Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Hospitals on alert as superbug C diff becomes resistant to key drug

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 January 2008
THE battle against hospital superbugs has suffered a serious setback after scientists discovered one of the most deadly bacteria has developed resistance to the main antibiotic used to kill it.
Recent tests on the stomach bug Clostridium difficile – 'C diff' – suggest a new strain has mutated which is more likely to survive treatment with metronidazole, currently the "front line" antibiotic.

That leaves only one antibiotic, vancomycin,
available to treat the mutated superbug. Doctors are reluctant to increase use of vancomycin because that increases the risk of C diff becoming resistant to the last line of defence.

Health officials last night warned doctors to be vigilant for any signs that patients were not responding to treatment and could be infected with the new strain. Patients' groups described the development as "very disturbing" and called for urgent action to improve hygiene in hospitals.

The revelation is contained in a new report by public health officials at the Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections. Routine tests carried out on samples taken from C diff patients showed that a common strain of the superbug had survived, despite being treated with metronidazole.

Further tests suggest that C diff has fought back against the antibiotic and mutated to develop a resistance to the drug. This new strain is already thought to have spread between patients.

C diff is linked to poor cleanliness in hospital wards and has become a major concern across the UK. Last year there were over 6,000 cases in Scotland.

A spokeswoman for the Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections said: "As a result of ongoing studies looking at potential antibiotic resistance to C difficile, we have seen evidence of a reduced susceptibility to metronidazole.

"However, we are still recommending this antibiotic as the first treatment for mild to moderate cases of C difficile.

"Doctors need to be alert for any evidence of treatment failure linked to metronidazole resistance to ensure the situation is being carefully monitored."

In the 6,035 cases recorded across Scotland last year the bug was the main cause of death of 164 people and a contributing factor in the deaths of a further 253 people.

C diff usually strikes patients who are on antibiotics for other illnesses. The antibiotics kill healthy gut bacteria, making the body more susceptible to the infection, which causes severe diarrhoea. Once someone has the infection, spores from their diarrhoea can spread and infect other patients. The spores can survive for a long time in the environment and spread on the hands of health staff who touch contaminated items.

The samples were taken from patients in the Leeds area of England. But because of the highly-infectious nature of C diff the mutated strain could spread quickly across the country.

The C diff strain in question is the 001 strain, the second most common in the UK, thought to affect around 20% of patients. However, it is less deadly than the 'hypervirulent' 027 strain which is still relatively rare in this country. The scientists found almost one-quarter of samples of this strain, 21 out of 88 cases, had "reduced susceptibility" to the antibiotic.

Margaret Watt, chairwoman of the Scotland Patients' Association, said:

"We need to bring back ward matrons who are responsible for ward cleanliness and staff who are found not washing their hands should be given a written warning."

Professor Nigel Minton, from the Centre for Healthcare Associated Infections, said: "It's just natural selection at the end of the day. If you subject bacteria to antibiotics they will find a way around it.

The UK has the worst C diff infection rates in the world so... we need to improve."

There are currently few hopes for a new treatment for C difficile. So far no alternative drug has proved effective. Meanwhile other measures are being developed including cutting down the number of prescriptions of drugs that are known to damage the healthy balance of the gut.

Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon said: "We expect all health boards to have robust policies in place to help manage C diff. These should include monitoring of compliance with cleaning standards, infection control precautions, prudent prescribing of antibiotics and rapid, accurate diagnosis of cases."

She added that £54m earmarked to

fight hospital acquired infection would drive down rates of C diff.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 January 2008 10:04 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Hospital superbugs
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 27/01/2008 00:27:48
'Aye' them "superbug's" are more clever than us Humans!

(Them minuscule wee cretins!)

And they don't even 'have-a-Brain' as we know it!

We are letting them, 'walk-all-over-and-into-us'!

Typical Human Complacency!! :((

How Stupid are we, at times, aint we..??
2

brian mcc,

the arctic 27/01/2008 01:12:06
That last line of defence...go to hospital for 1 illness & come out(maybe) with 2 or more. That's one way to address escalting health costs; create a panic so fewer patients are willingly admitted.

A simple issue of sanitation.
3

,

27/01/2008 01:18:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

subrosa,

27/01/2008 01:19:14
"However, we are still recommending this antibiotic as the first treatment for mild to moderate cases of C difficile."

The reason for this is that metronidazole is very cheap and vancomycin expensive. Medics know full well that vancomycin is far more effective in treating this bug than metronidazole but they continue to insist on using the cheaper drug first.

I contacted this bug in hospital a year ago and was very ill for some months. Went in for a small intrusive examination and three weeks later was back in being wrapped in tin foil and having intravenous steriods. The whole incident was handled badly by medical personnel, from my GP who insisted for 2 weeks that I had food poisoning to the hospital nurse who told me I had a 'small infection' and would have to be moved to a room on my own.

I made a formal complaint to my health trust only to eventually be sent pages of jargon about staff having supervised wards, cleaners were available (I was bedbound for 3 days and the shared toilet/shower was only cleaned once). But unless you take a video camera into these places then we have no evidence. NHS Trusts know we cannot afford to sue them in most instances.

Clean the places every day, don't allow public/visitors in unless they wash their hands thoroughly, ensure all medical and nursing staff wash their hands before touching you. Insist on vancomycin. It's not quite the last resort but it is in capsule (oral) form I understand. It has no side effects unlike metronidazole. The last resort which does work in severe cases is healthy faeces being processed, sterilised and introduced into the ailing bowel.

Should you have to go to a hospital for any reason please ensure you wash your hands as often as possible when there, especially when arriving and leaving. For your own sake if not for the sake of others.
5

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 27/01/2008 02:07:04
#2, 3, 4.
While I agree with what you say, it is the 'filth' we have created, 'as Humans', that this "Superbug" IS showing us and telling us,

"Gob,..Sneeze,..Spit,..Cough,..'all-over-the-place',
Don't wash your hands, after the Toilet"

'Slam,.Bam,.thankyou,.Very,.Much,.Mam'..we will gladly mutate into your Body and 'Kill-You'

"Superbug";..'very-nice-supper'! your Body was!
Now where's my next victim.??

When I was, 'brought-up', we were all taught, needed basic hygine'

Cover your nose, when you sneeze!
Cover your mouth, when you cough!
Dont 'Spitt', its dissgusting!
Wash your hands, after the toilet!
If Flu or Bad cold, stay away from work or Scool!
(dont spread it!)

Now these values have gone for most, its a,
'Hell-mend-you-Situation'
And there IS NO NEED FOR IT!

'Hell-mend-you" if YOU WONT!

BY 'GOD' the "Superbugs" WILL.!!
6

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 27/01/2008 02:14:07
Simple, very,..very Simple!!! to indicate "Superbugs"

'Cleanup our acts'

Or are we all Soo..'PIG-IGNORENT' to see this.??
7

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 27/01/2008 02:16:05
#6. correction, *to eradicate*.. (as in line one)
8

Homo Sapiens,

27/01/2008 10:28:34
Deep cleans and Matrons will not scare the bug away. The structure and design of UK hospitals is a major problem. In the vast majority of modern hospitals throughout the world, wards are now organised in small groupings of rooms accommodating one, two or up to four patients, each room with its own toilet and separate bathroom. This design prevents the spread of bugs and bacteria and cross contamination from one patient to the next. Each room can be decontaminated and sterilised whereas sterilising a whole "open ward" is imposible. It would require one time investments in restructuring the "open wards" creating single double, triple and quad patient rooms. But the investment will pay over time, and save lives. Throwing more people at the problem will not help.
9

livilion,

livingston 27/01/2008 10:41:04
Just wash your hands properly and don't cough or sneeze onto other people, never mind fancy wards its been as simple as that since the days of Florence Nightingale.

If you don't then someday one of these bugs will mutate into something spread like the common cold or flu bug and then we'll all know about it.

10

Ros,

Penicuik 27/01/2008 11:00:29
Re 8. The New Royal Infirmary in Edinburgh is this design as is the Borders General hospital they both have problems with superbugs. It is down to cleanliness my husband was a patient in the Royal last year and the standards of hygeine of staff and the cleanliness of ward were appalling. My Gran died 2 years ago in the BGH she had MRSA. It is time to look at the cleaning again. I am a nurse and I know standards have slipped. Cleaning contractors and agencys do not clean wards as efficently as the old system where each ward had its own cleaning team usually one full time and 2 part time domestics who covered from before breakfast until after tea. They were all very proud of their ward and worked along side ward staff to ensure things were kept very clean.This is where the money should be spent in the NHS not employing more and more managers and consultants ( not medical consultants I mean companies to consult on what needs to be done) employeeing more domestics needs no consultation it is simple and obvious.
11

JennyA,

Scotland 27/01/2008 12:15:30
It has now been proved that probiotic yogurt drinks can actually prevent patients from developing C. difficile. They can also reduce the severity of an infection. They do this by putting friendly bacteria, killed by broad spectrum antibiotics, back into the colon. Some hospitals allow patients to pre-book a side room, for an extra payment. The new virulent C.difficile strain 027 is VERY transmissable in open wards. I believe my life was saved by getting Metronidazole 'on spec' when I presented with diarrhoea. If they had waited for the lab results or if the bug had been resistant to it I would be dead!!
12

Pa broon,

27/01/2008 12:41:01
My Father had several stays in the ERI. Twice he picked up C diff within a space of nine months and this severely weakened him. The wards are not what I call clean. If you are old and you go in there is every chance that you will come out with some additional ailment.I visited nearly every day and don't remember anyone cleaning day or night. All you had to do was look under the bed to see some of the remnants of the days activity.
13

subrosa,

27/01/2008 13:50:45
# 11

Jenny the standard supermarket probiotic drink will do nothing to prevent anyone developing c.difficile. Digestive aids such as Acidophilus can help recovery though but they need to be taken regularly and only after good medical advice.

I contacted the bug because I was touched by someone with the bug on their hands. In a ward of 5 others only 3 visitors (over a period of 24 hours) used the gel before visiting the relevant patient. What defence can a patient take against that? I could only insist my own visitors washed their hands/used the gel. Now I know the gel is ineffective this needs to be advertised widely to the public.

In order to be safe I took many antiseptic aids with me not realising they were useless against such bugs.


14

treacleswamp,

27/01/2008 13:54:54
While most drug development is highly profitable, there is little incentive for manufacturers to develop last line of defence antibiotics. The patent will expire before volume of use becomes significant, and despite high price, development costs not recouped while under patent. As resistance develops, we all become vulnerable.
15

JennyA,

27/01/2008 14:58:18
Rosa-You are RIGHT! Only branded yogurt drinks are effective. A trial was done using Actimel and those patients on the placebo drink had a far higher incidence of C.difficile development. (All these patients had received broad spectrum antibiotics). This was in a BMJ article.I hope you are well now. C.difficile has long term health implications.
16

John Blackley,

Florida 27/01/2008 15:00:44
#9 I agree with you. Florence Nightingale would be horrified to see the conditions in some of Scotland's hospitals and would beg to be returned to the Crimea.

We've allowed our cleaners in hospitals to be 'outsourced'. We've done away with the one authority figure who had a passion for cleanliness - the Matron. We've increased the number of patients a nurse must care for in a work day - all for what? To save money.

At the same time, we've dismantled the social and educational structures that taught Johnny and Jenny basic hygiene. Now we'd rather teach them their rights and how to fill in benefit claim forms.

I wonder if the human race will end - not with a nuclear 'bang' but with the sound of groaning and toilet flushing?
17

Sunny Jim,

27/01/2008 15:03:01
difficile
P.O.I. it should be pronounced deef fee cheel eh (which means difficult in Italian)
18

McMicrogal,

27/01/2008 17:18:59
It is not appropriate to go straight for treatment with Vancomycin as all this will do is speed up C. diff's inevitable acquisition of resistance to that anti-microbial - then where will we be?

This is exactly why Staph aureus still gets treated with methicillin rather than heading straight to vancomycin. Not all strains are currently resistant.

All this nonsense about having been touched by someone who had the "bug" on their hands is old wives tales! The problem with Clostridium sp. is that it is a sporulating bacteria and these spores can resist disinfectants and dessication thus making them very hard to eradicate. Having enough nursing staff available to be allowed to take time off should they be stricken with a D&V infection would be more help in keeping things at bay, but currently the staff can be having to run off the ward to vomit and are still put under pressure not to go home sick!
19

subrosa,

27/01/2008 17:24:33
# 15

I'm quite well now Jenny although it's taken a year and I doubt if I'll ever be back to the full fitness I had then. This bug causes all sorts of complications unfortunately but I shan't go into them.

Mind you I'm one of the lucky ones, I was reasonably fit before I contracted this and also I was well below the age of reporting (65). No wonder people die from it, I had a couple of days I thought all was lost myself.
20

Doreen,

The Cyber Shebeen 27/01/2008 19:17:10
If I was in hospital I would slather myself in pure lavender oil....and spray it on anyone coming near me...its benefits were discovered by a Dr Valnet who used it to treat soldier's open wounds...with remarkable effects...however these things always mutate dont they?....maybe its natures way of bumping us off to make space for the next body....
21

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 27/01/2008 19:41:07
Hello All,

Here in the USA, we've had a super strain of Staphylococcus, which has killed a number of people, and NOT just in hospitals (where it started).

We found that it lives in just about anyplace; schools, libraries, offices, etc. All it needs is open wounds, really dirty surfaces, even scratches allowed it to wreak havoc.

It's favorite place to live in hospitals is on stainless steel surfaces (which means about everything important which is used in a hospital). Studies have found that the little virus can last a full day on stainless steel surface.

Those studying the problem wondered how long the virus would last on the surface of other metals.

COPPER turned out to be the least hospitable environment for the Staphylococcus: it could live only an hour and a half and then croaked.

So......copper would seem to be a good idea for wrapping around stainless steel cores; expensive, but if you're the one suffering from such a Super Bug, 'expensive' is a relative term.

Cheers from the Rockies
22

subrosa,

27/01/2008 19:46:54
# 20

Many thanks Clarry I appreciate your thoughts. Let me remind you (as you're presently hospital visiting) that gels DO NOT work with c.difficile. Only hot water and soap works - it's a proven fact. That's why there is so much emphasis on hand washing in these articles these days. The gels are fine for most bugs though and better than nothing. The problem with gels is that they have to make them stronger and stronger to fight these bugs and soon they'll take the skin off our hards. Already some dry out your hands badly with just one application.
23

Theo,

Richmond 27/01/2008 20:33:09
Having had several of these things all I could say is:
"One minute I was afraid I was going to die and the next minute I was afraid I wouldn't". No fun having to worship the Goddess Porculina at her alter in the bathroom (loo)every 30 min. or so! I am happy to say however she never abandoned me or let me down in my times of need!!
24

morris,

edinburgh 27/01/2008 23:19:21
Our hospitals are filthy and that is a fact. Netherlands do not have these problems on anything approaching a similar scale apparently,(I base this upon a TV documentary I saw)and the reason is pretty obvious.They clean their hospitals from top to bottom,and its not an area where they consider savings can be made. We have problems which other countries have managed to deal with.I can see only one culprit here.
WE try to run the NHS on the cheap. We get what we pay for.Cleaners are surely not asking too much in a flaming hospital!
25

Kentucky Bloke,

Henderson, Kentucky, USA 28/01/2008 00:01:18
It would seem that matters have not improved much in U.K. hospitals since my mother fell and broke a hip on Kings Road in London about 40 years ago. She was put in a ward with about twenty women. We could not get in touch with a competent surgeon. The "house surgeon" was Spanish. The doctor who operated on Lady Churchill did not return our urgent call. There was no help in sight, so we engaged a block of nine seats on a jet and flew to the States. The British nurses were wonderful, but the facilities were hopeless! Gas lights for emergency use during a power strike!

Come to Kentucky! We have modern hospitals, medical schools, Bourbon whisky and race horses. What more could one want?

Hugo
26

Scot fae Doon unner ,

Australia 28/01/2008 01:15:57
In Aberdeen RI for a hip op, my wife saw nurses moving from patient to patient without washing or using gloves.
The stench in the corridor thru ARI makes one gag and at Woodend the stench is even worse---few people would have their house smell like that----Don't they open doors and windows in hosp?
The neighbours would complain!
27

John1,

Stirling 28/01/2008 01:18:12
Is this all part of the 'no-responsibility' attitude that has infected this country over the last 30 years or so? Millions of pounds are poured into the bottomless pit of the NHS and produce no result. I am approaching 70 and fear the day I may need to go into hospital for whatever reason. Is this what was intended when the NHS was founded? The return of matrons with the right attitude has been advocated for years but nothing happens. Why not? What excuse is there for the present situation? What are politicians/ the medical profession/ the hospital managers doing about it?
Part of the problem - I stress 'part' - may well be that medicine apears to be aimed at tackling bugs directly, with drugs, instead of building up the immune system of patients, resulting in the breeding of stronger bugs which can overcome the immune system of all but the fittest. Natural selection? Perhaps the human race is in for a mass dying and we are witnessing the start of it.
28

JennyA,

Scotland 28/01/2008 09:15:07
26
Hugo-'The British nurses were wonderful but the facilities were hopeless.'
I'm afraid that in the UK nothing much has changed in 40 years, we progress in geological time here and It's a miracle I'm not a fossil,(yet!)
If I need another operation I will come to Kentucky, or Europe, or .....Anywhere except the UK!! Seriously, they are much better at managing C.difficile in the US. I wish we could learn some lessons from you.
19
Rosa I know exactly where you are coming from. I'm the same!!
29

DonnaB,

Elie 01/02/2008 16:29:20
I've been following an amazing blog since the new year which is charting how we might respond to a flu pandemic - www.dominieschronicle.blogspot.com

There seem to be so many parallels between her story and how viruses and bugs are becoming so resistant to control. I'll be reading it with even more interest from now on.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.