16:39:00
You all make good points!

I cannot see how on earth anyone can have a specific mileage each day which would entail considerable travelling time and be on Councillor 'work' as well as being a partner in job. The wards here are big - but to notch up that mileage? Naw.

The fitting of a tacograph is a good idea on his brand new car (Paid for by Cooncil expenses?)

Seriously the LA need to get a grip and fast. Surely receipts and proof of work done is the minimum required?

If he cannot demonstrate a 'legitimate' claim, time the boys in blue were called in. Surely one of his faithful constituents, who he visits can 'vouch' for him and demonstrate work done?
50

Fifi la Bonbon,

16/11/2008 00:35:21
What ever happened to this guy?
51

Iainbroch,

17/05/2009 03:27:51
Surely another mistake? Perhaps it time to have Politicians tagged?

re39

It Is JK that writes the fantasy. For it would be fantasy on an epic scale to save the Labour Party - Fiction alone would not be enough!Oh I forgot she is busy doing Alistairs next budget so I guess it wil have to be Rebus - thier doomed!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.