Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Bomber's cancer spreads to his bones

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 November 2008
THE Lockerbie bomber has been given a maximum of a year to live after cancer spread to his bones, Scotland on Sunday can reveal.
The diagnosis – delivered by three doctors, including one flown in from Libya – means Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi is likely to suffer excruciating pain in the remaining months of his life and cannot be properly cared for in prison.

It is understood this will form the key basis on which lawyers for Megrahi will apply for bail at a hearing later this week.

Sources have told Scotland on Sunday that the team of doctors who examined Megrahi were not able to agree that he had less than three months to live – the point at which he would have been freed on compassionate grounds.

Megrahi, who has always insisted he is innocent of the 1988 downing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie with the loss of 270 lives, is currently awaiting a second full appeal against his conviction but may not live to see its outcome.

Sources close to the convicted terrorist claim Megrahi is condemned to suffer horrendous pain – and compression fractures – as a result of prostate cancer spreading to his bones. They added that no part of the jail establishment is properly equipped to care for him.

Megrahi's lawyer, Tony Kelly, has declined to comment on what grounds he will appeal for the Libyan's release on bail at a hearing before three High Court judges in Edinburgh scheduled for Thursday.

Prisoners are routinely freed from Scottish prisons if they can show they have less than three months to live.

Megrahi's doctors could only predict that his life expectancy was somewhere between nine and 12 months, forcing Kelly to go to court to secure bail.

Megrahi's bail case will be decided by a bench comprising Scotland's most senior judge, Lord Hamilton, sitting with Lords Kingarth and Eassie.

If the judges refuse bail, Kelly can make a further application to Scottish ministers to release Megrahi on compassionate grounds. That would go before Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill, but there is no doubt First Minister Alex Salmond would also be involved.

The bail decision will have no bearing on Megrahi's appeal, which will be heard by a separate five-judge bench. But it is still seen as politically sensitive. The Libyan's supporters, who include many of the relatives of the British victims of the Lockerbie bombing, fear the Crown may oppose his liberation.

American authorities and the families of US victims are less sympathetic to Megrahi's plight, with few doubting his guilt.

There have already been high-powered diplomatic talks over Megrahi's future. Last Monday, the Foreign Office hosted a meeting between the head of the Scottish Government's justice department, Robert Gordon, senior Westminster officials and Abdul Ati al-Obeidi, Libya's deputy foreign minister.

It is understood the Libyans wanted to push for Megrahi to be allowed to go home. Ministers at Westminster and Holyrood have been fully briefed by senior civil servants and diplomats about the subtle balancing act they must now perform.

One source close to the matter said: "Unlike the UK relatives, most of the American relatives have been able to ignore the many revelations since the trial that cast doubt on his conviction and, to be blunt, they'd rather see Megrahi fry than go free.

"There is an awareness that the 20th anniversary of the bombing is looming, and there are concerns about how the American relatives would react to him being freed before that milestone is reached. However, they must also be aware that in Libya and most of the rest of the Arab world, Megrahi is seen as the innocent victim of a western conspiracy.

"If he were to die in prison, that would go down very badly and some extremists would try to make him into a martyr."

It was reported last week that Megrahi wished to remain in Scotland, where pain relief in cancer care is said to be better than in Libya. But other sources close to the Libyan have said he would want to go home to die.

Dr Jim Swire, who lost his daughter Flora in the bombing, has no doubt Megrahi is innocent. He said last night: "Megrahi must be freed at the earliest opportunity so that he can receive the care he needs and spend what time he has left with his family."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 November 2008 9:45 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Lockerbie
 
1

Conan the Librarian™,

02/11/2008 00:19:31
"A boy was lying at the bottom of the steps on to the road. A young laddie with brown socks and blue trousers on. Later that evening my son-in-law asked for a blanket to cover him. I didn't know he was dead. I gave him a lamb's wool travelling rug thinking I'd keep him warm. Two more girls were lying dead across the road, one of them bent over garden railings. It was just as though they were sleeping. The boy lay at the bottom of my stairs for days. Every time I came back to my house for clothes he was still there. 'My boy is still there,' I used to tell the waiting policeman. Eventually on Saturday I couldn't take it no more. 'You got to get my boy lifted,' I told the policeman. That night he was moved."

2

Dunnie,

Canada 02/11/2008 01:06:50

I hope it takes more than one year for this b*astard to slowly rot.
3

Dunnie,

Canada 02/11/2008 01:06:50

I hope it takes more than one year for this b*astard to slowly rot.
4

Dunnie,

Canada 02/11/2008 01:07:23

Hah! That was one in the moderator's eye!!
5

Jock MacSprog,

02/11/2008 01:58:31
fair is fair. He should be given the same mercy he afforded his victims, ie NONE. Rot in hell. A slow painful death alone, without his family. Same as his victims got.
6

Mark Renton,

Edinburgh 02/11/2008 03:46:19
Hopefully he will get some good medical care, in order that he may suffer in agony for as long as possible.
7

W Smith,

Middle East 02/11/2008 04:15:58
What happened to mercy killings?

Come on Margo, go and buy the hood and do the needful.

8

W Smith,

Middle East 02/11/2008 04:20:42
Maybe multi-milliionaire Tam Dalyell, with his son and daugther who are both lawyers, can pay for this guy's medical care on his release.

Or does Tam's 'concern' not stretch that far?
9

Guga II,

Rockall 02/11/2008 07:36:22
What an absolutely charming selection of comments. Probably all from putative Christians too.

This man was stitched up by the American and the English governments, and the Scottish legal establishment, to its eternal shame and disgrace, connived in this stitch-up.

He should be released immediately, and his appeal expedited.
10

donald,

glasgow 02/11/2008 07:59:25
Who bombed Gadafi's family? Megrahi claims he is innocent. Lybia has never done Scotland any harm and even pointed out England's Imperial role in Scotland. They are never going to forgive him for that.
11

Steve Ev,

Malta 02/11/2008 08:13:06
Are you to have Sympathy for this Devil? Never believe these Libyans, just look at the news this week with Gaddafi offering the Russian Navy use of bases in the Mediterranean port of Bengazi.
12

Fifi la Bonbon,

02/11/2008 11:02:54
Libya has never done Scotland any harm... eh?

Tell that to the families of thousands - many of them Scots, though God knows why the distinction is relevant - killed with Libyan supplied guns and bombs in the hands of the IRA.
13

Marac,

02/11/2008 11:53:30
I heard it was the Iranians, allegedly! Let the man die in peace. He's probably guilty of something horrendous, but I've a sneaking suspicion it's not Lockerbie!
14

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 02/11/2008 13:27:09
And what evidence is there that this man actually committed any crime? Zero. Just a corrupted legal system that cannot or will not face the truth.
15

,

02/11/2008 14:56:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

Radge from the West,

glasgow 02/11/2008 16:34:26
Al-Megrahi's big big big mistake was to go for a trial by 5 Judges at the Hague.
He should have come to the High Court in Glasgow or Edinburgh in front of a proper jury.The rest is history and I wonder if we will ever learn the truth.
Now this guy has served just 8 years in jail and might be released soon,20 years after the mass murder.
259 people in the air,most of whom knew what was happening,and 11 fellow Scots on the ground.
A political stitch up has taken place,politicians in their wisdom,knowing full well who and what countries and organisations are behind the attack,convince themselves that the greater good is being served to let this fade away.
I don't care who is behind it,I want to know the truth.Scotland can handle it.
If it ever comes out that the Scottish Government past or present knows the truth,are staying silent, they will never be forgiven.
17

,

02/11/2008 20:40:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

ExpatBackinScotland,

Carnoustie 02/11/2008 20:49:11
There is, and always has been, soem doubt that AlMegrahi was guilty. There was plenty of evidence pointing to Libya but the feeling I get is al Megrahi is a fall guy for the regime. He now has a death sentence one way or the other. If he cant be treated properly in Hospital then he HAS to be freed. If we allow him to die a painful death without proper care, which is tantamount to torture, then we, scotland, had better hope to god he WAS guilty. If it ever transpires he wasnt, I suggest enemies in the worng parts of the world may well be made.

The greater good is to free him for the time he has left. Scotland will be better for it,as I think eventually well find out it wasnt him after all. We will be seen as a fair people, not a vengeful torture accepting one.
19

Dr Jim Swire,

Chipping Campden 02/11/2008 22:01:35
'Conan', if you are talking of the night the plane fell,and want to ask the editor to put us in touch, please do. 'Guga II', I'm with you, (and with 'Draupnir': we all need to know the truth).

A man who is many miles from home and family has only months to live. 5 years ago he was granted leave to appeal again against his sentence, and still we have not managed even to fix a date for the start of this appeal. Had we done so, this dilema might not exist.
As it is, guilty or innocent, is the message from our comments really to be 'let him suffer and the more the better?' Is that what you would want for yourselves or your families? It's certainly not what I want my daughter's memory to be associated with. All men are our brothers. Justice is designed to take the place of the anarchy of revenge, uncompleted justice may be fueling our desire for revenge here. Whatever else it was, Lockerbie was itself a revenge attack: do you want more of the same?
Hatred and revenge are corrosive, they damage those who harbour them.
'Send not to know for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee'
20

Pandamack,

02/11/2008 22:15:22
Political procrastination is delaying justice to this man's right of appeal.The denial of the opportunity for transparency in this case is tantamount to corruption.The appeal must be conducted with haste.
21

brownlie,

02/11/2008 22:34:41
20 Dr Jim Swire,

I completely agree with you and you have my deepest respect and sympathy.
22

Conan the Librarian™,

02/11/2008 23:41:25
20
Dr Jim Swire.

Sir.

If you can forgive this man, who am I to disagree?


23

Malc Dow,

Berlin 03/11/2008 20:06:12
I cannot believe the man is guilty.

I can believe that Pan Am flight 103 was not meant to blow up over Lockerbie.

When I look at the US President of the time, George H. W. Bush, and I look at 9/11, US President of the time, George W. Bush, and look at the amazing similarities of both situations, the mistakes and ensuing cover ups... well I think to myself, what a wonderful world.

I know who I would like to see in prison, with bone cancer, and it ain't that poor chap. Though you can be assured his family will, or have, received suitable compensation.

What I do find unbelievable is the way 'the people' fall for the incredible rubbish that is spoon fed to them, in the words of Thomas Pynchon, "If you can get them asking the wrong questions you don't have to worry about the answers."

And worry about the answers, we do not.
24

Shadowplay,

Oxford 03/11/2008 21:41:08
I think there are two things to remember here. First and foremost is whether we consider ourselves to be decent human beings. If Megrahi is indeed guilty we must provide him with the necessary medical care, it's how we demonstrate our compassion and humanity. It's often said we denegrate ourselves to the wrong-doer's level if we treat them cruelly and vindictively, however we do show ourselves as above them if we treat them properly.

The second thing is the fact that the evidence for Megrahi's conviction is weak and, as a previous poster pointed out, has he been tried in front of a British jury it may well not have stood up. At the very least he deserves a re-trial, given the lack of time the most decent thing to do would be to move him to a secure hospital wing where he can be with his family and get the care he needs and at the same time speed up his appeal. The worst thing would be for Megrahi to die and then be found innocent as that would show the British justice system in a terrible light.

Dr Jim Swire- having followed your campaign for many years I have to say I don't think there is a finer example of a decent, honourable and forgiving man. You are a fine example of a Christian and a parent. God bless you and your family in abundance.
25

Scythia,

Alba 29/11/2008 19:19:43
This man has been found guilty in a court of law for murdering 270 innocents (mosty American),and as a libyan secret service agent may well have been involved in other murders (such as PC Fletcher). He's a bad egg, and should rot in prison. The vast majority of the deceased families want him left there.Justice is being done.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.