Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Anger over Hyslop's student debt U-turn

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 March 2008
AN SNP minister was at the centre of a political storm last night after she claimed that her party "never said" it would write off student debt during last year's victorious election campaign.
In an interview with STV's Politics Now programme on Thursday night, Education Secretary Fiona Hyslop said: "We never said we would write off student debt. We promised to service that debt."

Hyslop added that ministers would soon bring forward a c
onsultation document revealing the plans.

But her words last week contradict several high-profile announcements made by the SNP in the run-up to the election last May.

A campaign paper stated: "With an SNP Government led by Alex Salmond we will write off the debt to the Student Loan Company for Scottish domiciled students."

In July 2006, unveiling the policy, deputy leader Nicola Sturgeon said the plans would "allow for the write-off of the existing graduate debt from student loans that holds so many young people back from taking entrepreneurial risks and getting on the housing ladder".

And in November 2006, Hyslop herself said: "An SNP Government will abolish the student loans system and replace it with a fairer system of student grants and will write off the outstanding student loans debt."

An SNP spokesman said Hyslop's comments were consistent with the pledges made by the party during the election campaign.

Under the SNP plans, the Government would spend £100m a year to take on the cost of student debts and to replace them with grants. It could take up to 40 years to pay off the accumulated sums under such a scheme.

"What we are saying is that we will stand in the shoes of students," the spokesman added.

Murdo Fraser, the deputy leader of the Scottish Tories, said: "This is a complete betrayal of Scottish students. The SNP campaigned for the student vote in the run-up to the election with the clear message that they would wipe out student debt.

"It is now clear that this was a dishonest promise that they had no intention of fulfilling.

"Fiona Hyslop should be ashamed of her comments."





The full article contains 360 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Aýrshire Scot™,

02/03/2008 00:42:40
All the SNPs's chickens seem to be coming home to roost.
2

donald,

glasgow 02/03/2008 07:27:01
Anger over Barnes' Labour good turn
3

Nikostratos,

02/03/2008 08:01:11
complete betrayal...........becoming the snp trademark
4

Phil C,

02/03/2008 08:15:48
The following ‘stories’ printed today are given an anti SNP twist by the SoS. They are ALL By Eddie Barnes, Political Editor & Labour Bottom Wiper! It’s really not very clever!

1. “THE SNP's flagship plan to scrap council tax has been wrecked by the UK Government after ministers categorically ruled out helping to fund the radical reform.”

2. “THE flagship policy of free personal care for the elderly will be drastically cut because of a cash crisis in town halls across Scotland, leaked council documents have revealed.”

3. “ALEX Salmond is facing a second parliamentary inquiry into claims SNP ministers have interfered in Scotland's planning rules.”

4. “THEIR campaign to clear cheap drink from Scotland's supermarket shelves has displayed all the fervour of a group of American Prohibitionists. But SNP ministers were facing embarrassment last night after it emerged that online shoppers can buy cut-price alcohol from adverts on their own website.”

5. "AN SNP minister was at the centre of a political storm last night after she claimed that her party "never said" it would write off student debt during last year's victorious election campaign."

………Time for a holiday Mr (or is it Ms?) Barnes! A very long one. Have a rest, ponder, unwind, relax. Iron out the bitterness. Get real. Have a swim to clean up your Brown nose. Come back when you have a more open mind, capable of delivering fair reporting, or else go and work for Labour Weakly (pun intended!).

5

Jimmy the Pie,

02/03/2008 08:18:02
You've excelled yourself this week Eddie.
Do you have a competition at the SOS each week to see who can write the biggest load of drivel?
Congratulations - you've won again and as you've won so often we're going to let you keep the title of To$$er of the Year
6

Nikostratos,

02/03/2008 08:47:14
#6

easy peasy........one was true,the other was not
7

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 02/03/2008 08:59:40
Stop being naive? Politics is all about lies and decepetion.

No political party in history has ever fulfilled its
list of election pledges, and never will.
8

Linda,

Edinburgh 02/03/2008 09:04:46
SNP were never going to Write off Student Loans in a single year it always said it was going to pay off the debt by taking over the student's debt on an annual basis.

If Murdo Fraser and some students didn't bother to read the full details of the policy then tough.
9

Linda,

Edinburgh 02/03/2008 09:05:13
Another non story
10

Nikostratos,

02/03/2008 09:26:44
#14

Credit card economics...snp style of Governance.......minimum payment £5
11

Queen D,

Glasgow 02/03/2008 10:53:19
I think students will be delighted that they no longer have to pay the graduate tax , imposed by the previous incumbents.
I see another three years ahead in which the SNP can fulfill their promise.

How are the circulation figures Eddie??
Dropping are they?
12

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 02/03/2008 12:38:35
#6 #13 #14 ad nauseum

Yawn, yawn, yawn, yawn, yawn.

EVERY policy in the SNP manifesto was - quite obviously and just like every other party's manifesto in every election in the entire history of democracy - dependent on winning a majority control of the Parliament. In a situation where other parties can spend huge chunks of the finite budget against the SNP's wishes, and can combine to vote down any SNP initiative they wish, it is of course farcical and juvenile to then demand the SNP fulfil all those policies regardless, and complain when they don't.

You can't have it both ways.
13

puskas,

East kilbride 02/03/2008 13:29:15
No17 Rev.,

Why do you educate the unionists?.





14

bill-alba,

fife 02/03/2008 14:35:17
#17 stop being right, u will only upset the unionists who can't see further than their lets keep everything the way it is ruled by people where we have no say.
15

Linda,

Edinburgh 02/03/2008 15:52:31
AM2

You are still wrong. There was never any commitment to wipe off student debt in one go. Payments (interst and capital) were to be met as they become due.

What many Unionists are forgetting is that Westminster produced the lowest ever settlement for Scotland and this obviously impacted on SNP Budget as did the wasted £500 millions on Edinburgh's trams that the unionists forced on the SNP budget.
16

Linda,

Edinburgh 02/03/2008 15:55:30
Remember Labour and Tory MSPs voted against the abolition of Graduate Endowment so they are unlikely to vote for cancellimg student debt.
17

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 02/03/2008 17:37:21
#1, Ayrshire Scot

"All the SNPs's chickens seem to be coming home to roost."

No, it's just that you've been reading Eddie-Barnes-On-Sunday; you'd think he was Scotland on Sunday.
18

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 02/03/2008 17:57:59
'A campaign paper stated: "With an SNP Government led by Alex Salmond we will write off the debt to the Student Loan Company for Scottish domiciled students."'

But we don't have an SNP Government. We have a minority government in which the SNP are the largest party, but in which the opposition can force through huge spending commitments, meaning the SNP no longer have the money to fund their manifesto in full. So Hyslop's statement, at least on a technicality, is true and there is no contradiction.

Of course, the whole matter is a desperate red herring anyway. What matters is not who said what a year ago, but what actually happens. As it stands the SNP have already freed students of several thousand pounds of graduation tax, and are about to reveal their plans with regard to existing debt. It would be common courtesy to wait and see what those plans are before squawking about broken promises, which in any event would in fact have been broken by the opposition, not the SNP.

Politics is a fluid business - Labour, after all, got elected on a promise not to introduce tuition fees, and promptly introduced tuition fees. Of course, that turned out to be the least of their lies and sleaze, so it's only to be expected that they're grasping at straws now to try to portray their opponents as being at least a hundredth as bad as they are. Their spinners, like the ubiquitous AM2, deserve no more respect than the corrupt, warmongering liars they defend.
19

AJM,

02/03/2008 20:08:39
#25 I have read some justifications that make me laugh, yours comes very high up the list.

This is what happens when you get a party promising things to get votes that whether it has no intention of delivering or not. Hyslop is poor and get your excuse book out for more of the same from her. I can recall her performance on Newsnight when asked about whether some education initiative that was proving successful in England could work up here, she shuffled so nervously in her seat, she nearly fell off. Her reply, was to bluster for seconds and then rambled on about, Finland.
20

A.K.,

edinburgh 02/03/2008 20:30:42
Last year our Student Union invited Fiona Hyslop to talk about writing off student debt...an invitation she was happy to accept if it meant a few thousand more votes...our union had 10,000 voting members
21

A.K.,

edinburgh 02/03/2008 20:31:38
Oh! And I voted SNP on the strength of that promise Hyslop!!!
22

AJM,

02/03/2008 20:45:01
#29 I took out a sentence indicating exactly that point, thanks for making it from a personal point of view.
23

Matt there,

somewhere 03/03/2008 00:52:38
It is amazing how a story can be slanted by a journalist or a sub-editor with a particular bias:

"My word, we have a lot of pensioners, don't we? And many of them get ill in the winter" can magically be changed to: "xxxx Hates pensioners. Hopes they get ill this winter."

It is not clever because eventually people stop trusting all journalists, not just those who are creative. My tip is if you are a journalist or a sub editor who wants to get creative: write a novel. You have no place in writing for a newspaper.
24

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 03/03/2008 07:42:51
"Minority or majority - it's an SNP government."

No it isn't. An SNP government would command a majority and therefore be free to pursue its own policies. The Scottish Government is a minority administration reliant on the opposition to get anything done. If the opposition choose to wreck the SNP's plans - as with student debt - and can summon the competence to act together, there's nothing the SNP can do about it. You can make as many semantic excuses as you like, but those are the facts. The SNP leads the administration, but it does not control it, and it is therefore absolutely not an "SNP government". For one of those, you'll have to wait until after the next election.
25

Doh,

03/03/2008 12:46:38
#32 Rev,

Incorrect.

The SNP are the government, they have a minority position in the parliament.

They are free to bring forward legislation to "write off" Student debt - they have not.

The are free to bring forward legislation to have a referendum - they have not.

They are free to bring forward legislation on LIT - they have not.

An SNP promise is looking pretty worthless at the moment.
26

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 03/03/2008 16:05:53
There's no point in wasting the Parliament's time with bills that have no chance of getting passed, and which - thanks to the opposition - there'd be no money for even if they did.

You can hairsplit the semantics all you want, but the simple fact is you can't demand that the SNP fulfil policies when the other parties have taken away the money.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.