Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Sarwar attacks Brown's anti-terror plans

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 March 2008
PREVIOUSLY loyal backbench MPs, including Muslim MP Mohammed Sarwar, are turning against Gordon Brown's counter-terrorism plans and are preparing to deliver the first parliamentary defeat of his premiership.
Tensions in Muslim communities are also rising as a result of the plans, Sarwar warned. Opponents said last night they were "reasonably optimistic" they would be able to throw out plans to extend the time terror suspects can be held without charge fr
om 28 to 42 days.

Their case has been strengthened by around a dozen MPs who voted in favour of similar laws in 2005, including Sarwar, who have changed their minds. Speaking about his decision for the first time, Sarwar told Scotland on Sunday he now regretted supporting a 90-day limit and was concerned the legislation would unfairly target the Muslim community.

The Glasgow Central MP said: "Last time I voted out of loyalty with the Government.

But since then there has not been a single case where prosecutors or the police have asked for an extension beyond 28 days. Only six people have been held for 28 days – three of whom were released without charge. The Government should think twice about doing this."

Asked about the possible impact on the Muslim community, he replied: "They will be upset. Most people are very reasonable but they just do not see a need for this legislation."

Ayrshire North and Arran Labour MP Katy Clark added: "Whether it's intended or not, the legislation will be seen as an attack on the Muslim community which is not good for community relations in the current climate."

Osama Saeed of the Scottish Islamic Federation said: "A detention period of 42 days is posturing in order to look tough but in reality it will not achieve anything and at worst it will be counterproductive and cause tension between communities."

The counter terrorism bill receives its second reading on Tuesday, with the key votes expected in April or May.

A Home Office source said "positive conversations" were taking place with Labour MPs opposed to the bill.

The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and SNP are all opposed to the bill.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 March 2008 9:18 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Labour Party
 
1

Frodo the Scot,

outside lookin in 30/03/2008 05:44:37
What planet does this superb IDIOT gordon brown come from?.... The creton is seriously Brain dead. With the character of a frozen Turd. Consideration should be made as to the internment of this fool in a insane asylum for the good of the nation or else your all done
2

Jonesy,

glasgow 30/03/2008 09:35:32
The person who is brain dead is Sarwar of doubtful background. Just seeking cheap publicity since his name not in the papers this week.
3

,

30/03/2008 17:26:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

oder,

Scotland 30/03/2008 22:36:13
Mr Sarwar is wise enough to understand that the real threat to Muslim liberties is not what laws/rules the British government make but the actions of Islamic terrorist and extremists! in the end the Government is duty bound to protect its citizens and if serious enough may have to remove civil liberties to combat the threat! the terrorist in almost all situations in the UK live and operate within the Muslim community, whether they know it or not, its time for them to recognise it! and find ways of working with the security services in dealing with it, the threat to them is as real,as it is to the rest of us, but it does require participation!
5

Rozz Fyffe,

Scotland 30/03/2008 23:00:46
# 2
indeed

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.