Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Sunday, 30th November 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Bannockburn battle over right to roam



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 March 2008
Millionaire ordered to unblock paths as estate near historic conflict becomes land reform test
IT is close to the site of one of Scotland's greatest battles but has led a largely peaceful existence in the 794 years since.

But the Sauchieburn Estate just south of the Bannock Burn is now at the centre of a 21st-century conflict over access to
land.

Stirling Council is about to serve enforcement notices on William Roddie, the millionaire landowner of the estate, ordering him to unlock gates that block paths that have been in use by walkers, cyclists and horse-riders for generations.

According to official council documents, the Glasgow property developer and landlord who bought the estate and its mansion house last year for £2m, has built the gates and adjoining 6ft fences, without planning permission, across a popular route past the gardens of his house out to a local beauty spot.

He has, alleges the council, also topped the fences with anti-climb paint and electric fence warning signs – even though the fences are not electrified – to further deter what he considers to be intruders on his property.

The council, backed by walkers' groups, believe the obstructions breach the Scottish Parliament's Land Reform Act, which gives walkers the right to responsible access to property as long as they do not encroach on formal gardens.

Sauchieburn Estate is now set to become the latest testing ground for land access laws following high-profile cases involving newly rich entrepreneurs such as Stagecoach tycoon Ann Gloag and businessman Euan Snowie. If Roddie fails to comply with enforcement notices, he faces court action.

Roddie runs Spectrum Properties (Scotland) Ltd, based in Glasgow's east end and is a major landlord with commercial and domestic properties in the city. In 2005, he sold a block of flats for £2.5m.

Roddie, who went through a well-publicised divorce two years ago, in which his former wife was given a £2m settlement, bought the 7,000-acre agricultural estate last April. Apart from the main house, a mock baronial mansion, there is a small lochan and fields for horses. Most of the land is wooded.

Among Roddie's critics is Dennis Canavan, the former MP and MSP, and current president of the Ramblers' Association Scotland. He and other residents claim there were no access problems under the previous owner, Gay Stafford, who died in 2006.

They argue that since Roddie moved in with his new wife and their children he has erected gates, fences and private land signs on frequently used entrance pathways.

Stirling Council officials inspected the fences in December. Their report said: "A site visit revealed that the gates were over 6ft tall with a 6ft fence to each side. A number of private signs and private no through signs had also been installed.

"Subsequently some of the fencing was extended further into the woodland with electric fence warning signs, anti-climb paint applied to the top and screws pointing out of the top rail.

"It is believed that these are obstructions in terms of Section 14 of the Land Reform Act and a safety concern in terms of Section 15 of the Act. In addition, enquiries reveal that the gates actually require planning permission, which has not been obtained."

The council confirmed last week that as the owner had not complied with requests to unlock the gate, it was now taking further action. A spokeswoman said: "Regarding obstructions to access, the council is taking enforcement action under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 and is in the process of serving notices on the owner."

Canavan said he had been walking the estate unhindered for more than 25 years. He added: "The council is of the view that these locked gates are unlawful and they block a path that has been used by local people to get to the crags. This is a good path compared to a diversion he wants you to take which takes you away from where you want to go up a very muddy track."

Central Scotland police have confirmed they investigated an incident between Roddie and swimming coach David Armour, 43, who lives in the village of Bannockburn.

Armour claims that while jogging alone through the estate in December he was confronted by Roddie.

A spokesman for Central Police confirmed an "inquiry was carried out into an alleged minor assault at Sauchieburn Estate on December, 13, 2007 but there was insufficient evidence to charge any individual." The Ramblers' Association Scotland said in the light of the Sauchieburn case it was seeking a meeting with Environment Minister Mike Russell to urge him to give new powers to council to speed up the enforcement process.

Scotland on Sunday twice asked Roddie if he was prepared to meet to discuss the allegations against him. But he replied: "I have no comment to make at this stage. I'd rather you didn't come on my land. That's all I want to say."





The full article contains 831 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 March 2008 8:40 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Land reform
 
1

AJ Fife,

02/03/2008 00:18:36
It's time for a bit of pitchfork action and storming the local nob's ancient pile!

Dennis is the very man to sort Mr Roddie oot!
2

druidh,

edinburgh 02/03/2008 00:25:34
Anne Gloag got away with it. Did anyone really expect no one else would try?
3

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 02/03/2008 00:46:37
i would rather you did not come om my land sounds like avery nice chap wonder if he tells his clients that he will go bust
4

,

02/03/2008 01:35:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

An Beal Bacht,

02/03/2008 01:37:53
In any other country the land surrounding the site of a battle which secured their nationhood would have been turned into a National Park and shrine. Here we get fences with GTF signs.
6

indune1,

02/03/2008 02:37:14

Meths - have you been into the Licor 43 again?
7

indune1,

02/03/2008 02:37:49

5 - For once we agree.
8

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 02/03/2008 05:11:07
#5 Sauchieburn was the scene of a Regicde not where the Bruce repelled EdwardII's relieving force. tak tent to you history lessons.
9

donald,

glasgow 02/03/2008 06:54:49
What now for the Prince who wants to be a soldier? (Dress up as an Admiral?)

Glasgow property millionaire. Which Cooncil made him rich? Friends of the property millionares: Glasgow Labour.
10

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 02/03/2008 08:56:14
Walking groups should avoid costly confrontations with landowners as they have free access to the vast majority of the Scottish landmass, and should stop taking on estate owners who probably have good cause to protect their personal safety, and privacy.
11

Pilrig.,

Livingston 02/03/2008 09:27:03
2 Anne Gloag, hasn't got away with it. There will be or should be about that sheriff's eccentric ruling.
12

haggis 10,

Scotlands Capital City 02/03/2008 09:31:55
M5 Automatic firing machine guns should be erected to ensure public privacy is not breached by private individuals wishing to extend their socially acceptable land use ie (Wooded Land Pays NO Tax to IRS!!)
13

Pilrig.,

Livingston 02/03/2008 09:33:24
10 - it's anti-social landowners like this mutha who are causing the problems. What he is doing is going against the Land Reform (Scotland) Act, and the book should be thrown at him.
14

Maid of Norway, (ex.pat.Scot),

Norway 02/03/2008 09:53:28
There are no restrictions on where one can wander or walk in Norway irrespective of who owns the land. There are guidlines, of course, about not walking over fields of corn and not lighting up fires in the forests in periods of drought etc., usual common sense things. But nobody can prevent you from walking exactly wherever you want. Not even the landowner!
Isn't it a pity that we Scots can't be afforded the same priviledges in our own country?
15

Pilrig.,

Livingston 02/03/2008 10:01:09
14 - unfortunately there are those, and not solely amongst the big estate-owning fraternity, who think the Right to Roam law is one freedom too far for the Scottish people.
16

Nomada,

02/03/2008 10:07:28
#14 - You have what seem to be the same privileges, though the guidelines may be different in detail. See the Scottish Outdoor Access Code at http://www.snh.org.uk/pdfs/access/ApprovedCode050604.pdf for these guidelines.
17

Queen D,

Glasgow 02/03/2008 11:01:38
I understood that Scotland had no law of trespass , am I wrong?
However , that said, I would be wary of allowing Tom, Dick and Harry romping around my back garden!
18

Andrew Scalloway,

Stirling 02/03/2008 11:37:29
Mr Lachie Todd buffoon...this 'landowner' sounds like a typical yob who has made money at others expense.
19

Miss Jean Brodie,

02/03/2008 12:19:19
I’m awa up there for a walk richt noo!
20

Pilrig.,

Livingston 02/03/2008 13:28:06
17 - the law of trespass still exists, but has been amended by the Land Reform (Scotland)Act 2003 and is so difficulr to implement it's hardly worth the bother.
Besides we're not discussing back gardens, but sizeable areas which anti-social nouveau-riche types such as the yob mentioned in this report own.
21

Himself,

Aberdeenshire 02/03/2008 16:56:15
Money wins every time. See what happened with millionaire locals in Pitullie (Near Fraserburgh). Lots of talk but nothing else. Mr Salmond is aware.
22

joppa jock,

Huntingdon 02/03/2008 19:10:37
#17 You're right about the nouveau-riche. They're so full of their own importance that they really believe that money makes them special. Bannockburn is the most sacred place in Scotland and no stuck-up prat should ever be allowed to forget that.
23

Terry53,

Perth 02/03/2008 23:02:58
What a pompous jealous lot you are. How happy would you be if somebody started tramping across your garden. No excuse for breaking planning laws though. I just see this as another high profile aggressive stance being taken by the Ramblers Association, who,by the way, have issues with almost all other users of the countryside eg 4WD, mountain bikes, Moto-X etc.
24

Pilrig.,

Livingston 02/03/2008 23:32:00
23- once again it's not somebody's back garden we're discussing but a sizeable tract of land.
You would appear to be one of those who think that the Land Reform Act is one freedom too much for the Scottish people.
Mind and tug the forelock next time you see the new laird.
25

Tris,

dundee 03/03/2008 00:05:11
#14

Maid of Norway.

Norway, a small independent northern, oil rich country with sensible laws drawn up with the good of all its people in mind, sensible investment of its oil money in a secure future for its people, nil deaths among the old for the want of heat, and a standard of living we can only dream about.

What luck not to be saddled with a wannbe superpower that has to waste all its money on rubbish like wars and weapons....

Oh, and someone needs to bulldoze that prat's fences sharpish.
26

made for walkin,

glasgow 09/03/2008 21:49:47
I think the guy has the right to have his privacy he pays for it after all i am sure the ramblers would not pay his rates or pay for the upkeep of the pathways!!
i think we should stop crying and enjoy the many places we can walk no problems the land reform act is a farse.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.