Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Empty flights cost taxpayers £300 per seat



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 October 2008
TAXPAYERS are being forced to pay out more than £300 a seat for air routes with almost no passengers and "zilch" economic benefits, Scotland on Sunday can reveal.
So few people have booked on Argyll Air Services that 27 flights were cancelled in July and August because there were no passengers. Yet the local authority behind the airport scheme still has to pay over £30,000 a month to the airline running the
services, whether the flights take off or not.

The payments come on top of an £8.9m upgrade of Oban Airport and its satellite airfields on the islands of Coll and Colonsay.

Argyll business leaders are angry about the cost of the scheme, especially when ferry, road and rail links are also in desperate need of investment.

Stewart Farmer, of the Federation of Small Businesses, yesterday attacked the spending and said: "The economic benefits from this project appears to be zilch."

Figures obtained by Scotland on Sunday show uptake from islanders and people wishing to visit the islands has been very slow. An average of 135 passengers were carried to or from Coll and Tiree a month in July and August. The figure for Colonsay was even lower, at 65. That indicates only around one in four possible tickets were sold and compares with 1,000 passengers flying between Tiree and Glasgow in July.

Basil O'Fee, the managing director of Highland Airways, which operates the flights, admitted demand had been inconsistent. "The numbers have been clumpy," he said. "One day you will get a whole group going and the next day there won't be anybody."

But O'Fee believes that, with better advertising, next summer's results will be improved. "The pre-marketing wasn't very strong," he said.

Argyll and Bute Council declined to say how much they were paying Highland Airways, citing commercial confidentiality. Sources, however, insisted the figure was more than £30,000 a month.

Senior figures in the council, including its former leader Allan Macaskill, believed Oban Airport could turn into the Newquay of the north, providing direct services to Glasgow, Edinburgh and even the continent.

Critics argue that Oban Airport now has less business than it did before its upgrade. Iain MacDonald, chairman of the community council in Ardchattan, the area north of Oban which includes the airport, said: "What was once a small-scale low-cost sustainable operation has become a dwindling asset and financial liability to the public purse.

"Nothing is being done to address the decline. After spending millions of pounds the council have left us much worse off than we were before they started."

A spokesman for the council insisted: "Oban Airport is a wonderful new facility which is a major benefit to the people of Argyll and Bute.

"We are confident the air services will support economic development in the area as well as attracting more visitors."



The full article contains 484 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 October 2008 11:08 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

truthsleuth,

12/10/2008 00:20:44
And these are not the only costs imposed upon the taxpayer by air brained aviation schemes.

The quicker aviation is forced into the emmissions trading scheme and made to pay for its certifiicates the better
Then aviation should be made to pay tax on its fuel as all we motorists have to.

Follow this by removing the stupid unfair 'duty free' scam and the other 'benefits' aviation gets even better still.
2

Joe,

Kirk Brae 12/10/2008 08:31:29
Looks very much like the taxpayer
is funding an air service used exclusively by a few influential
VIPs?
3

Guga II,

Rockall 12/10/2008 10:51:44
What the article fails to mention is the cost of the fares on these routes.

If they are anything like the standard fares on the Stornoway - Glasgow run, which is dearer than Glasgow - New York, then maybe people can't afford to use them.
4

Joe,

Kirk Brae 12/10/2008 13:23:48
#3..Edinburgh isn't in your 'Scotland'? Edinburgh - Stornoway,
Edinburgh - New York, are similarly priced?
5

lotusflower,

argyll 12/10/2008 14:31:52
What a shame - a fraction of those millions could have been spent on things those islands really need instead of on a little used air service.
6

Joe,

Kirk Brae 12/10/2008 17:19:09
#5..Like upgrading the dreadful A85?
7

harvey05,

trying to buy a pint of milk 12/10/2008 17:28:53
Or some shop opening on a Sunday.
8

Lundavra,

Fort William 14/10/2008 00:24:36
It would be interesting to know what percentage of the passengers were councillors and council officials?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.